Topic: Obama supports Bush's police State Patriot Act
jrbogie's photo
Fri 06/17/11 04:36 AM

I submit the following as evidence that they are only called "conspiracy theories" until proper light is shed on them and they are proven to be true.



sounds like your idea of what a theory is flies in the face of this:


"A good theory will describe a large range of phenomena on the basis of a few simple postulates and will make definite predictions that can be tested. If the predictions agree with the observations, the theory survives that test, though it can never be proved to be correct."

Stephen Hawking, The universe in a Nutshell.

jrbogie's photo
Fri 06/17/11 04:43 AM



yes, all you can say is we are doomed. what you obviouslycannot say is what rights and freedoms we have lost which was my question.


The right to privacy.
The right to a lawyer if you are arrested for ANYTHING.
Freedom of information.




whoa People have the right to a lawyer if they are arrested, in fact the police cant talk to you until they marandize you. If a lawyer is requested, one is brought in before they will even talk to the suspect. I deal with this everyday at work. Nice try.


NOT IF YOU ARE CLASSIFIED A "TERRORIST." OR EVEN A DOMESTIC TERRORIST.

Have you ever really read the patriot act?

Yes, a normal arrest, you are marandized, and you can call a lawyer.


yeah, i've read the patriot act. your posts here give me doubts that you have. the kkk has been classified as a terrist organization by the fbi for decades. can you name one arrest of a klansman where maranda did not apply? perhaps if you're to continue along these lines you'd like to cite sections of the patriot act that support your position when you claim that you and i or any citizen has lost any rights or freedoms.

Kleisto's photo
Fri 06/17/11 10:06 AM
Edited by Kleisto on Fri 06/17/11 10:07 AM




yes, all you can say is we are doomed. what you obviouslycannot say is what rights and freedoms we have lost which was my question.


The right to privacy.
The right to a lawyer if you are arrested for ANYTHING.
Freedom of information.




we still have a right to privacy. roe v wade was decided based on that right.


How do we have a right to privacy if they can listen in on our phone conversations?


you still have a right to an abortion and keep it private right? a phone tap requires a warrant even under the patriot act. phone taps are not new at all.


As if they really give a crap about the law jr! They break it all the time! One thing you should remember about them is, they are held to a different standard than we are. Things we couldn't get away with, they can and do on a regular basis.

no photo
Fri 06/17/11 11:19 AM
They work hard to propagate the illusion of freedom and people's rights but all of that goes out the window anytime they decide, and they have the law behind them that allows them to ignore your rights whenever they chose.

Here is an article of interest in this subject about the governments interpretation and use of section 215 of the patriot act.


http://www.aclu.org/blog/national-security/unmasking-secret-law-new-demand-answers-about-governments-hidden-take-patriot



no photo
Fri 06/17/11 11:22 AM
Direct evidence:


http://www.aclu.org/files/patriot_foia/2003/215formappn.pdf

http://www.aclu.org/files/patriot_foia/2003/FBImemo_102903.pdf

http://www.aclu.org/files/patriot_foia/2003/FBIemail_041403.pdf

But I don't know why I waste my time. You can do your own research if you are really interested in the truth.

jrbogie's photo
Fri 06/17/11 04:28 PM
Edited by jrbogie on Fri 06/17/11 04:32 PM
oh, i often do "MY OWN RESEARCH" jeannie, which rarely if ever includes the aclu and is why i never click on links in forums. i'd be reading YOUR research, in this case a highly biased left wing organization, and not my own. irregardless, i'm here to discuss real issues with real people who's position i can challenge and who can likewise challenge me. the auther of a link, news article, youtube video producer, whatever, is never here for me to challenge. what is written in a law, such as the patriot act, is unchallengeable. what is written is written. i said that i've read the act and find nothing in it that supports your contention that i've lost freedoms or rights and i challenge you, who are here to be challenged, to point out where in the act i've missed something?

no photo
Fri 06/17/11 05:41 PM
in this case a highly biased left wing organization


How so?

no photo
Fri 06/17/11 06:01 PM

oh, i often do "MY OWN RESEARCH" jeannie, which rarely if ever includes the aclu and is why i never click on links in forums. i'd be reading YOUR research, in this case a highly biased left wing organization, and not my own. irregardless, i'm here to discuss real issues with real people who's position i can challenge and who can likewise challenge me. the auther of a link, news article, youtube video producer, whatever, is never here for me to challenge. what is written in a law, such as the patriot act, is unchallengeable. what is written is written. i said that i've read the act and find nothing in it that supports your contention that i've lost freedoms or rights and i challenge you, who are here to be challenged, to point out where in the act i've missed something?


If you pick and choose your sources... (only the ones you like and or agree with) then you are the one who is biased.

I read both sides, I read crap, propaganda, official documents, testimony, news papers, books and websites on both sides of an issue.

You have to learn to sort through the agendas and the propaganda in order to see the whole of what is going on. But the best thing to do is to FOLLOW THE MONEY. There is where you will find the criminals.


Kleisto's photo
Fri 06/17/11 06:33 PM


oh, i often do "MY OWN RESEARCH" jeannie, which rarely if ever includes the aclu and is why i never click on links in forums. i'd be reading YOUR research, in this case a highly biased left wing organization, and not my own. irregardless, i'm here to discuss real issues with real people who's position i can challenge and who can likewise challenge me. the auther of a link, news article, youtube video producer, whatever, is never here for me to challenge. what is written in a law, such as the patriot act, is unchallengeable. what is written is written. i said that i've read the act and find nothing in it that supports your contention that i've lost freedoms or rights and i challenge you, who are here to be challenged, to point out where in the act i've missed something?


If you pick and choose your sources... (only the ones you like and or agree with) then you are the one who is biased.

I read both sides, I read crap, propaganda, official documents, testimony, news papers, books and websites on both sides of an issue.

You have to learn to sort through the agendas and the propaganda in order to see the whole of what is going on. But the best thing to do is to FOLLOW THE MONEY. There is where you will find the criminals.




Yep, and ask yourself, why is there a double standard between us and them?

Lpdon's photo
Fri 06/17/11 10:25 PM

Kleisto's photo
Fri 06/17/11 10:42 PM




I think the one that needs to free their mind is you I'm afraid. You are so controlled and conditioned by those who are running the show, and you don't even realize it.

jrbogie's photo
Sat 06/18/11 04:27 AM
Edited by jrbogie on Sat 06/18/11 04:30 AM


oh, i often do "MY OWN RESEARCH" jeannie, which rarely if ever includes the aclu and is why i never click on links in forums. i'd be reading YOUR research, in this case a highly biased left wing organization, and not my own. irregardless, i'm here to discuss real issues with real people who's position i can challenge and who can likewise challenge me. the auther of a link, news article, youtube video producer, whatever, is never here for me to challenge. what is written in a law, such as the patriot act, is unchallengeable. what is written is written. i said that i've read the act and find nothing in it that supports your contention that i've lost freedoms or rights and i challenge you, who are here to be challenged, to point out where in the act i've missed something?


If you pick and choose your sources... (only the ones you like and or agree with) then you are the one who is biased.

I read both sides, I read crap, propaganda, official documents, testimony, news papers, books and websites on both sides of an issue.

You have to learn to sort through the agendas and the propaganda in order to see the whole of what is going on. But the best thing to do is to FOLLOW THE MONEY. There is where you will find the criminals.





jeannie, how can you know my sources are biased when you've not a clue what my sources are. i too have used the aclu as a reference from time to time and i never said it is a source that i don't like. good that you read both sides but not having a side i do my best to read ALL sides. i have learned to "sort through the agendas and the propaganda' which is why i've developed my own HIGHLY VARIED sources, some biased left, some right, some no bias at all, and have neither the time or inclination to click on a source here that someone with an obvious agenda has posted.

jrbogie's photo
Sat 06/18/11 04:36 AM



oh, i often do "MY OWN RESEARCH" jeannie, which rarely if ever includes the aclu and is why i never click on links in forums. i'd be reading YOUR research, in this case a highly biased left wing organization, and not my own. irregardless, i'm here to discuss real issues with real people who's position i can challenge and who can likewise challenge me. the auther of a link, news article, youtube video producer, whatever, is never here for me to challenge. what is written in a law, such as the patriot act, is unchallengeable. what is written is written. i said that i've read the act and find nothing in it that supports your contention that i've lost freedoms or rights and i challenge you, who are here to be challenged, to point out where in the act i've missed something?


If you pick and choose your sources... (only the ones you like and or agree with) then you are the one who is biased.

I read both sides, I read crap, propaganda, official documents, testimony, news papers, books and websites on both sides of an issue.

You have to learn to sort through the agendas and the propaganda in order to see the whole of what is going on. But the best thing to do is to FOLLOW THE MONEY. There is where you will find the criminals.




Yep, and ask yourself, why is there a double standard between us and them?



this "us an them" mentality may just be the most distructive, devicive problem with our political system today. we will never enjoy a free, harmonious, equal liberties for all country, much less a have a government that works well, until this kind of thinking has given way to what thomas paine called, "common sense." if you affiliate with any political party that you call "us", your the major part of the problem in this country today.

Kleisto's photo
Sat 06/18/11 09:47 AM




oh, i often do "MY OWN RESEARCH" jeannie, which rarely if ever includes the aclu and is why i never click on links in forums. i'd be reading YOUR research, in this case a highly biased left wing organization, and not my own. irregardless, i'm here to discuss real issues with real people who's position i can challenge and who can likewise challenge me. the auther of a link, news article, youtube video producer, whatever, is never here for me to challenge. what is written in a law, such as the patriot act, is unchallengeable. what is written is written. i said that i've read the act and find nothing in it that supports your contention that i've lost freedoms or rights and i challenge you, who are here to be challenged, to point out where in the act i've missed something?


If you pick and choose your sources... (only the ones you like and or agree with) then you are the one who is biased.

I read both sides, I read crap, propaganda, official documents, testimony, news papers, books and websites on both sides of an issue.

You have to learn to sort through the agendas and the propaganda in order to see the whole of what is going on. But the best thing to do is to FOLLOW THE MONEY. There is where you will find the criminals.




Yep, and ask yourself, why is there a double standard between us and them?



this "us an them" mentality may just be the most distructive, devicive problem with our political system today. we will never enjoy a free, harmonious, equal liberties for all country, much less a have a government that works well, until this kind of thinking has given way to what thomas paine called, "common sense." if you affiliate with any political party that you call "us", your the major part of the problem in this country today.


The irony here is they work to divide us all the time.......and they have.

jrbogie's photo
Sat 06/18/11 09:53 AM
you've made your point quite clear. you are in the group of "us" and will fight "them" to the death if need be never accomplishing anything on either side. not unlike our congress.

no photo
Sat 06/18/11 11:22 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sat 06/18/11 11:33 AM
Yes, I would fight 'them' to the death.

You will know who "THEM" are by their sick perverted "evil" deeds. You will know "Them" by their lies, their crimes, their propaganda, and their human rights violations. They start wars, commit genocide, torture and rape. They steal the wealth from the people.

I will fight that kind of tyranny. Will you?


Kleisto's photo
Sat 06/18/11 11:29 AM

you've made your point quite clear. you are in the group of "us" and will fight "them" to the death if need be never accomplishing anything on either side. not unlike our congress.


Ok, well what do you suggest we do then? Keep letting them **** us over any way they want? Cause that's what they're doing.

no photo
Sat 06/18/11 11:37 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Sat 06/18/11 11:38 AM
I'm not talking about "left wing" or "right wing" petty bull sheet.

I am talking about tyranny and lies and the chipping away of our freedom. Chip chip chip chip.

There is no "justice for all" only for the few. If they want to destroy you.... they can and they will. Does that sound paranoid?


Its only paranoid if it is NOT true. huh

Kleisto's photo
Sat 06/18/11 12:11 PM

I'm not talking about "left wing" or "right wing" petty bull sheet.

I am talking about tyranny and lies and the chipping away of our freedom. Chip chip chip chip.

There is no "justice for all" only for the few. If they want to destroy you.... they can and they will. Does that sound paranoid?


Its only paranoid if it is NOT true. huh


There's an oft used religious quote that could apply to this. That being, the biggest lie the government could ever concoct is that their evils do not exist.

msharmony's photo
Sat 06/18/11 12:39 PM
evil gets slung around alot in these threads,,,

that being said,, most people, I would hope, realize that a government made of HUMANS will have the same afflictions the rest of the human race does

meaning, good and bad, good judgment and bad judgment, righteousness and unrighteousness

unless we remove humans from the equation , we cant stop these things from HAPPENING

we can only deter the frequency with which they happen by responding with corrective measure