Barry refuses to get rid of Queering advocate


Governor's Commission on Gay and Lesbian Youth.

"We immediately seized upon the opponent's calling card – safety – and explained how homophobia represents a threat to students' safety by creating a climate where violence, name-calling, health problems, and suicide are common. Titling our report 'Making Schools Safe for Gay and Lesbian Youth,' we automatically threw our opponents onto the defensive and stole their best line of attack. This framing short-circuited their arguments and left them back-pedaling from day one. "

So successful was Mr Jennings in his framing operation that he was appointed in the first Obama administration to the position of Assistant Deputy Secretary, Office of Safe and Drug Free Schools, in the Department of Education. The irony was not lost on 52 members of Congress, who wrote to President Obama requesting that he rescind the appointment because Mr. Jennings had, as the letter stated, ��for more than 20 years, almost exclusively focused on promoting the homosexual agenda. Mr. Obama did not do so, and Mr. Jennings served in the position for two years.

Guess another rewrite of (All the presidents MEN) could be in order.



This sound kinda like you didn't create that business?

( Your children are not your children; )

perhaps you are not aware of the lawsuit decided by the United States Court of Appeals (Parker vs. Hurley). This case established Lexington's right to teach diversity units, including stories that show same gender parents. The court decided we are not required to inform parents in advance of teaching units that include same gender parents or required to release students when such topics are discussed. The Appeals Court dismissed the claim that parents have a right to require the school provide advance notice or the right to remove their children. In addition, the School Committee has decided that teachers must be able to teach topics they feel are appropriate without the requirement parents be notified in advance��.


As if on cue, in May 2013, the Tippecanoe School for the Arts and Humanities, a Milwaukee elementary school, sponsored a “Gender Bender Day for which the students were asked to dress as a member of the opposite sex. I think it'��s just teaching them the wrong lesson about gender, one parent told local Fox affiliate WITI. “If you're a boy, stay a boy. You shouldn't have something like that at school. Another parent said she was speechless about the school's decision day. She, like some other parents, ended up keeping her son home from school that day. A school-board member dismissed parents�� concerns, saying they were ��using the kids for political purposes. In an effort to appease upset parents, the school changed the name to Switch It Up Day. In fact, WITI couldn'��t find many students participating in the themed day when it finally came last Friday; it appears to be mostly teachers and other staffers. On Fox-6 News TV, one mother protested: I don't want to send my son to school dressed as girl. He's only 7 years old.

However, this is clearly the age at which some homosexual ideologues and their allies would like to reach children with their propaganda.

Classroom presentations by homosexuals or on the subject of homosexuality are invitations to obscenity and inevitably lead to the question asked by one boy during It'��s Elementary: “How do you guys do it? The response was, We are not allowed to talk about our personal sex lives we can't do that. Nevertheless, with the question implanted, curious young minds will ineluctably be drawn to the subject of sodomy. So that's what those nice guys who talked with us do? There must not be anything wrong with it��. Mission accomplished to make the ab-normative normative before the children have developed their critical faculties of thought.

It's probably not as bad as the homophobes would have you think, but you wouldn't know from the OP taken from a conservative blogger. Teaching children diversity and acceptance is a far cry from forcing sexuality. Those children won't learn to be gay, but also, hopefully won't as likely act violently toward people they wouldn't otherwise understand.

So, tell me more about this, so called, gay agenda.

It's probably not as bad as the homophobes would have you think, but you wouldn't know from the OP taken from a conservative blogger. Teaching children diversity and acceptance is a far cry from forcing sexuality. Those children won't learn to be gay, but also, hopefully won't as likely act violently toward people they wouldn't otherwise understand.

So, tell me more about this, so called, gay agenda.

It's probably not as bad as the homophobes would have you think, but you wouldn't know from the OP taken from a conservative blogger. Teaching children diversity and acceptance is a far cry from forcing sexuality. Those children won't learn to be gay, but also, hopefully won't as likely act violently toward people they wouldn't otherwise understand.

So, tell me more about this, so called, gay agenda.

probably? would have you think? that doesn't sound like your very sure...

I use qualifiers because all we have here is the post from a "pro-family" blog.

lol...so you don't think the whole gay agenda is moving faster than it should be? in other words, getting crmmed down our throats?

It's probably not as bad as the homophobes would have you think, but you wouldn't know from the OP taken from a conservative blogger. Teaching children diversity and acceptance is a far cry from forcing sexuality. Those children won't learn to be gay, but also, hopefully won't as likely act violently toward people they wouldn't otherwise understand.

So, tell me more about this, so called, gay agenda.

Of course it is, anything to divide and conquer. And the sheeple just eat it up instead of addressing the issue.

just another Argument against Public Education!

Public education is not education ... it is schooling.(Indoctrination)

there is a way to teach about diversity and acceptance, by teaching about ACCEPTANCE, without teaching the morality of peoples choices,,,,

but teaching the morality of our reaction when peoples choices don't match ours,,,,


to teach homosexuality as 'normal' and 'ok' and teach kids they are wrong to not embrace or accept it is not the schools place,,,,

one moms opinion,,,,

it just smells like liberal population control agenda....

It's dangerous to push this on children because they may choose to become gay (not that there is anything wrong with that, they just need to be older when they decide to be gay).

How old were you when you decided to be straight?

lol, it's called letting nature take it's course...