Topic: ricer or musscle car ??? | |
---|---|
what would your preference be?
i my self am for both of them, i own musscle n ricer. an they do have their advantages n disadvantages. ricers have a lower power band but better fuel milage, n to musscle way more power but piss poor fuel milage. i recieved a new car the other day a 1997 olds 2 door 4.0L high output v-6 needs body work but ill b driving it soon. |
|
|
|
Definitely a Muscle-Car. In fact, I've got one-
A 1967 Dodge Coronet R/T with hard vinyl top. I've gotta put the damn thing together (trying to find parts for the things is a real bee-yeotch), and THAT'S provided I come up with enough money to finish it. |
|
|
|
what would your preference be? i my self am for both of them, i own musscle n ricer. an they do have their advantages n disadvantages. ricers have a lower power band but better fuel milage, n to musscle way more power but piss poor fuel milage. i recieved a new car the other day a 1997 olds 2 door 4.0L high output v-6 needs body work but ill b driving it soon. |
|
|
|
72 Nova 450 hp would'nt have it any other way !
|
|
|
|
I like my acceleration.
|
|
|
|
Apples n oranges. Either or. Don't matter. To each his own. Everyone has different preferences.
|
|
|
|
muscle car cant get any better than great american muscle
|
|
|
|
I like my acceleration. true acceleration is the fun alot of cars lack this. ive had a 900 lb car with a 300 hp motor 90 in second gear it was a bunch of fun. my new olds is a kicker with acceleration too. so i guess it is the way u build it n how much acceleration u want. |
|
|
|
Hiya Speed
|
|
|
|
Skyline GTR34 imo
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Rockmybobbysocks
on
Tue 01/13/09 10:46 PM
|
|
um... classic custom prior to 1970.
I want to build my own 49 ford convertible ... one day. then muscle.. because they're orgasmic.. then import. becuase i owned a mitsubishi 3000GT and loved every moment of driving it through los angeles :p i worked blood sweat and tears to own that car on my own. lol and looked like sex on wheels in that thing. cops pulled me over just to check the car out. damn. that was back in the days of endless legs, dangerous curves and cleavage views. man.. i miss those days. *was a wild child behind the wheel* |
|
|
|
Edited by
Riding_Dubz
on
Tue 01/13/09 10:46 PM
|
|
i've had em both i like em both,
i just wish my dsm was awd instead of fwd, but then again i don't i probbally would broke it twice as fast |
|
|
|
I drive a Mitsubishi So ricer
|
|
|
|
you got a tin can on it ?
|
|
|
|
Apples n oranges. Either or. Don't matter. To each his own. Everyone has different preferences. Classic trucks (at roughly OEM height) for me. <<< My 1970 Chevy C\10 long bed on the left. And my brother's 1971 Dodge D200 Custom on the right. |
|
|
|
you got a tin can on it ? Yes, yes I do have a fart pipe on it |
|
|
|
Apples n oranges. Either or. Don't matter. To each his own. Everyone has different preferences. Classic trucks (at roughly OEM height) for me. <<< My 1970 Chevy C\10 long bed on the left. And my brother's 1971 Dodge D200 Custom on the right. i almost bought a 1973 chevy truck.. it was used for offroading by the last guy... i wanted to turn it into a project and really fix it up for street. but i guess it was 4x4 all the time. i din't get it. i kinda regret it. |
|
|
|
gst ? gsx? awd fwd turbo?
|
|
|
|
**** I wish Dubz. Its a Lancer with the OZ Rally package on it. Fwd no turbo. I wish I could afford an Evo
|
|
|
|
then it would break every other week,
pinks looose the race loose your ride, |
|
|