Topic: Why Religion and Science can't come to terms... | |
---|---|
The troubling thing about the assumption science is going to answer everything that it doesn't leave room for miracles. Yes, miracles aren't logical... ! That's why they're miracles. ************************************************************************************************************************************ Anybody figured-out why there's a 515 foot long petrified boat 6300 feet above sea-level yet in the Ararat Mountains ? Problem is,there ain't! |
|
|
|
I don't really see how you can compare the two to begin with.
And what do you mean by come to terms... what??? One writes science fiction/fantasy of a world made in 7 days by some almighty wadyamacallit god thingy oh and the world is around 4000 years old or so. The other one presents evidence which is carefully looked at from various angles and proves it by careful study which in the end can be dis proven as many times as it needs to. It's kind of like xfiles Religion is Mulder, science is Scully. The truth is out there, but this isn't x-files and you're a hairless ape. |
|
|
|
Reductionism is a term that is usually used as a derogatory term.
**************************************** Kind of like when Professor Johnny Larue explains why water boils... "Because It's Hot !" |
|
|
|
no sir.
monothism in his actual condition is never reached to the west till now. you all of westren people including your scinetists and scholars are thinkg that the form of islamic monothism is same thing that found in the bible. and when the scince denied that kind of monothism you ignore the islamic monothism as well as. westren people are actual never knows the concepts of monothism in islam and also never imagenies the effects of monothism |
|
|
|
Erm, Islam & science are like peas in a pod
|
|
|
|
the Book of Job in old testament Job uses amazing knowledge to explain his belief.
|
|
|
|
Erm, Islam & science are like peas in a pod the Baghdad battery... muslims never hindered science like the Christians did... |
|
|
|
Erm, Islam & science are like peas in a pod the Baghdad battery... muslims never hindered science like the Christians did... Sry, didn't get that Moe. Can u explain? |
|
|
|
Erm, Islam & science are like peas in a pod the Baghdad battery... muslims never hindered science like the Christians did... Sry, didn't get that Moe. Can u explain? they found some artifacts in baghdad, dated 250bc, and when put together with an acidic fluid, such as lemmon juice, it makes an electrical currant... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Battery early Christians "scientists" were controlled by the church, and if they said anything the church didn't agree with, they were usually killed or jailed as heretics... |
|
|
|
Sorry again don't mean demean or antyhing, but weather it be scientific theory or just a theory, it's just an educated guess. Because if it were truly a "fact" it wouldn't be either "theories", it would be a scientific fact. That's the difference between theory and fact, one is absolute without a doubt, the other is "guessing" at points... or in other hands stating things along the lines of "assumptions" it will continue to be true, but again has no absolute fact behind it. Uh, no. A scientific theory explains how something works. It isn't a guess because it has been tested for accuracy. Sadly, scientific laymen have their own definition of "theory" that is different from the definition used by scientists. |
|
|
|
Sorry again don't mean demean or antyhing, but weather it be scientific theory or just a theory, it's just an educated guess. Because if it were truly a "fact" it wouldn't be either "theories", it would be a scientific fact. That's the difference between theory and fact, one is absolute without a doubt, the other is "guessing" at points... or in other hands stating things along the lines of "assumptions" it will continue to be true, but again has no absolute fact behind it. Uh, no. A scientific theory explains how something works. It isn't a guess because it has been tested for accuracy. Sadly, scientific laymen have their own definition of "theory" that is different from the definition used by scientists. |
|
|
|
Sorry again don't mean demean or antyhing, but weather it be scientific theory or just a theory, it's just an educated guess. Because if it were truly a "fact" it wouldn't be either "theories", it would be a scientific fact. That's the difference between theory and fact, one is absolute without a doubt, the other is "guessing" at points... or in other hands stating things along the lines of "assumptions" it will continue to be true, but again has no absolute fact behind it. Uh, no. A scientific theory explains how something works. It isn't a guess because it has been tested for accuracy. Sadly, scientific laymen have their own definition of "theory" that is different from the definition used by scientists. what the whale turns into cow the cow turns into a bear??? its a hilarious scientific miracle lol. there's not enough billions of years for that to happen. how many mutations needs to happen for that |
|
|
|
Actually the creature that turned into a whale was more like a wolf that liked to eat fish.
Cows eat grass. |
|
|
|
Sorry again don't mean demean or antyhing, but weather it be scientific theory or just a theory, it's just an educated guess. Because if it were truly a "fact" it wouldn't be either "theories", it would be a scientific fact. That's the difference between theory and fact, one is absolute without a doubt, the other is "guessing" at points... or in other hands stating things along the lines of "assumptions" it will continue to be true, but again has no absolute fact behind it. Uh, no. A scientific theory explains how something works. It isn't a guess because it has been tested for accuracy. Sadly, scientific laymen have their own definition of "theory" that is different from the definition used by scientists. what the whale turns into cow the cow turns into a bear??? its a hilarious scientific miracle lol. there's not enough billions of years for that to happen. how many mutations needs to happen for that lol, your funny... i guess it's easier to believe god snapped his fingers and "poof" all life just appeared? how do you explain the mass extinctions and the life that followed them then? at least 5 mass extinctions have happened so far... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sorry again don't mean demean or antyhing, but weather it be scientific theory or just a theory, it's just an educated guess. Because if it were truly a "fact" it wouldn't be either "theories", it would be a scientific fact. That's the difference between theory and fact, one is absolute without a doubt, the other is "guessing" at points... or in other hands stating things along the lines of "assumptions" it will continue to be true, but again has no absolute fact behind it. Uh, no. A scientific theory explains how something works. It isn't a guess because it has been tested for accuracy. Sadly, scientific laymen have their own definition of "theory" that is different from the definition used by scientists. what the whale turns into cow the cow turns into a bear??? its a hilarious scientific miracle lol. there's not enough billions of years for that to happen. how many mutations needs to happen for that lol, your funny... i guess it's easier to believe god snapped his fingers and "poof" all life just appeared? how do you explain the mass extinctions and the life that followed them then? at least 5 mass extinctions have happened so far... the fossil records shows an explosion of life not a slow one mutation at a time. Richard Dawkins ur all time leading expert says the human eye came from a bump on somethings skin now imagine 1+1+1+1+1 viola the human eye. lol what kind of science is that!!!! when he uses his chart I cracked up laughing he has a big chart with monkies apes oranatangs then he points at pictures say this and this made this. as he points to NOTHING!!! He just knows they made something he doesn't know what it made. That's science???? |
|
|
|
Sorry again don't mean demean or antyhing, but weather it be scientific theory or just a theory, it's just an educated guess. Because if it were truly a "fact" it wouldn't be either "theories", it would be a scientific fact. That's the difference between theory and fact, one is absolute without a doubt, the other is "guessing" at points... or in other hands stating things along the lines of "assumptions" it will continue to be true, but again has no absolute fact behind it. Uh, no. A scientific theory explains how something works. It isn't a guess because it has been tested for accuracy. Sadly, scientific laymen have their own definition of "theory" that is different from the definition used by scientists. what the whale turns into cow the cow turns into a bear??? its a hilarious scientific miracle lol. there's not enough billions of years for that to happen. how many mutations needs to happen for that lol, your funny... i guess it's easier to believe god snapped his fingers and "poof" all life just appeared? how do you explain the mass extinctions and the life that followed them then? at least 5 mass extinctions have happened so far... the fossil records shows an explosion of life not a slow one mutation at a time. Richard Dawkins ur all time leading expert says the human eye came from a bump on somethings skin now imagine 1+1+1+1+1 viola the human eye. lol what kind of science is that!!!! when he uses his chart I cracked up laughing he has a big chart with monkies apes oranatangs then he points at pictures say this and this made this. as he points to NOTHING!!! He just knows they made something he doesn't know what it made. That's science???? 4.5 billion years isn't long enough for you? BTW, chimps and orangutans have about 97% same DNA as humans... just because we can't see the changes in our 75 years of life doesn't mean it's not happening... try reading up on the changes that animals have made in the Galapagos Islands, how they Evolved in a short period of time just to survive... |
|
|
|
Sorry again don't mean demean or antyhing, but weather it be scientific theory or just a theory, it's just an educated guess. Because if it were truly a "fact" it wouldn't be either "theories", it would be a scientific fact. That's the difference between theory and fact, one is absolute without a doubt, the other is "guessing" at points... or in other hands stating things along the lines of "assumptions" it will continue to be true, but again has no absolute fact behind it. Uh, no. A scientific theory explains how something works. It isn't a guess because it has been tested for accuracy. Sadly, scientific laymen have their own definition of "theory" that is different from the definition used by scientists. what the whale turns into cow the cow turns into a bear??? its a hilarious scientific miracle lol. there's not enough billions of years for that to happen. how many mutations needs to happen for that yep,the Whale loves to jew the Cud! |
|
|
|
Sorry again don't mean demean or antyhing, but weather it be scientific theory or just a theory, it's just an educated guess. Because if it were truly a "fact" it wouldn't be either "theories", it would be a scientific fact. That's the difference between theory and fact, one is absolute without a doubt, the other is "guessing" at points... or in other hands stating things along the lines of "assumptions" it will continue to be true, but again has no absolute fact behind it. Uh, no. A scientific theory explains how something works. It isn't a guess because it has been tested for accuracy. Sadly, scientific laymen have their own definition of "theory" that is different from the definition used by scientists. what the whale turns into cow the cow turns into a bear??? its a hilarious scientific miracle lol. there's not enough billions of years for that to happen. how many mutations needs to happen for that yep,the Whale loves to jew the Cud! i was waiting for him to get the Jews involved in this, but you beat him to it... |
|
|
|
Sorry again don't mean demean or antyhing, but weather it be scientific theory or just a theory, it's just an educated guess. Because if it were truly a "fact" it wouldn't be either "theories", it would be a scientific fact. That's the difference between theory and fact, one is absolute without a doubt, the other is "guessing" at points... or in other hands stating things along the lines of "assumptions" it will continue to be true, but again has no absolute fact behind it. Uh, no. A scientific theory explains how something works. It isn't a guess because it has been tested for accuracy. Sadly, scientific laymen have their own definition of "theory" that is different from the definition used by scientists. what the whale turns into cow the cow turns into a bear??? its a hilarious scientific miracle lol. there's not enough billions of years for that to happen. how many mutations needs to happen for that lol, your funny... i guess it's easier to believe god snapped his fingers and "poof" all life just appeared? how do you explain the mass extinctions and the life that followed them then? at least 5 mass extinctions have happened so far... the fossil records shows an explosion of life not a slow one mutation at a time. Richard Dawkins ur all time leading expert says the human eye came from a bump on somethings skin now imagine 1+1+1+1+1 viola the human eye. lol what kind of science is that!!!! when he uses his chart I cracked up laughing he has a big chart with monkies apes oranatangs then he points at pictures say this and this made this. as he points to NOTHING!!! He just knows they made something he doesn't know what it made. That's science???? 4.5 billion years isn't long enough for you? BTW, chimps and orangutans have about 97% same DNA as humans... just because we can't see the changes in our 75 years of life doesn't mean it's not happening... try reading up on the changes that animals have made in the Galapagos Islands, how they Evolved in a short period of time just to survive... 3% difference in DNA is a light year apart the 97% shows we were designed by the same thing. 1.5 billions years to go from a bump on skin to the complexity of a human is not even close to enough time to evolve an eye from noting!!! unless a miracle happened and 5 billion mutations happened all at once. u can't prove ur theory nor can I prove my spiritual experiences. |
|
|