if you only had two choices, which would you prefer

a lover with an alright physique but amazing intimate skills

or a lover with an amazing physique but just an alright skill in the intimate department?





for this question, pretend that bodies and bedroom skills cannot improve or change,,,




my preference would be the first,,,,,


Im guessing most men want the latter, what do you think?

At the risk of sounding corny I believe all women in their own way have something sexy about them personality, looks etc. however in the spirit of the thread I would chose the first option because if I am going to be intimate with a woman for a long time its obvious I would want toe curling sex,and also because when I look in the mirror I see the flaws in myself quite plainly so I am hoping to show her how I truly feel about her by doing the same in the intimate skills department.

I would rather date a 6 or 7 with awesome intimate skill, than a 9 or 10 with limited intimate skills....just saying...

Intimate skills are far more important than physical looks.

Hands down this one is my pic~~~

Guarantee to keep me going back for more~~~

Dang... you stole my answer...

That is what the test drive is all about..

What do yo mean by intimacy?

Good at getting me off?
or
In to me see?


In to me see is what gets me off

Can appreciate a good outer but prefer to get in her.

Hahahah yea true believer in those test drives

Wait a minute.....does she have big hooters?

So what is your definition of "alright physique", not that it really matters in my case, I'm just curious?

I would just feel too sorry for the first option because they would be the one ending up with the worst of both option. So I guess I would have to go with the latter because at least that way one of us would be attractive even though we would both be rubbish in bed. In ether case I think I would strongly encourage them to find someone better.

First option, no doubt about it.
Just like Jack said about women, I can see something attractive and sexy in a man without him being Adonis himself.
The greatest appeal to me is in a man's eyes and smile and the way he carries himself.
If he can keep me interested between the sheets too...

If all that you want is a sex partner, then go for whomever turns you on sexually.

For me, there is a different subtlety to this question.

The most talented and experience harlot in the world, can't make me feel anywhere near as overall excited and pleased with my existence, as a woman who I love and who loves me in turn.

I have found that how a person makes love, is an intrinsic part of how and if they care about and understand you. If they seem clumsy, it is usually because they actually think of sex as a sort of task to be performed, rather than as an intimate celebration or even a recreational mini adventure with the person they care about.

The experienced harlot (a term I chose without intending it to be derogatory, just indicative of an approach to sex as a skilled profession), no matter what they are "good at," wont make me feel important or special for being in their arms. I will only feel that I was "competently serviced." I've had the experience, and I will not choose to repeat it.

As for looks, that is as well, an intertwined thing. Most people, when they are being most honest, will admit that a person MUST be at least somewhat physically attractive, before we are at all likely to become emotionally involved with them. We don't fall in love JUST because of looks (not really anyway), but it always plays a part. So there are subtleties involved with that part of this question as well.

After all, you aren't even going to FIND OUT that the person has " amazing intimate skills," unless you are attracted ENOUGH by their physical qualities, to try them out.