100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: how wake up a woman correctly ? | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
Scrambled eggs, bacon, toast and coffee.... :) thank you! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
mylifetoday
on
Sat 03/19/11 02:13 PM
|
|
WUX,
I'm sorry you misunderstood what I was saying. I quoted you only as the latest example of how this passage can be twisted to suit the desires of men who want to have evidence their inappropriate behavior is acceptable. My reply was to people in general. I'm sorry, a lot of time I use the word "you" I mean it in the plural or general meaning of the word. In this case when I said "you" I was talking to everyone in general to look from their own point of view. It was not directed at you specifically at all. As a matter of fact, my response was in general towards all men that use this passage to defend their own behavior. As far as your claim the passage is logically flawed is based on a false premise. That being, the relationships you describe where it would be logically flawed would not exist for long. A woman that wouldn't want to inflict pain on her man would leave him if he continually asks or he leave her because she doesn't. What your logic is implying is when two people start dating that they must stay together and be with someone they don't want to be with. Paul is saying what the two should do in a loving relationship. I personally can't see anyone that is either a masochist or a sadist being capable of having a loving relationship. The desire to receive or inflict pain is contradictory with a loving relationship. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yeah, that Bible thing wouldn't go over well, it might be used as a weapon if some guy nattered it at me.
 That said, if I wake up in the morning, I'm up and going. No breakfast in bed, or funny business (yes, I'm terribly unromantic!  ). I get animals up, out, fed, etc. before I sit down and eat, even when I'm horrendously sick. THEN I get to come in, grab a bite and continue on with the day's work (or go back to bed, if I'm horrendously sick!). Usually takes me an hour. I got 4 days off, when I had heart surgery several years ago, and that's because I was in the hospital those 4 days. After that, things had to be done (very carefully, and slowly) but they got done. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
  i would wake up her... with a breakfast and you??? what would you make? The sound of the vaccum cleaner and the smell of clean laundry. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUX, I'm sorry you misunderstood what I was saying. I quoted you only as the latest example of how this passage can be twisted to suit the desires of men who want to have evidence their inappropriate behavior is acceptable. My reply was to people in general. I'm sorry, a lot of time I use the word "you" I mean it in the plural or general meaning of the word. In this case when I said "you" I was talking to everyone in general to look from their own point of view. It was not directed at you specifically at all. As a matter of fact, my response was in general towards all men that use this passage to defend their own behavior. As far as your claim the passage is logically flawed is based on a false premise. That being, the relationships you describe where it would be logically flawed would not exist for long. A woman that wouldn't want to inflict pain on her man would leave him if he continually asks or he leave her because she doesn't. What your logic is implying is when two people start dating that they must stay together and be with someone they don't want to be with. Paul is saying what the two should do in a loving relationship. I personally can't see anyone that is either a masochist or a sadist being capable of having a loving relationship. The desire to receive or inflict pain is contradictory with a loving relationship. You are again besmirching my reputation. This can go on forever, this is my last post. You couldn't heave used my post to show how man can twist the passage etc., because I did not twist it. I just took for what it said. I am sorry, I won't stand for simply decrying me for your lack of capacities and poor faculties of reasoning. What you say I was implying was equivalent to saying that the sky is blue becuase the air on a G-string is generally sublidimidual. You are now trying to toy with me, I am sure, and go play with yourself in the dark. That's an imperative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WUX, I'm sorry you misunderstood what I was saying. I quoted you only as the latest example of how this passage can be twisted to suit the desires of men who want to have evidence their inappropriate behavior is acceptable. My reply was to people in general. I'm sorry, a lot of time I use the word "you" I mean it in the plural or general meaning of the word. In this case when I said "you" I was talking to everyone in general to look from their own point of view. It was not directed at you specifically at all. As a matter of fact, my response was in general towards all men that use this passage to defend their own behavior. As far as your claim the passage is logically flawed is based on a false premise. That being, the relationships you describe where it would be logically flawed would not exist for long. A woman that wouldn't want to inflict pain on her man would leave him if he continually asks or he leave her because she doesn't. What your logic is implying is when two people start dating that they must stay together and be with someone they don't want to be with. Paul is saying what the two should do in a loving relationship. I personally can't see anyone that is either a masochist or a sadist being capable of having a loving relationship. The desire to receive or inflict pain is contradictory with a loving relationship. You are again besmirching my reputation. This can go on forever, this is my last post. You couldn't heave used my post to show how man can twist the passage etc., because I did not twist it. I just took for what it said. I am sorry, I won't stand for simply decrying me for your lack of capacities and poor faculties of reasoning. What you say I was implying was equivalent to saying that the sky is blue becuase the air on a G-string is generally sublidimidual. You are now trying to toy with me, I am sure, and go play with yourself in the dark. That's an imperative. ??????? I don't understand your umbrage. I wasn't trying to besmirch you or your reputation. If you feel I did, you may want to rethink your posts. I was trying to appologize for a misunderstand and get insulted for it. I don't get it. You said a woman must submit even when she finds it abhorrent. I was saying she would leave before she would fall under the guide in his passage. Namely being married to him. That is the flaw in your argument. The situation would not exist. Rather than acknowledge that, you claim righteous indignation for an attack that does not exist. Then feel justified in insulting me. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There is no corect way to wake a woman. It changes everyday and by the time you figure it out, she gone to bed for the night.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ohhh hell if a man wakes me up the
right way we will both have a great morning..... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Of course LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i would wake up her... with a breakfast and you??? what would you make? The sound of the vaccum cleaner and the smell of clean laundry. Waking up to the vacuum cleaner and the washing machine making noise would be horrible! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not if it was done right. LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i would wake up her... with a breakfast and you??? what would you make? Pinch her butt , kiss it then breakfast in bed ... whatever she likes |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i would wake up her... with a breakfast and you??? what would you make? Pinch her butt , kiss it then breakfast in bed ... whatever she likes just take it easy on those sweetcheeks hombre |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Personally, I believe in Sunday Breakfast. We wake up, make breakfast together, end up having sex on the kitchen floor. GOOD MORNING!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have a strange craving for some pancakes now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i would wake up her... with a breakfast and you??? what would you make? Pinch her butt , kiss it then breakfast in bed ... whatever she likes just take it easy on those sweetcheeks hombre Will do
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Browneydone
on
Sat 03/19/11 09:34 PM
|
|
wake her up with soft gentle warm kisses on her neck and all down her body....treating her like she needs to be treated
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i would wake up her... with a breakfast and you??? what would you make? Pinch her butt , kiss it then breakfast in bed ... whatever she likes just take it easy on those sweetcheeks hombre Will do 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not if it was done right. LOL ya - like certain sounds and scents are comfort - remind us of being cared for as kids - homey sounds for me it's the smell of coffee & cigarettes - reminds me of my folks when I was little |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
simply say,
yo, wake up biaaaaatch! : D |
|
|
|
|
