The guy in the OP video makes a big deal about fake blah blah blah and slurs about CT and then goes on defending one of the most common CT stories surrounding 9/11. The problem with these clowns is that they make false statements and then make up crap to defend the false statements. The whole "explosives used in building 7" story has been debunked from every possible direction. It is time to give it up.

Enlighten me who and when did they debunk it?

Yep, that's why they hung banners under the American flag saying "WE WILL NEVER FORGET!"

There is only debunking from govt talking heads..... not answers to legitimate questions....

But this is not about a particular event, or anyones belief of that event.

It's about the foolishness of accepting opinion as truth to facts not yet in evidence, and those with the money and power to control the conversation overpowering the peoples right to truthful answers by character assassination in the sponsored media they control

My gawd this is truly a refreshing thread.


SS if your ever in Oregon I'M buying.

The whole CD narrative is just ridiculous from the outset and it doesn't take much 'debunking'.

What are you talking about? Did you read the entire article? He gives simple scientific reasons why the Loch Ness monster can't exist and why the lunar footage couldn't be faked.



Now you're just being silly.



You're not debating rationally at the moment. Why do you get so upset when someone presents an alternative opinion? You just attack without offering any form of contradictory evidence.

Double post.

Plenty of scientists have worked on this hypothesis for years. You'll need a lot of time to get through all this, but it will be worth it when you've covered all the material.

http://forums.randi.org/local_links.php?catid=18

Here is a link to a recent paper on the 'thermitic residue':

http://dl.dropbox.com/u/64959841/9119ProgressReport022912_rev1_030112web.pdf

More hogwash!

Double post

It is not "his" video.

You could have made an intelligent comment on the actual video's points but you just said: "Unlike your rather banal video, eh?"
Like, why do you describe it as "banal"?

Your response is quite revealing of the chip that always seems to be on your shoulder regarding other people's opinions and posts.

That is so funny.

Building 7 was taken down by explosives and that has been pretty much proven. People like you and official story defenders have put on blinders and ear plugs and just keep harping over and over that it has been "debunked" and it has not.

There is no way building 7 collapsed that way without explosives.

I know, as my post was addressed to him, he knew as well.



Because it is.



Your biased selectivity is duly noted, and you're projecting and insulting a member.

I am making an observation. I can sense your attitude by the way you respond. So you think a video is banal. That doesn't say much.

Please provide a link to a peer-reviewed scientific paper (not a blog) that proves this. I would find that most interesting.

You can guess, and that is about it. I'm not getting into another pointless argument with you on this, because SS will complain about my post count.



No, it didn't, that's why it was banal.

There is no "single" blog. There are dozens of experts who agree who are not bullied by the crap put out by the cover up. Demolition experts and other professionals. I am sure if you were motivated to learn the truth you can find them on your own. But you are simply a defender of officialdom and an admitted CIA plant. LOL

who is SS and why would anyone complain about your post count?

Please provide a link if you would be so kind. After all, I've presented a scientific paper proving otherwise, it's the least you could do.

The OP and it beats me.