Topic: Why bash obama on this??? | |
---|---|
Frank....we are getting
|
|
|
|
1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) That's the one I use. |
|
|
|
Edited by
yellowrose10
on
Fri 10/09/09 12:32 PM
|
|
1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) That's the one I use. but you usually (from what I've seen) back it up |
|
|
|
Edited by
yellowrose10
on
Fri 10/09/09 12:32 PM
|
|
double post
|
|
|
|
1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) That's the one I use. but you usually (from what I've seen) back it up ahhh so that's my problem I don't back it up, I drop it like it's hawt! |
|
|
|
1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) That's the one I use. but you usually (from what I've seen) back it up ahhh so that's my problem I don't back it up, I drop it like it's hawt! that's only ONE of your problems doll |
|
|
|
top 5 arguments given in here, that I see a lot, are: 1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) 2. racism (the only reason people could possibly have for not agreeing with the president is racism ) 3. Obama says....(sorry but I don't always agree with what he says....just like past presidents) 4. hate or fear mongering (happens on both sides) 5. biased source (but those that complain about that use biased sources themselves and that seems to be ok) Oh ya, that's the way to turn it all around. who turn what around? Making the tone worse by rubbing it in. It's a tactic my brothers used to use if I got in trouble. They stand by reminding my punisher what I did earlier which made the situation even more unstable. Wasn't so funny at the time though. |
|
|
|
It would be more appropriate if it was called the Nobel Appeasement Prize..
|
|
|
|
top 5 arguments given in here, that I see a lot, are: 1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) 2. racism (the only reason people could possibly have for not agreeing with the president is racism ) 3. Obama says....(sorry but I don't always agree with what he says....just like past presidents) 4. hate or fear mongering (happens on both sides) 5. biased source (but those that complain about that use biased sources themselves and that seems to be ok) Oh ya, that's the way to turn it all around. who turn what around? Making the tone worse by rubbing it in. It's a tactic my brothers used to use if I got in trouble. They stand by reminding my punisher what I did earlier which made the situation even more unstable. Wasn't so funny at the time though. I do tell my son "because I said so" when I don't want an argument or to back it up....now I just give him THE LOOK |
|
|
|
1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) That's the one I use. but you usually (from what I've seen) back it up ahhh so that's my problem I don't back it up, I drop it like it's hawt! that's only ONE of your problems doll you mean I have more than 1??? |
|
|
|
It would be more appropriate if it was called the Nobel Appeasement Prize.. hey you |
|
|
|
1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) That's the one I use. but you usually (from what I've seen) back it up ahhh so that's my problem I don't back it up, I drop it like it's hawt! that's only ONE of your problems doll you mean I have more than 1??? oh let me count the ways....how long ya got? |
|
|
|
Edited by
franshade
on
Fri 10/09/09 12:41 PM
|
|
1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) That's the one I use. but you usually (from what I've seen) back it up ahhh so that's my problem I don't back it up, I drop it like it's hawt! that's only ONE of your problems doll you mean I have more than 1??? oh let me count the ways....how long ya got? I don't have long at all |
|
|
|
damn Fran...I'll have to give the shot version then
short version: what ISN'T your problem |
|
|
|
Thank goodness for a free Country to have all these opinions whether we like them or not not rhetoric. it's actually accurate. you haven't been in here more than how long??? I've seen this done...so it's not rhetoric I guess I should have clarified that I was referring *American* rhetoric in particular. It really doesn't matter how long I've been here. It's not like this political forum isn't just like every other one when it comes to hacks spouting their bi-partisan ********. |
|
|
|
Thank goodness for a free Country to have all these opinions whether we like them or not not rhetoric. it's actually accurate. you haven't been in here more than how long??? I've seen this done...so it's not rhetoric I guess I should have clarified that I was referring *American* rhetoric in particular. It really doesn't matter how long I've been here. It's not like this political forum isn't just like every other one when it comes to hacks spouting their bi-partisan ********. gotcha. I assumed you were referring to the arguments used it here |
|
|
|
gotcha. I assumed you were referring to the arguments used it here |
|
|
|
gotcha. I assumed you were referring to the arguments used it here http://scrapetv.com/News/News%20Pages/Politics/Images/sarah-palin-wink.jpg |
|
|
|
1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) That's the one I use. but you usually (from what I've seen) back it up Unlike most of the so called "right wingers" on this site. |
|
|
|
1. that's not true/not accurate (but nothing backing it up) That's the one I use. but you usually (from what I've seen) back it up Unlike most of the so called "right wingers" on this site. as well as...ummmm the other side |
|
|