Topic: What is God?
CowboyGH's photo
Sun 03/20/11 09:25 PM

Cowboy wrote:

It is all purely about love. Is it love for one to give their life for another? Of course it is, people from the military are honored all the time and many individual people are honored in memory for giving their life up to save another all the time as well.

Is it love to give the last piece of bread to another even though you are starving?

Is it love to give the last drink of water to another even though you are dehydrated?

That is definitely a sign of love. Same goes with sacrificing animals to God. Food, especially meat wasn't as abundant then as it is now. It was a sacrifice to give their best bull to God. Jesus felt the pain of death for you, he didn't "have" to. He could have lived his life how ever he wished to live it. But he sacrificed his life for you giving us the new covenant between man and God. That is love right there, willing to give up everything and feel incredible pain so that another would not have to.


I'm sorry Cowboy but I don't accept anything you have to say here. You're attempting to belittle God and reduce God to the helplessness of a mere mortal person.

You say,

It is all purely about love. Is it love for one to give their life for another? Of course it is, people from the military are honored all the time and many individual people are honored in memory for giving their life up to save another all the time as well.


Humans go to war because they feel they have no other way to solve the problem. Let's hope they aren't going to war because it's their preferred method of solving a problem!

With God all things are possible. So you can't have a God "sacrificing his son" to save mankind. That would imply that God was either too inept to figure out a better way to solve the problem, thus being less than "all-wise", or that he had no choice, which would imply that's he's not all-powerful and not all things are possible for him.

So your lame analogy of comparing God with the desperate acts of humans who can't do any better only suggests that you believe that God is just as helpless and inept as mortal men.

You can't have an all-powerful, all-wise God doing "desperate things" because he has no choice to do better. That would be an inept God who can't do any better than mere mortal men.

So your analogy breaks down in a deeply serious way.

I don't buy it.

You're asking me to believe that God is just as helpless and powerless as mere mortal men.







With God all things are possible. So you can't have a God "sacrificing his son" to save mankind. That would imply that God was either too inept to figure out a better way to solve the problem, thus being less than "all-wise", or that he had no choice, which would imply that's he's not all-powerful and not all things are possible for him.


God didn't sacrifice Jesus. Jesus sacrificed himself. And God is all powerful and all knowing. That is the reason it's such a beautiful loving thing Jesus did. Jesus knew the outcome of his coming and giving us the new covenant, but was willing to do it regardless of the outcome of the crucifixion. Jesus was willing to go through the pain and agony of the crucifixion for you because he loves you.

freakyshiki2009's photo
Mon 03/21/11 08:32 AM
This is an easy question.

God is not a what, but a who. And God is love.

no photo
Mon 03/21/11 09:55 AM


Cowboy wrote:

It is all purely about love. Is it love for one to give their life for another? Of course it is, people from the military are honored all the time and many individual people are honored in memory for giving their life up to save another all the time as well.

Is it love to give the last piece of bread to another even though you are starving?

Is it love to give the last drink of water to another even though you are dehydrated?

That is definitely a sign of love. Same goes with sacrificing animals to God. Food, especially meat wasn't as abundant then as it is now. It was a sacrifice to give their best bull to God. Jesus felt the pain of death for you, he didn't "have" to. He could have lived his life how ever he wished to live it. But he sacrificed his life for you giving us the new covenant between man and God. That is love right there, willing to give up everything and feel incredible pain so that another would not have to.


I'm sorry Cowboy but I don't accept anything you have to say here. You're attempting to belittle God and reduce God to the helplessness of a mere mortal person.

You say,

It is all purely about love. Is it love for one to give their life for another? Of course it is, people from the military are honored all the time and many individual people are honored in memory for giving their life up to save another all the time as well.


Humans go to war because they feel they have no other way to solve the problem. Let's hope they aren't going to war because it's their preferred method of solving a problem!

With God all things are possible. So you can't have a God "sacrificing his son" to save mankind. That would imply that God was either too inept to figure out a better way to solve the problem, thus being less than "all-wise", or that he had no choice, which would imply that's he's not all-powerful and not all things are possible for him.

So your lame analogy of comparing God with the desperate acts of humans who can't do any better only suggests that you believe that God is just as helpless and inept as mortal men.

You can't have an all-powerful, all-wise God doing "desperate things" because he has no choice to do better. That would be an inept God who can't do any better than mere mortal men.

So your analogy breaks down in a deeply serious way.

I don't buy it.

You're asking me to believe that God is just as helpless and powerless as mere mortal men.







With God all things are possible. So you can't have a God "sacrificing his son" to save mankind. That would imply that God was either too inept to figure out a better way to solve the problem, thus being less than "all-wise", or that he had no choice, which would imply that's he's not all-powerful and not all things are possible for him.


God didn't sacrifice Jesus. Jesus sacrificed himself. And God is all powerful and all knowing. That is the reason it's such a beautiful loving thing Jesus did. Jesus knew the outcome of his coming and giving us the new covenant, but was willing to do it regardless of the outcome of the crucifixion. Jesus was willing to go through the pain and agony of the crucifixion for you because he loves you.


Anyone who incarnates on the earth knows the outcome. We live here and we will die here.

Christians say that Jesus died, yet they say that he still lives. They say that he rose from the dead. Therefor he did not sacrifice anything. He merely did what every human on earth eventually does. Die in the flesh. Jesus's life is eternal and guaranteed by God. He has nothing to fear. Humans on the other hand, fear hell and damnation. They don't know if their personality will survive physical death.

So there was no real sacrifice except that Jesus had to spend 33 years or so in human form.


ShiningArmour's photo
Mon 03/21/11 09:58 AM



Cowboy wrote:

It is all purely about love. Is it love for one to give their life for another? Of course it is, people from the military are honored all the time and many individual people are honored in memory for giving their life up to save another all the time as well.

Is it love to give the last piece of bread to another even though you are starving?

Is it love to give the last drink of water to another even though you are dehydrated?

That is definitely a sign of love. Same goes with sacrificing animals to God. Food, especially meat wasn't as abundant then as it is now. It was a sacrifice to give their best bull to God. Jesus felt the pain of death for you, he didn't "have" to. He could have lived his life how ever he wished to live it. But he sacrificed his life for you giving us the new covenant between man and God. That is love right there, willing to give up everything and feel incredible pain so that another would not have to.


I'm sorry Cowboy but I don't accept anything you have to say here. You're attempting to belittle God and reduce God to the helplessness of a mere mortal person.

You say,

It is all purely about love. Is it love for one to give their life for another? Of course it is, people from the military are honored all the time and many individual people are honored in memory for giving their life up to save another all the time as well.


Humans go to war because they feel they have no other way to solve the problem. Let's hope they aren't going to war because it's their preferred method of solving a problem!

With God all things are possible. So you can't have a God "sacrificing his son" to save mankind. That would imply that God was either too inept to figure out a better way to solve the problem, thus being less than "all-wise", or that he had no choice, which would imply that's he's not all-powerful and not all things are possible for him.

So your lame analogy of comparing God with the desperate acts of humans who can't do any better only suggests that you believe that God is just as helpless and inept as mortal men.

You can't have an all-powerful, all-wise God doing "desperate things" because he has no choice to do better. That would be an inept God who can't do any better than mere mortal men.

So your analogy breaks down in a deeply serious way.

I don't buy it.

You're asking me to believe that God is just as helpless and powerless as mere mortal men.







With God all things are possible. So you can't have a God "sacrificing his son" to save mankind. That would imply that God was either too inept to figure out a better way to solve the problem, thus being less than "all-wise", or that he had no choice, which would imply that's he's not all-powerful and not all things are possible for him.


God didn't sacrifice Jesus. Jesus sacrificed himself. And God is all powerful and all knowing. That is the reason it's such a beautiful loving thing Jesus did. Jesus knew the outcome of his coming and giving us the new covenant, but was willing to do it regardless of the outcome of the crucifixion. Jesus was willing to go through the pain and agony of the crucifixion for you because he loves you.


Anyone who incarnates on the earth knows the outcome. We live here and we will die here.

Christians say that Jesus died, yet they say that he still lives. They say that he rose from the dead. Therefor he did not sacrifice anything. He merely did what every human on earth eventually does. Die in the flesh. Jesus's life is eternal and guaranteed by God. He has nothing to fear. Humans on the other hand, fear hell and damnation. They don't know if their personality will survive physical death.

So there was no real sacrifice except that Jesus had to spend 33 years or so in human form.




laugh Obviously you fail to understand the reason behind the coming.

And I'm not patient enough to take the hours and hours to make you understand it.

no photo
Mon 03/21/11 10:12 AM
It is not "the coming" I am talking about. It is the big deal everyone makes about "the going."

On the one hand, they say that it is not your physical life or death that matters, it is your soul. Then on the other hand they make a big deal about Jesus who 'sacrificed' his life.


freakyshiki2009's photo
Mon 03/21/11 10:48 AM
Jeanniebean writes:

"On the one hand, they say that it is not your physical life or death that matters, it is your soul. Then on the other hand they make a big deal about Jesus who 'sacrificed' his life."

Yes, so now, we all have the opportunity to enter heaven. No longer are we held back by the sins of our fathers. We now control whether we will spend eternity with God.

That is why this is such a big deal.

A more relevant question is why you do not feel worthy of Christ's love.

no photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:03 AM

Jeanniebean writes:

"On the one hand, they say that it is not your physical life or death that matters, it is your soul. Then on the other hand they make a big deal about Jesus who 'sacrificed' his life."

Yes, so now, we all have the opportunity to enter heaven. No longer are we held back by the sins of our fathers. We now control whether we will spend eternity with God.

That is why this is such a big deal.

A more relevant question is why you do not feel worthy of Christ's love.


laugh laugh laugh That's not relevant at all.

You assume way too much. Christ is free to love me all he wants.
and I am free to love God any way and in my own way.




freakyshiki2009's photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:06 AM
But, do you love Christ?

ShiningArmour's photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:07 AM


Jeanniebean writes:

"On the one hand, they say that it is not your physical life or death that matters, it is your soul. Then on the other hand they make a big deal about Jesus who 'sacrificed' his life."

Yes, so now, we all have the opportunity to enter heaven. No longer are we held back by the sins of our fathers. We now control whether we will spend eternity with God.

That is why this is such a big deal.

A more relevant question is why you do not feel worthy of Christ's love.


laugh laugh laugh That's not relevant at all.

You assume way too much. Christ is free to love me all he wants.
and I am free to love God any way and in my own way.






I'm reminded of caine and abel. Abel brought what God wanted, Sacrifice.

Caine brought vegetables. He worshiped God in his own way yes. But he did not do it God's way! He did it wrong and was punished.

It's the same way today.

freakyshiki2009's photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:13 AM
And killing his own brother had nothing to do with his punishment?

ShiningArmour's photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:22 AM

And killing his own brother had nothing to do with his punishment?


No it did. But that's not the point I was trying to make here.

All I'm saying is just because you worship God in your own way does not make it right.

Of course murder is wrong. But it was not his only crime.

no photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:25 AM


No it did. But that's not the point I was trying to make here.

All I'm saying is just because you worship God in your own way does not make it right.



You know nothing about how I worship God and you are in no position to make any judgments. This thread is not about religion it is about God.


freakyshiki2009's photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:25 AM
Yes, but it was the one that put him over the top, so to speak. It was because of his brother's murder that caused God to punish him.

no photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:26 AM

But, do you love Christ?


I know Love.
God is Love.
Christ is Love.

I love love.

So, yes.

CowboyGH's photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:28 AM



No it did. But that's not the point I was trying to make here.

All I'm saying is just because you worship God in your own way does not make it right.



You know nothing about how I worship God and you are in no position to make any judgments. This thread is not about religion it is about God.




???

Shiningarmour's post was in response to freakyshiki2009's post. Wasn't directed at you.

ShiningArmour's photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:39 AM

Yes, but it was the one that put him over the top, so to speak. It was because of his brother's murder that caused God to punish him.


Huh, who knew I could learn something from the anti christian chat? Oh! sorry the "General religion chat"

no photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:42 AM




No it did. But that's not the point I was trying to make here.

All I'm saying is just because you worship God in your own way does not make it right.



You know nothing about how I worship God and you are in no position to make any judgments. This thread is not about religion it is about God.




???

Shiningarmour's post was in response to freakyshiki2009's post. Wasn't directed at you.



It doesn't matter. It is on a public thread. And.. he was making a general statement. I will reword:

You know nothing about how anyone else might worship God, and you are in no position to make judgments about what is right or wrong in how anyone else choses to worship.




freakyshiki2009's photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:43 AM
You are saying General Religion is antiChristian. We will agree to disagree here. I believe this topic includes, but is not limited to, Christianity.

no photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:45 AM


Yes, but it was the one that put him over the top, so to speak. It was because of his brother's murder that caused God to punish him.


Huh, who knew I could learn something from the anti christian chat? Oh! sorry the "General religion chat"



Proves my point that any other religion is not another valid religion to a Christian, it is simply thought of at anti-Christian.

That is the "You are either with us or against us" mentality.

It is the: "You are either a Christian or you are going to hell" mentality.

It is the "All of you other religions worship false Gods" mentality.

You guys do this so naturally and so automatically you don't even realize it.


no photo
Mon 03/21/11 11:45 AM

You are saying General Religion is antiChristian. We will agree to disagree here. I believe this topic includes, but is not limited to, Christianity.


Thank you!