Going all hillbilly on me now I see..

Yea , at one point , I kinda sorta thought that , as it may have saved his family from pain , but then I reconsidered and commended his courageousness for not only himself but giving others struggling with similar issues a voice . And as far as the family goes , he had to come clean with them regardless anyway and those who choose to ridicule family members , as if they had something to do with it are unfortunately cowards anyway . Bottom line is although I find the whole situation interesting it's really none of my or anyone else's dam business

Frankly I could care less about what he does to himself or what the "Adams Family" of Hollywood, The Kardashian do

But I beg to differ.. they are shoving his transformation down the throats of everyone.. on purpose.. for money.. plain and simple. He and his clan will do anything for a buck.. anything.

If he were broadcasting this to help " his cause" then he would donate any money received to a charity that helps " his cause".. he is not. He is banking it. And will continue to bank it until no one watches anymore. Then the K Clan ( and him) will manufacture some other reason to stay in the print and keep the cash cow fed.

Gravity:

that is the key to ending this families run.

You see In time and with age, Kim's a** is going to fall to the pavement. Then the lights will dim.. and " poof".. its over.

But Of course I am sure her PR people are already in talks with the best engineering companies to try to prolong and stabilize that monstrosity.

I hear she is trying to hire the engineering firm that built the Hoover Dam.

This editorial in the NYTimes is rather pertinent to the issue, Id say. At least in terms of the agenda trans activists are pushing. This is just an excerpt, Ill follow with the link to the entire article.

"" In January 2014, the actress Martha
Plimpton, an abortion-rights
advocate, sent out a tweet about a
benefit for Texas abortion funding
called “A Night of a Thousand
Vaginas.” Suddenly, she was
swamped by criticism for using the
word “vagina.” “Given the
constant genital policing, you can’t
expect trans folks to feel included
by an event title focused on a
policed, binary genital,” responded
@DrJaneChi.
WHEN Ms. Plimpton explained that
she would continue to say
“vagina” — and why shouldn’t she,
given that without a vagina, there
is no pregnancy or abortion? —
her feed overflowed anew with
indignation, Michelle Goldberg
reported in The Nation. “So you’re
really committed to doubling down
on using a term that you’ve been
told many times is exclusionary &
harmful?” asked one blogger. Ms.
Plimpton became, to use the new
trans insult, a terf, which stands
for “trans exclusionary radical
feminist.”
In January, Project: Theatre at
Mount Holyoke College, a self-
described liberal arts college for
women, canceled a performance of
Eve Ensler’s iconic feminist play
“The Vagina Monologues” because
it offered an “extremely narrow
perspective on what it means to be
a woman,” explained Erin Murphy,
the student group’s chairwoman.
Let me get this right: The word
“vagina” is exclusionary and offers
an extremely narrow perspective
on womanhood, so the 3.5 billion
of us who have vaginas, along with
the trans people who want them,
should describe ours with the
politically correct terminology
trans activists are pushing on us:
“front hole” or “internal
genitalia”?
Even the word “woman” has come
under assault by some of the very
people who claim the right to be
considered women. The hashtags
#StandWithTexasWomen,
popularized after Wendy Davis,
then a state senator, attempted to
filibuster the Texas Legislature to
prevent passage of a draconian
anti-abortion law, and
#WeTrustWomen, are also under
attack since they, too, are
exclusionary.
“Abortion rights and reproductive
justice is not a women’s issue,”
wrote Emmett Stoffer, one of many
self-described transgender persons
to blog on the topic. It is “a uterus
owner’s issue.” Mr. Stoffer was
referring to the possibility that a
woman who is taking hormones or
undergoing surgery to become a
man, or who does not identify as a
woman, can still have a uterus,
become pregnant and need an
abortion.""
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2015/06/07/opinion/sunday/what-makes-a-woman.html?referrer=&_r=3

So...no more vaginas, eh? Its now "front hole"

Its a gotdang Bizzaro world, I tell ya...