Topic: Buffalo, NY | |
---|---|
![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
i think so
it would be the end of the world as we know it hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmm there is a song in there some where ![]() |
|
|
|
i think so it would be the end of the world as we know it hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmm there is a song in there some where ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
I am so glad that criminal regime is out of power. It is a huge pattern of disregard for our basic rights from torture to wire tapping. We dodged a bullet for sure I think they were one step away from martial law. Thank goodness we didnt have another 911 type event to inspire them.
|
|
|
|
I am so glad that criminal regime is out of power. It is a huge pattern of disregard for our basic rights from torture to wire tapping. We dodged a bullet for sure I think they were one step away from martial law. Thank goodness we didnt have another 911 type event to inspire them. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
i think so it would be the end of the world as we know it hhhhhmmmmmmmmmmm there is a song in there some where ![]() http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0E7MM30BUh8&feature=related REM/End Of The World As We Know It (And I feel Fine) ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Bestinshow
on
Sat 07/25/09 04:19 PM
|
|
I am so glad that criminal regime is out of power. It is a huge pattern of disregard for our basic rights from torture to wire tapping. We dodged a bullet for sure I think they were one step away from martial law. Thank goodness we didnt have another 911 type event to inspire them. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
crickstergo
on
Sat 07/25/09 06:53 PM
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002.
ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. |
|
|
|
How soon one forgets....911... and the atmosphere of FEAR that existed for the American people and for the Bush administration to protect the country against an unknown enemy. The year according to the article was 2002. It is easy to say after 8 years with no attacks that something like this would be wrong but in 2002 to not have such a backup plan would have been insane.... Suppose there had been 20 more terrorist lurking somewhere in the US. My thoughts as well. |
|
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002. ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002. ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() So you would let terrorist inside the US with a nuclear weapon destroy three states and not call in the military? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
Unknow
on
Sat 07/25/09 07:44 PM
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002. ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() So you would let terrorist inside the US with a nuclear weapon destroy three states and not call in the military? ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Sat 07/25/09 07:40 PM
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002. ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() So you would let terrorist inside the US with a nuclear weapon destroy three states and not call in the military? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
Mirror, you said no military action on the US soil ever.
So if the military was need to search a 3 state area for a terrorist with a nuclear bomb, you would still say no? Do you also believe, natural disasters do not required military involvement? Just asking. |
|
|
|
So most that posted seem to be against using the military to round up possible terrorist in 2002. ISN'T THAT THE SAME DECISION BUSH MADE TOO! Isn't that ironic, Bush Bashers on the same page as Bush! But Bush made his decision without the knowledge that there would be no more attacks. Songsbirds would be singing a different tune if there had been several more follow up attacks of the same magnitude. ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() So you would let terrorist inside the US with a nuclear weapon destroy three states and not call in the military? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
How soon one forgets....911... and the atmosphere of FEAR that existed for the American people and for the Bush administration to protect the country against an unknown enemy. The year according to the article was 2002. It is easy to say after 8 years with no attacks that something like this would be wrong but in 2002 to not have such a backup plan would have been insane.... Suppose there had been 20 more terrorist lurking somewhere in the US. AMEN!!!!! Winx... you are beating a dead horse... why bring up the 7yr old article here what is your point? |
|
|
|
Mirror, you said no military action on the US soil ever. So if the military was need to search a 3 state area for a terrorist with a nuclear bomb, you would still say no? Do you also believe, natural disasters do not required military involvement? Just asking. ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
http://www.canada.com/topics/news/story.html?id=403d90d6-7a61-41ac-8cef-902a1d14879d&k=14984
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Winx
on
Sat 07/25/09 07:56 PM
|
|
How soon one forgets....911... and the atmosphere of FEAR that existed for the American people and for the Bush administration to protect the country against an unknown enemy. The year according to the article was 2002. It is easy to say after 8 years with no attacks that something like this would be wrong but in 2002 to not have such a backup plan would have been insane.... Suppose there had been 20 more terrorist lurking somewhere in the US. AMEN!!!!! Winx... you are beating a dead horse... why bring up the 7yr old article here what is your point? It's not a 7 yr. old article. ![]() It's not a dead horse. It's new information. Sat Jul 25, 4:02 pm |
|
|