Community > Dating & Relationships

Topic: Best to start off with an intimate encounter.
soufiehere Joined Sat 10/24/09 Posts: 45408	Sun 09/29/13 09:58 AM
Edited of non-PG13 rated material. soufie Site Moderator

paintecards01 Joined Wed 09/11/13 Posts: 4725	Sun 09/29/13 11:33 AM
I'm not looking for an intimate encounter...and not to be rude to anyone who is, but if I was, it wouldn't be on a dating site; so many of those to be found in my community, if I was interested in that.

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Sun 09/29/13 11:36 AM
Edited of non-PG13 rated material. soufie Site Moderator Since when are 13 year olds on this site? I didn't realize this was a pg13 site.

SparklingCrystal 💖💎 Joined Mon 05/20/13 Posts: 33364	Sun 09/29/13 11:55 AM
Edited of non-PG13 rated material. soufie Site Moderator Since when are 13 year olds on this site? I didn't realize this was a pg13 site. Haha, I hadn;t even thought of that one, indeed, a dating site and 13 year olds? I was trying to remember what the posting was about. It had to do with the Romans, but didn't think the content was that bad. Seen worse/more derogatory comments here. Oh well, what have the Romans ever done for us? (the aquaduct, sanitation, roads, irrigation, medication) But still, what have the Romans ever done for us?! (Monty Python)

massiel Joined Wed 05/15/13 Posts: 480	Sun 09/29/13 12:12 PM
I'm not looking for an intimate encounter...and not to be rude to anyone who is, but if I was, it wouldn't be on a dating site; so many of those to be found in my community, if I was interested in that. I agree with you. You can find just about anybody for a one night stand.

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Sun 09/29/13 12:12 PM
Edited of non-PG13 rated material. soufie Site Moderator Since when are 13 year olds on this site? I didn't realize this was a pg13 site. Haha, I hadn;t even thought of that one, indeed, a dating site and 13 year olds? I was trying to remember what the posting was about. It had to do with the Romans, but didn't think the content was that bad. Seen worse/more derogatory comments here. Oh well, what have the Romans ever done for us? (the aquaduct, sanitation, roads, irrigation, medication) But still, what have the Romans ever done for us?! (Monty Python) I saw something briefly, but don't remember what it was. It didn't strike me as something that was going to be deleted, though. Oh well. I just thought pg13 for a site like this was a bit odd.

soufiehere Joined Sat 10/24/09 Posts: 45408	Sun 09/29/13 12:16 PM
Edited of non-PG13 rated material. soufie Site Moderator Since when are 13 year olds on this site? I didn't realize this was a pg13 site. http://mingle2.com/topic/249135 "4a) No explicit, sexual, offensive, insulting or vulgar language. The Mingle2 forums are rated PG-13."

singmesweet Joined Mon 07/28/08 Posts: 26661	Sun 09/29/13 12:23 PM
Interesting. Thanks!

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sun 09/29/13 12:27 PM
I think so because ultimately that is what everybody wants. It is no good finding a "soulmate" if the sex is no good. So I think an intimate encounter is the best way to start off a date. Because you don't want to fall in love with a lame duck. You still have alot to learn!

Conrad_73 Joined Sat 09/29/07 Posts: 22488	Sun 09/29/13 12:29 PM
Edited of non-PG13 rated material. soufie Site Moderator Since when are 13 year olds on this site? I didn't realize this was a pg13 site. It can be accessed by anyone,since it is a public Forum! Then you too need Advertisers to make the Site pay!

sybariticguy Joined Thu 09/27/12 Posts: 1639	Sun 09/29/13 01:02 PM
I was beginning to wonder when you were going to come up with the next provocative statement, hahahaha. If you really have found your soulmate, twinsoul, twinflame, you have a connection at such a deep level that intimacy will also be good. Simply because you complement each other, connect at many levels. Then there is the desire to become one, to be even closer. Totally different ballgame and different from sheer lust. Sure you can go for sex first, and you might click in the sack, but doesn't mean that you are compatible as partners. The fallacy in your reasoning is that great sex comes from having a soulmate and that is just not necessarily true.Chemistry is not attached to any aspect of a person other than their physiology and all the connection with another can pale in the absence of a strong physical attraction. that is the way men are wired i am not suggesting women are the same however...how else could we explain really disgusting appearing men with gorgeous women(excluding large quantities of cash or fame mind you)

SparklingCrystal 💖💎 Joined Mon 05/20/13 Posts: 33364	Sun 09/29/13 01:54 PM
I was beginning to wonder when you were going to come up with the next provocative statement, hahahaha. If you really have found your soulmate, twinsoul, twinflame, you have a connection at such a deep level that intimacy will also be good. Simply because you complement each other, connect at many levels. Then there is the desire to become one, to be even closer. Totally different ballgame and different from sheer lust. Sure you can go for sex first, and you might click in the sack, but doesn't mean that you are compatible as partners. The fallacy in your reasoning is that great sex comes from having a soulmate and that is just not necessarily true.Chemistry is not attached to any aspect of a person other than their physiology and all the connection with another can pale in the absence of a strong physical attraction. that is the way men are wired i am not suggesting women are the same however...how else could we explain really disgusting appearing men with gorgeous women(excluding large quantities of cash or fame mind you) I beg to differ. If you are with a soulmate the attraction will be there, otherwise it's not a soulmate, twinsoul, twinflame. The connection will run much deeper than the things you mention, though. Guess you never been with a soulmate/twinsoul. It is a totally different experience that cannot be equaled by a 'regular' encounter.

Toodygirl5 Joined Fri 10/26/12 Posts: 15048	Sun 09/29/13 02:10 PM Edited by Toodygirl5 on Sun 09/29/13 02:16 PM
I think so because ultimately that is what everybody wants. It is no good finding a "soulmate" if the sex is no good. So I think an intimate encounter is the best way to start off a date. Because you don't want to fall in love with a lame duck. I think a hug and a light kiss on a date is fine, most dates I have had chemistry for the man. Most dates do not end in a life partner, so I would not want a intimate encounter with a near stranger to me.

TawtStrat Joined Fri 11/16/12 Posts: 3581	Mon 09/30/13 05:58 AM
I think so because ultimately that is what everybody wants. It is no good finding a "soulmate" if the sex is no good. So I think an intimate encounter is the best way to start off a date. Because you don't want to fall in love with a lame duck. Well, it works for me because if I do that I know that I'm going to get a second date but it's a risky strategy if you lack the confidence and experience with women because they won't come back if the sex is crap. Given that you have said that you do lack confidence and experience, I'm not sure that you should do this. You tell us that women do not like you for your personality and being told that they don't want you for that either might not do much to help you to build up your confidence at all.

markc48 Joined Wed 05/07/08 Posts: 5536	Mon 09/30/13 01:51 PM
I think so because ultimately that is what everybody wants. It is no good finding a "soulmate" if the sex is no good. So I think an intimate encounter is the best way to start off a date. Because you don't want to fall in love with a lame duck. And what's the harm if it doesn't work out at least you gave it a go.