"
A few weeks ago when there was all that snow some Republican magazine cover featured a cartoon of Al Gore standing in the snow with is pants around his ankles and all the FOX News ***** were braying about how all that snow proves Gore's global warming agenda false.

Never mind that actual climate change reports state that with more warmth there will be more moisture in the atmosphere for storms to feed on, resulting in heavier rain & snow amounts, but that's just one of those silly progressive details, easily ignored.

But now that here in the upper Midwest winter ended as soon as February did and we've had 50's and 60's for all of March, I've been waiting for a GOP Mag with a retraction or for the FOX News donkeys to start braying that Gore was right. Shall I hold my breath?

Of course a warm March is no more proof of Global Warming than a snowy February is disproof, but now that "Stupid" is a valid alternative point of view in this country, proof is what we say it is. Right?

I was in my front yard this morning cutting down two old crippled trees when that jerk neighbor came by again, telling me I'd better not let Al Gore know I was cutting down trees. The last time he felt the need to spew his GOP Talking Point Load in my driveway I didn't feel like getting into it, but this morning I was in too good a mood to put up with the Stupid. So I mentioned to him about the Righty Mag with the drawing of Gore with his pants down and that I was waiting for a retraction now that winter ended a month and a half early, and he goes off on how there's more ice on the poles now than there ever was and a lot more Glen Beck sounding blah blah. I asked him where he read/heard that, because all I've seen are stories with satellite photos of chunks of Antarctica the size of New York breaking off and floating away.

His answer, as he quickly walked away: "Everywhere!"
"

http://www.politicalgroove.com/threads/19420-When-quot-Stupid-quot-becomes-a-valid-poiiint-of-view

The thread title had me fooled a moment. I thought it would be about the "stuck on stupid" state that the AGW movement is in.

I completely understand that point of view...

HAHAHAHAHA!!!!

Nancy Pelosi said recently that she has spoken with little children about what health care would mean to them. She stated that some of the children were as young as SIX WEEKS OLD.

At least she found an intellectual equal to talk to.

Stupid has been a point of view ever since the Libs took over.

See how that works??

Two can play that game.

For every " stupid " thing someone on the right has said, an equal and opposite thing can be found coming from someone on the left.

_____________________________________________________________________

By the way....in case you haven't noticed....the Global Warming hoax has been exposed. And I'm not speaking about the snowfall over the Winter.

You can stop honking about it now.

Pelosi said that? (needs citation) but even if then a gaff is a gaff...the point is that people who feed off POX are usually ignorant morons like this girl's neighbor.

Oh for God sake! All this crap reminds me of the story of the three blind men and the elephant. No one sees clearly.

Yeah. She actually did say that.

I was listening to KFI online and I actually heard the audio.

The point is, no matter what, BOTH sides say some incredibly stupid things.

Kinda like Harry Reid saying that our tax system is " voluntary ". lol

Either side will screw us one way or the other, we just choose the lesser of two evils now.

Shame is that we have to choose the lesser of two evils.

Okay, let's compare these statments:

"...said to 6 month old babies"

with this one

"Iraq has weapons of mass-destruction"

Eh?

Like I said...BOTH sides say some incredibly stupid things.

By the way...just for the record....

The Dems voted along with everyone else as far as going into Iraq.

If they now want to argue that Bush lied....then they are as much to blame as anyone else because they allowed themselves to be duped ( if indeed that's what happened ) by him.

Funny how the pols like to revise their positions after the fact.

Congress was lied to as well....are you guys still so deep in denial of the disasters of your party's deeds? "Iraq has WMD's"...one million Muslims and 5K coalition troops...millions displaced, 30 to 40 thousand injured...helped bankrupt our economy and ruin our reputation in the world and to some of you half-wits it's ok to say.."OOPS SORRY FOR THE MISUNDERSTANDING"???

What planet are some one here?

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
--President Bill Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998


"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by:
-- Democratic Senators Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others, Oct. 9, 1998

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction."
-- Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force -- if necessary -- to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members ... It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
-- Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"Without question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation ... And now he is miscalculating America's response to his continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real..."
-- Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003

for me i realize. if the story from fox news. must likely is completely made up.

After 9-11 dare anyone to question the administration's assertions...they were duped as many were to buy into the LIES that the Neo-con's perpetuated on EVERYONE....we all know the truth now...and it's NOT who told the second or third lie...it's the original LIAR who is the criminal...this guy et.al.

here is the problem.question is did or does Iraq have wmd. must likely Saddam did have wmd. must likely. they went to Syria, i can be for sure there not in Iran. but in the end, the usa army has not found wmd. so war was a waste of humen life. for what.

look again at the dates on those quotes

most of em were long before Bush was even President

but seems like conservatives always leave out how Saddam got those weapons. facts are USA gave Saddam those weapons in Saddam war with Iran. so when Iraq does not do what usa wants it bombs Iraq. something in this phase of life don't seem fair.

BS, neither of the statements made before the Dippic was illegally installed into the WH were about invading Iraq...we had a no-fly zone and were doing ops to contain Iraq...what changed? 9-11 gave the Dippic the chance to lie us into this war...

"say anything" is not a very smart debate tactic...

lets look at the facts of 9/11. hijackers came to USA through Canada. all trained in Afghanistan. notice in the statement . Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11.who died and left USA in charge. if iraq want to fly wherever. its not USA business.