100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Intruder calls 911, fears homeowner may have gun! | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
(CNN) -- This time it was the intruder who called 911. A man who broke into a house in Portland, Oregon, called police -- afraid the homeowner may have a gun. The suspect, Timothy James Chapek, was in the bathroom taking a shower when the homeowner returned to the house Monday night, Portland police said in a statement. Accompanied by two German shepherds, the homeowner asked Chapek what he was doing in the house. Chapek locked himself in the bathroom and made an emergency call, police said. He said he had broken into the house, the owner had come home, and that he was concerned the owner might have a gun. The homeowner also called the police to report that he had found a man in the house. Police with dogs took Chapek, 24, into custody "without incident," they said. He was booked for criminal trespass. They did not say if the homeowner did in fact have a gun.  This , right here....is epic stupidity at it's finest! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i still wanna know what he was doing in a strangers shower? but why???  HI!
because he didnt want to LOSE HIS LIFE over the decision to enter someone elses home he faced justice for the crime he committed instead of losing his life over it,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,,
lol, yeah if the single girl didnt CHOOSE to go to a frat party alone, she might not have gotten raped either but would that have had ANYTHING to do with what her options were ONCE she made the decision to go? ( ie. leave, or not get drunk and EXACERBATE her risk?) he couldnt change that he went in the house , he couldnt go back and RE THINK about it, that part was done,,what he did kept the situation from getting WORSE |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,, breaking a law or not, it is an equal CHOICE to take a risk and it seemed the debate was centered on an idea that taking a risk meant proceeding into the worst possible outcome,,, |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,,
lol, yeah if the single girl didnt CHOOSE to go to a frat party alone, she might not have gotten raped either but would that have had ANYTHING to do with what her options were ONCE she made the decision to go? ( ie. leave, or not get drunk and EXACERBATE her risk?) he couldnt change that he went in the house , he couldnt go back and RE THINK about it, that part was done,,what he did kept the situation from getting WORSE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,,
lol, yeah if the single girl didnt CHOOSE to go to a frat party alone, she might not have gotten raped either but would that have had ANYTHING to do with what her options were ONCE she made the decision to go? ( ie. leave, or not get drunk and EXACERBATE her risk?) he couldnt change that he went in the house , he couldnt go back and RE THINK about it, that part was done,,what he did kept the situation from getting WORSE
yall dont get the point, obviously,,,or you just really feel that death is a reasonable end to breaking the law and no type of intervention to that end is reasonable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,,
lol, yeah if the single girl didnt CHOOSE to go to a frat party alone, she might not have gotten raped either but would that have had ANYTHING to do with what her options were ONCE she made the decision to go? ( ie. leave, or not get drunk and EXACERBATE her risk?) he couldnt change that he went in the house , he couldnt go back and RE THINK about it, that part was done,,what he did kept the situation from getting WORSE
yall dont get the point, obviously,,,or you just really feel that death is a reasonable end to breaking the law and no type of intervention to that end is reasonable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As Sammy Davis told us:
Don't go to bed, with no price on your head No, no, don't do it. Don't do the crime, if you can't do the time, Yeah, don't do it. And keep your eye on the sparrow. When the going gets narrow. Don't do it, don't do it. Where can I go where the cold winds don't blow, Now. Well, well, well.  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 03/08/11 05:55 PM
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,,
lol, yeah if the single girl didnt CHOOSE to go to a frat party alone, she might not have gotten raped either but would that have had ANYTHING to do with what her options were ONCE she made the decision to go? ( ie. leave, or not get drunk and EXACERBATE her risk?) he couldnt change that he went in the house , he couldnt go back and RE THINK about it, that part was done,,what he did kept the situation from getting WORSE
yall dont get the point, obviously,,,or you just really feel that death is a reasonable end to breaking the law and no type of intervention to that end is reasonable who said I am 'for him' I am for noone having to lose their life unnecessarily,,, the risk he took breaking the law was going to jail or getting killed Id say going to jail was the lesser of the two consequences and he did the smartest thing he could AT THAT POINT to avoid being an UNNECESSARY (death) statistic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,,
lol, yeah if the single girl didnt CHOOSE to go to a frat party alone, she might not have gotten raped either but would that have had ANYTHING to do with what her options were ONCE she made the decision to go? ( ie. leave, or not get drunk and EXACERBATE her risk?) he couldnt change that he went in the house , he couldnt go back and RE THINK about it, that part was done,,what he did kept the situation from getting WORSE
yall dont get the point, obviously,,,or you just really feel that death is a reasonable end to breaking the law and no type of intervention to that end is reasonable who said I am 'for him' I am for noone having to lose their life unnecessarily,,, the risk he took breaking the law was going to jail or getting killed Id say going to jail was the lesser of the two consequences and he did the smartest thing he could AT THAT POINT to avoid being an UNNECESSARY (death) statistic |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,,
lol, yeah if the single girl didnt CHOOSE to go to a frat party alone, she might not have gotten raped either but would that have had ANYTHING to do with what her options were ONCE she made the decision to go? ( ie. leave, or not get drunk and EXACERBATE her risk?) he couldnt change that he went in the house , he couldnt go back and RE THINK about it, that part was done,,what he did kept the situation from getting WORSE
yall dont get the point, obviously,,,or you just really feel that death is a reasonable end to breaking the law and no type of intervention to that end is reasonable who said I am 'for him' I am for noone having to lose their life unnecessarily,,, the risk he took breaking the law was going to jail or getting killed Id say going to jail was the lesser of the two consequences and he did the smartest thing he could AT THAT POINT to avoid being an UNNECESSARY (death) statistic all of those are possibilities, but being that this was a criminal TRESPASS charge, and THIS criminal chose to call 9-11, none of those are applicable to THIS situation he did what he could to prevent a fatality AT THAT TIME, I cant fault that in ANYONE.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...and THEN, when it doesn't work out, dude gets suddenly remorseful, right? "Oh 911.....SAVE ME....I am sooo sorry...." Yea. Dude is a chump.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,,
lol, yeah if the single girl didnt CHOOSE to go to a frat party alone, she might not have gotten raped either but would that have had ANYTHING to do with what her options were ONCE she made the decision to go? ( ie. leave, or not get drunk and EXACERBATE her risk?) he couldnt change that he went in the house , he couldnt go back and RE THINK about it, that part was done,,what he did kept the situation from getting WORSE
yall dont get the point, obviously,,,or you just really feel that death is a reasonable end to breaking the law and no type of intervention to that end is reasonable who said I am 'for him' I am for noone having to lose their life unnecessarily,,, the risk he took breaking the law was going to jail or getting killed Id say going to jail was the lesser of the two consequences and he did the smartest thing he could AT THAT POINT to avoid being an UNNECESSARY (death) statistic all of those are possibilities, but being that this was a criminal TRESPASS charge, and THIS criminal chose to call 9-11, none of those are applicable to THIS situation he did what he could to prevent a fatality AT THAT TIME, I cant fault that in ANYONE.. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
...and THEN, when it doesn't work out, dude gets suddenly remorseful, right? "Oh 911.....SAVE ME....I am sooo sorry...." Yea. Dude is a chump. remorse can be left up to him and his creator, Im just glad noone was killed INCLUDING dude |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 03/08/11 06:12 PM
|
|
well then he should have thought about that BEFORE he went inside. Losing your life is the chance you take when you decide to break into someone else's home. we can agree to disagree I take the risk of losing my life walking in a dark alley too, but that wouldnt mean I shouldnt use 9/11 if I felt in danger while I was there he couldnt TAKE back the decision to go in, but he could do something that wouldnt exacerbate the situation into an unnecessarily deadly one,,,
lol, yeah if the single girl didnt CHOOSE to go to a frat party alone, she might not have gotten raped either but would that have had ANYTHING to do with what her options were ONCE she made the decision to go? ( ie. leave, or not get drunk and EXACERBATE her risk?) he couldnt change that he went in the house , he couldnt go back and RE THINK about it, that part was done,,what he did kept the situation from getting WORSE
yall dont get the point, obviously,,,or you just really feel that death is a reasonable end to breaking the law and no type of intervention to that end is reasonable who said I am 'for him' I am for noone having to lose their life unnecessarily,,, the risk he took breaking the law was going to jail or getting killed Id say going to jail was the lesser of the two consequences and he did the smartest thing he could AT THAT POINT to avoid being an UNNECESSARY (death) statistic all of those are possibilities, but being that this was a criminal TRESPASS charge, and THIS criminal chose to call 9-11, none of those are applicable to THIS situation he did what he could to prevent a fatality AT THAT TIME, I cant fault that in ANYONE.. such things as strangers taking showers in our home? and he has the right to turn himself in to police so noone gets hurt |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Have YOU ever had yr house broken into? Just curious....cuz' I have....and I'll tell ya' what....It's not cool. You never feel secure again. I'd do whatever I had to take care of ME! I somehow have the feeling that you'd just cook this guy dinner or something.......
|
|
|
|
|
