100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Fake Skeptics & The "Conspiracy Theorist" Slur | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Stop the personal attacks toward members. Kim Thank you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder why the CTers don't go for my nano-termite theory? It makes better sense than explosives.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I wonder why the CTers don't go for my nano-termite theory? It makes better sense than explosives. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nice statist piece from whom? I could say the sky is getting closer to the ground and it wouldn't make it true or false, just another opinion. Unlike your rather banal video, eh?  Why do you always have to insult people rather than discuss the topic or answer the questions posed to you? Are you trolling? god, you people can't read? just where did he insult anyone? you people just trying to start something thats not there... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the NIST was dragged into a muddy lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, it reluctantly parted with the video of firemen talking about huge explosions causing the twin towers to collapse on the day of the 9/11 tragedy. The video is clear proof of the damning knowledge that huge explosions were what caused the towers to collapse and that there was a fully fledged master game behind the execution of the tragedy on American soil. Although there is evidence to suggest that the impact of a plane to the building could have caused the collapse, the firemen in the video clearly claim that they heard secondary explosions that led the towers to fall down, as the firemen were present in the lobby of one of the towers. According to another firefighter, there were at least three huge explosions that led the lobby to collapse on their heads. The video surely has added another perspective to the whole 9/11 tragedy. Watch the firemen covered in the dust of 911 give live testimony to news cameras. yet they were ignored. Go figure. watch it here. http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6951395-firemen-give-huge-explosions-testimony-in-911-fiasco-video Pathetic that you call them kooks or whatever. your lack of logic astounds me... your saying the explosions at the bottom made them fall, but in EVERY video, it shows both buildings falling from the top, but i hear no explanation as to how this could be... could you explain this please? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The guy in the OP video makes a big deal about fake blah blah blah and slurs about CT and then goes on defending one of the most common CT stories surrounding 9/11. The problem with these clowns is that they make false statements and then make up crap to defend the false statements. The whole "explosives used in building 7" story has been debunked from every possible direction. It is time to give it up. That is so funny. Building 7 was taken down by explosives and that has been pretty much proven. Please provide a link to a peer-reviewed scientific paper (not a blog) that proves this. I would find that most interesting. There is no "single" blog. There are dozens of experts who agree who are not bullied by the crap put out by the cover up. Demolition experts and other professionals. I am sure if you were motivated to learn the truth you can find them on your own. But you are simply a defender of officialdom and an admitted CIA plant. LOL Please provide a link if you would be so kind. After all, I've presented a scientific paper proving otherwise, it's the least you could do. Please provide this alleged scientific paper. I did not ever see it. The paper about the 'thermitic dust residue' posted on the previous page. Here it is again. http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf Now, you do remember that the thermitic residue is the basis for the CD theory, don't you? Now this paper debunk's Bentham's paper that started the whole CD theory as initially proposed by Gage and later adopted by all and sundry. That paper appears to be a very narrow study about thermite dust at WTC area. and does not address what caused building 7 to collapse and does nothing to "debunk" expert opinions that Building 7 was a very controlled demolition, or how building 7, which was not hit by a plane managed such a clean near free fall to the ground all at once. It would be a bit of a waste of time to read it in detail because it addresses a specific theory that I am not familiar with.[b\] seems like you don't want to waste any time reading something that disagrees with you... |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Bestinshow
on
Fri 01/25/13 10:18 AM
|
|
After the NIST was dragged into a muddy lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, it reluctantly parted with the video of firemen talking about huge explosions causing the twin towers to collapse on the day of the 9/11 tragedy. The video is clear proof of the damning knowledge that huge explosions were what caused the towers to collapse and that there was a fully fledged master game behind the execution of the tragedy on American soil. Although there is evidence to suggest that the impact of a plane to the building could have caused the collapse, the firemen in the video clearly claim that they heard secondary explosions that led the towers to fall down, as the firemen were present in the lobby of one of the towers. According to another firefighter, there were at least three huge explosions that led the lobby to collapse on their heads. The video surely has added another perspective to the whole 9/11 tragedy. Watch the firemen covered in the dust of 911 give live testimony to news cameras. yet they were ignored. Go figure. watch it here. http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6951395-firemen-give-huge-explosions-testimony-in-911-fiasco-video Pathetic that you call them kooks or whatever. your lack of logic astounds me... your saying the explosions at the bottom made them fall, but in EVERY video, it shows both buildings falling from the top, but i hear no explanation as to how this could be... could you explain this please? We do not need to convince every individual about 911 clearly your mind supports the "official version" of 911 even when all the evidence points to a conspiracy, or at the very least a white wash. They could however blow support columns in whatever manner that would give the desired effect. Can you explain then why they had molten pools of metal at the base of buildings? Explain molten metal gushing out open windows or even explain how no modern steel framed building has ever collapsed in such manner at or near free fall speed as if there was no resistance at all? Your fooling yourself only most of america and the rest of the world is hip to the 911 fiasco but no one can do a damn thing because most of the evidence used in the official theory remains classified and will remain classified for many years to come. I am sure deep down inside you know I am right. After all 911 was the tool they used to shred our rights as Americans. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the NIST was dragged into a muddy lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, it reluctantly parted with the video of firemen talking about huge explosions causing the twin towers to collapse on the day of the 9/11 tragedy. The video is clear proof of the damning knowledge that huge explosions were what caused the towers to collapse and that there was a fully fledged master game behind the execution of the tragedy on American soil. Although there is evidence to suggest that the impact of a plane to the building could have caused the collapse, the firemen in the video clearly claim that they heard secondary explosions that led the towers to fall down, as the firemen were present in the lobby of one of the towers. According to another firefighter, there were at least three huge explosions that led the lobby to collapse on their heads. The video surely has added another perspective to the whole 9/11 tragedy. Watch the firemen covered in the dust of 911 give live testimony to news cameras. yet they were ignored. Go figure. watch it here. http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6951395-firemen-give-huge-explosions-testimony-in-911-fiasco-video Pathetic that you call them kooks or whatever. your lack of logic astounds me... your saying the explosions at the bottom made them fall, but in EVERY video, it shows both buildings falling from the top, but i hear no explanation as to how this could be... could you explain this please? We do not need to convince every individual about 911 clearly your mind supports the "official version" of 911 even when all the evidence points to a conspiracy, or at the very least a white wash. They could however blow support columns in whatever manner that would give the desired effect. Can you explain then why they had molten pools of metal at the base of buildings? Explain molten metal gushing out open windows or even explain how no modern steel framed building has ever collapsed in such manner at or near free fall speed as if there was no resistance at all? Your fooling yourself only most of america and the rest of the world is hip to the 911 fiasco but no one can do a damn thing because most of the evidence used in the official theory remains classified and will remain classified for many years to come. I am sure deep down inside you know I am right. After all 911 was the tool they used to shred our rights as Americans. so, in other words, you cannot explain it... i'm not convinced there was not a conspiracy, but there is more evidence showing it was mostly as it was explained... and all you CT'ers really have done nothing but confuse the issue. real evidence goes a long way, and you guys are falling short... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the NIST was dragged into a muddy lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, it reluctantly parted with the video of firemen talking about huge explosions causing the twin towers to collapse on the day of the 9/11 tragedy. The video is clear proof of the damning knowledge that huge explosions were what caused the towers to collapse and that there was a fully fledged master game behind the execution of the tragedy on American soil. Although there is evidence to suggest that the impact of a plane to the building could have caused the collapse, the firemen in the video clearly claim that they heard secondary explosions that led the towers to fall down, as the firemen were present in the lobby of one of the towers. According to another firefighter, there were at least three huge explosions that led the lobby to collapse on their heads. The video surely has added another perspective to the whole 9/11 tragedy. Watch the firemen covered in the dust of 911 give live testimony to news cameras. yet they were ignored. Go figure. watch it here. http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6951395-firemen-give-huge-explosions-testimony-in-911-fiasco-video Pathetic that you call them kooks or whatever. your lack of logic astounds me... your saying the explosions at the bottom made them fall, but in EVERY video, it shows both buildings falling from the top, but i hear no explanation as to how this could be... could you explain this please? We do not need to convince every individual about 911 clearly your mind supports the "official version" of 911 even when all the evidence points to a conspiracy, or at the very least a white wash. They could however blow support columns in whatever manner that would give the desired effect. Can you explain then why they had molten pools of metal at the base of buildings? Explain molten metal gushing out open windows or even explain how no modern steel framed building has ever collapsed in such manner at or near free fall speed as if there was no resistance at all? Your fooling yourself only most of america and the rest of the world is hip to the 911 fiasco but no one can do a damn thing because most of the evidence used in the official theory remains classified and will remain classified for many years to come. I am sure deep down inside you know I am right. After all 911 was the tool they used to shred our rights as Americans. so, in other words, you cannot explain it... i'm not convinced there was not a conspiracy, but there is more evidence showing it was mostly as it was explained... and all you CT'ers really have done nothing but confuse the issue. real evidence goes a long way, and you guys are falling short... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
After the NIST was dragged into a muddy lawsuit by the International Center for 9/11 Studies, it reluctantly parted with the video of firemen talking about huge explosions causing the twin towers to collapse on the day of the 9/11 tragedy. The video is clear proof of the damning knowledge that huge explosions were what caused the towers to collapse and that there was a fully fledged master game behind the execution of the tragedy on American soil. Although there is evidence to suggest that the impact of a plane to the building could have caused the collapse, the firemen in the video clearly claim that they heard secondary explosions that led the towers to fall down, as the firemen were present in the lobby of one of the towers. According to another firefighter, there were at least three huge explosions that led the lobby to collapse on their heads. The video surely has added another perspective to the whole 9/11 tragedy. Watch the firemen covered in the dust of 911 give live testimony to news cameras. yet they were ignored. Go figure. watch it here. http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/6951395-firemen-give-huge-explosions-testimony-in-911-fiasco-video Pathetic that you call them kooks or whatever. your lack of logic astounds me... your saying the explosions at the bottom made them fall, but in EVERY video, it shows both buildings falling from the top, but i hear no explanation as to how this could be... could you explain this please? We do not need to convince every individual about 911 clearly your mind supports the "official version" of 911 even when all the evidence points to a conspiracy, or at the very least a white wash. They could however blow support columns in whatever manner that would give the desired effect. Can you explain then why they had molten pools of metal at the base of buildings? Explain molten metal gushing out open windows or even explain how no modern steel framed building has ever collapsed in such manner at or near free fall speed as if there was no resistance at all? Your fooling yourself only most of america and the rest of the world is hip to the 911 fiasco but no one can do a damn thing because most of the evidence used in the official theory remains classified and will remain classified for many years to come. I am sure deep down inside you know I am right. After all 911 was the tool they used to shred our rights as Americans. so, in other words, you cannot explain it... i'm not convinced there was not a conspiracy, but there is more evidence showing it was mostly as it was explained... and all you CT'ers really have done nothing but confuse the issue. real evidence goes a long way, and you guys are falling short... and when you put others down by thinking your the only one that knows, your case gets even weaker... so your thinking that everyone that doesn't agree with you are the "dimmest"? that should really help your cause there... show me some real evidence, and i could get on board. but all i have seen and heard are ridiculous theories/statements about missiles, thermite, dancing Jews, free fall speeds and rayguns that turn metal into dust... the official story, whether true or not, makes much more sense than anything any CT'er has came up with yet... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Bestinshow
on
Fri 01/25/13 12:11 PM
|
|
"I don't have every missing piece of this puzzle. But I have enough pieces to KNOW that the government-media version is false! Imagine if I gave you a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle, and told you that the image is of a beach in Hawaii. But after snapping 30 pieces together, you notice polar bears, snow capped mountains, and men covered in furs. Although there are still 70 missing pieces, you already have enough to KNOW that the image is NOT that of a beach in Hawaii. It's the same with solving conspiracies. I may not have all of the details, but I have laid out enough pieces to know that the official story is a lie. Does that make sense to you? (Wait for response.) http://mingle2.com/topic/show/344696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I don't have every missing piece of this puzzle. But I have enough pieces to KNOW that the government-media version is false! Imagine if I gave you a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle, and told you that the image is of a beach in Hawaii. But after snapping 30 pieces together, you notice polar bears, snow capped mountains, and men covered in furs. Although there are still 70 missing pieces, you already have enough to KNOW that the image is NOT that of a beach in Hawaii. It's the same with solving conspiracies. I may not have all of the details, but I have laid out enough pieces to know that the official story is a lie. Does that make sense to you? (Wait for response.) http://mingle2.com/topic/show/344696 Very good analogy! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I don't have every missing piece of this puzzle. But I have enough pieces to KNOW that the government-media version is false! Imagine if I gave you a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle, and told you that the image is of a beach in Hawaii. But after snapping 30 pieces together, you notice polar bears, snow capped mountains, and men covered in furs. Although there are still 70 missing pieces, you already have enough to KNOW that the image is NOT that of a beach in Hawaii. It's the same with solving conspiracies. I may not have all of the details, but I have laid out enough pieces to know that the official story is a lie. Does that make sense to you? (Wait for response.) http://mingle2.com/topic/show/344696 i don't doubt you, or think any less of you for your opinions, but i just don't see it that way... nothing is 100% on either side of an issue, but like i said i just don't see the ct'er's side of it...yet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I don't have every missing piece of this puzzle. But I have enough pieces to KNOW that the government-media version is false! Imagine if I gave you a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle, and told you that the image is of a beach in Hawaii. But after snapping 30 pieces together, you notice polar bears, snow capped mountains, and men covered in furs. Although there are still 70 missing pieces, you already have enough to KNOW that the image is NOT that of a beach in Hawaii. It's the same with solving conspiracies. I may not have all of the details, but I have laid out enough pieces to know that the official story is a lie. Does that make sense to you? (Wait for response.) http://mingle2.com/topic/show/344696 Very good analogy! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I don't have every missing piece of this puzzle. But I have enough pieces to KNOW that the government-media version is false! Imagine if I gave you a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle, and told you that the image is of a beach in Hawaii. But after snapping 30 pieces together, you notice polar bears, snow capped mountains, and men covered in furs. Although there are still 70 missing pieces, you already have enough to KNOW that the image is NOT that of a beach in Hawaii. It's the same with solving conspiracies. I may not have all of the details, but I have laid out enough pieces to know that the official story is a lie. Does that make sense to you? (Wait for response.) http://mingle2.com/topic/show/344696 i don't doubt you, or think any less of you for your opinions, but i just don't see it that way... nothing is 100% on either side of an issue, but like i said i just don't see the ct'er's side of it...yet |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I don't have every missing piece of this puzzle. But I have enough pieces to KNOW that the government-media version is false! Imagine if I gave you a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle, and told you that the image is of a beach in Hawaii. But after snapping 30 pieces together, you notice polar bears, snow capped mountains, and men covered in furs. Although there are still 70 missing pieces, you already have enough to KNOW that the image is NOT that of a beach in Hawaii. It's the same with solving conspiracies. I may not have all of the details, but I have laid out enough pieces to know that the official story is a lie. Does that make sense to you? (Wait for response.) http://mingle2.com/topic/show/344696 i don't doubt you, or think any less of you for your opinions, but i just don't see it that way... nothing is 100% on either side of an issue, but like i said i just don't see the ct'er's side of it...yet Sad to think that you feel America is dead. I don't see it that way. As long as those who believe in America continue to profess her standards against all odds and stand immovable. She lives. Liberty yet lives! The Constitution is a restrainer. It is still our banner! Stay strong. I admire that in the men and women of mingle2!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
People who believe in the official story... well good for them. They stand by their lying politicians no matter what.
They lost me when they claimed they found a passport of one of the high jackers in the dust of the twin towers, and then later admitted it was planted by the FBI. How can anyone put faith in officialdom? They even tried to assign cover-up spin master Henry Kissinger as head of the 9-11 investigation. That would have been laughable. The guy they finally did get was less known but just as much a spin doctor. Laughable. Building 7 was demolished on purpose. Videos clearly show a line of explosives going off just below the collapse and it was certainly not a towering inferno. There was very little fire. What a joke. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"I don't have every missing piece of this puzzle. But I have enough pieces to KNOW that the government-media version is false! Imagine if I gave you a 100 piece jigsaw puzzle, and told you that the image is of a beach in Hawaii. But after snapping 30 pieces together, you notice polar bears, snow capped mountains, and men covered in furs. Although there are still 70 missing pieces, you already have enough to KNOW that the image is NOT that of a beach in Hawaii. It's the same with solving conspiracies. I may not have all of the details, but I have laid out enough pieces to know that the official story is a lie. Does that make sense to you? (Wait for response.) http://mingle2.com/topic/show/344696 i don't doubt you, or think any less of you for your opinions, but i just don't see it that way... nothing is 100% on either side of an issue, but like i said i just don't see the ct'er's side of it...yet i agree, America has changed since i was a kid. change isn't bad, but the slow change the way they did makes look like something is going on. power corrupts, absolute power corrupts absolutely. If you don't like the way the government is being handled, then vote out the incumbents. things are always going to change, nothing we can do about that, but we can do something about crooked politicians in office. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Americans just do not pay attention. Most people are engrossed in the day to day struggles of how to pay bills feed the family, keep the boss out of your butt keep the wife happy etc etc to even care.
The mindless activities of sport and american idle tend to keep most people intellectually content. The exception being when the powers that be need to whip up a propaganda campaign to get support for yet another war and the media whores slavishly comply. Take Iraq for an example, at least under Sadam people could have a life, they had hospitals,schools and an intact infrastructure and no WMDS. What do they have now that we have gave them our gift of democracy? Does the media even bother to report the aftermath of our liberation? The effects and drain on our budgets? The answer is self evident that is if your paying attention at all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
People who believe in the official story... well good for them. They stand by their lying politicians no matter what. They lost me when they claimed they found a passport of one of the high jackers in the dust of the twin towers, and then later admitted it was planted by the FBI. How can anyone put faith in officialdom? They even tried to assign cover-up spin master Henry Kissinger as head of the 9-11 investigation. That would have been laughable. The guy they finally did get was less known but just as much a spin doctor. Laughable. Building 7 was demolished on purpose. Videos clearly show a line of explosives going off just below the collapse and it was certainly not a towering inferno. There was very little fire. What a joke. see, your talking like you know what happened. you don't know, i don't know, we can only from an opinion by what we believe. if you really think the government is that evil, then more power to ya. but saying you know something when you have no clue is ridiculous. remember, your opinion means no more than mine, but for some reason, you think your opinions are fact... |
|
|
|
|
