100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: RNC Spends $150,000 on Palin's... | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
money was well used - she had to dress the part
I just want to know where they are going to be donating them 
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Thu 10/23/08 01:13 PM
|
|
money was well used - she had to dress the part
I just want to know where they are going to be donating them
the republican national convention think you qualify lmao  hugz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
money was well used - she had to dress the part
I just want to know where they are going to be donating them
the republican national convention think you qualify lmao hugz
Saks here I come 
nothing stands between me and my shopping well maybe prices do
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you play nice while I was gone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
money was well used - she had to dress the part
I just want to know where they are going to be donating them
the republican national convention think you qualify lmao hugz
you think I qualify  I think you qualify too
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They will be given to Hillary
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They will be given to Hillary
now you know, Hillary dresses w/Bills Clothing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They will be given to Hillary
now you know, Hillary dresses w/Bills Clothing
 I thought bill dressed in Hillary's
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
They will be given to Hillary
now you know, Hillary dresses w/Bills Clothing
I thought bill dressed in Hillary's
That is why she needs them 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just remember... No matter how you slice it a POLL is a crossectional peek at the current OPINION of a selection of the active population. OPINION... not FACT... For facts you have to actuall dig up the data and look at it. Just because 10,000 sheep belive the dog will eat them does not mean the dog will actually eat them... This is what the dog counts on to control the herd. When you list the number of ads each canditate had... and then break that list down by the number of actual NEGATIVE ads vs POSITIVE ads you find that B.H. OBAMA did in FACT have 86% of his initial adds against the Republicans as NEGATIVE. While McCain in the same period did in FACT have only 43% of his ads as negative. Now of course they have hit the point where money makes a big diference. (Dems have an average of 4 times as much) this means that in order to be competetive Obama can afford NICER adds yet McCain can not... (it is well know in political circles that negative adds are more effective). Would you like some more facts...from September 12 to October 18 -- Barack Obama ran 119,101 negative ads at a total cost of $65 mil. (McCain ran during the same time frame approx 30,000 negative ads). In a seven day period starting Oct 12, B.H. Obama spent 22 Million on negative adds compared to approx $7 mil spent by J. McCain. Obama's camp spend a lot of time crying to the media that McCain is spreading falsehoods... Lets put that record straight for just this month alone... B.H. Obama runs add claiming that McCain will cut social security for seniors... (this is more than likely targeted at the voting seniors in florida) this add is a delibrate and misleading falsehood...(don't believe me CHECK THE FACTS look at McCain's actual proposals) Another this month.. B.H. Obama add that so badly distorts McCains position on immigration that even LEFT LEANING news services labled it (NYT - 'fradulent'. CNN - 'Absolutly and directly wrong') i.e a LIE. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Both sides spend ridiculous amounts of money on their clothing and appearances. Neither Hillary nor Barack are buying their clothes at JC Pennys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The clothes don't make the man(woman)...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The clothes don't make the man(woman)... No they don't and I really wish they would all stop spending so much money. It makes me sick. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 i need new clothes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i need new clothes
That's what happens when you hate shopping. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i need new clothes
That's what happens when you hate shopping.
Ok you got me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i need new clothes
That's what happens when you hate shopping.
Ok you got me
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just remember... No matter how you slice it a POLL is a crossectional peek at the current OPINION of a selection of the active population. OPINION... not FACT... For facts you have to actuall dig up the data and look at it. Just because 10,000 sheep belive the dog will eat them does not mean the dog will actually eat them... This is what the dog counts on to control the herd. When you list the number of ads each canditate had... and then break that list down by the number of actual NEGATIVE ads vs POSITIVE ads you find that B.H. OBAMA did in FACT have 86% of his initial adds against the Republicans as NEGATIVE. While McCain in the same period did in FACT have only 43% of his ads as negative. Now of course they have hit the point where money makes a big diference. (Dems have an average of 4 times as much) this means that in order to be competetive Obama can afford NICER adds yet McCain can not... (it is well know in political circles that negative adds are more effective). Would you like some more facts...from September 12 to October 18 -- Barack Obama ran 119,101 negative ads at a total cost of $65 mil. (McCain ran during the same time frame approx 30,000 negative ads). In a seven day period starting Oct 12, B.H. Obama spent 22 Million on negative adds compared to approx $7 mil spent by J. McCain. Obama's camp spend a lot of time crying to the media that McCain is spreading falsehoods... Lets put that record straight for just this month alone... B.H. Obama runs add claiming that McCain will cut social security for seniors... (this is more than likely targeted at the voting seniors in florida) this add is a delibrate and misleading falsehood...(don't believe me CHECK THE FACTS look at McCain's actual proposals) Another this month.. B.H. Obama add that so badly distorts McCains position on immigration that even LEFT LEANING news services labled it (NYT - 'fradulent'. CNN - 'Absolutly and directly wrong') i.e a LIE. I think that you left out the lies that McCain tells in his ads. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just remember... No matter how you slice it a POLL is a crossectional peek at the current OPINION of a selection of the active population. OPINION... not FACT... For facts you have to actuall dig up the data and look at it. Just because 10,000 sheep belive the dog will eat them does not mean the dog will actually eat them... This is what the dog counts on to control the herd. When you list the number of ads each canditate had... and then break that list down by the number of actual NEGATIVE ads vs POSITIVE ads you find that B.H. OBAMA did in FACT have 86% of his initial adds against the Republicans as NEGATIVE. While McCain in the same period did in FACT have only 43% of his ads as negative. Now of course they have hit the point where money makes a big diference. (Dems have an average of 4 times as much) this means that in order to be competetive Obama can afford NICER adds yet McCain can not... (it is well know in political circles that negative adds are more effective). Would you like some more facts...from September 12 to October 18 -- Barack Obama ran 119,101 negative ads at a total cost of $65 mil. (McCain ran during the same time frame approx 30,000 negative ads). In a seven day period starting Oct 12, B.H. Obama spent 22 Million on negative adds compared to approx $7 mil spent by J. McCain. Obama's camp spend a lot of time crying to the media that McCain is spreading falsehoods... Lets put that record straight for just this month alone... B.H. Obama runs add claiming that McCain will cut social security for seniors... (this is more than likely targeted at the voting seniors in florida) this add is a delibrate and misleading falsehood...(don't believe me CHECK THE FACTS look at McCain's actual proposals) Another this month.. B.H. Obama add that so badly distorts McCains position on immigration that even LEFT LEANING news services labled it (NYT - 'fradulent'. CNN - 'Absolutly and directly wrong') i.e a LIE. I think that you left out the lies that McCain tells in his ads. Thats cuz McCain doesnt lie , McCain's campaign doesn'e lie or stretch the truth... It's only Obama and his campaign that does that. 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Just remember... No matter how you slice it a POLL is a crossectional peek at the current OPINION of a selection of the active population. OPINION... not FACT... For facts you have to actuall dig up the data and look at it. Just because 10,000 sheep belive the dog will eat them does not mean the dog will actually eat them... This is what the dog counts on to control the herd. When you list the number of ads each canditate had... and then break that list down by the number of actual NEGATIVE ads vs POSITIVE ads you find that B.H. OBAMA did in FACT have 86% of his initial adds against the Republicans as NEGATIVE. While McCain in the same period did in FACT have only 43% of his ads as negative. Now of course they have hit the point where money makes a big diference. (Dems have an average of 4 times as much) this means that in order to be competetive Obama can afford NICER adds yet McCain can not... (it is well know in political circles that negative adds are more effective). Would you like some more facts...from September 12 to October 18 -- Barack Obama ran 119,101 negative ads at a total cost of $65 mil. (McCain ran during the same time frame approx 30,000 negative ads). In a seven day period starting Oct 12, B.H. Obama spent 22 Million on negative adds compared to approx $7 mil spent by J. McCain. Obama's camp spend a lot of time crying to the media that McCain is spreading falsehoods... Lets put that record straight for just this month alone... B.H. Obama runs add claiming that McCain will cut social security for seniors... (this is more than likely targeted at the voting seniors in florida) this add is a delibrate and misleading falsehood...(don't believe me CHECK THE FACTS look at McCain's actual proposals) Another this month.. B.H. Obama add that so badly distorts McCains position on immigration that even LEFT LEANING news services labled it (NYT - 'fradulent'. CNN - 'Absolutly and directly wrong') i.e a LIE. I think that you left out the lies that McCain tells in his ads. Thats cuz McCain doesnt lie , McCain's campaign doesn'e lie or stretch the truth... It's only Obama and his campaign that does that.
Silly me to have forgotten that.
|
|
|
|
|
