100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
| Topic: last seen over a month ago... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
You know... Maybe it's just me, but it really sucks when a profile description is that of a wonderful woman, who's last login was "over a month ago." especially when you realize that she's 2 years older than the age she puts in her description... Does this bother anyone else? I mean, it may be true that this person hasn't been on in over a month, but over a month seems to turn into an understatement after awhile... Just sayin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you 100%
I would say they should deleted unused accounts after 3 months if they haven't been accessed in that time but they wouldn't do that because they like to keep members numbers up to attract advertising etc. But I know what you mean it is annoying, on the other hand there are plenty of lovely women/girls on here that are current so that more than makes up for it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What you can do is, on your Search results,
check about halfway through the list to see when the 'last time on' is. If at that point, you are already into the 'Not seen in over 30 days' profiles, go further forward in the list. As you can go further backward if they are more current. I believe the Search results are 'ordered' by when they last visited. Hence, the more current, the closer to the top of your Search results. Once you see someone who has not been there in over 30 days, all others beneath them are at least that noncurrent. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What you can do is, on your Search results, check about halfway through the list to see when the 'last time on' is. If at that point, you are already into the 'Not seen in over 30 days' profiles, go further forward in the list. As you can go further backward if they are more current. I believe the Search results are 'ordered' by when they last visited. Hence, the more current, the closer to the top of your Search results. Once you see someone who has not been there in over 30 days, all others beneath them are at least that noncurrent. I wonder how those people feel by being referenced at as "noncurrent". A conversation between two such persons might go this way: Bill: How are you, Joe? Joe: Eh... noncurrent. Bill: Bummer. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow me to simplify this for you Homeboy...
Don't look at profiles... Look at who is posting in the forums...you KNOW those people are active. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
wux
on
Thu 03/24/11 07:45 PM
|
|
I agree with you 100% I would say they should deleted unused accounts after 3 months if they haven't been accessed in that time but they wouldn't do that because they like to keep members numbers up to attract advertising etc. But I know what you mean it is annoying, on the other hand there are plenty of lovely women/girls on here that are current so that more than makes up for it. I feel your pain, you guy and OP, but I have no similar problems. I've been a regular on all kinds of dating sites for more than five years. I am single, straight as the road to salvation, hard too, (okay, not narrow, granted), extremely rich and funny. But I have not gone out on one date yet. Every woman so far rejected me. Some did not even reply to my letter. You guys could make a thread out of that too, if it happned to you. Rude, init? The thing is so bad that I don't get spam even from hookers on the sites. Once a gay guy wrote to me that he liked me, but after I posted my photo, he wrote again, excusing himself, that it will be an early nightie-nightie for him because he has to catch a flu in the morning. Anyhow. On June seventh, 2007, at 2:04 pm. a woman wrote she wanted to meet me. I saw her picture, she looked decent. We emailed for a week, we phoned, eventually I went over to her house to pick her up. I was a half hour late, because the plane connection was quick in Anmsterdarm, and I got to Bangkog in good time. So I am sitting in the cAr, checking my txt messages, and lo and behold, she said she was terribly sorry, but her Siamese twin was having her tonsils out that day. Could she take a rain check? I wrote the check, but the ink was washed away, coz it was the monsoon season. Dreck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What you can do is, on your Search results, check about halfway through the list to see when the 'last time on' is. If at that point, you are already into the 'Not seen in over 30 days' profiles, go further forward in the list. As you can go further backward if they are more current. I believe the Search results are 'ordered' by when they last visited. Hence, the more current, the closer to the top of your Search results. Once you see someone who has not been there in over 30 days, all others beneath them are at least that noncurrent. I wonder how those people feel by being referenced at as "noncurrent". A conversation between two such persons might go this way: Bill: How are you, Joe? Joe: Eh... noncurrent. Bill: Bummer. haha! i was noncurrent once made rafting a drag. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
haha! i was noncurrent once made rafting a drag. Imagine if you were an electrician. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allow me to simplify this for you Homeboy... Don't look at profiles... Look at who is posting in the forums...you KNOW those people are active. And might I add, a lot of fun to get to know.. :) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know... Maybe it's just me, but it really sucks when a profile description is that of a wonderful woman, who's last login was "over a month ago." especially when you realize that she's 2 years older than the age she puts in her description... Does this bother anyone else? I mean, it may be true that this person hasn't been on in over a month, but over a month seems to turn into an understatement after awhile... Just sayin. Maybe the person found who they were looking for.. Or maybe something happened in their life.. There could be any number of possibilities as to why they are not on anymore |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you 100% I would say they should deleted unused accounts after 3 months if they haven't been accessed in that time but they wouldn't do that because they like to keep members numbers up to attract advertising etc. But I know what you mean it is annoying, on the other hand there are plenty of lovely women/girls on here that are current so that more than makes up for it. I feel your pain, you guy and OP, but I have no similar problems. I've been a regular on all kinds of dating sites for more than five years. I am single, straight as the road to salvation, hard too, (okay, not narrow, granted), extremely rich and funny. But I have not gone out on one date yet. Every woman so far rejected me. Some did not even reply to my letter. You guys could make a thread out of that too, if it happned to you. Rude, init? The thing is so bad that I don't get spam even from hookers on the sites. Once a gay guy wrote to me that he liked me, but after I posted my photo, he wrote again, excusing himself, that it will be an early nightie-nightie for him because he has to catch a flu in the morning. Anyhow. On June seventh, 2007, at 2:04 pm. a woman wrote she wanted to meet me. I saw her picture, she looked decent. We emailed for a week, we phoned, eventually I went over to her house to pick her up. I was a half hour late, because the plane connection was quick in Anmsterdarm, and I got to Bangkog in good time. So I am sitting in the cAr, checking my txt messages, and lo and behold, she said she was terribly sorry, but her Siamese twin was having her tonsils out that day. Could she take a rain check? I wrote the check, but the ink was washed away, coz it was the monsoon season. Dreck. Shite, love, I would have at least let you stare at me over a free lunch before I let my Siamese twin get his tonsils out. I would have told him, "suck it up, buttercup, you're getting a free lunch." |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
wux
on
Thu 03/24/11 09:38 PM
|
|
What you can do is, on your Search results, check about halfway through the list to see when the 'last time on' is. If at that point, you are already into the 'Not seen in over 30 days' profiles, go further forward in the list. As you can go further backward if they are more current. I believe the Search results are 'ordered' by when they last visited. Hence, the more current, the closer to the top of your Search results. Once you see someone who has not been there in over 30 days, all others beneath them are at least that noncurrent. I wonder how those people feel by being referenced at as "noncurrent". A conversation between two such persons might go this way: Bill: How are you, Joe? Joe: Eh... noncurrent. Bill: Bummer. haha! i was noncurrent once made rafting a drag. I am glad you regained your currency (i.e. flow)... By drafting a rag. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with you 100% I would say they should deleted unused accounts after 3 months if they haven't been accessed in that time but they wouldn't do that because they like to keep members numbers up to attract advertising etc. But I know what you mean it is annoying, on the other hand there are plenty of lovely women/girls on here that are current so that more than makes up for it. I feel your pain, you guy and OP, but I have no similar problems. I've been a regular on all kinds of dating sites for more than five years. I am single, straight as the road to salvation, hard too, (okay, not narrow, granted), extremely rich and funny. But I have not gone out on one date yet. Every woman so far rejected me. Some did not even reply to my letter. You guys could make a thread out of that too, if it happned to you. Rude, init? The thing is so bad that I don't get spam even from hookers on the sites. Once a gay guy wrote to me that he liked me, but after I posted my photo, he wrote again, excusing himself, that it will be an early nightie-nightie for him because he has to catch a flu in the morning. Anyhow. On June seventh, 2007, at 2:04 pm. a woman wrote she wanted to meet me. I saw her picture, she looked decent. We emailed for a week, we phoned, eventually I went over to her house to pick her up. I was a half hour late, because the plane connection was quick in Anmsterdarm, and I got to Bangkog in good time. So I am sitting in the cAr, checking my txt messages, and lo and behold, she said she was terribly sorry, but her Siamese twin was having her tonsils out that day. Could she take a rain check? I wrote the check, but the ink was washed away, coz it was the monsoon season. Dreck. Shite, love, I would have at least let you stare at me over a free lunch before I let my Siamese twin get his tonsils out. I would have told him, "suck it up, buttercup, you're getting a free lunch." Yeah, you know how it is... two heads are better than one. I was actually looking forward to that. BTW, I am not extremely rich. NO. I am poor. Geese, it never pays to lie. Now I have had twenty-eight guys and gals asking me for a loan, on the email, and forty-hudnred investment advice. Fer crying out loud, I don't even know the value of money. I... AM... NOT... RICH... SORRY FOR THE LIE, I TAKE IT BACK AND APOLOGIZE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You know... Maybe it's just me, but it really sucks when a profile description is that of a wonderful woman, who's last login was "over a month ago." especially when you realize that she's 2 years older than the age she puts in her description... Does this bother anyone else? I mean, it may be true that this person hasn't been on in over a month, but over a month seems to turn into an understatement after awhile... Just sayin. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maybe it's just me but I think it is best to reserve complaining about not getting any action until you have been here longer than five days..I'm just saying.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
What you can do is, on your Search results, check about halfway through the list to see when the 'last time on' is. If at that point, you are already into the 'Not seen in over 30 days' profiles, go further forward in the list. As you can go further backward if they are more current. I believe the Search results are 'ordered' by when they last visited. Hence, the more current, the closer to the top of your Search results. Once you see someone who has not been there in over 30 days, all others beneath them are at least that noncurrent. Noncurrent?  I guess being AC/DC kinda minimizes my chances then?  
|
|
|
|
|
