Topic: Why do women act like all men are dogs? | |
---|---|
so if a guy takes the notion that women think men are dogs into a new relationship, then aren't they doing the same? Assuming the women will treat them like dogs? Just a thought
|
|
|
|
Truth is that we should not let individual experiences hinder us from meeting the exceptional.. Attraction=partner+partner screws up=we are still attracted to them. It is the base of attraction, we are attracted to (x) when (x) is bad for us for any multitude of things...so regardless of it ending with (x), we will still have the base attraction of (x) and will in good form base every single other relationship experience off of (x)...regardless of if we happen to date (y) or (z) or 1, 2, 3...experience is the teacher. Personally, base everything you can on experience...it is, after all, the only thing that is constant. |
|
|
|
actually men who think that is always trying to prove different even if he's not that. So that internalization initially breaks down the platform of the "encounter"... So in other word she thinks that and he knows that she thinks it.
|
|
|
|
If you flip a coin 100 times and it comes up heads 100 times, I think you might be justified in wondering if perhaps this tells you something significant about the coin.
|
|
|
|
actually men who think that is always trying to prove different even if he's not that. So that internalization initially breaks down the platform of the "encounter"... So in other word she thinks that and he knows that she thinks it. If he's always trying to prove he's not a dog, what's the problem? If someone does something long enough to be believed, I don't see why the earlier assumption is still an issue. |
|
|
|
so men can read minds now???? Or could it be that the woman picked up on the vibe being sent out from the guy???
|
|
|
|
I don't. My dogs actually listen and pay attention.
|
|
|
|
But should we not question the dimensions of knowledge? We learn by questioning and rejecting the platforms of knowledge, "experience" and to fall in love we need to question what we get from every encounter whether good or bad.
|
|
|
|
questioning and learning is different than assuming...is it not?
|
|
|
|
a lot of power is held by the identifiers so in other words he know what most females think of him by that basic generalization so he is no guilt ridden by something he's not..
|
|
|
|
It not about reading mind or not, it is just a social taboo that we face everyday... It's just like small minded men who think that men are stronger that women( not saying literally)
|
|
|
|
true but it is proven theory in most social academia
|
|
|
|
If you flip a coin 100 times and it comes up heads 100 times, I think you might be justified in wondering if perhaps this tells you something significant about the coin. Nice analogy...I like what you did there, Lex. |
|
|
|
Just so you know, you did flip the same coin 100 times.....
|
|
|
|
If you flip a coin 100 times and it comes up heads 100 times, I think you might be justified in wondering if perhaps this tells you something significant about the coin. Nice analogy...I like what you did there, Lex. Thanks. There's even a point in there somewhere! |
|
|
|
Just so you know, you did flip the same coin 100 times..... In the example, yes. In real life -- 100 different coins. All heads, all the time. There is trouble at the mint. |
|
|
|
true but it is proven theory in most social academia Theories aren't proven, otherwise they would be called conclusions. |
|
|
|
Just so you know, you did flip the same coin 100 times..... In the example, yes. In real life -- 100 different coins. All heads, all the time. There is trouble at the mint. |
|
|
|
Do u knw what a theory is? (no offense)
|
|
|
|
Oh dear......
|
|
|