ON FISH BECOMING REPTILES, JUST HOW OR WHY THEY DID THIS WE will
probabaly never know- The fishes

on anfibians becoming reptiles, one of the frustrating features of the
fossel record of vertabrate history is that it shows so little about the
evolution of reptiles during the earliest times, when the shelled egg
was devloping. - the reptiles

there is no missing link that connects the mammals and reptiles
-the reptiles

fossils unfortantlu reveal very little about the creatures we consider
the first true mammals -the mammals

The transition from reptiles to birds is poorly documented.
-processes of organic evolution

unfortunately, the fossil record which wouls enable us to trace the
emergence of apes is hopelessly incomplete -the primates

modern apes seem to have sprung out of nowhere. they have no yesterday,
no fossilrecord- science digest

the human family does not consist of a line of decent leading from an
ape like form to our species. -the new evolutionaty timetable


all from books found in any school library.

i think its time for you evolutionists to prove your side. ive proven
mine.

And what Mr. Ram exactly are the odds that a single lonely being,
without shape or form or mass existed and decieded to create a universe
and beings that included form and mass from the same inanimate material
you say can not produce life?????

get your chemistry set out and make me an oak tree. then get back to me
about how wrong i am.

can a skyscrper build itself? can a national road system accidently
appear after a meteroite strike? life... any form of life is vastly more
complicated than aything man has ever made. Name one thing we have
created that produces offspring for exixtance. that kind of
unbelievably complex orginization takes a creator. I would say that the
bible account of creation and the evidence we see every day are in
perfect harmony. We cant say that about evolution if being honest with
ourselves.
remember the odds against life origionating by chance? 1x10 123 power
to one. thats a 1 with 123 zeros behind it. makes the lotto look very
winnable in comparison. ill draw it out for you. the odd against
evolution are 1/
100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000

- a math geek from Harvard university did the odds.

There is evidence of evolution today. Today's insects are far more
resistance to bugs sprays of the past. We have to keep creating a more
toxic chemicals to kill them. Also viruses have also become resistance
to the older anti-biotics so new anti-biotics have to be develop.

The reason is that insects and viruses have shorter generations cycles
than other animals, so they evolve faster.

There your evidence of evolution.

there still the same insects.get youe microscope out and compare. they
didnt evolve to resist pesticides, they adapted.

Skyscapers aren't living beings, Roads aren't living being. They can't
repoduce. And even with the odds of 1 out of a 100 trillion for life to
"sprout", there are billions of years for it to eventually happen. Given
enough time "life will find a way" Perhaps if you look at a different,
though, one can say that the law of evolution is one of God's law of
nature.

Adaption is one of the main forces of evolution. Why don't you read a
book instead of making a statement that proves my point.

i feel like rambill has given up on actually defending the non-existence
of evolution...

and moved right on to preaching!!


AMEN!

**ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ**---

mabe another direction would be helpful... lets try to find one reason
why creationism cant be true... scientificly speaking.

Do you know how huge 10- 123 power is? thats more than there are atoms
in the universe. HMMM pretty weak odds there.

my work here is done... despite all the books ive quoted from... despite
the math....despite the scientists I ve quoted.. the true belivers
still cant see the picture. they would rather shoot the messanger than
look at this objectively.
im not the preacher here you evolutionists are. My only hope is that
after you get done laughing at my ignorance, youll pray about this. mabe
the lord can help you see the picture.
I used to be one of you, actually. When i looked at this, really
looked hard, the flaws in evolution became apparent. its not a
religious issue to me its simple logic. good luck with your studies.

its cute that you think you won.



its werid how the entire non-christian population, and a great deal of
the christian population could be so fundamentally wrong in something
that is so concrete.

okay to pour more gasoline on the fire, an expert in my city told me
that if we have questions, we should go visit the oranutans and see how
they live. so there. maybe lucy is not the missing link.

prussia who the hell is Darvin? at first I thought maybe it was a missed
key but w and v are not even close on the keyboard, so I assume you
meant Darwin?

well if man evolved from primates what happened to the rest of the
primates we still have? Why did they not evolve? fitnessfanatic insects
and viruses do not evolve, they mutate, there is a difference. They
adapt, the bird flu virus does not change to become something else like
aids. Insects don't turn into birds. THAT would be evolution.

actually its 10 to the 123rd. more than the atoms in the universe. Still
trying to wrap my brain around that one.
for those religous peoples who believe in evolution i can only implore
you to PRAY about this. Let God help you find the truth. You might be
suprised where he leads you if you just let him.
to all others, just Look a little closer at the odds. Mabe you could
try to make a rabbit from chemicals in your laboratory. Dont just trust
the so called experts, research it for yourself.

:=