Well I would not be so sure about that. People have been documented even in this day and age of having come back from the dead. Do a search on Google and you will find that while being uncommon, has happened.

That is not to say anyone can prove someone did that 2000 years ago.

May not be able to prove a resurrection, but another idea is that the guy was not fully dead. With enough blood loss and maybe a heart defect when checked to see if he was still alive the flunky who did this made a mistake. Then the person they now call Jesus woke up a few days later.

Another idea is since he was suppose to have a following at the time then someone stole the body and put it somewhere else...

How many of those people were dead for three days?

There are many stories about zombies in Haiti. But, it was discovered Voodoo practitioners were using a poison that only made people appear to be dead.

Have you ever heard of Occom's Razer?


(That is an over simplification, but I think it'll suffice for my purposes here.)

What do you think is more likely? That god sent his son down from heaven to be nailed to a cross and free mankind from sin or someone made up a story to suit their needs at the time?

Three days seems to be the magic number. I found two stories of men who were dead for three days and came back to life. One was in a cold storage locker for three days after having been pronounced dead by a doctor and came alive during autopsy. He lives in Texas.

The other was in another country. A man was dead for three days during a battle and even had maggots eating his flesh when he came back.

I have stated before, that the story itself in the New Testament is primarily a fiction. That is not to say that coming back to life is not possible, as there have been more than one documented cases of that happening.

Dead is dead and no one comes back. If someone came back they weren't dead, someone made a mistake or they lied.

I guess you are all knowing then.

I know what I know. When I don't know, I keep quiet, keep an open mind and try to learn. When I'm wrong, I admit it. But, you'll seldom catch me in the wrong, because when I post something I'm pretty damn sure about it before I post it. I do my research. And I don't pretend to know something when I don't.

Education is my passion. I spend all the time I can learning all I can about the world we live in as well as what motivates us. I am fascinated by science, history, economics, politics and evolutionary psychology. Then I love talking about it with others. If I can argue it, I must know an understand it.

OMG last night I may have found the answer to my dilemma about infinity. Its pretty incredible and I am not a mathematician by a very very long shot. It has to do with frequency/vibration and the length of a planck in time. The length of a planck depends on frequency of origin.

I don't know how to type the symbols anyway.

I had been thinking that the length of a planck was infinitely small, hence could not be measured or found. I now believe the length of a planck depends on vibration/frequency. (This is probably not new to scientists.)

But I think the fluctuation between -t and +t has to do with vibration. Perhaps the present moment in time (NOW) has what I call "wiggle room." This wiggle room may account for the popping in and out of existence of particles that scientists say are going forward and backward in time.

Its the "thing" between +t and -t that is very interesting....

oops wrong thread.... sorry to be so off topic.