Topic: Is the Bible historically accurate? | |
---|---|
Edited by
missyfissy
on
Sun 09/18/11 03:29 PM
|
|
This is a poll. Do you believe the Bible is historically accurate? Does your church teach that the Bible is true and historically accurate? Are all the stories set out and told in the Bible true or are they fiction or a mixture of both? Doesn't every church teach that their interpretation of it, which is different from every other church, is accurate? ;) Seriously though, if you never read any other part of it, the predictions chapter (Revelations) can certainly give most a scare, particularly the appearance of two suns, a burning of the third part of the trees and grass, the dying of a third part of the creatures in the sea, the destruction of a third part of the ships, and finally a third part of mankind that dies of plagues, smoke, and sulphur that will come out of people's mouths. For some reason, I don't think the sulphur will come from eating too much Italian spaghetti. |
|
|
|
some of the stories are historical facts,like the fact that an imaginary God used its magic and poofed everything into existance,then it poofed after puffing on some of the home grown chit it poofed,the life on this planet.Then it poofed this baby into some "virgin womans" womb,sure it did it got a little sumtin sumtin like Zues did.So then this babys daddy decided that the only way to chat with it is through its baby,the baby grew up did some magic tricks and chit,then like a dumba$$ got himself crucified,i think the dude smoked way to much of what daddy poofed to puff. |
|
|
|
.
|
|
|