Topic: What is your Inner scripture?
no photo
Thu 03/31/11 11:45 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 03/31/11 11:46 AM


If everyone had the same point of view there would only be the one.


no photo
Thu 03/31/11 11:47 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Thu 03/31/11 11:48 AM


While ignorance is curable,
you can't fix "stupid."



flowers

no photo
Fri 04/01/11 10:15 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Fri 04/01/11 10:18 AM
Truth is at hand.

~~~ creativesoul Fri 04/01/11 01:49



http://mingle2.com/topic/show/294230?page=28

Milesoftheusa's photo
Fri 04/01/11 10:28 AM

You will treat others with respect and only judge character. Miles 101

creativesoul's photo
Fri 04/01/11 02:09 PM
"If I agreed with you Randy, we would both be wrong."

Steven Tyler of Aerosmith during an episode of American Idol, 2011.

I laughed so hard I cried.

krupa's photo
Fri 04/01/11 06:32 PM
Do unto others as they have done unto you.

But better.

Love with more love.
Hate with more hate.

Basic stuff.

No forgiving. No Forgetting.


krupa's photo
Fri 04/01/11 06:37 PM
That is just a personal creedo.

And it works...

make your loved ones feel truly loved...cause that is where your own love will come from...if you don't give love freely...you will never receive the free love you seek.

Make your enemies afraid to look you in the eye...

They are then, no longer your enemies.

Redykeulous's photo
Fri 04/01/11 07:20 PM

Yes I do have multiple personalities. I call them "the council." They are all different aspects of me. I believe everyone has these if they will pay attention. They are the human psyches.

These psyches can be split apart and that is what is called a multiple personality disorder. My psyches are not split apart. They cooperate and communicate with each other.



Now don't get excited or anything - but you have some ideas there that I agree with.

BUT, I'm sure this is a surface issue because at the heart of the matter I'm sure you and I would have vastly different views. For example, you contend that a psyche can split apart and cause multiple personality disorder and I do not.

But I just found it interesting that some other person would even make a suggestion so close to my own view that people have found to be so strange.


As for my reply to the OP:::
Just one of my common laments in responce to the daily stresses that tend to make me think hell is real - until I tell myself


"This can't be hell, I don't even believe in god."

what

no photo
Fri 04/01/11 08:24 PM
Now don't get excited or anything - but you have some ideas there that I agree with.

BUT, I'm sure this is a surface issue because at the heart of the matter I'm sure you and I would have vastly different views. For example, you contend that a psyche can split apart and cause multiple personality disorder and I do not.



Why would I get "excited?"

The multiple personality disorder, I believe, is probably a controversial one. Some people may say it does not exist; but I believe there are documented cases. But from what I have read, MK Ultra was a government mind control program that utilized trauma to split the psyche's.... horribly -- on young children.




Redykeulous's photo
Sat 04/02/11 06:32 AM

Now don't get excited or anything - but you have some ideas there that I agree with.

BUT, I'm sure this is a surface issue because at the heart of the matter I'm sure you and I would have vastly different views. For example, you contend that a psyche can split apart and cause multiple personality disorder and I do not.



Why would I get "excited?"

The multiple personality disorder, I believe, is probably a controversial one. Some people may say it does not exist; but I believe there are documented cases. But from what I have read, MK Ultra was a government mind control program that utilized trauma to split the psyche's.... horribly -- on young children.




I think our personalities are formed by the events we experience. At some point we leave a sort of snap shot behind which occurs as we develop, cognitively, physiologically, and mentally through experiences. That snapshot holds all the pieces that make us who we are so they are 'foundational' building blocks. It's becasue we tend to create these snapshots that loose the ability to recall events directly related to us in that particular time frame or we may recall some thing but not accurately or without understanding what the event actually meant.

Like you, I believe that trauma or great stress that occurs within a 'frame of referene' (the snapshot period)can resurface if or when an individual is faced with severe or consistent trauma or stress.

Not every reacts to such events to the extreme of completely retreating or reliving a previous snapshop experience and often those who do have placed themselves into an experience consistent with an altered state of reality - in other words, the snapshop bears little resemblence to what was once expereinced.

ANYWAY - the following is an example of the kind of stuff that just ticks me off..

Richard McGarrah Helms (March 30, 1913 – October 22, 2002) was the Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) from 1966 to 1973. He was the only director to have been convicted of lying to the United States Congress over Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) undercover activities. In 1977, he was sentenced to the maximum fine and received a suspended two-year prison sentence.

That is the guy who ordered the distruction of all the files pertaining to CIA ordered MKUltra experiments. The files missed in that distruction allowed for some follow up on who was involved and at least some of what happend and what the goals had orignally been. If I understand correcly, those files have all been declassified.

Why does a government hirarchy have the right to destroy any information or research pertaining to the government that the people allow, support and pay for and get a slap on the wrist? And what happened to all those people who participated in the that research which harmed individuals?? Another one of the sad but true in governance.

no photo
Sun 04/03/11 06:26 PM
Why does a government hirarchy have the right to destroy any information or research pertaining to the government that the people allow, support and pay for and get a slap on the wrist? And what happened to all those people who participated in the that research which harmed individuals?? Another one of the sad but true in governance.



A government doesn't. However there are those operating in the world who create governments, own politicians and judges etc. They are outside of the law...... literally. I will tell you why.

The United States of America is a corporation. (Yes, America is a country, but the United States is a corporation. Said corporation is run by the "government" which is more like the board of directors of the corporation.

All laws of the United States of America are corporate laws. Anyone who claims to be a citizen of the United States of America is subject to those laws and protections provided. Non-citizens... that's a bit tricky. Sovereign citizens of America are not subject to those laws within their sovereign community if they do it right. (Native Americans, the Amish, etc.) They don't pay income taxes, social security etc.

The people who own the corporation... are basically criminals according to corporate laws, but to them, they are not because they are above the law.




RainbowTrout's photo
Mon 04/04/11 05:43 AM
I think for my ex and me it would have to be the first commandment because we were both control freaks.:smile:

no photo
Mon 04/04/11 08:05 AM

I think for my ex and me it would have to be the first commandment because we were both control freaks.:smile:



I was actually looking for your own personal inner scripture, not someone else's commandments.

no photo
Mon 04/04/11 08:07 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Mon 04/04/11 08:07 AM
Where the future is concerned, intent will set the event up. It can be changed, but only if intent is changed."

Abracadabra's photo
Mon 04/04/11 08:50 AM


I think for my ex and me it would have to be the first commandment because we were both control freaks.:smile:



I was actually looking for your own personal inner scripture, not someone else's commandments.


That's still inner scripture. Just because the authors of the Bible used it first doesn't render it invalid for other people. bigsmile

no photo
Mon 04/04/11 09:45 AM



I think for my ex and me it would have to be the first commandment because we were both control freaks.:smile:



I was actually looking for your own personal inner scripture, not someone else's commandments.


That's still inner scripture. Just because the authors of the Bible used it first doesn't render it invalid for other people. bigsmile


True, as we are all one and all connected, there is no such thing as plagiarism either. If you believe and live by your inner scripture, then it is yours.

no photo
Mon 04/04/11 11:52 AM
God is for all. No religious doctrine owns God.

ArtGurl's photo
Sat 05/28/11 01:26 PM
Live fully, love openly and make a difference



I try ...

no photo
Sat 05/28/11 02:37 PM
"There is no try. There is only do or do not do."

~Yoda, Jedi master. bigsmile

wux's photo
Sat 05/28/11 08:17 PM
"Eat when you are hungry, kiss when you are thirsty, f when you are needy, and worship when you are stupid."