Previous 1
Topic: When did youtube become....
Dragoness's photo
Mon 10/27/08 10:16 PM
A reliable news source of any kind? Don't people understand that youtube or utube, however it is spelled, is a personally produced and ALTERED version of what people want to express?

The few things I have seen from there are funny sometimes and entertaining sometimes and shocking and disgusting sometimes but at no point period should it be considered a reliable news source.

Can someone tell me why some people think it is verifiable fact?

Jamesdei07's photo
Mon 10/27/08 10:22 PM

A reliable news source of any kind? Don't people understand that youtube or utube, however it is spelled, is a personally produced and ALTERED version of what people want to express?

The few things I have seen from there are funny sometimes and entertaining sometimes and shocking and disgusting sometimes but at no point period should it be considered a reliable news source.

Can someone tell me why some people think it is verifiable fact?


well in my opinion people have become so wrapped up in the whole youtube thing that they actually believe what they are seeing or hearing

Dragoness's photo
Mon 10/27/08 10:34 PM


A reliable news source of any kind? Don't people understand that youtube or utube, however it is spelled, is a personally produced and ALTERED version of what people want to express?

The few things I have seen from there are funny sometimes and entertaining sometimes and shocking and disgusting sometimes but at no point period should it be considered a reliable news source.

Can someone tell me why some people think it is verifiable fact?


well in my opinion people have become so wrapped up in the whole youtube thing that they actually believe what they are seeing or hearing


I guess that could be. I view the real news channels with some skepticism, always looking for a bias but at least they are suppose to be real news, held to some kind of standard. Utube is peoples personal playthings they put up.

Not that the artistic expression should be downplayed, it is a form of art but not factual news. At least in my opinion.

Jamesdei07's photo
Mon 10/27/08 10:34 PM



A reliable news source of any kind? Don't people understand that youtube or utube, however it is spelled, is a personally produced and ALTERED version of what people want to express?

The few things I have seen from there are funny sometimes and entertaining sometimes and shocking and disgusting sometimes but at no point period should it be considered a reliable news source.

Can someone tell me why some people think it is verifiable fact?


well in my opinion people have become so wrapped up in the whole youtube thing that they actually believe what they are seeing or hearing


I guess that could be. I view the real news channels with some skepticism, always looking for a bias but at least they are suppose to be real news, held to some kind of standard. Utube is peoples personal playthings they put up.

Not that the artistic expression should be downplayed, it is a form of art but not factual news. At least in my opinion.


right i hear ya

damnitscloudy's photo
Mon 10/27/08 11:15 PM
Youtube isn't any worse than Fox News of CNN IMO

Rapunzel's photo
Mon 10/27/08 11:18 PM
i just tune into it for the music videos flowerforyou


nothing more and nothing less drinker

damnitscloudy's photo
Mon 10/27/08 11:21 PM

i just tune into it for the music videos flowerforyou


nothing more and nothing less drinker


Oh your missing The Angry Video Game Nerd, Hot For Words, and Red State Update drinker

Winx's photo
Mon 10/27/08 11:27 PM

Youtube isn't any worse than Fox News of CNN IMO


I think that CNN tries harder than other TV stations.

What do you think is more unbiased?

warmachine's photo
Mon 10/27/08 11:29 PM
Youtube is just like anything else, a Newspaper, the T.V., whatever, you have to view it all with skepticism and do your own homework before your can produce something as verifiable fact.

damnitscloudy's photo
Mon 10/27/08 11:31 PM


Youtube isn't any worse than Fox News of CNN IMO


I think that CNN tries harder than other TV stations.

What do you think is more unbiased?


My cat does a great unbias news cast. She hates everyone lol

Winx's photo
Mon 10/27/08 11:31 PM



Youtube isn't any worse than Fox News of CNN IMO


I think that CNN tries harder than other TV stations.

What do you think is more unbiased?


My cat does a great unbias news cast. She hates everyone lol


I was asking because I haven't found a more unbiased one. I'm open to suggestions.


warmachine's photo
Mon 10/27/08 11:34 PM
The Alex Jones show, he only focuses on corruption and rarely messes with fluff. Just recently he co-hosted a pro-liberty event with Willie Nelson and Jesse Ventura.


Rapunzel's photo
Mon 10/27/08 11:39 PM


i just tune into it for the music videos flowerforyou


nothing more and nothing less drinker


Oh your missing The Angry Video Game Nerd, Hot For Words, and Red State Update drinker



it doesn't sound like i am missing anything noway



bigsmile bigsmile bigsmile bigsmile bigsmile bigsmile bigsmile bigsmile

adj4u's photo
Tue 10/28/08 09:47 AM

A reliable news source of any kind? Don't people understand that youtube or utube, however it is spelled, is a personally produced and ALTERED version of what people want to express?

The few things I have seen from there are funny sometimes and entertaining sometimes and shocking and disgusting sometimes but at no point period should it be considered a reliable news source.

Can someone tell me why some people think it is verifiable fact?


it depends on the clip

some are good and reliable

and some are conjured up comedy routines (per say)

kinda like news networks

gotta analyze the out put

and come to your own decisions

no photo
Tue 10/28/08 09:48 AM
if it's on the interweb it must be true

no photo
Tue 10/28/08 09:51 AM


Youtube isn't any worse than Fox News of CNN IMO


I think that CNN tries harder than other TV stations.

What do you think is more unbiased?


both of those are unreliable news sources. Their mission is to sell advertising. They sell a certain demographic to the advertisers and then frame all their news to keep that demographic watching. They tell you what you want to hear (unless you're not of that demographic)

Dan99's photo
Tue 10/28/08 09:53 AM
The BBC is about as unbiased as you can get i think, but then you cant completely trust any of the large studios.

no photo
Tue 10/28/08 09:54 AM
I get all my news from the 700 Club

Dan99's photo
Tue 10/28/08 09:55 AM
I get mine from the shoe shine boy

Winx's photo
Tue 10/28/08 09:59 AM



Youtube isn't any worse than Fox News of CNN IMO


I think that CNN tries harder than other TV stations.

What do you think is more unbiased?


both of those are unreliable news sources. Their mission is to sell advertising. They sell a certain demographic to the advertisers and then frame all their news to keep that demographic watching. They tell you what you want to hear (unless you're not of that demographic)


Then what do you consider better? I've been going with CNN on TV and NPR on the radio.

Previous 1