and PLEASE dont teach them anything... just send them to school

But hey you keep using that memory of yours. glad I don't have one that
"works" so well *rolls eyes*

The Bulletin of Atomic scientists: "the theories of human evolution are
quite odd if one stops to look at them. David Pilbeam has described the
thory as fossel free. There are theories about human evolution that
would require some fossel evidence, yet there are are so few fossils or
none at all. the evolutionary theory exists in the fertile minds of 20th
century scientists. people wanted to believe in evolution, and this
affected the results of thier work""

weird that this quote has no link... and such bad grammer..


almost as if you typed it from memory?

perhaps

I'm not going to take time out to do any research on Google or anywhere.
I just go by what I have read and learned coupled with my opinions.
That's why my replys here or anywhere tend toward the mundane (look it
up). There is absolutely No reason evolution and creationism can't
co-exsis peacefully. Some guy once showed me a picture of an ape. He
said, "Does that look to you like the image and likenees of God." Hell,
No! God is a spirit of some sort. An intelligent being or force who
started all of this. I believe that God doesn't look like anything:
either a monkey or a lizard or man. I'm going up to the bar and get a
drink.

HI EVERYONE, damn but I've been missing out on some good stuff here.
ISLAND KING - you need to read more science or actually archeology. You
obviously have a computer, go on-line and google archeology magazines or
just archeology. You seem to have the will to want to learn, you will
learn much there. Actually there is some skepticizm with regards to the
chart on evolution, since it was discovered that we "modern man"
actually coincided with one thought to be our evolutionary predicessor?
How funky is that? Lex names a few evolved species, what about those
that every school kid learns about, sees pictures of - the sabre tooth
tiger, the woolly mamoth, several types of fish. - Evolution is not a
myth. Rambill never wants to follow up his opinion with factual
data, so I almost didn't respond, but then I saw that other of you were
falling in line, adding research you had done - KUDDOS to you all, I AM
SO PROUD TO BE HERE WITH YOU ALL!

the myths of human evolution, by evolutinists Niles Eldridge and Ian
Tattersall: we eliminated any evolutionary family tree. any link taht
makes up our ancestors can only be guessed at. see also discover
magazine. " if the evidence were there, one could expect that as
morehominoid fossils are found, the story of human evolution would
become clearer, wheras, if ianthing, the opposite has occured. The human
species in fact all species, remain orphans of a sort, the identities of
thier parents lost to the past. lost, that is from an evolutionary
standpoint.
the biology of race: the flesh and hair on reconstructions have to be
filled in by resorting to imagination. also, refering to various
primitave species, these "experts" base ther conclusions more on
imagination than evidence.

i see your all too religious to believe in anything but evolution...
would advise you to look with an open mind at the fossil record
yourself. if it looks like an ape is probabluy an ape. there is a large
ang growing movement of scientists from all walks of life away from
evolution as the facts become clearer. the math aint there and the
fossel record aint there. cant draw you a better picture for you than
that.

saber tooth? wolly? fish? the fossil record is clear... they existed for
a time and then went extinct. a wolly mammoth was always a wolly
mammoth. just as the bible states.

hahahahahah


ridiculous

of course the hair and flesh of our ancestors hasnt been preserved!!!

thats not what connects us to them tho, its our bones!!!!

just..



im starting to feel kinda bad. you need to open your eyes,

believe in god, believe in christianity, by all means, but you cannot
ignore the simple fact that is science. you can't make stuff up and not
back it up with evidence. its just... an extreme waste of time

you my dear have been brainwashed by the schools who dont like prayer..
ect. big suprise. it is you that are confused. not really your fault,
but now you have been warned. do what you will but you have been
presented the facts.

i have been presented with nothing but 'your memory"


i actually never learned about evolution in school... well maybe when i
was really young..


but the reason i know what i know is that i got interested in it when
this debate came up with one of my best friends (catholic)

and was so intent on proving it to her that i continued to study it
myself.. not my brain washing schools, in university,

Discoverer magazine: evolution is under attack not only by
fundamentalist christian scientists, but also is being questioned by
other mainstream scientists as well. among paleintologists, there is
growing dissent from the prevailing view of dawwinism.
Francis Hitching, author of the neck of the girraffe: For all its
acceptance in the scientific world as the great unifing principle of
biology, darwinism is , after 125 years, in a suprising anmount of
trouble.

yah the liberal communist universities.

memory again?

ive heaped enough quotes on ya but rest assured there is lots more.
would have to crack some books and scientific mags for more ammo.
are you saying that my photographic memory evolved from apes?
science 101- why do they call it the THEORY of evolution?
because its not a fact its a theory.

hahah

sorry rambill... but memory really isn't enough to convince me to let
go of everything that i have learned.

but anyways, you have fun with your bible! im out!

ive quoted several books in addition to some periodicals. what more do
you want?

Well, from memory let me repeat what I've said in a couple other posts,
for any of you that might find it interesting, archeology.org has some
terrific articles about Lucy, and some newer discoveries, including the
fact that we were not the only bipedal, intelligent species on this
planet. AND YES, Ram is correct in one aspect, though taken out of
context. And that is that the evolutionaly chart itself has been put
under some suspicion, but ONLY because it has been discovered that we
co-existed, even co-habited with other species that were previously
believed to be our predicessors. The fact is there were enough DNA
likenesses that it was possible for us to have mated with them, and in
some weird way, that makes the chart, not so much incorrect as sending
it to another branch of the family tree, so to speak.

the hupothesis that life has devloped from inorganic matter is at
present, an article of faith. - mathmetition J W Sullivan

the probability of life origionating by accident is comparable to the
probability of an unabridged dictionary resulting from an explosion at a
print shop. - Biologist Edwin Conklin

One has only to contemplate the magnitude of the task to concede that
the spontainious generation of life is impossible- Biochemist George
wald

An honest person, armed with all the knowledge available to us now, can
only state that in some sense, the origion of life appears to be almost
a miracle. -Biologist FRANKLIN cRICK

iF ONE IS NOT PREJUDICED EITHER BY SOCIAL BELIEFS OR BY A SCIENTIFIC
TRAINING INTO THE CONVICTION THAT LIFE origionated spontaniously on the
earth, a simple mathematical calculation will show that the odds against
it wipes it entirely out of court. - Astronomers Fred Hoyle and N.C.
wICKRAMASINGHER