Video interview 9/11 Ripple Effect 8/07: "I flew the two actual aircraft which were involved in 9/11; the Fight number 175 and Flight 93, the 757 that allegedly went down in Shanksville and Flight 175 is the aircraft that's alleged to have hit the South Tower. I don't believe it's possible for, like I said, for a terrorist, a so-called terrorist to train on a [Cessna] 172, then jump in a cockpit of a 757-767 class cockpit, and vertical navigate the aircraft, lateral navigate the aircraft, and fly the airplane at speeds exceeding it's design limit speed by well over 100 knots, make high-speed high-banked turns, exceeding -- pulling probably 5, 6, 7 G's. And the aircraft would literally fall out of the sky. I couldn't do it and I'm absolutely positive they couldn't do it."

Capt. Russ Wittenberg, U.S. Air Force – Former U.S. Air Force fighter pilot with over 100 combat missions. Retired commercial pilot. Flew for Pan Am and United Airlines for 35 years. Aircraft flown: Boeing 707, 720, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, and 777. 30,000+ total hours flown. Had previously flown the actual two United Airlines aircraft that were hijacked on 9/11 (Flight 93, which impacted in Pennsylvania, and Flight 175, the second plane to hit the WTC).
http://patriotsquestion911.com/

Havent they had ohhhhh 10 years to figure it out and come up with some sort of proof to verify their theories?

you go from one person to the entire engineering community?
think about the babble before you babble it...

Chairman, 9/11 Commission, Thomas H. Kean, Former Governor of New Jersey: "FAA and NORAD officials advanced an account of 9/11 that was untrue.… We, to this day, don't know why NORAD told us what they told us.… It was just so far from the truth."

Vice Chairman, 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence, Homeland Security Advisory Council: "We got started late; we had a very short time frame.… we did not have enough money.… We had a lot of people strongly opposed to what we did. We had a lot of trouble getting access to documents and to people.... So there were all kinds of reasons we thought we were set up to fail."

9/11 Commissioner, Timothy J. Roemer, PhD, Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence: "Panel members so distrusted testimony from Pentagon officials that they referred their concerns to the Pentagon's inspector general.… We were extremely frustrated with the false statements we were getting."

Senior Counsel, 9/11 Commission, John J. Farmer, Jr., Former Attorney General, NJ,Former Commissioner of the State Commission of Investigations: “Some staff members and commissioners of the Sept. 11 panel concluded that the Pentagon's initial story of how it reacted to the 2001 terrorist attacks may have been part of a deliberate effort to mislead the commission and the public.

"I was shocked at how different the truth was from the way it was described.… The tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years."

So there you have it. The only reason these questions are unanswered is because the Cheney/Bush administration is still actively covering up their complicity or condoning of this atrocity.
How about the 911 commission?

http://www.envirosagainstwar.org/know/read.php?itemid=7338

have fun finding the secrets...lol
i've listen to this crap for 9 years now and not one bit of proof..
looking for the truth is kind of like this:

no the experienced pilots are wrong, the countless engineers are wrong, I am wrong, many of my co workers are wrong and just about anyone I know with a glimmer of an IQ are wrong , were all just liveing in our moms basements and just love a good conspiracy

It has been investigated by the US and numerous coutries and NATO and the UN.

There are a few people who belive it was an inside job. The same people also believe that Elvis is alive and that Area 51 has space craft.

i'm not trying to put you down, but any proof that you can post, i can counter it, and vice versa... i've posted 2 websites on here that counter most of your cliams and i have not heard one word about them...so, yea, i think all those people you just listed are wrong.

They have spent hundreds of millions of dollars investigation this over the year.

Fewer then 1% of the population believe's that it was an inside job and they base their evidence on kooks like this Major General who was forced into retirement for spending millions of dollars on and claiming he could walk through walls. The guy has been exposed as a liar, fraud and extortionest.

There is no disagreement among qualified engineers as to the major cause of building failure. There is minor disagreement about minor issues relating to truss failure mode.

There is no evidence of any explosives. There is no need of any explosives to cause the failure.

The twin towers and Bldg 7 were NOT ( please read this carefully NOT NOT NOT ) built using the usual methods of steel or concrete construction for high rise buildings. They were built using "light commercial" construction which is far less resistant to fire damage and is normally only used for low to mid rise building construction. Light commercial construction uses light weight steel trusses that cannot withstand heat for very long and much of the fire proofing that is sprayed on them would be stripped off mechanically by a plane crash of this type.

Fire proofing only delays the steel absorbing heat. It does not stop it and it only lasts a short while to give occupants time to get out of the building.

The steel lost sufficient strength to support the building at around 1,000F. Jet fuel burns at 1,800F. All the garbage about the steel "melting" or needing "melting temperature" is false and shows no knowledge of steel's strength curve which can be found in many places on the internet.

If it took explosives to turn the concrete to dust, explosives would have to be placed everywhere in the building concrete existed which is 100% impossible. The explosives would have to be sequenced to the falling of the building and would appear as the entire building exploding as it went down instead of falling.

All of the conspiracy theories contradict each other as to what actually happened and why.

The conspiracy theories rely of an unbelievable amount of ignorance as to the most basic elements of the theory.

The most difficult part of flying is landing. Any fool who can read a compass could find New York City and any fool who can see NYC can find the twin towers.

Operating the radio is more difficult than pointing the plane in the direction you want it to go.

Hey at least these ingnorant DB's help keep the thread alive...notice "they spent hundreds of millions" (investigating 9-11)...LOL...that shows they don't know what they are talking about...and to add this:



Just tossing crap against the wall again.

DEMAND JUSTICE!!!

Just like the Major General doesn't know what he's talking about?

Finally the Truth! Look at the scientific facts!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_OIXfkXEj0

LOL...how's that Onion tasting right now? Did you even see the video? This video makes a mockery of the 9-11 Comission's report..LOL

THANKS!

GOTTA LOVE THE ONION!

"Justin Bieber Found To Be Cleverly Disguised 51-Year-Old Pedophile"

See the video here:

http://www.theonion.com/

Yeah, I liked it, too! It makes a mockery of the conspiracy theories!

The mockery is that Norad refused to defend the air space over Washington.

"In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties. One of the imagined targets was the World Trade Center.... [there were] early drills, including one operation, planned in July 2001 and conducted later, that involved planes from airports in Utah and Washington state that were 'hijacked.' Those planes were escorted by U.S. and Canadian aircraft to airfields in British Columbia and Alaska. NORAD officials have acknowledged that 'scriptwriters' for the drills included the idea of hijacked aircraft being used as weapons.... Until Sept. 11, 2001, NORAD conducted four major exercises a year. Most included a hijack scenario.'"
NORAD had drills of jets as weapons
USA Today, 18 April 2004

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-04-18-norad_x.htm

Just like the OP postes Military Officer's, pluralizing it and making it sound like there's a league of them out there when in fact it's a lone kook who hasn't been in the military for close to 30 years who was forced in to retirement for claiming he could walkl through walls and spending millions on the bogus project.

or its even funnier when people ignore reality and choose to live in a propagated dream world.


In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties. One of the imagined targets was the World Trade Center.... [there were] early drills, including one operation, planned in July 2001 and conducted later, that involved planes from airports in Utah and Washington state that were 'hijacked.' Those planes were escorted by U.S. and Canadian aircraft to airfields in British Columbia and Alaska. NORAD officials have acknowledged that 'scriptwriters' for the drills included the idea of hijacked aircraft being used as weapons.... Until Sept. 11, 2001, NORAD conducted four major exercises a year. Most included a hijack scenario.'"
NORAD had drills of jets as weapons
USA Today, 18 April 2004

http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/2004-04-18-norad_x.htm

heres a few follow the link if you dare.......

Capt. Claude Barnhart, BS, M.Ed – Retired airline transport pilot, flying for FedEx for 22 years. Commercial aircraft flown: Boeing 727. Former U.S. Air Force Pilot and Aircraft Commander. Aircraft flown: Boeing B-52D bomber.
Statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition:

"When I heard Dan Rather say on CBS news that "....this looks like a controlled demolition," I immediately researched "controlled demolition" sites on the Internet. All three WTC buildings that went down looked exactly like examples of controlled demolitions (videos) that building demolition companies had posted on their websites." http://www.ae911truth.org


Signatory: Petition requesting a reinvestigation of 9/11, signed by more than 1,000 Architects and Engineers:

"On Behalf of the People of the United States of America, the undersigned Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth and affiliates hereby petition for, and demand, a truly independent investigation with subpoena power in order to uncover the full truth surrounding the events of 9/11/01 - specifically the collapse of the World Trade Center Towers and Building 7. We believe that there is sufficient doubt about the official story and therefore that the 9/11 investigation must be re-opened and must include a full inquiry into the possible use of explosives that may have been the actual cause behind the destruction of the World Trade Center Towers and WTC Building 7." http://www.ae911truth.org/joinus.php


Editor's note: WTC Building 7 was 610 feet tall, 47 stories. It would have been the tallest building in 33 states. Although it was not hit by an airplane, it completely collapsed into a pile of rubble in less than 7 seconds at 5:20 p.m. on 9/11, seven hours after the collapses of the Twin Towers. However, no mention of its collapse appears in the 9/11 Commission's "full and complete account of the circumstances surrounding the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks." Watch the collapse video here. And six years after 9/11, the Federal government has yet to publish its promised final report that explains the cause of its collapse.





Donald Berk
No photo available


top

Donald Berk, MA – FAA certified commercial pilot. FAA certified Flight Instructor. Veteran, U.S. Air Force. 1,500+ total hours flown.
Personal statement of support for Pilots for 9/11 Truth:

"Nothing is more cynical and disdainful of human dignity, the Constitution and the memory of patriotic sacrifice than a false flag operation. The truth of 9/11 must be dug out and publicly displayed."


Member: Pilots for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe that have gathered together for one purpose. We are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001. Our main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. We do not offer theory or point blame. However, we are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day since the United States Government doesn't seem to be very forthcoming with answers."





Rob Bishop
No photo available


top

Rob Bishop – Former U.S. Marine Corps Aviation Mechanic. Radio talk show host, "The Rob Bishop Show" Truth Net Radio.
Member: Pilots for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe that have gathered together for one purpose. We are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001. Our main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. We do not offer theory or point blame. However, we are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day since the United States Government doesn't seem to be very forthcoming with answers.









Maj. Jon Bjornson, MD
No photo available


top

Maj. Jon Bjornson, MD – Former Physician, U.S. Army Medical Corps, Vietnam Veteran, 7 years of service. Retired Psychiatrist. Former Assistant Professor of Psychiatry, Jefferson Medical College.
Signatory of Petition to Release Information Pertaining to 9/11 10/5/06:

"We, the undersigned, demand the immediate declassification and release of:
all transcripts and documents relating to the July 10, 2001 meeting that took place between former CIA Director George Tenet and then National Security Advisor, Condoleezza Rice. It has been alleged that this urgent and out-of-the-ordinary meeting was called to discuss the increasingly dire warnings of an imminent al Qaeda attack within the U.S. ...
the redacted 28 pages of the Joint Inquiry Into The Terrorist Attacks of September 11, 2001 (JICI), and
the CIA Inspector General’s report, CIA Accountability With Respect To The 9/11 Attacks
The disastrous nature of the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks warrant the release of all of this information so that the American public may learn what its government did or did not do to protect them. Had this nation been properly warned of the looming and imminent terrorist threat, life saving choices could have been made that day." http://www.petitiononline.com/july10






Darin M. Bowers
No photo available


top

Darin M. Bowers – FAA certified Airframe and Powerplant Mechanic 16+ years experience. U.S. Air Force veteran, serving as Crew Chief, 561st Fighter Wild Weasel Squadron. Deployed to Turkey and Saudi in Operations Provide Comfort and Southern Watch. Retired the McDonnell Douglas F-4G Phantoms in 1996. Phase inspector on the Fairchild - Republic A-10 Thunderbolt II (aka "Warthog") and McDonnell Douglas F-15E Strike Eagle. Mechanic on McDonnell Douglas DC-8, DC-9, MD-11; Boeing 727, 757, 767; and Airbus A300 for the past 12 years.
Member: Pilots for 9/11 Truth Association Statement: "Pilots for 9/11 Truth is an organization of aviation professionals and pilots throughout the globe that have gathered together for one purpose. We are committed to seeking the truth surrounding the events of the 11th of September 2001. Our main focus concentrates on the four flights, maneuvers performed and the reported pilots. We do not offer theory or point blame. However, we are focused on determining the truth of that fateful day since the United States Government doesn't seem to be very forthcoming with answers."







Lt. Col. Robert Bowman, PhD



http://www.militaryofficersfor911truth.org/