100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Rape something God intended..... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
You don't think it's cruel that it's god's will that some women get pregnant via rape? Sorry, but that sounds like a pretty evil god to me. Sing. I figure that God's will post is only one persons opinion. Violence against women is permitted in only one religion at present. That be Islam. Men are rarely convicted of raping Muslim women. Dat's da' facts, maam. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
singmesweet
on
Fri 10/26/12 07:24 AM
|
|
You don't think it's cruel that it's god's will that some women get pregnant via rape? Sorry, but that sounds like a pretty evil god to me. Sing. I figure that God's will post is only one persons opinion. Violence against women is permitted in only one religion at present. That be Islam. Men are rarely convicted of raping Muslim women. Dat's da' facts, maam. This guy wasn't a Muslim, though. Islam isn't his religion. He's a Christian Republican. I've heard that he was just espousing basic Christian belief. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You don't think it's cruel that it's god's will that some women get pregnant via rape? Sorry, but that sounds like a pretty evil god to me. as I said before, childre are a gift, however they are conceived many batterd wives have children wih men that have battered them, nd those children are gifts too,, many terrible things happen to people, rape happens that doesnt end in pregnancy,,,,,and the notion of Gods will is an endless debate I am not going to have but pregnancy is Gods choice, and Gods gift is the life we each have that starts out in our mothers womb,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Beast Women’s bodies are yet again at the axis of the 2012 election season. All it took was an Indiana Republican Senate candidate saying aloud what many evangelical anti-abortion activists seem to believe—that a pregnancy resulting from a rape is “something God intended to happen.” When asked if he was sorry, Richard Mourdock demurred. “I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologize,” he said. First there was Akin....now Mourdock. as a woman, and a rape survivor, I happen to believe all pregnancies are Gods intention as well not necessarily all the ways in which pregnancies occur, becuase I believe the body is a vessel for the soul and pregnancy is the way souls enter the world smh... Got to shake my head on this one too.. 
Indiana senate candidate...Republican...Richard Mourdock says this, "Pregnancies resulting from rape are God's will."...Shocking, disappointingly stupid, inappropriate...An affront to human dignity, an affront to christians, an affront to women... Mourdock says his belief stems from faith, DEEP faith....I call bullchit... If, as a christian, you believe all life is a sacred gift from God, how do you justify exploiting God's will in the political arena for self serving reasons?...On second thought, how does any so called christian justify exploiting the word of God for any reason?... 
thats a good question another one is when and how do we determine the difference between sharing and exploiting,,,? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Beast Women’s bodies are yet again at the axis of the 2012 election season. All it took was an Indiana Republican Senate candidate saying aloud what many evangelical anti-abortion activists seem to believe—that a pregnancy resulting from a rape is “something God intended to happen.” When asked if he was sorry, Richard Mourdock demurred. “I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologize,” he said. First there was Akin....now Mourdock. as a woman, and a rape survivor, I happen to believe all pregnancies are Gods intention as well not necessarily all the ways in which pregnancies occur, becuase I believe the body is a vessel for the soul and pregnancy is the way souls enter the world smh... Got to shake my head on this one too..
Indiana senate candidate...Republican...Richard Mourdock says this, "Pregnancies resulting from rape are God's will."...Shocking, disappointingly stupid, inappropriate...An affront to human dignity, an affront to christians, an affront to women... Mourdock says his belief stems from faith, DEEP faith....I call bullchit... If, as a christian, you believe all life is a sacred gift from God, how do you justify exploiting God's will in the political arena for self serving reasons?...On second thought, how does any so called christian justify exploiting the word of God for any reason?...
thats a good question another one is when and how do we determine the difference between sharing and exploiting,,,? Circumstances surrounding statements are usually a pretty good indicator...Obvious circumstances and those that are not so obvious too...Become informed, especially about politicians running for office.... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Beast Women’s bodies are yet again at the axis of the 2012 election season. All it took was an Indiana Republican Senate candidate saying aloud what many evangelical anti-abortion activists seem to believe—that a pregnancy resulting from a rape is “something God intended to happen.” When asked if he was sorry, Richard Mourdock demurred. “I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologize,” he said. First there was Akin....now Mourdock. as a woman, and a rape survivor, I happen to believe all pregnancies are Gods intention as well not necessarily all the ways in which pregnancies occur, becuase I believe the body is a vessel for the soul and pregnancy is the way souls enter the world smh... Got to shake my head on this one too..
Indiana senate candidate...Republican...Richard Mourdock says this, "Pregnancies resulting from rape are God's will."...Shocking, disappointingly stupid, inappropriate...An affront to human dignity, an affront to christians, an affront to women... Mourdock says his belief stems from faith, DEEP faith....I call bullchit... If, as a christian, you believe all life is a sacred gift from God, how do you justify exploiting God's will in the political arena for self serving reasons?...On second thought, how does any so called christian justify exploiting the word of God for any reason?...
thats a good question another one is when and how do we determine the difference between sharing and exploiting,,,? Circumstances surrounding statements are usually a pretty good indicator...Obvious circumstances and those that are not so obvious too...Become informed, especially about politicians running for office.... I do and I am,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Beast Women’s bodies are yet again at the axis of the 2012 election season. All it took was an Indiana Republican Senate candidate saying aloud what many evangelical anti-abortion activists seem to believe—that a pregnancy resulting from a rape is “something God intended to happen.” When asked if he was sorry, Richard Mourdock demurred. “I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologize,” he said. First there was Akin....now Mourdock. as a woman, and a rape survivor, I happen to believe all pregnancies are Gods intention as well not necessarily all the ways in which pregnancies occur, becuase I believe the body is a vessel for the soul and pregnancy is the way souls enter the world smh... Got to shake my head on this one too..
Indiana senate candidate...Republican...Richard Mourdock says this, "Pregnancies resulting from rape are God's will."...Shocking, disappointingly stupid, inappropriate...An affront to human dignity, an affront to christians, an affront to women... Mourdock says his belief stems from faith, DEEP faith....I call bullchit... If, as a christian, you believe all life is a sacred gift from God, how do you justify exploiting God's will in the political arena for self serving reasons?...On second thought, how does any so called christian justify exploiting the word of God for any reason?...
Not saying that his (Mr Murdock's) wording is correct, but... Mr Murdock may have a DEEP faith in God, that those who have ears to hear may read God's Word for themselves and come away realizing the fact that babies don't deserve to be murdered because they were conceived in chaotic circumstances. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Beast Women’s bodies are yet again at the axis of the 2012 election season. All it took was an Indiana Republican Senate candidate saying aloud what many evangelical anti-abortion activists seem to believe—that a pregnancy resulting from a rape is “something God intended to happen.” When asked if he was sorry, Richard Mourdock demurred. “I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologize,” he said. First there was Akin....now Mourdock. as a woman, and a rape survivor, I happen to believe all pregnancies are Gods intention as well not necessarily all the ways in which pregnancies occur, becuase I believe the body is a vessel for the soul and pregnancy is the way souls enter the world smh... Got to shake my head on this one too..
Indiana senate candidate...Republican...Richard Mourdock says this, "Pregnancies resulting from rape are God's will."...Shocking, disappointingly stupid, inappropriate...An affront to human dignity, an affront to christians, an affront to women... Mourdock says his belief stems from faith, DEEP faith....I call bullchit... If, as a christian, you believe all life is a sacred gift from God, how do you justify exploiting God's will in the political arena for self serving reasons?...On second thought, how does any so called christian justify exploiting the word of God for any reason?...
Not saying that his (Mr Murdock's) wording is correct, but... Mr Murdock may have a DEEP faith in God, that those who have ears to hear may read God's Word for themselves and come away realizing the fact that babies don't deserve to be murdered because they were conceived in chaotic circumstances. I am questioning Mourdock's depth of faith AND his understanding of faith because he contradicts himself...Nothing wrong with that Cerise...If you're going to talk the talk, please walk the walk...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Beast Women’s bodies are yet again at the axis of the 2012 election season. All it took was an Indiana Republican Senate candidate saying aloud what many evangelical anti-abortion activists seem to believe—that a pregnancy resulting from a rape is “something God intended to happen.” When asked if he was sorry, Richard Mourdock demurred. “I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologize,” he said. First there was Akin....now Mourdock. as a woman, and a rape survivor, I happen to believe all pregnancies are Gods intention as well not necessarily all the ways in which pregnancies occur, becuase I believe the body is a vessel for the soul and pregnancy is the way souls enter the world smh... Got to shake my head on this one too..
Indiana senate candidate...Republican...Richard Mourdock says this, "Pregnancies resulting from rape are God's will."...Shocking, disappointingly stupid, inappropriate...An affront to human dignity, an affront to christians, an affront to women... Mourdock says his belief stems from faith, DEEP faith....I call bullchit... If, as a christian, you believe all life is a sacred gift from God, how do you justify exploiting God's will in the political arena for self serving reasons?...On second thought, how does any so called christian justify exploiting the word of God for any reason?...
thats a good question another one is when and how do we determine the difference between sharing and exploiting,,,? Circumstances surrounding statements are usually a pretty good indicator...Obvious circumstances and those that are not so obvious too...Become informed, especially about politicians running for office.... I do and I am,,,, Why you making my answer to your question personal?  Wasn't about you Harmony...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Whether god nature or what have intended rape or not.....I ask you have you ever seen ducks or other animals mate? Its pretty much rape and if it didnt happen the species would not survive I have seen a bull surprise a cow.  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You don't think it's cruel that it's god's will that some women get pregnant via rape? Sorry, but that sounds like a pretty evil god to me. Sing. I figure that God's will post is only one persons opinion. Violence against women is permitted in only one religion at present. That be Islam. Men are rarely convicted of raping Muslim women. Dat's da' facts, maam. This guy wasn't a Muslim, though. Islam isn't his religion. He's a Christian Republican. I've heard that he was just espousing basic Christian belief. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Beast Women’s bodies are yet again at the axis of the 2012 election season. All it took was an Indiana Republican Senate candidate saying aloud what many evangelical anti-abortion activists seem to believe—that a pregnancy resulting from a rape is “something God intended to happen.” When asked if he was sorry, Richard Mourdock demurred. “I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologize,” he said. First there was Akin....now Mourdock. as a woman, and a rape survivor, I happen to believe all pregnancies are Gods intention as well not necessarily all the ways in which pregnancies occur, becuase I believe the body is a vessel for the soul and pregnancy is the way souls enter the world smh... Got to shake my head on this one too..
Indiana senate candidate...Republican...Richard Mourdock says this, "Pregnancies resulting from rape are God's will."...Shocking, disappointingly stupid, inappropriate...An affront to human dignity, an affront to christians, an affront to women... Mourdock says his belief stems from faith, DEEP faith....I call bullchit... If, as a christian, you believe all life is a sacred gift from God, how do you justify exploiting God's will in the political arena for self serving reasons?...On second thought, how does any so called christian justify exploiting the word of God for any reason?...
thats a good question another one is when and how do we determine the difference between sharing and exploiting,,,? Circumstances surrounding statements are usually a pretty good indicator...Obvious circumstances and those that are not so obvious too...Become informed, especially about politicians running for office.... I do and I am,,,, Why you making my answer to your question personal? Wasn't about you Harmony...
my bad, I thought this Circumstances surrounding statements are usually a pretty good indicator...Obvious circumstances and those that are not so obvious too...Become informed, especially about politicians running for office.... was in response to my post above it,,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Beast Women’s bodies are yet again at the axis of the 2012 election season. All it took was an Indiana Republican Senate candidate saying aloud what many evangelical anti-abortion activists seem to believe—that a pregnancy resulting from a rape is “something God intended to happen.” When asked if he was sorry, Richard Mourdock demurred. “I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologize,” he said. First there was Akin....now Mourdock. as a woman, and a rape survivor, I happen to believe all pregnancies are Gods intention as well not necessarily all the ways in which pregnancies occur, becuase I believe the body is a vessel for the soul and pregnancy is the way souls enter the world smh... Got to shake my head on this one too..
Indiana senate candidate...Republican...Richard Mourdock says this, "Pregnancies resulting from rape are God's will."...Shocking, disappointingly stupid, inappropriate...An affront to human dignity, an affront to christians, an affront to women... Mourdock says his belief stems from faith, DEEP faith....I call bullchit... If, as a christian, you believe all life is a sacred gift from God, how do you justify exploiting God's will in the political arena for self serving reasons?...On second thought, how does any so called christian justify exploiting the word of God for any reason?...
thats a good question another one is when and how do we determine the difference between sharing and exploiting,,,? Circumstances surrounding statements are usually a pretty good indicator...Obvious circumstances and those that are not so obvious too...Become informed, especially about politicians running for office.... I do and I am,,,, Why you making my answer to your question personal? Wasn't about you Harmony...
my bad, I thought this Circumstances surrounding statements are usually a pretty good indicator...Obvious circumstances and those that are not so obvious too...Become informed, especially about politicians running for office.... was in response to my post above it,,,, Appreciate this, thank you for saying! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Beast Women’s bodies are yet again at the axis of the 2012 election season. All it took was an Indiana Republican Senate candidate saying aloud what many evangelical anti-abortion activists seem to believe—that a pregnancy resulting from a rape is “something God intended to happen.” When asked if he was sorry, Richard Mourdock demurred. “I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologize,” he said. First there was Akin....now Mourdock. as a woman, and a rape survivor, I happen to believe all pregnancies are Gods intention as well not necessarily all the ways in which pregnancies occur, becuase I believe the body is a vessel for the soul and pregnancy is the way souls enter the world smh... Got to shake my head on this one too..
Indiana senate candidate...Republican...Richard Mourdock says this, "Pregnancies resulting from rape are God's will."...Shocking, disappointingly stupid, inappropriate...An affront to human dignity, an affront to christians, an affront to women... Mourdock says his belief stems from faith, DEEP faith....I call bullchit... If, as a christian, you believe all life is a sacred gift from God, how do you justify exploiting God's will in the political arena for self serving reasons?...On second thought, how does any so called christian justify exploiting the word of God for any reason?...
thats a good question another one is when and how do we determine the difference between sharing and exploiting,,,? Circumstances surrounding statements are usually a pretty good indicator...Obvious circumstances and those that are not so obvious too...Become informed, especially about politicians running for office.... I do and I am,,,, Why you making my answer to your question personal? Wasn't about you Harmony...
my bad, I thought this Circumstances surrounding statements are usually a pretty good indicator...Obvious circumstances and those that are not so obvious too...Become informed, especially about politicians running for office.... was in response to my post above it,,,, Appreciate this, thank you for saying!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I assume pointing out that the Bible standard is to only count a child who is one month old or older as a person; that it advocates killing pregnant women, etc. Chapter and Verse? Nah, if Xians cannot even follow what Jesus taught, I assume that would be pointless.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I assume pointing out that the Bible standard is to only count a child who is one month old or older as a person; that it advocates killing pregnant women, etc. Chapter and Verse? Nah, if Xians cannot even follow what Jesus taught, I assume that would be pointless. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I assume pointing out that the Bible standard is to only count a child who is one month old or older as a person; that it advocates killing pregnant women, etc. Chapter and Verse? Nah, if Xians cannot even follow what Jesus taught, I assume that would be pointless. where did Jesus say children one month or younger are not people? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Beast Women’s bodies are yet again at the axis of the 2012 election season. All it took was an Indiana Republican Senate candidate saying aloud what many evangelical anti-abortion activists seem to believe—that a pregnancy resulting from a rape is “something God intended to happen.” When asked if he was sorry, Richard Mourdock demurred. “I spoke from my heart. And speaking from my heart, speaking from the deepest level of my faith, I would not apologize,” he said. First there was Akin....now Mourdock. Well it is kinda in the bible that woman is supposed to submit. But I think they are taking it a bit far. You know if it is unborn the right wing is all about protecting it (using "it" as I hear the right wingers sound when they speak of them) but once born they couldn't care less about it. It is usually considered punishment for having sex at that point. Who cares if it eats, gets schooled, get healthcare, etc.... So yea, if you were unfortunate enough to raise that penis then suffer the consequences you nasty wench....
I think that is taken out of context, as far as I Remember the bible only requires SPOUSES to submit to each other (man to his wife and woman to her husband) I dont think anywhere does the bible suggest women should submit to any and all men,,, Okay good, then I will shoot them if they try anything. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I assume pointing out that the Bible standard is to only count a child who is one month old or older as a person; that it advocates killing pregnant women, etc. Chapter and Verse? Nah, if Xians cannot even follow what Jesus taught, I assume that would be pointless. where did Jesus say children one month or younger are not people? Where in his post does he say Jesus said it?....TBR said "bible standard"...He """""might""""" have been referring to some of these verses.... http://skepticsannotatedbible.com/says_about/abortion.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Isn't most of that from the Old Testament?
I don't think Christians should pay any attention to any of that. It's old Hebrew law. |
|
|
|
|
