100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Buffalo, NY | |
|---|---|
|
|
 I dont think they could actually do it
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i think so
it would be the end of the world as we know it hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmm there is a song in there some where  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i think so it would be the end of the world as we know it hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmm there is a song in there some where The end of the world as THEY know it. (The two goverments)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am so glad that criminal regime is out of power. It is a huge pattern of disregard for our basic rights from torture to wire tapping. We dodged a bullet for sure I think they were one step away from martial law. Thank goodness we didnt have another 911 type event to inspire them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I am so glad that criminal regime is out of power. It is a huge pattern of disregard for our basic rights from torture to wire tapping. We dodged a bullet for sure I think they were one step away from martial law. Thank goodness we didnt have another 911 type event to inspire them. Yeah me too. Its frightening to think about the past 8 years and how they tricked so many people. I thank GOD we made it thru that. Those maniacs were capable of anything, and a lot of gullible people supported themANYTHING is better than those psychos. That is why I am reluctant to criticize what we got now. I dont want to look a gift horse in the mouth
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i think so it would be the end of the world as we know it hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmm there is a song in there some where http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E7MM30BUh8&feature=related REM/End Of The World As We Know It (And I feel Fine) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Bestinshow
on
Sat 07/25/09 04:19 PM
|
|
I am so glad that criminal regime is out of power. It is a huge pattern of disregard for our basic rights from torture to wire tapping. We dodged a bullet for sure I think they were one step away from martial law. Thank goodness we didnt have another 911 type event to inspire them. Yeah me too. Its frightening to think about the past 8 years and how they tricked so many people.I thank GOD we made it thru that. Those maniacs were capable of anything, and a lot of gullible people supported themANYTHING is better than those psychos. That is why I am reluctant to criticize what we got now. I dont want to look a gift horse in the mouth |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think EVERY conservative republican should read this and read the stuff adj4u put up about the deal with canada. Their patriotic Commander in Chief was willing to sell out the citizens of this country and allow a FOREIGN military to invade OUR soveriegn territory. So much for their patriotism. I dont see how anyone could vote republican or call themself a conservative after learning about this stuff But then again,some of these people have been able to rationalize torture and the demonization of their fellow Americans (muslims,liberals,gays,etc.)so I wont get my hopes up I think some of these people are actually sadists disguising themselves a patriots
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
crickstergo
on
Sat 07/25/09 06:53 PM
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002.
ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How soon one forgets....911... and the atmosphere of FEAR that existed for the American people and for the Bush administration to protect the country against an unknown enemy. The year according to the article was 2002. It is easy to say after 8 years with no attacks that something like this would be wrong but in 2002 to not have such a backup plan would have been insane.... Suppose there had been 20 more terrorist lurking somewhere in the US. My thoughts as well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002. ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. NO MILITARY ACTION ON U.S. SOILFor any reason ever.A lot of us have learned our lesson about trusting "patriotic" goverments. Never again no matter what Not this American
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002. ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. NO MILITARY ACTION ON U.S. SOILFor any reason ever.A lot of us have learned our lesson about trusting "patriotic" goverments. Never again no matter what Not this American So you would let terrorist inside the US with a nuclear weapon destroy three states and not call in the military?  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Unknow
on
Sat 07/25/09 07:44 PM
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002. ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. NO MILITARY ACTION ON U.S. SOILFor any reason ever.A lot of us have learned our lesson about trusting "patriotic" goverments. Never again no matter what Not this American So you would let terrorist inside the US with a nuclear weapon destroy three states and not call in the military? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Sat 07/25/09 07:40 PM
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002. ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. NO MILITARY ACTION ON U.S. SOILFor any reason ever.A lot of us have learned our lesson about trusting "patriotic" goverments. Never again no matter what Not this American So you would let terrorist inside the US with a nuclear weapon destroy three states and not call in the military? whut?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mirror, you said no military action on the US soil ever.
So if the military was need to search a 3 state area for a terrorist with a nuclear bomb, you would still say no? Do you also believe, natural disasters do not required military involvement? Just asking. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002. ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. NO MILITARY ACTION ON U.S. SOILFor any reason ever.A lot of us have learned our lesson about trusting "patriotic" goverments. Never again no matter what Not this American So you would let terrorist inside the US with a nuclear weapon destroy three states and not call in the military? What does it have to do with "letting terrorists into the country"? How does the Constitution "let terrorists in"? What nuclear weapon? How would a nuclear weapon destroy 3 states? No explosion is that big The military can somehow reverse a sci fi bomb that can blow up three states? I think I seen that on Star Trek  We have FBI and law enforcement to arrest terrorists found in this country,jails to put them in,and courts to determine their guilt. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How soon one forgets....911... and the atmosphere of FEAR that existed for the American people and for the Bush administration to protect the country against an unknown enemy. The year according to the article was 2002. It is easy to say after 8 years with no attacks that something like this would be wrong but in 2002 to not have such a backup plan would have been insane.... Suppose there had been 20 more terrorist lurking somewhere in the US. AMEN!!!!! Winx... you are beating a dead horse... why bring up the 7yr old article here what is your point? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mirror, you said no military action on the US soil ever. So if the military was need to search a 3 state area for a terrorist with a nuclear bomb, you would still say no? Do you also believe, natural disasters do not required military involvement? Just asking. Dispatching troops into the streets is virtually unheard of. The Constitution and various laws restrict the military from being used to conduct domestic raids and seize property. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=403d90d6-7a61-41ac-8cef-902a1d14879d&k=14984
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Sat 07/25/09 07:56 PM
|
|
How soon one forgets....911... and the atmosphere of FEAR that existed for the American people and for the Bush administration to protect the country against an unknown enemy. The year according to the article was 2002. It is easy to say after 8 years with no attacks that something like this would be wrong but in 2002 to not have such a backup plan would have been insane.... Suppose there had been 20 more terrorist lurking somewhere in the US. AMEN!!!!! Winx... you are beating a dead horse... why bring up the 7yr old article here what is your point? It's not a 7 yr. old article.  It's from today. It's not a dead horse. It's new information. Sat Jul 25, 4:02 pm |
|
|
|
|
