lol .. Id never want to be first lady, Im too protective of a partner and my kids ...

Sorry mshormony but I think you've missed that boat. I doubt you can be anyone's first lady on here lol

Someone else just said differently mikey, just speaking in generalizations ...

I was meaning "first " as in first and not first as in potus lady!

ahhh,,,, clever

No. I would not want to be anyone's FIRST anything at this point in life, too much pressure ..

Cool glad that's cleared up lol

Missed my point. He wasn't in office and she accepted the money. She is now going full out on it. Even if he had an affair...that is between him and his wife. Stormy isn't a saint either. At least it wasn't while in office.

I have heard more about this bs in the media than ole slick willy who was doing it even as governor

She was paid off two weeks before election. All of it is shady. All involved are shady. But no one will care really ...

I don't care for the reasons I already gave

I imagine it would be hard enough to admit they cheated to their

spouse,but to have to do it in front of the world..All of this should have

been kept out of the media ..if for nothing else the way it makes him look

in the eyes of the world..and what purpose does it really serve..it

happened before he was even president so ..BFD..But if there's a chance to

rake this guy over the coals for whatever reason..well there you go..Ok so

now hopefully we're done with all the distractions and let's get on with the

investigation of the real colluders HILLARY and all her cronies...

hopefully Bolton will get all of the clintonites out of the swamp and we

can get to the truth for once..popcorn and soda at the ready...there's no

more diversionary tactics so let's see what happens now..There's no more

excuses not to run Hillary through the same wringer Trump just went

through...anything less would be double standards ..so on with the

show...

or maybe delete emails are the distraction

When they spend as much time and money investigating Trump as they have the Clintons, that will be a lovely day ..

And to think that all of our money spent on the Clinton investigations was done by a corrupt bogus justice system that was working in favor of the Clintons..So now since we've spent so much on BS let's get to a real investigation she had the tax payers waste so much money on her BOGUS dossier while chasing our tails..

So let's get to a real investigation where they're not exonerating her before any questions are even asked..Ya see it's a whole new ball game once we clear out the corrupt justice system ..time to really investigate the evil one..

It's about time we get our monies worth and do a proper investigation for once..

Uh huh, its people that are FOR them that investigate them, cause that makes perfect sense .... In Trumpland...

And when they complete just as much bogus(wink wink) investigation into Trump before getting to 'real' proven crimes, that will be a lovely day too

until then, I guess they all just stand 'accused' ....

I would clearly bet all my marbles on the one in the box. Msharmony

Probably something stupid that he shouldn't that anyone can twist to show something even worse.

What I really wish he'd say is "you know what? It's really none of your business. It was a long time ago. Our relationship, whatever it was, was purely consensual, it wasn't funded by taxpayers. I did what I could to keep it private. And I am just not going to talk about it. If you want to believe I have something to hide, go ahead, you gossiping about it, you judging me for it, that reflects on you more than me. Have a nice day."


I don't. Not that I think he should lie. I think he should shut up.
But I think he would be excoriated for that by the press. And I don't think he's the type to be quiet when he feels attacked or gossiped about. So that only really leaves lying, or as they call it in politics "controlling the narrative," or "spin."

I'm just thinking of future presidents.
"Yes, I used to be a man, and I hooked up with that guy that used to be a female, here's a bunch of pictures...I just want to be honest and get it all out there! The American people have a right to know everything that goes on in someones bedroom at any point in their life as soon as they become a public figure!"

So far in politics since the invention of the television it's been the person with the most airtime on t.v., the most social presence and recognition, that generally wins the election.
If the "news," t.v. and social media, is going to focus so much on affairs and who is banging whom and when in their life...what does that mean for future political campaign strategy?
"I was going to talk about my tax plan, but instead next week I'm going to leak about an affair I had with (x) celebrity!"

And future social precedents.
"Well, son, for the sake of honesty, while I talk to you about the birds and bees, I need to also tell you about all the people I picked up in bars, the internet, tindr, exactly what we did, and why.
Even though this was before you were born I brought them in to this very house! I just want to be honest with you! You have the right to know who I really am!"



Being paid doesn't necessarily mean there is any guilt.
Companies pay to settle lawsuits without feeling any guilt simply for the sake of avoiding future lawsuits, people coming out of the woodwork, and having to pay exorbitant legal fees in the pursuit of innocence.

Look at the #metoo! movement and how many people have jumped on that bandwagon.
If you knew that you could pay off the first #metoo'er which would prevent all the hundreds, thousands, millions, of people coming out and saying "me too!" even though there's no evidence, they're reporting just BS and calling "me too" wouldn't you say the payout was worth it?


Slick willy was being sued for sexual harassment.
Not consensual sex.
Monica Lewinsky, among many others, came up as a means to show Clinton routinely had sex, tried to have sex, acted inappropriately, with female coworkers and such.
He lied about having sex with Monica Lewinsky to avoid having it proved that he routinely had sex with, acted inappropriately, with coworkers/underlings/state workers.

It's a false comparison to use Trump and Clinton together, IMO.
Maybe if Stormy Daniels was suing Trump for sexual harassment.
Or Trump was being sued for sexual harassment by his employees/models and Stormy Daniels was being subpoenaed as part of a strategy to show he routinely had sex with employees.

Otherwise it's like saying "I have heard more about this BS about Trump dating younger women than I did about that famous guy that constantly molests children."

Hey, I dont 'gamble' with politics. I would otherwise have gambled everything I had that a public that was so incensed and 'divided' about a President saying he might have a son that looked like a young black man, would be equally incensed and 'divided' about a mere candidate saying some Mexicans are decent and muslims should be banned from entering the states and blacks are commiting 80 percent of murder against whites, and he gropes(also could be spun as 'molests') young women under his authority without provocation or consent

or that same public Outraged that a President would 'harass' a woman (that came to his hotel room), would also be equally outraged at young girls being groped by a full grown man who found it funny and boastful

or that same public so sure of one candidates 'corruption' that has not yet been proven, only investigated, would be equally sure of the 'corruption' of the other candidate who has been also investigated throughout his own career .... AND FOUND GUILTY of or PAID off the allegations

but there just is no sure or consistent standard to count on these days .. . ... so time will tell...

Like the sands through the hourglass
So are the days of our lives.