Topic: Political Leaders for 9/11 Truth Officially Launches
think2deep's photo
Mon 03/09/09 08:48 AM

T2...i do know about you from your emails back when i tried to defend your beliefs whether i agreed or not. until you blamed me for other peoples posts just because i had the nerve to disagree with your theory.

i actually look at many theories....and not decide on just one until i feel that it is right

theories for 9/11:
1. US cover up - whether someone in power in the US had an agenda or they were covering up a mistake
2. the ones responsible for crashing the planes may have had someone in the Pentagon to let them know about the drill
3. it could be a weird coincidence.


YES i look at these and any other theory....i don't jump on a band wagon just because the leaders so it's true or because of someone's opinion


how far have you researched? you just leave yourself staying in the questioning mode. i dont.

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 03/09/09 08:50 AM


T2...i do know about you from your emails back when i tried to defend your beliefs whether i agreed or not. until you blamed me for other peoples posts just because i had the nerve to disagree with your theory.

i actually look at many theories....and not decide on just one until i feel that it is right

theories for 9/11:
1. US cover up - whether someone in power in the US had an agenda or they were covering up a mistake
2. the ones responsible for crashing the planes may have had someone in the Pentagon to let them know about the drill
3. it could be a weird coincidence.


YES i look at these and any other theory....i don't jump on a band wagon just because the leaders so it's true or because of someone's opinion


how far have you researched? you just leave yourself staying in the questioning mode. i dont.


i have said before that i'm out of the loop. i do have other things to do. you seem threatened by anyone asking questions to get different opinions of what the posters IN HERE (NOT ON ANOTHER SITE) have to think

just because i don't jump at one theory doesn't mean i don't research or ask questions or use my brain.

no photo
Mon 03/09/09 08:51 AM



you guys just don't even understand how hard i'm laughing right now. i'm talking to a real kagney and lacey detective group. thank you so much for the early morning giggles.


enjoy it


rose, i have researched this to a point of wanting to just fall down. i have gathered so much info on it. at what point am i not to keep questioning it? you don't realize how much evidence is mounting out there. thats why you aren't quick to jump to a theory. war and i have already been through yours and winxs thought process. that ended long ago for me. once you start seeing the puzzles come together then it starts gettin easier to believe that something is amiss. so at that point you get way farther then you two's little 'alternate theories'


The difference between you and war is that he doesn't talk down to people who don't agree with him. He just provides lots of info here for people to read. You however, talk down to those who don't agree with you.

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 03/09/09 08:52 AM
T2...then use credible resources to prove your opinion. show us the research and not from wiki or blogs of others opinions!!!!!!!!

at least i am trying to see broader, outside the box views

think2deep's photo
Mon 03/09/09 08:52 AM



T2...i do know about you from your emails back when i tried to defend your beliefs whether i agreed or not. until you blamed me for other peoples posts just because i had the nerve to disagree with your theory.

i actually look at many theories....and not decide on just one until i feel that it is right

theories for 9/11:
1. US cover up - whether someone in power in the US had an agenda or they were covering up a mistake
2. the ones responsible for crashing the planes may have had someone in the Pentagon to let them know about the drill
3. it could be a weird coincidence.


YES i look at these and any other theory....i don't jump on a band wagon just because the leaders so it's true or because of someone's opinion


how far have you researched? you just leave yourself staying in the questioning mode. i dont.


i have said before that i'm out of the loop. i do have other things to do. you seem threatened by anyone asking questions to get different opinions of what the posters IN HERE (NOT ON ANOTHER SITE) have to think

just because i don't jump at one theory doesn't mean i don't research or ask questions or use my brain.


i'm not threatened by your lack of knowledge on the subject. because that's what it is. i'm just defending my right to post my opinion on this ****ing thread.

wiley's photo
Mon 03/09/09 08:53 AM

i'm not threatened by your lack of knowledge on the subject. because that's what it is.


Then it should be pretty easy to move on to another subject... right?

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 03/09/09 08:53 AM




T2...i do know about you from your emails back when i tried to defend your beliefs whether i agreed or not. until you blamed me for other peoples posts just because i had the nerve to disagree with your theory.

i actually look at many theories....and not decide on just one until i feel that it is right

theories for 9/11:
1. US cover up - whether someone in power in the US had an agenda or they were covering up a mistake
2. the ones responsible for crashing the planes may have had someone in the Pentagon to let them know about the drill
3. it could be a weird coincidence.


YES i look at these and any other theory....i don't jump on a band wagon just because the leaders so it's true or because of someone's opinion


how far have you researched? you just leave yourself staying in the questioning mode. i dont.


i have said before that i'm out of the loop. i do have other things to do. you seem threatened by anyone asking questions to get different opinions of what the posters IN HERE (NOT ON ANOTHER SITE) have to think

just because i don't jump at one theory doesn't mean i don't research or ask questions or use my brain.


i'm not threatened by your lack of knowledge on the subject. because that's what it is. i'm just defending my right to post my opinion on this ****ing thread.


until people don't agree with you then you think the world is picking on you

like sing said...war actually gives info to think about

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 03/09/09 08:54 AM
war....why should these theories be dismissed?

theories for 9/11:
1. US cover up - whether someone in power in the US had an agenda or they were covering up a mistake
2. the ones responsible for crashing the planes may have had someone in the Pentagon to let them know about the drill
3. it could be a weird coincidence.

warmachine's photo
Mon 03/09/09 08:57 AM

War,

There are alot of questions to be answered. Hopefully the investigative group that you showed on a thread can get to the bottom of it.


I sure hope so, even though there have been groups like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 that have far more credibility to me, because what they're doing to based on science. The political leaders site is important, because hopefully they can use their clout to kick the door open on this subject.

I firmly believe that no hijackers could have defeated our air defense system without help. When golfer Payne Stewart died, his plane had went off course and they had jets scrambled and on him within 10-20 minutes. Where were the Jets on 9/11? Especially after the first plane hit?

I could just keep this up all day, so i should stop!

Winx's photo
Mon 03/09/09 08:58 AM



you guys just don't even understand how hard i'm laughing right now. i'm talking to a real kagney and lacey detective group. thank you so much for the early morning giggles.


enjoy it


rose, i have researched this to a point of wanting to just fall down. i have gathered so much info on it. at what point am i not to keep questioning it? you don't realize how much evidence is mounting out there. thats why you aren't quick to jump to a theory. war and i have already been through yours and winxs thought process. that ended long ago for me. once you start seeing the puzzles come together then it starts gettin easier to believe that something is amiss. so at that point you get way farther then you two's little 'alternate theories'


War doesn't go through my thought processes. laugh He has better things to do with his time. He answers questions when people have them. He is not rude or condescending about it. He accepts the fact that people have different opinions.

think2deep's photo
Mon 03/09/09 09:00 AM


War,

There are alot of questions to be answered. Hopefully the investigative group that you showed on a thread can get to the bottom of it.


I sure hope so, even though there have been groups like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 that have far more credibility to me, because what they're doing to based on science. The political leaders site is important, because hopefully they can use their clout to kick the door open on this subject.

I firmly believe that no hijackers could have defeated our air defense system without help. When golfer Payne Stewart died, his plane had went off course and they had jets scrambled and on him within 10-20 minutes. Where were the Jets on 9/11? Especially after the first plane hit?

I could just keep this up all day, so i should stop!


war, i stopped with these two long ago. you can answer there questions and they will still have the same question afterward lol.

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 03/09/09 09:01 AM



i'm not threatened by your lack of knowledge on the subject. because that's what it is.


Then it should be pretty easy to move on to another subject... right?


no, because i'm still being entertained by this one. i don't try to give rose and winx any information anymore, it's not worth my time. but just arguing with them is just plain entertainment because all that will be accomplished with them is arguing about how arrogant i am lol. there is no substance to their methods, they just hate me and want to see me fall no matter what. because they are such sweethearts lol.


seriously..move on with your life. i don't hate you at all and never have. remember i defended you before (even though i didn't agree) i even apologized for hijacking the putin thread because it was getting to heated in there. that isn't someone that wants you to fall or hates you. you came at me first because i dared to disagee with you.


Winx's photo
Mon 03/09/09 09:05 AM



i'm not threatened by your lack of knowledge on the subject. because that's what it is.


Then it should be pretty easy to move on to another subject... right?


no, because i'm still being entertained by this one. i don't try to give rose and winx any information anymore, it's not worth my time. but just arguing with them is just plain entertainment because all that will be accomplished with them is arguing about how arrogant i am lol. there is no substance to their methods, they just hate me and want to see me fall no matter what. because they are such sweethearts lol.


huh

Winx's photo
Mon 03/09/09 09:06 AM


War,

There are alot of questions to be answered. Hopefully the investigative group that you showed on a thread can get to the bottom of it.


I sure hope so, even though there have been groups like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 that have far more credibility to me, because what they're doing to based on science. The political leaders site is important, because hopefully they can use their clout to kick the door open on this subject.

I firmly believe that no hijackers could have defeated our air defense system without help. When golfer Payne Stewart died, his plane had went off course and they had jets scrambled and on him within 10-20 minutes. Where were the Jets on 9/11? Especially after the first plane hit?

I could just keep this up all day, so i should stop!


I've learned a lot about it from you, War.

wiley's photo
Mon 03/09/09 09:08 AM


War,

There are alot of questions to be answered. Hopefully the investigative group that you showed on a thread can get to the bottom of it.


I sure hope so, even though there have been groups like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 that have far more credibility to me, because what they're doing to based on science. The political leaders site is important, because hopefully they can use their clout to kick the door open on this subject.

I firmly believe that no hijackers could have defeated our air defense system without help. When golfer Payne Stewart died, his plane had went off course and they had jets scrambled and on him within 10-20 minutes. Where were the Jets on 9/11? Especially after the first plane hit?

I could just keep this up all day, so i should stop!


I can appreciate the number of theories on this. I just can't get my head around our government being competent enough to pull this off.

Winx's photo
Mon 03/09/09 09:09 AM
laugh

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 03/09/09 09:10 AM



War,

There are alot of questions to be answered. Hopefully the investigative group that you showed on a thread can get to the bottom of it.


I sure hope so, even though there have been groups like Architects and Engineers for 9/11 that have far more credibility to me, because what they're doing to based on science. The political leaders site is important, because hopefully they can use their clout to kick the door open on this subject.

I firmly believe that no hijackers could have defeated our air defense system without help. When golfer Payne Stewart died, his plane had went off course and they had jets scrambled and on him within 10-20 minutes. Where were the Jets on 9/11? Especially after the first plane hit?

I could just keep this up all day, so i should stop!


I can appreciate the number of theories on this. I just can't get my head around our government being competent enough to pull this off.


until all the evidence comes out....they are just that....theories

warmachine's photo
Mon 03/09/09 09:10 AM

war....why should these theories be dismissed?

theories for 9/11:
1. US cover up - whether someone in power in the US had an agenda or they were covering up a mistake
2. the ones responsible for crashing the planes may have had someone in the Pentagon to let them know about the drill
3. it could be a weird coincidence.



A little devils advocate then...

Dismissing begins
1) If I were to try to dismiss this theory, I would start with the idea that Bush wouldn't be smart enough to pull this off on his own and that by invovling a cabal of people, there would be far too much risk that someone would blow the whistle. I would also go with the risk/reward. While the event could be used as a pretext for war and the erosion of civil liberties, to get caught would probably mean execution for treason.

2) The concept of spies inside the pentagon and other places of power isn't a new idea. In fact there has been ample proof that there have been spies operating in this country, one person, not all that long ago was arrested for passing on classified intel to the Chinese and there were quite a few Israelis who had been detained for spying. To dismiss it is quite easy though, because Norad was told to stand down, no spy would have that kind of authority.

3) what are the odds that on the very day that they are running drills involving flying hijacked planes into buildings in NY, that some terrorist jack offs would be flying planes into buildings in NY? Awful dang slim I would guess, in fact, if you could have guessed that would happen, then you should play the lotto... and fast! Also, true coincidence happens to be an extremely rare creature indeed.

"War doesn't go through my thought processes. He has better things to do with his time. He answers questions when people have them. He is not rude or condescending about it. He accepts the fact that people have different opinions. "



I have found it's better to attract bees with honey, than to bang the hive with a stick!





no photo
Mon 03/09/09 09:11 AM

War doesn't go through my thought processes. laugh He has better things to do with his time. He answers questions when people have them. He is not rude or condescending about it. He accepts the fact that people have different opinions.


I knew there was a reason I liked War. I always respected the fact that he didn't fear being disagreed with.

I too think something is not right about 9/11 and am glad there is more interest now in finding out what really happened. I never bought the original finding, but then I am not apt to just take anyone's word for what happened either. I will enjoy keeping up on their findings.

yellowrose10's photo
Mon 03/09/09 09:12 AM


war....why should these theories be dismissed?

theories for 9/11:
1. US cover up - whether someone in power in the US had an agenda or they were covering up a mistake
2. the ones responsible for crashing the planes may have had someone in the Pentagon to let them know about the drill
3. it could be a weird coincidence.



A little devils advocate then...

Dismissing begins
1) If I were to try to dismiss this theory, I would start with the idea that Bush wouldn't be smart enough to pull this off on his own and that by invovling a cabal of people, there would be far too much risk that someone would blow the whistle. I would also go with the risk/reward. While the event could be used as a pretext for war and the erosion of civil liberties, to get caught would probably mean execution for treason.

2) The concept of spies inside the pentagon and other places of power isn't a new idea. In fact there has been ample proof that there have been spies operating in this country, one person, not all that long ago was arrested for passing on classified intel to the Chinese and there were quite a few Israelis who had been detained for spying. To dismiss it is quite easy though, because Norad was told to stand down, no spy would have that kind of authority.

3) what are the odds that on the very day that they are running drills involving flying hijacked planes into buildings in NY, that some terrorist jack offs would be flying planes into buildings in NY? Awful dang slim I would guess, in fact, if you could have guessed that would happen, then you should play the lotto... and fast! Also, true coincidence happens to be an extremely rare creature indeed.

"War doesn't go through my thought processes. He has better things to do with his time. He answers questions when people have them. He is not rude or condescending about it. He accepts the fact that people have different opinions. "



I have found it's better to attract bees with honey, than to bang the hive with a stick!







laugh ty war for answering me. but all of theories (regardless of how remote) are possible. we will never know without the evidence what is correct. we may never know but i do think it should be investigated