If you want to put a face on the head of the snake look back at the foundation of the East India Trade Company. The Corporation goes back into the 1600s. But the East India Corporation was founded in the early 1700s. These were the first Globalists making money off of the exploitation of others.

Let us look back at the Aztecs for a moment. They reigned trough terror and blood shed. When the Conquistadors met them they found on the way to their capital that the Aztecs had enemies. The Spanish allowed the locals to overthrow the one power that could have had a chance at repelling them from the new land, weakened the indigenous people, and turned on them for GOLD GLORY AND GOD in that order!


Bankers have a plan. One thing they want to destroy American currency and force us onto the American Unified Currency which in principle is just like the European Union. It isn't a government bent on taking over but a clique of businessmen using money to leverage power on us through the auspices of law! Take the Federal Reserve bank for instance. You know it was voted in during Congress's off season by THREE CONGRESSMEN, NOT A TRUE HOUSE VOTE? And WHO IS the Federal Reserve bank? Bankers. A huge issue right now no one is facing is the Sovereignty of our government and its authority base. We allow media to spoon feed us tainted information (as an example the Treyvon martin shooting case where the media was busted red handed!) through a deregulated media in America. The reporters were not sanctioned for their crimes! neither were the media outlets. the whole thing is who gets funded and why are they being funded. Well, Who did Obama help and who did he make foot the bill? I know homeowners of all races right now who tried and got no help.

Why is it Jessie Jackson has never appeared for the benefit of any WHITE VICTIM OF BLACK CRIME? How is it he takes the criminal's side in these situations or just hides in the shadows? A white or Asian civil rights leader that comes to the call of all suffering oppression no matter the color is more respectable than a color myopic or opportunistic bigot. To me the Al Sharptons, Jessie Jacksons, and Lewis Pharrokahns are the Ambulance Chasing Attorneys of Civil Rights.

Yes I am passionate about this problem. I see what goes on in the house of my neighbor (metaphor) and what I see in my own house is contradictory of everything I stand for. I would never treat a woman like property. I would never send a child to die intentionally. I would not make promises of an afterlife I myself am not sure exists. I don't like fighting or killing or cheating. So why is it I am supposed to tolerate something by its own book of rules is something I really should fear?

I can tolerate a Wolverine in the wild but I sure in the hell don't want one in my house! Who wants a pissed off ball of fur trying to eat them all the time? That is a case of animal nature. But Islam is a little different from Wolverines. it is more akin to a disease of thinking! Sadly most religion is a social sickness.

Well, if I know Muslims will lie to me because I am an infidel how can I trust them? Trust does work both ways doesn't it?

BTW, I am terrified of the legacy our generation is leaving behind for our children and their children! We are led by corrupt sell outs who gave us up for their own personal comfort!

And what faith (or honor) is behind the drone attacks in which Americans are responsible for well over 1,000 innocent lives, including pregnant women, babies, and children and there seems to be no pattern or reason for this abhorant action.

it's "not a novel concept" to target enemy leaders for death, pointing out such attacks were made against al-Qaida's chief Osama bin Laden and during World War II, including shooting down an aircraft specifically because it was carrying Japanese Admiral Isoroku Yamamoto, leader of the attack on Pearl Harbor. He said Congress has given the president authorization to use lethal methods under a resolution passed a week after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks that authorizes the use of all necessary force to prevent any future acts of international terrorism against the United States. He said that authority was not limited to battlefields in Afghanistan, because the nation faces a threat of terrorism from "a stateless enemy, prone to shifting operations from country to country."

"It is preferable to capture suspected terrorists where feasible — among other reasons, so that we can gather valuable intelligence from them," Holder said. "But we must also recognize that there are instances where our government has the clear authority — and, I would argue, the responsibility — to defend the United States through the appropriate and lawful use of lethal force."

Holder said that doesn't mean the administration can use military force whenever it wants and that it must respect other nations' sovereignty before acting alone on their soil. "But the use of force in foreign territory would be consistent with these international legal principles if conducted, for example, with the consent of the nation involved or after a determination that the nation is unable or unwilling to deal effectively with a threat to the United States."

Or just watch President Obama discuss the issue in the clip below.

http://youtu.be/VLsNarODIj0

"It is the common fate of the indolent to see their rights become a prey to the active. The condition upon which God hath given liberty to man is eternal vigilance; which condition if he break, servitude is at once the consequence of his crime and the punishment of his guilt."

-John Curran

Ah I see -