Topic: Pelossini: Investigate 'Mosque' Critics ... | |
---|---|
Wait for it ... won't be long before we see 'RAYciss!' pop out ... i'm sure someone is formulating the thoughts now... |
|
|
|
8/18/10 - UPDATE 1: Speaker Pelosi has sent out a statement regarding her comments on investigating those who she believes may be funding the opposition to the mosque: "The freedom of religion is a Constitutional right. Where a place of worship is located is a local decision. “I support the statement made by the Interfaith Alliance that ‘We agree with the ADL that there is a need for transparency about who is funding the effort to build this Islamic center. At the same time, we should also ask who is funding the attacks against the construction of the center.’ I agree completely. If religious freedom is going to be free, then we have to allow religions to be free to build and worship where they want to. If we are not going to be religiously free, I will contribute to some churches I believe should be removed or moved for my convenience. yeah, its the consistency thing for me all over again. IF the SUSPICION is applied to all equally , I support it. IF it is necessary to investigate those supporting the mosque it is FAIR AND JUST to also investigate those opposing it. like they say about the AZ law,, if you have nothing to hide,, whats the issue? (I just believe in consistency, I dont believe there is any problem with inquiries as long as they are investigated EQUALLY on both sides, much like I feel about immigration, if EVERYONE will be responsible for proving citizenship thats fine with me too) |
|
|
|
8/18/10 - UPDATE 1: Speaker Pelosi has sent out a statement regarding her comments on investigating those who she believes may be funding the opposition to the mosque: "The freedom of religion is a Constitutional right. Where a place of worship is located is a local decision. “I support the statement made by the Interfaith Alliance that ‘We agree with the ADL that there is a need for transparency about who is funding the effort to build this Islamic center. At the same time, we should also ask who is funding the attacks against the construction of the center.’ I agree completely. If religious freedom is going to be free, then we have to allow religions to be free to build and worship where they want to. If we are not going to be religiously free, I will contribute to some churches I believe should be removed or moved for my convenience. yeah, its the consistency thing for me all over again. IF the SUSPICION is applied to all equally , I support it. IF it is necessary to investigate those supporting the mosque it is FAIR AND JUST to also investigate those opposing it. like they say about the AZ law,, if you have nothing to hide,, whats the issue? (I just believe in consistency, I dont believe there is any problem with inquiries as long as they are investigated EQUALLY on both sides, much like I feel about immigration, if EVERYONE will be responsible for proving citizenship thats fine with me too) bloomberg said it was unconstitutional to investigate the mosque builders... apparently pelosi doesn't know about the Constitution either... or is it bloomberg? |
|
|
|
Where do you draw the line when your religion is threatning and killing people all over the world?You may have your freedom of religion in this country but your freedom of religion ends the minute you start threatning the people of your country with death and destruction.A man preaching Sharia law for America is a threat to this country and should not be tolerated.
|
|
|
|
What if they wanted to construct a Catholic Church next to a childrens playground?
|
|
|
|
What if they wanted to construct a Catholic Church next to a childrens playground? i thought the "playground" was already inside? |
|
|
|
Wait for it ... won't be long before we see 'RAYciss!' pop out ... Yup, i've been waiting for it.......... |
|
|
|
Wait for it ... won't be long before we see 'RAYciss!' pop out ... i'm sure someone is formulating the thoughts now... And I think we all know who that is, err they are |
|
|
|
What if they wanted to construct a Catholic Church next to a childrens playground? What does that have to do with anything? |
|
|
|
What if they wanted to construct a Catholic Church next to a childrens playground? What does that have to do with anything? What did Pelosi really being a man have to do with anything?? And the Catholic church being super fond(le) of children has been widely reported... I'm sure you've heard... Certainly the Islamic faith has earned its critics. But so has the Catholic Church... And oh yeah, y'all are a bunch of racists!! |
|
|
|
What if they wanted to construct a Catholic Church next to a childrens playground? What does that have to do with anything? What did Pelosi really being a man have to do with anything?? And the Catholic church being super fond(le) of children has been widely reported... I'm sure you've heard... Certainly the Islamic faith has earned its critics. But so has the Catholic Church... And oh yeah, y'all are a bunch of racists!! Ummmm Islam advocated pedophilia............. |
|
|
|
What if they wanted to construct a Catholic Church next to a childrens playground? What does that have to do with anything? What did Pelosi really being a man have to do with anything?? And the Catholic church being super fond(le) of children has been widely reported... I'm sure you've heard... Certainly the Islamic faith has earned its critics. But so has the Catholic Church... And oh yeah, y'all are a bunch of racists!! Ummmm Islam advocated pedophilia............. |
|
|
|
|
|
Ummmm Islam advocated pedophilia............. Well, there's yer balance! Muslims will get to rape the lil' girls and, (the perverted), Cathlick priests rapes the lil boys.<Not all Catlick Priests do it and they certainly don't have permission. Muslims do it and have Husseins, uh, I mean, Mohameds blessing. |
|
|
|
catholics married little girls as young as 12 with permission from the church,,,,
they just dont do it anymore, due to cultural changes, not because the bible doesnt support it |
|
|
|
catholics married little girls as young as 12 with permission from the church,,,, they just dont do it anymore, due to cultural changes, not because the bible doesnt support it muslims still do it |
|
|
|
catholics married little girls as young as 12 with permission from the church,,,, they just dont do it anymore, due to cultural changes, not because the bible doesnt support it muslims still do it yeah, I guess they still havent progressed past all those EVIL ENEMY catholics whose cultures mandated a change oh wait, upon research, there ARE Muslim cultures which also make molestation illegal,,,, |
|
|
|
catholics married little girls as young as 12 with permission from the church,,,, they just dont do it anymore, due to cultural changes, not because the bible doesnt support it muslims still do it yeah, I guess they still havent progressed past all those EVIL ENEMY catholics whose cultures mandated a change oh wait, upon research, there ARE Muslim cultures which also make molestation illegal,,,, yea, some of them are growing up |
|
|
|
Edited by
willing2
on
Thu 08/19/10 09:39 AM
|
|
catholics married little girls as young as 12 with permission from the church,,,, they just dont do it anymore, due to cultural changes, not because the bible doesnt support it muslims still do it yeah, I guess they still havent progressed past all those EVIL ENEMY catholics whose cultures mandated a change oh wait, upon research, there ARE Muslim cultures which also make molestation illegal,,,, yea, some of them are growing up It's a money thang. They want them to pay for what they broke. If he refuses to or can't pay, he and the kid he molested are stoned. |
|
|
|
i guess muslim/islam is the only "religion" that can just change it's doctrines at will. was mohammed disfigured or something? was he really a woman? whats the big secret with him?
|
|
|