Community > Politics, Current News & Events

Topic: teaching kids to be gay?
mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 02/12/14 07:24 PM
it just smells like liberal population control agenda.... What is this liberal population control agenda? you didn't get the memo either? in a nutshell, force gayness on everyone and tell them they have to accept it, then more kids grow up being gay bullies(like the ones cramming the gayness down our throats now), and less not gay people are making even fewer babies...

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 02/12/14 07:25 PM
It's dangerous to push this on children because they may choose to become gay (not that there is anything wrong with that, they just need to be older when they decide to be gay). How old were you when you decided to be straight? lol, it's called letting nature take it's course... So, when you're straight it's letting nature take it's course, but when someone's gay they were taught to be gay or decided to be gay? you got it

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Wed 02/12/14 07:26 PM
it just smells like liberal population control agenda.... What is this liberal population control agenda? you didn't get the memo either? in a nutshell, force gayness on everyone and tell them they have to accept it, then more kids grow up being gay bullies(like the ones cramming the gayness down our throats now), and less not gay people are making even fewer babies... "Gayness" has never been forced on me. I know people who are gay and am friends with them just as I would be friends with those who aren't gay. But nothing has ever been forced on me. And psssst... any gay person I know has straight parents. People aren't going to stop having children, either. And just because someone is gay, it doesn't mean they can't have children. There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers.

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Wed 02/12/14 07:27 PM
It's dangerous to push this on children because they may choose to become gay (not that there is anything wrong with that, they just need to be older when they decide to be gay). How old were you when you decided to be straight? lol, it's called letting nature take it's course... So, when you're straight it's letting nature take it's course, but when someone's gay they were taught to be gay or decided to be gay? you got it How so?

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 02/12/14 07:29 PM
it just smells like liberal population control agenda.... What is this liberal population control agenda? you didn't get the memo either? in a nutshell, force gayness on everyone and tell them they have to accept it, then more kids grow up being gay bullies(like the ones cramming the gayness down our throats now), and less not gay people are making even fewer babies... "Gayness" has never been forced on me. I know people who are gay and am friends with them just as I would be friends with those who aren't gay. But nothing has ever been forced on me. And psssst... any gay person I know has straight parents. People aren't going to stop having children, either. And just because someone is gay, it doesn't mean they can't have children. There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers. oh, so just let the gays take over, huh...

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 02/12/14 07:29 PM
It's dangerous to push this on children because they may choose to become gay (not that there is anything wrong with that, they just need to be older when they decide to be gay). How old were you when you decided to be straight? lol, it's called letting nature take it's course... So, when you're straight it's letting nature take it's course, but when someone's gay they were taught to be gay or decided to be gay? you got it How so? you got it right, correct...

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Wed 02/12/14 07:30 PM
it just smells like liberal population control agenda.... What is this liberal population control agenda? you didn't get the memo either? in a nutshell, force gayness on everyone and tell them they have to accept it, then more kids grow up being gay bullies(like the ones cramming the gayness down our throats now), and less not gay people are making even fewer babies... "Gayness" has never been forced on me. I know people who are gay and am friends with them just as I would be friends with those who aren't gay. But nothing has ever been forced on me. And psssst... any gay person I know has straight parents. People aren't going to stop having children, either. And just because someone is gay, it doesn't mean they can't have children. There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers. oh, so just let the gays take over, huh... I'm not sure what you mean. What do you mean let them take over?

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Wed 02/12/14 07:31 PM
It's dangerous to push this on children because they may choose to become gay (not that there is anything wrong with that, they just need to be older when they decide to be gay). How old were you when you decided to be straight? lol, it's called letting nature take it's course... So, when you're straight it's letting nature take it's course, but when someone's gay they were taught to be gay or decided to be gay? you got it How so? you got it right, correct... Why do you think that way?

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 02/12/14 07:39 PM
Why do you think that way? straight = natural gay = not natural I'm not sure if i can say it any simpler... and yes, I think it's a decision people make... when your born, your mind is a blank slate, not gay, not straight... if your taught being gay is right and the normal way is wrong, then the kids that are not gay would be having the same issues growing up as the gays had 10 years ago... just a reversal of projection... I think there is a balance point, where neither side gains nor loses

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 02/12/14 07:41 PM
it just smells like liberal population control agenda.... What is this liberal population control agenda? you didn't get the memo either? in a nutshell, force gayness on everyone and tell them they have to accept it, then more kids grow up being gay bullies(like the ones cramming the gayness down our throats now), and less not gay people are making even fewer babies... "Gayness" has never been forced on me. I know people who are gay and am friends with them just as I would be friends with those who aren't gay. But nothing has ever been forced on me. And psssst... any gay person I know has straight parents. People aren't going to stop having children, either. And just because someone is gay, it doesn't mean they can't have children. There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers. oh, so just let the gays take over, huh... I'm not sure what you mean. What do you mean let them take over? "There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers." not much need for straight guys, huh...

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Wed 02/12/14 07:41 PM
Why do you think that way? straight = natural gay = not natural I'm not sure if i can say it any simpler... and yes, I think it's a decision people make... when your born, your mind is a blank slate, not gay, not straight... if your taught being gay is right and the normal way is wrong, then the kids that are not gay would be having the same issues growing up as the gays had 10 years ago... just a reversal of projection... I think there is a balance point, where neither side gains nor loses If you think people choose their sexual orientation, when did you choose to be straight? Why do you think those who are gay are taught that not normal is right and normal is wrong? None of my friends who are gay have told me that being straight is wrong. It's just something they're not.

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Wed 02/12/14 07:43 PM
it just smells like liberal population control agenda.... What is this liberal population control agenda? you didn't get the memo either? in a nutshell, force gayness on everyone and tell them they have to accept it, then more kids grow up being gay bullies(like the ones cramming the gayness down our throats now), and less not gay people are making even fewer babies... "Gayness" has never been forced on me. I know people who are gay and am friends with them just as I would be friends with those who aren't gay. But nothing has ever been forced on me. And psssst... any gay person I know has straight parents. People aren't going to stop having children, either. And just because someone is gay, it doesn't mean they can't have children. There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers. oh, so just let the gays take over, huh... I'm not sure what you mean. What do you mean let them take over? "There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers." not much need for straight guys, huh... If they're gay, then I'd imagine no, they don't need a straight man as part of their relationship. Why would that bother you?

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 02/12/14 07:46 PM
it just smells like liberal population control agenda.... What is this liberal population control agenda? you didn't get the memo either? in a nutshell, force gayness on everyone and tell them they have to accept it, then more kids grow up being gay bullies(like the ones cramming the gayness down our throats now), and less not gay people are making even fewer babies... "Gayness" has never been forced on me. I know people who are gay and am friends with them just as I would be friends with those who aren't gay. But nothing has ever been forced on me. And psssst... any gay person I know has straight parents. People aren't going to stop having children, either. And just because someone is gay, it doesn't mean they can't have children. There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers. oh, so just let the gays take over, huh... I'm not sure what you mean. What do you mean let them take over? "There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers." not much need for straight guys, huh... If they're gay, then I'd imagine no, they don't need a straight man as part of their relationship. Why would that bother you? ??? why would I want to be a part of their relationship??? are you missing the point of that on purpose?

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Wed 02/12/14 08:45 PM Edited by singmesweet on Wed 02/12/14 08:46 PM
it just smells like liberal population control agenda.... What is this liberal population control agenda? you didn't get the memo either? in a nutshell, force gayness on everyone and tell them they have to accept it, then more kids grow up being gay bullies(like the ones cramming the gayness down our throats now), and less not gay people are making even fewer babies... "Gayness" has never been forced on me. I know people who are gay and am friends with them just as I would be friends with those who aren't gay. But nothing has ever been forced on me. And psssst... any gay person I know has straight parents. People aren't going to stop having children, either. And just because someone is gay, it doesn't mean they can't have children. There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers. oh, so just let the gays take over, huh... I'm not sure what you mean. What do you mean let them take over? "There is artificial insemination and surrogate mothers." not much need for straight guys, huh... If they're gay, then I'd imagine no, they don't need a straight man as part of their relationship. Why would that bother you? ??? why would I want to be a part of their relationship??? are you missing the point of that on purpose? Where did I say you wanted to be part of their relationship? I asked why it bothered you, because you made a comment about not needing straight guys.

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Wed 02/12/14 09:09 PM
I don't know how far human cloning has come but otherwise, human life requires a sperm (male) and an egg (female) to conceive it it can be carried in another womb, but it will still require a man,, always,, at some point (unless or until cloning becomes successful) a homosexual UNION cannot create life,, ever,, though one partner or the other can biologically create a life with someone of the opposite sex,,, but that isn't even the issue really, just clarifying the point about how gay people cant have kids,, its false because all individuals who aren't infertile can be one HALF Of a life creating union,, but that union has to be a male/female interaction,,,at some point,,,

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Wed 02/12/14 09:14 PM
I don't know how far human cloning has come but otherwise, human life requires a sperm (male) and an egg (female) to conceive it it can be carried in another womb, but it will still require a man,, always,, at some point (unless or until cloning becomes successful) a homosexual UNION cannot create life,, ever,, though one partner or the other can biologically create a life with someone of the opposite sex,,, but that isn't even the issue really, just clarifying the point about how gay people cant have kids,, its false because all individuals who aren't infertile can be one HALF Of a life creating union,, but that union has to be a male/female interaction,,,at some point,,, we need women lots more than women need us... there is enough sperm frozen to last for years, there is no real reason for men to be around in the future...just saying, hypothetically, of course...

msharmony Joined Mon 08/31/09 Posts: 61041	Wed 02/12/14 10:39 PM
I don't know how far human cloning has come but otherwise, human life requires a sperm (male) and an egg (female) to conceive it it can be carried in another womb, but it will still require a man,, always,, at some point (unless or until cloning becomes successful) a homosexual UNION cannot create life,, ever,, though one partner or the other can biologically create a life with someone of the opposite sex,,, but that isn't even the issue really, just clarifying the point about how gay people cant have kids,, its false because all individuals who aren't infertile can be one HALF Of a life creating union,, but that union has to be a male/female interaction,,,at some point,,, we need women lots more than women need us... there is enough sperm frozen to last for years, there is no real reason for men to be around in the future...just saying, hypothetically, of course... I don't believe that, the sperm came from men and men will always be needed for more sperm

metalwing Joined Fri 11/14/08 Posts: 26218	Thu 02/13/14 07:07 AM
The politically correct (read that as progressive) version is that gays are normal and their lifestyle should be celebrated and taught. The homophobic version is that gays are repugnant and should be "retrained and reviled". I have a gay nephew who I love the same as the straight ones. He, however, has a bad habit of bringing gay lovers over who are infinitely obnoxious with their "in you face" gayness. Nobody in the family likes them but it seems the type of person to which he is attracted. I also have some friends who are gay. That said, the science behind gayness would indicate that it is obviously an abnormal trait that can manifest itself in an infinite variety of ways and degree. A study was done on rats. A large "rat condo" was built with a small rat population but an infinite supply of food and water. The population exploded until the rats were crowded in every nook and corner. The apparent stress of the overcrowding caused a percentage of the rats to exhibit homosexual behavior. Some studies with humans also indicate that stress plays a large role.

Leigh2154 Joined Sun 10/02/11 Posts: 16479	Thu 02/13/14 07:12 AM
The politically correct (read that as progressive) version is that gays are normal and their lifestyle should be celebrated and taught. The homophobic version is that gays are repugnant and should be "retrained and reviled". I have a gay nephew who I love the same as the straight ones. He, however, has a bad habit of bringing gay lovers over who are infinitely obnoxious with their "in you face" gayness. Nobody in the family likes them but it seems the type of person to which he is attracted. I also have some friends who are gay. That said, the science behind gayness would indicate that it is obviously an abnormal trait that can manifest itself in an infinite variety of ways and degree. A study was done on rats. A large "rat condo" was built with a small rat population but an infinite supply of food and water. The population exploded until the rats were crowded in every nook and corner. The apparent stress of the overcrowding caused a percentage of the rats to exhibit homosexual behavior. Some studies with humans also indicate that stress plays a large role. I enjoyed this chapter...

mightymoe Joined Sun 11/19/06 Posts: 37362	Thu 02/13/14 07:13 AM
The politically correct (read that as progressive) version is that gays are normal and their lifestyle should be celebrated and taught. The homophobic version is that gays are repugnant and should be "retrained and reviled". I have a gay nephew who I love the same as the straight ones. He, however, has a bad habit of bringing gay lovers over who are infinitely obnoxious with their "in you face" gayness. Nobody in the family likes them but it seems the type of person to which he is attracted. I also have some friends who are gay. That said, the science behind gayness would indicate that it is obviously an abnormal trait that can manifest itself in an infinite variety of ways and degree. A study was done on rats. A large "rat condo" was built with a small rat population but an infinite supply of food and water. The population exploded until the rats were crowded in every nook and corner. The apparent stress of the overcrowding caused a percentage of the rats to exhibit homosexual behavior. Some studies with humans also indicate that stress plays a large role. makes sense, natures way of taking care of a problem...