1 2 3 5 7 8 9 13 14
Topic: _I_N_T_U_I_T_I_O_N - cracking the enigma...
SkyHook5652's photo
Thu 10/22/09 03:58 PM
The PEAR research was largely ignored but the results stand anyway.drinker The implications are enormous. If we can make an electromagnet by wrapping a bar of iron with wire flowing with electricity, and make it stronger by more wraps, what needs to be done to amplify the effects shown by PEAR?
Excellent question Metal.

I'm just taking a shot in the dark here, but because of the hows and whys of PEAR evolving into "The Science of the Subjective", it seems that it must involve in some way increasing the subjective aspect.

Which indicates to me that that would require something along the lines of "increasing subjective certainty".

Just an idea.
Every journey begins with a single step. The first step here researched by PEAR was "Does it happen?" and apparently proved that it does indeed happen. The next step would be something like "How does it happen or why does it happen? At some point it moves to "Can we make it happen? and on to "Can we control it?" Of course that will lead to "Should we control it? and "Who should control it?"
If you haven't read them already, there are couple other PEAR papers that are the best I've seen on a scientific approach the How and Why questions.

http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/pdfs/sos.pdf
http://www.princeton.edu/~pear/pdfs/Change_The_Rules.pdf

And as you said, we'd need to answer the How and/or Why before we could go any farther.

drinker

Edy_ca's photo
Thu 10/22/09 08:51 PM




INTUITION {I} (a gut feeling/instinct, a hunch, a 6th sense) IS a hidden resource that most of people seem to possess, but apparently don’t employ on a regular basis as, for instance, reading, writing, speaking. All of those activities are intellectual in nature -- rooted in Thinking. Consequently, an {I} must have something in common with Intellectual capability and/or Knowledge (?) However, it isn’t exactly appear to be the Knowledge {K} in itself (i.e. a learnt, stored Information), but rather an AWARENESS of the Information which hasn't been stored and/or learnt previously! (although, it’s doubtful whether perceiving anything is possible without an idea of what the Information is about...-- thus, some familiarity with the subject matter would be necessary!) Nevertheless, {I} is not the same as Knowledge! ***In fact, even the dictionary defines Knowledge and Reason as ANTONIMS to [u[Intuition (which is defined as The act or faculty of knowing or sensing without the use of rational processes; immediate cognition of something not evident or deducible ”)!!! Although that leaves 2 less values out of consideration, still the mechanism of the occurrence remains largely an enigma!

Some people are naturally intuitive, while most of the others are far from being so. Yet, everyone has the capability – to a greater or lesser degree. However, with practice, anyone can develop the “magical” ability…
Perhaps, an intense focus appears to be necessary for Intuition to occur -- suddenly, you get enlightened with the answer! As though one is getting an insight into the answer (although an Insight is identical to the intuitive awareness…) Still, just as often, you get nothing – probably, the {I} hasn’t kicked in, yet, or the focus isn't intense enough?...)

Have you ever experienced regrets of not following your gut instincts? I know, I have: usually, when faced with the decision, an idea would pop up in my mind out of nowhere -- totally illogical, totally unreasonable, often one of the first hypothesis (and, therefore, the most often overlooked one) -- because, when I tried to reason it out, it wouldn't appear as practical... And yet, afterwards, I'd be thinking regretfully -- I should've listened to my Inner Voice (i.e. Intuition)!..

Yet, recognizing the intuitive thoughts from the multitude of various other conjectures, going through one's mind, doesn't always (if ever) appear possible! They look and feel like any other conjecture – even less logical than the rest… Yet, acquiring the mastery of Intuition is one of the secrets of WISDOM – wise people may not always know the answer, yet they’ve acquired the habit of trusting their Intuition!!! (and the same, I suspect, may be said of “INGENUITY”!!!)
.
. . . . . . . . . . . . what . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Puzzles, Puzzles, Puzzles -- the nature of life! Yet, sooner or later, most of puzzles eventually turn into the "pieces of cake" (with lots of crumbs :smile: )! However, until then, keep on thinking intensely... think and maybe we will crack the enigma of Intuition… (? ? ?)

P.S. People of Previous Civilizations are said to have possessed a third "wisdom" eye! Who knows, may be that has mutated into the yet undiscovered ability -- which we refer to as Intuition? ? ?

bigsmile I believe itflowerforyou

Well, if you believe it, that means YOU're REALLY WISE!!! Are you really??? bigsmile
flowerforyou I have been realizing a lot of things recently.bigsmileI am becoming more aware of the universe around me and the messages it is sending meflowerforyou


you've been smoking pot too...me too drinks

no photo
Thu 10/22/09 09:36 PM
Edited by JaneStar1 on Thu 10/22/09 10:14 PM
"How does it happen or why does it happen? "Can we make it happen? "Can we control it?" "Should we control it? "Who should control it?"

Obviously, without certain safeguards concerning our immense capabilities, there would be a total anarchy! Thus, such capabilities are better be well guarded and the appropriate contre-measures would have to be implemented... Nevetheless, accidents do happen... Hopefully, by the time the phenomenon becomes wide spread -- accessible to the general public -- the public's conscience will be raised to the appropriate tolerable level...

_______________Intuition notes 2_______________
____________DEFINITION OF TERMS:
-- telepathy: mind-to-mind communication;
-- clairvoyance: information received from a distant place;
-- precognition: information received from a distant time;
-- presentiment: a response to a future emotional event;
-- the 6th sense/ESP: perceptual experiences that transcend the usual boundaries of space and time.


*** astronomer Carl Sagan, in one of his last books, "The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark", wrote, "At the time of writing there are three claims in the ESP field which, in my opinion, deserve serious study:
(1) that by thought alone humans can (barely) affect random number generators in computers;
(2) that people under mild sensory deprivation can receive thoughts or images "projected" at them;
(3) that young children sometimes report the details of a previous life, which upon checking turned out to be accurate and which they could not have known about in any other way than reincarnation."

Clearly, human intelligence is more than logic, and comprehension is more than consciousness. Psychologist George Miller illustrated this truth using a conversation between two ship passengers: "'There sure is a lot of water in the ocean,' said one. 'Yes,' answered his friend, 'and we've only seen the top of it.'" laugh

--- rational thinking is masculine and intuition is feminine.

>>> genuine intuition (as a survival mechanism hard-wired into all of us) can be safely relied upon. It's inherently trustworthy, whereas our emotions need to be viewed much more cautiously.

The unconscious is where most of the work of the mind gets done; it's the repository of automatic skills (riding a bike), the source of intuition and dreams, the engine of much information processing. Fleeting perceptions register on the unconscious mind long before we may be aware of them.

Because our minds work through analogy and association, whenever a situation reminds us, consciously or unconsciously, of a disturbing event from the past, we're compelled -- or better, "cued"-- to respond to that situation just as we did earlier.

**** But if the present-day circumstance "triggers" us, we'll still react to it as though it were a recurrence of the original situation. Regressing to an earlier emotional state, in the moment our rational mind is impaired, unable to function logically.

-------Just as our thoughts govern our emotions, our emotions in turn govern our behavior. (a rather obvious and, frankly, useless piece of wizdom!)

metalwing's photo
Fri 10/23/09 06:18 AM



--- rational thinking is masculine and intuition is feminine.


The unconscious is where most of the work of the mind gets done; it's the repository of automatic skills (riding a bike), the source of intuition and dreams, the engine of much information processing. Fleeting perceptions register on the unconscious mind long before we may be aware of them.



Excellent post Jane drinks

This brings up a politically incorrect scientific study that I saw maybe twenty years ago. The human brain was frozen and sliced thin and male brains were compared to female brains. Lo and behold, there were actual structural differences in the hard wiring of the sexes. Female brains contain a network of "interconnections" that do not exist in the male counterpart. The network appeared to provide additional connectivity to the various functions of the brain.

It was postulated that the need to protect children and provide widespread communication in times of communal danger caused the female mind to draw on as many resources at once as possible. Even today, in the midst of an intense conversation with several other people a woman can pick up and focus on her own child's faint cry of distress. This ability is not intuition, but draws on the same subconscious processing power as intuition.

Conversely, thousands of years ago men had the task of predatory hunting. Focus was the name of the game with analytical skills to stalk and subconscious in depth calculation of vectors and physics to hit the running deer with the spear while themselves running (the vector mathematics are actually quite complex). Communication was minimal to avoid spooking the animals so only a hand signal or a grunt was all that was required to convey instructions. In order to maximize the focus potential, additional input from other parts of the brain would just lead to distraction.

This study "explained" why men do so much better at math than women and got instantly sent to the "science from hell" file. I am not being judgmental about the study here. I just think it meshes with your "male=rational, female=intuitive" comment. I think we both have both abilities to greater or lesser degree.




no photo
Sat 10/24/09 11:07 PM
Edited by JaneStar1 on Sat 10/24/09 11:11 PM
"male=rational, female=intuitive" -- I think we both have both abilities to greater or lesser degree.

I don't know about most of the other folks in here, but you and I might definitely have these abilities to greater or lesser degree.
Although most of the instinctual hunting habits have mostly developed over time, i.e. are experince based -- involve reason! Though, I can imagine the encient hunter intuitively setting the trap "here" instead of "there"... (for no apparent reason!)

It appears, there really is a difference between sexes: "Female brains contain a network of "interconnections" that do not exist in the male counterpart." Probably, that's a compensation for the child-bearing hardships... spock

From my personal experience, up to grade 10 I used to be the best pupil in mathematics. Unfortunately, the nature took its course and I became only the 4th best!
Nevertheless, I've always kept my boyfriends amazed with the ability of seeing through their tricks -- attempting to get into my pents!!!

If you'd like some fascinating reading, try searching for "Volf Messing" -- Messing, Volf, 1899-1974 (Russia's greatest psychic)!
(A not-so-Russian name suggests his Western origins...)

metalwing's photo
Sun 10/25/09 05:30 AM
Wolf reminds me of Edgar Casey who had different abilities and was much more documented. They were both the most renowned psychics of their time. It would appear Wolf Messing's abilities were uniquely powerful in controlling the minds of others.

no photo
Thu 10/29/09 09:38 PM
Edited by JaneStar1 on Thu 10/29/09 10:03 PM
By the way, have you heard the latest news:
The scientists at the University of California have succeded in producing a male sperm from the stem cells! ! !


Do you recognize the implications?
According to my intuition :
It means it would soon be possible growing embrios in test-tubes!
(Now they only have to invent the artificial womb -- instead of using female volunteers...)

And do you recognize the implications of that?
That means next decade (if not even earlier) colonization of the near space will become possible!!!

Finally, Humans will have their own subordinate race!!!

And do you recognize the implications of that?
That means the Afgany women would no longer be forced into having 5-6 kids -- enough to sacrifice a couple for suicide bombings! laugh


metalwing's photo
Fri 10/30/09 10:09 AM

By the way, have you heard the latest news:
The scientists at the University of California have succeded in producing a male sperm from the stem cells! ! !


Do you recognize the implications?
According to my intuition :
It means it would soon be possible growing embrios in test-tubes!
(Now they only have to invent the artificial womb -- instead of using female volunteers...)




I thought you were going to say men won't be necessary anymore! laugh

no photo
Fri 10/30/09 11:48 AM
Edited by Jeanniebean on Fri 10/30/09 11:48 AM

By the way, have you heard the latest news:
The scientists at the University of California have succeded in producing a male sperm from the stem cells! ! !


Do you recognize the implications?
According to my intuition :
It means it would soon be possible growing embrios in test-tubes!
(Now they only have to invent the artificial womb -- instead of using female volunteers...)





For the artifical womb, use a cow's belly like the aliens do.


yellowrose10's photo
Fri 10/30/09 11:55 AM
I have deleted a couple of posts in here. Please stay on topic and avoid the insults and attacking.

Thank you,
Kim
Site Moderator

metalwing's photo
Fri 10/30/09 11:57 AM
Crap! I missed something good! Work can be such a distraction at times.

no photo
Sat 10/31/09 02:58 AM
I thought you were going to say men won't be necessary anymore!


Oh, metal (not to mention wing, especially the right one), at times you can be simply preposterous!!! How could you presume I was going to say such an utter nonsence, really???
* Men may no longer be necessary for insemination, but I'm still craving the afterglow conversation and caress... laugh

As far as using the cow belly for embrios development -- as the aliens do -- no wonder they would never succede in conquering the Humanity: the only thing that can develop from the cow's womb is a Moo-lien!!! laugh

metalwing's photo
Sat 10/31/09 05:39 AM

I thought you were going to say men won't be necessary anymore!


Oh, metal (not to mention wing, especially the right one), at times you can be simply preposterous!!! How could you presume I was going to say such an utter nonsence, really???
* Men may no longer be necessary for insemination, but I'm still craving the afterglow conversation and caress... laugh

As far as using the cow belly for embrios development -- as the aliens do -- no wonder they would never succede in conquering the Humanity: the only thing that can develop from the cow's womb is a Moo-lien!!! laugh


That's pretty funny! Depending upon the topic, I am accused of being either left wing or right wing pretty much on an equal basis. I guess having two equal wings is what makes me fly straight.laugh

I am glad us men have some use other than sperm producers.flowerforyou

no photo
Sun 11/01/09 01:16 AM
Oh, I'm quite sure you can caress and provide quite a conversation...
The question is: CAN YOU DELIVER THE AFTERGLOW? what ???... laugh

metalwing's photo
Sun 11/01/09 06:59 AM

Oh, I'm quite sure you can caress and provide quite a conversation...
The question is: CAN YOU DELIVER THE AFTERGLOW?
what ???... laugh


Jane! Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson already did that in 1964. They won the Nobel prize. So how could I claim to deliver the afterglow when it has already been delivered?:cry: tears what

I could have a pizza delivered.flowerforyou

no photo
Sun 11/01/09 05:41 PM
Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson already did that in 1964. They won the Nobel prize. So how could I claim to deliver the afterglow when it has already been delivered?


You must be pulling my leg!!! (which I don't mind, if you're careful..) But, frankly, I'm not even familiar with those gentlemen! Besides, if they made some lucky girl glow, I'm sure that wasn't me -- that was even before I was born, for pete's sake!!! (unless your talking about some ohter afterglow which I'm not familiar with(?) LOL

I'd appreciate if you could clarify it? ? ?

metalwing's photo
Sun 11/01/09 05:49 PM

Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson already did that in 1964. They won the Nobel prize. So how could I claim to deliver the afterglow when it has already been delivered?


You must be pulling my leg!!! (which I don't mind, if you're careful..) But, frankly, I'm not even familiar with those gentlemen! Besides, if they made some lucky girl glow, I'm sure that wasn't me -- that was even before I was born, for pete's sake!!! (unless your talking about some ohter afterglow which I'm not familiar with(?) LOL

I'd appreciate if you could clarify it? ? ?


They discovered the afterglow of the big bang. They called it Cosmic Background Radiation. They wore working for AT&T and found it by accident with a small radio telescope.

Does that make you glow a little?flowerforyou

no photo
Sun 11/01/09 08:56 PM
Edited by JaneStar1 on Sun 11/01/09 08:59 PM
Oh yeah, I recall something I've heard about the Cosmic Background Radiation... Than you! (I was just pulling your wing!)

Not only did I get excited, but I felt compelled of relieving myself... (unfortunately, you're far away!) Nevertheless, keeping you in my mind while I was at it, gave me a few pleasant moments -- though not long enough to make me actually "glow"! biggrin

no photo
Thu 11/05/09 12:22 AM
Something (well, obviously, MY INTUITION) is telling me.. WE'RE AT THE VERGE OF A MAJOR BREAKTHROUGH!!!

metalwing's photo
Thu 11/05/09 06:00 AM
I got an idea. Let's use this thread to make predictions!

I predict MAJOR news will come out of the climate change conference.

1 2 3 5 7 8 9 13 14