My different personalities tell me to be an option.

Actually, there are some who really enjoy watching their partner with another. It acts like an aphrodisiac for them. It's still a loving relationship with people who love one another. It's just exciting for one to watch their partner with someone else and see what it is like from a different perspective.

Is that really a loving relationship or a person not giving value to who they are with....

Is that really a loving relationship or a person not giving value to who they are with....

Good thread. I over E. If one is having difficulty pleasing one woman then wouldn't the difficulty level be raised? I just love the logic problems. Usually when I let my emotions rule my intellect I always have to pay Karma. Which makes me wonder if Karma is female.

I have gone through phases where I would, but not often.

I think it equates to different levels of commitment and the purpose of dating or relationships.

Some people are dating for companionship and fun, so what that other is doing when they aren't around doesn't hold as much significance as how much fun and attention they get when they are together.


Others want the 'perks' of being courted and not the 'responsibility' of sharing a commitment.

Some people are in the type of 'commitment' where there are enough other factors that they are happy with that they can compromise with the fidelity.

Some people are matched with others who just find sex an activity for entertainment and are all too well matched to be happy sharing each other sexually, as the sex doesn't hold the same value as those who are more inclined towards monogamy.

I do think she was talking about sex.

I don't think spending time on a social forum quite measures up,,,lol

but about judging the value of 'relationship', it is very subjective

true

however, the sharing I think the op referred to was sexual

people, hopefully, have lives outside of their significant other,

have other relationships with family or friends,, and whether that happens online or not is really not significant,,,

I give a 100 percent to my relationship like you give 100 percent to my posts and posting history....im flattered...

there is obviously some disconnect here,,lol

who mentioned sex with relatives? I was referring to time spent on other relationships,, whether internet or rt


time on the internet is the same kind of 'sharing' as time spent with family or friends ,, its not sexual,, and therefore a type of sharing most people wouldn't take issue with,,


that was kind of the point,,,

no, she didn't specifically mention sex

but I cant imagine that 'sharing' could be a problem in any other area where a romantic relationship is involved.

and she did respond to all the other posts that referred to sexual sharing,,,,so,,,,,


maybe more specifics would have helped the individual interpretation going on,,,

When I was younger, I had a lot of wild sex; but I remember 3 women that I cared for and offered their willingness to share. I told them that I was dating them not the others and was not interested

what a stud,,,

Sharing meaning dating and intimacy...

As for an egotistical attitude I don't display that but you seem to be judgemental to all my posts....

Im the op so yes they were directed at me....

Move on.....

And we can tell.....

an opinion is an opinion,just that....you started a thread asking for opinions which is what was given, being referred to as the OP just makes reference to the question posed, not the person specifically.

got anymore of these? to share??