100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: White man is discriminated against! | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
yeah..Im still not seeing how whites are being "discriminated" against, since anglos still hold the lions share of global power and control. If some poor schmock feels like he or she is getting kicked in the face, I think it has more to do with the politically correct bones that these power bases toss the subjugated masses in order to apease them. poor whites are getting sold out by the richer whites...in that case I guess someone could cry discrimination...even so, the most discriminated against "white person" is still way ahead of the game than other races... That's not the point...maybe you did not read the OP? I agree that there are blacks or others who'd beat your arse because it's white...and if they do that they will get extra time for a hate crime. The thread is about the heavy sided number of white people who dominate in being racists these days...deny that. Jenna Six, they didn't get nailed for a hate crime. According to the Reverend Jessie Jackson and the NAACP they were "Misunderstood." That alone shoots your argument all to hell. Six black kids on one white kid and they were armed. If it was the other way around it would be a hate crime. That is the most famous example of this BS. Affirmative Action maintains Segregation. I have been bitten by that one. Funny thing is how I am supposed to be a Caucasian. I am Mediterranean and Irish. I have no Eastern European heritage. Now discrimination to deal with discrimination is Discrimination! Two Wrongs do not make a right! Moving ON! Obviously some people didn't know all that happened there to lead to what the six did. It was retaliatory. The hate crimes that were committed before caused the reaction. That is why they were more lenient. You are so full of yourself. Retaliation? Again two wrongs do not make a right. I mean I smell some ripe BS here! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
AndyBgood
on
Tue 10/12/10 08:39 AM
|
|
BTW, Justifying hate crimes FOR ANY REASON is pretty weak dragoness!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The legal definition of hate crime (i.e., the offender attacks the victim because of the victim's actual or perceived race, color, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or national origin) tends to be viewed as a causality description for the offense. This paper maintains that the "because" statement in the legal definition refers to the offender's criminal intent and distorted cognitions (e.g., blaming the victim and using different group memberships to justify and rationalize their hate crimes),
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16923731 I would imagine a personal dispute would not fall under the hate crime category,,,,unless it was proven the victim was not chosen in retaliation for some reason specific to him |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The legal definition of hate crime (i.e., the offender attacks the victim because of the victim's actual or perceived race, color, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or national origin) tends to be viewed as a causality description for the offense. This paper maintains that the "because" statement in the legal definition refers to the offender's criminal intent and distorted cognitions (e.g., blaming the victim and using different group memberships to justify and rationalize their hate crimes), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16923731 I would imagine a personal dispute would not fall under the hate crime category,,,,unless it was proven the victim was not chosen in retaliation for some reason specific to him What has this comment got do do with ANY of this???? Gang violence IS Racially motivated. Oh but you don't live in Los Angeles or New York or any other big city with real gang problems. There are gangs anywhere you go but like when I lived in Redding the looser there were utter posers! They were smart enough to leave me alone cause I don't play that BS. There are neighborhoods here walking through them and being white is a sure fire way to get a beat down. Again there is no justification or rationalization for the behavior. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Tue 10/12/10 10:43 AM
|
|
The legal definition of hate crime (i.e., the offender attacks the victim because of the victim's actual or perceived race, color, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or national origin) tends to be viewed as a causality description for the offense. This paper maintains that the "because" statement in the legal definition refers to the offender's criminal intent and distorted cognitions (e.g., blaming the victim and using different group memberships to justify and rationalize their hate crimes), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16923731 I would imagine a personal dispute would not fall under the hate crime category,,,,unless it was proven the victim was not chosen in retaliation for some reason specific to him What has this comment got do do with ANY of this???? Gang violence IS Racially motivated. Oh but you don't live in Los Angeles or New York or any other big city with real gang problems. There are gangs anywhere you go but like when I lived in Redding the looser there were utter posers! They were smart enough to leave me alone cause I don't play that BS. There are neighborhoods here walking through them and being white is a sure fire way to get a beat down. Again there is no justification or rationalization for the behavior. no, all gang violence isnt racially motivated or you would find a predominance of black gangs killing white gangs yes, if you walk through someplace and are beaten down for your race(and not something you do or say), that would fall under the requirements there is no justification or rationalization for jenna but there are legal REQUIREMENTS to classify as a hate crime this apparently didnt meet the requirements |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The legal definition of hate crime (i.e., the offender attacks the victim because of the victim's actual or perceived race, color, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or national origin) tends to be viewed as a causality description for the offense. This paper maintains that the "because" statement in the legal definition refers to the offender's criminal intent and distorted cognitions (e.g., blaming the victim and using different group memberships to justify and rationalize their hate crimes), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16923731 I would imagine a personal dispute would not fall under the hate crime category,,,,unless it was proven the victim was not chosen in retaliation for some reason specific to him What has this comment got do do with ANY of this???? Gang violence IS Racially motivated. Oh but you don't live in Los Angeles or New York or any other big city with real gang problems. There are gangs anywhere you go but like when I lived in Redding the looser there were utter posers! They were smart enough to leave me alone cause I don't play that BS. There are neighborhoods here walking through them and being white is a sure fire way to get a beat down. Again there is no justification or rationalization for the behavior. no, all gang violence isnt racially motivated or you would find a predominance of black gangs killing white gangs yes, if you walk through someplace and are beaten down for your race(and not something you do or say), that would fall under the requirements there is no justification or rationalization for jenna but there are legal REQUIREMENTS to classify as a hate crime this apparently didnt meet the requirements That is dense, you do not clearly know what you are talking about. There is a Gang war going on right now here in Los Angeles where the Hispanics are at war with the blacks. I know someone who got caught in the middle of it. Heck, I know people on both sides of it! Stuff like this never makes the news! And a legal test for the Jena Six? Six Blacks with a Broom stick, and one white guy? Stop trying to justify their actions under legal Pretense. When Jessie Jackson defends the actions of thugs like this you know they are guilty! Please stop making it so easy for us to put your foot in your mouth. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Dragoness
on
Tue 10/12/10 04:03 PM
|
|
The legal definition of hate crime (i.e., the offender attacks the victim because of the victim's actual or perceived race, color, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or national origin) tends to be viewed as a causality description for the offense. This paper maintains that the "because" statement in the legal definition refers to the offender's criminal intent and distorted cognitions (e.g., blaming the victim and using different group memberships to justify and rationalize their hate crimes), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16923731 I would imagine a personal dispute would not fall under the hate crime category,,,,unless it was proven the victim was not chosen in retaliation for some reason specific to him What has this comment got do do with ANY of this???? Gang violence IS Racially motivated. Oh but you don't live in Los Angeles or New York or any other big city with real gang problems. There are gangs anywhere you go but like when I lived in Redding the looser there were utter posers! They were smart enough to leave me alone cause I don't play that BS. There are neighborhoods here walking through them and being white is a sure fire way to get a beat down. Again there is no justification or rationalization for the behavior. Not. As usual, off the mark. Gang violence is territorial  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Dragoness
on
Tue 10/12/10 04:04 PM
|
|
The legal definition of hate crime (i.e., the offender attacks the victim because of the victim's actual or perceived race, color, religion, disability, sexual orientation, or national origin) tends to be viewed as a causality description for the offense. This paper maintains that the "because" statement in the legal definition refers to the offender's criminal intent and distorted cognitions (e.g., blaming the victim and using different group memberships to justify and rationalize their hate crimes), http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16923731 I would imagine a personal dispute would not fall under the hate crime category,,,,unless it was proven the victim was not chosen in retaliation for some reason specific to him What has this comment got do do with ANY of this???? Gang violence IS Racially motivated. Oh but you don't live in Los Angeles or New York or any other big city with real gang problems. There are gangs anywhere you go but like when I lived in Redding the looser there were utter posers! They were smart enough to leave me alone cause I don't play that BS. There are neighborhoods here walking through them and being white is a sure fire way to get a beat down. Again there is no justification or rationalization for the behavior. no, all gang violence isnt racially motivated or you would find a predominance of black gangs killing white gangs yes, if you walk through someplace and are beaten down for your race(and not something you do or say), that would fall under the requirements there is no justification or rationalization for jenna but there are legal REQUIREMENTS to classify as a hate crime this apparently didnt meet the requirements That is dense, you do not clearly know what you are talking about. There is a Gang war going on right now here in Los Angeles where the Hispanics are at war with the blacks. I know someone who got caught in the middle of it. Heck, I know people on both sides of it! Stuff like this never makes the news! And a legal test for the Jena Six? Six Blacks with a Broom stick, and one white guy? Stop trying to justify their actions under legal Pretense. When Jessie Jackson defends the actions of thugs like this you know they are guilty! Please stop making it so easy for us to put your foot in your mouth. Noone is justifying anything. The truth of the matter was that there was white hate crimes perpetrated against the blacks first and then the six retaliated when provoked. Not making any of it right but not making it violence that had no cause either. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BTW, Justifying hate crimes FOR ANY REASON is pretty weak dragoness! From what I have heard from you, you don't practice what you preach. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This topic is being locked at this time to be reviewed at that time it will be decided if in fact this topic will be left within the forums. Site Mod Kristi |
|
|
|
|
