100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: don't you guys... | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
ArtGurl
on
Tue 05/20/08 08:33 AM
|
|
Funches
OP: ...and never come to any understanding. Artgurl: yes...I agree! Now burn me at the stake ... (for whatever else you'd like to fabricate about me) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beginning to? that's debateable, like I said.  well "wouldee"..that you think it's "debatable" brings home my point ...since this thread is to condemn those that wish to debate ..so welcome to death row ... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funches OP: ...and never come to any understanding. Artgurl: yes...I agree! Now burn me at the stake ... (for whatever else you'd like to fabricate about me) sorry "artgurl" my intentions is not do unto you as you have tried to do unto others ...my intentions was to get you and your cohorts to see the light and place you all back on the path to true rightousness |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
beginning to? that's debateable, like I said. well "wouldee"..that you think it's "debatable" brings home my point ...since this thread is to condemn those that wish to debate ..so welcome to death row ... then move your butt over so I can sit down and set the captives free, too.   
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It would be fun to see what the strobe light king has to say about your post wouldee but I gotta get back to swingin' the hammer.  "star_tin_gover..so it's no longer referred to as spanking the monkey Nope. I am talking about a real hammer. I am a carpenter.  That was funny though!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
funches,
You may have all the best intentions my friend, but I can assure you that your pursuit of correcting Artsy's presumed"holier than thou" approach was but a fabrication in your own mind. For in order for that assessment to be valid, she must first believe that she is "holier than thou"... For one to say that they are frustrated with the conversations which do not seem to come to any agreeable conclusions does not call anyone nor anything "right or wrong", therefore, holier than thou does not apply. Therefore, as wouldee so aptly noted at least twice... You funches, are the only one performing the witch hunt here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
MirrorMirror
on
Tue 05/20/08 12:27 PM
|
|
Funches OP: ...and never come to any understanding. Artgurl: yes...I agree! Now burn me at the stake ... (for whatever else you'd like to fabricate about me) sorry "artgurl" my intentions is not do unto you as you have tried to do unto others ...my intentions was to get you and your cohorts to see the light and place you all back on the path to true rightousness It worked on me Funches Im on the path to true rightousness
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
funches, You may have all the best intentions my friend, but I can assure you that your pursuit of correcting Artsy's presumed"holier than thou" approach was but a fabrication in your own mind. For in order for that assessment to be valid, she must first believe that she is "holier than thou"... For one to say that they are frustrated with the conversations which do not seem to come to any agreeable conclusions does not call anyone nor anything "right or wrong", therefore, holier than thou does not apply. Therefore, as wouldee so aptly noted at least twice... You funches, are the only one performing the witch hunt here. well I would agree with you "creativesoul" well ..er.. maybe if artgurl didn't make the below statement don't think it is the debating ... it is the degeneration into something that is less than honouring of the individuals that seems to be happening more lately ... that statement seen mean spirited and angry and to prove that it was I asked her if her statement also applies to you since you also have been known to have spirited debates on this forum but then she did a complete turn around and then tried to defend your behavior resulting in a refusal to answer that question |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funches,
That quote only referred to the times where one has spoken(written) in a way that was less than honourable about another's character. It happens... For anyone who could deny this, would clearly be delusional, I am sure that you would agree... For her to mention her specific reasons, and have the conversation go into the direction that it did was quite comical actually. She simply stated that she agreed with the OP, especially in the times which she spoke of, and you then quoted her, while simultaneously deflecting her intent only to later redefine it according to your own agenda... Since you are so curious... Of course I have been guilty of a quick response which was not well thought out. I am ok with it though, and have made amends where I felt necessary. I am merely a human, with my own sets of flaws... For you to ask her to explain for me, or justify on my behalf was unreasonable of you, wouldn't you agree? Especially after her repeated attempts to redirect the conversation away from the notion. I miss you too, funches... Peace |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funches, That quote only referred to the times where one has spoken(written) in a way that was less than honourable about another's character. It happens... For anyone who could deny this, would clearly be delusional, I am sure that you would agree... For her to mention her specific reasons, and have the conversation go into the direction that it did was quite comical actually. She simply stated that she agreed with the OP, especially in the times which she spoke of, and you then quoted her, while simultaneously deflecting her intent only to later redefine it according to your own agenda... Since you are so curious... Of course I have been guilty of a quick response which was not well thought out. I am ok with it though, and have made amends where I felt necessary. I am merely a human, with my own sets of flaws... For you to ask her to explain for me, or justify on my behalf was unreasonable of you, wouldn't you agree? Especially after her repeated attempts to redirect the conversation away from the notion. I miss you too, funches... Peace AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAHAHAHAHAHA! He said "delusional"! The word of the month...... initially submitted (and driven into the ground) by funches.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funches, That quote only referred to the times where one has spoken(written) in a way that was less than honourable about another's character. It happens... For anyone who could deny this, would clearly be delusional, I am sure that you would agree... but strangely when I asked her if that same quote also applies to you she circumvented around the question and never did answer it ..she could have simply said yes but I knew she wouldn't and that's why I asked her so she could see her statement in another light Since you are so curious... Of course I have been guilty of a quick response which was not well thought out. I am ok with it though, and have made amends where I felt necessary. I am merely a human, with my own sets of flaws... so then wouldn't you agree that all the debators in this forum is probably somewhat human as you are...so why are you distinguishing that you yourself is different by stating that you are merely a human ..those were the same excuses 'artgurl' was using to defend your zealousness ..so why does the excuse of being human only apply to you in this case For you to ask her to explain for me, or justify on my behalf was unreasonable of you, wouldn't you agree? Especially after her repeated attempts to redirect the conversation away from the notion. I didn't ask her to explain for you..I asked her do her statement also applies to you...in which she refused to answer because in doing so she would have to admit that you at times have also (her words) "degenerated into a less than honmouring of the individual" and of course she wasn't about to admit that ..and that in itself should have shown her how others may have viewed her statement as being somewhat holier than thou and just a little vicious... I miss you too, funches... cool now I can practice code breaking your parables and leave those new york times crossword puzzles alone |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
scttrbrain
on
Tue 05/20/08 05:00 PM
|
|
Belushi...I know you are fairly new here...and are probably not aware that.... ArtGurl ( a very beautiful and kind young lady, who is highly respected here) , is involved in a relationship with a gentleman , who not only respects her highly also .... but also cherishes her and loves her very deeply. Sorry...that was only funny because I know that Belushi and artgurl go waaaay back Belushi is from another time. A good guy. I am sure he means no disrespect. I know he means no disrespect. You are a nice person morning. Thank you. Kat Uh oh....sorry. I just read the parts I had not seen yet, It was already explained. Sorry once again. My bad.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
ArtGurl
on
Tue 05/20/08 08:31 PM
|
|
Belushi...I know you are fairly new here...and are probably not aware that.... ArtGurl ( a very beautiful and kind young lady, who is highly respected here) , is involved in a relationship with a gentleman , who not only respects her highly also .... but also cherishes her and loves her very deeply. Sorry...that was only funny because I know that Belushi and artgurl go waaaay back Belushi is from another time. A good guy. I am sure he means no disrespect. I know he means no disrespect. You are a nice person morning. Thank you. Kat Uh oh....sorry. I just read the parts I had not seen yet, It was already explained. Sorry once again. My bad. Awww Kat ... you make me laugh ... It is all good girlfriend |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belushi...I know you are fairly new here...and are probably not aware that.... ArtGurl ( a very beautiful and kind young lady, who is highly respected here) , is involved in a relationship with a gentleman , who not only respects her highly also .... but also cherishes her and loves her very deeply. Sorry...that was only funny because I know that Belushi and artgurl go waaaay back Belushi is from another time. A good guy. I am sure he means no disrespect. I know he means no disrespect. You are a nice person morning. Thank you. Kat Uh oh....sorry. I just read the parts I had not seen yet, It was already explained. Sorry once again. My bad. Awww Kat ... you make me laugh ... It is all good girlfriend I swear Sherrie, you get more beautiful as time goes on. You just glow. What's that sticking out the side of your head? Kidding. Hi Creative. Kat |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Belushi...I know you are fairly new here...and are probably not aware that.... ArtGurl ( a very beautiful and kind young lady, who is highly respected here) , is involved in a relationship with a gentleman , who not only respects her highly also .... but also cherishes her and loves her very deeply. Sorry...that was only funny because I know that Belushi and artgurl go waaaay back Belushi is from another time. A good guy. I am sure he means no disrespect. I know he means no disrespect. You are a nice person morning. Thank you. Kat Uh oh....sorry. I just read the parts I had not seen yet, It was already explained. Sorry once again. My bad. Awww Kat ... you make me laugh ... It is all good girlfriend I swear Sherrie, you get more beautiful as time goes on. You just glow. What's that sticking out the side of your head? Kidding. Hi Creative. Kat my heart
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Someone call my name?
My ears were burning ... Now, what are we going to talk about today, kids? Something entertaining, slightly sardonic and very very disrespectful?  Lets have a little lookie shall we? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
but strangely when I asked her if that same quote also applies to you she circumvented around the question and never did answer it ..she could have simply said yes but I knew she wouldn't and that's why I asked her so she could see her statement in another light It is nice of you to be so helpful funches. Although she is and was very well aware of my behaviour(s) and also has a more in depth perspective, I would not expect her to defend me for a plethora of reasons... so then wouldn't you agree that all the debators in this forum is probably somewhat human as you are...so why are you distinguishing that you yourself is different by stating that you are merely a human ..those were the same excuses 'artgurl' was using to defend your zealousness ..so why does the excuse of being human only apply to you in this case Why would you assume that I am distinguishing myself, or that I do not empathize with another's humanity? I didn't ask her to explain for you..I asked her do her statement also applies to you...in which she refused to answer because in doing so she would have to admit that you at times have also (her words) "degenerated into a less than honmouring of the individual" and of course she wasn't about to admit that ..and that in itself should have shown her how others may have viewed her statement as being somewhat holier than thou and just a little vicious... You trust your own assessment capabilities too much at times, my friend... Have you... can you... possibly quote any of her words which would substantiate your misleading direction? That was the overlooked reality of the conversation, at least from this vantage point. cool now I can practice code breaking your parables and leave those new york times crossword puzzles alone Code breaking? I thought that my language was clear as glass... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It is nice of you to be so helpful funches. Although she is and was very well aware of my behaviour(s) and also has a more in depth perspective, I would not expect her to defend me for a plethora of reasons... but you keep overlooking the fact that she did defend the same behavior in you that she condemn and found to be so horrid in the anonymous others ..... why is it so hard to just admit she was bias towards you ..wouldn't that be the reason that I would place you into the equation so that she could see her statement in another perspective .. Why would you assume that I am distinguishing myself, or that I do not empathize with another's humanity? well "creativesoul" first "artgurl" was the one that brought up the fact that your zealousness behavior was because you are human and then you brought up the fact that you are human and have flaws ...so do she and you not considered the anonymous others to be human and have flaws but yet she condemn them for theirs You trust your own assessment capabilities too much at times, my friend... my assessments are that of pure logic Have you... can you... possibly quote any of her words which would substantiate your misleading direction? ..er..ok...she said "degeneration less that honoruing of the individual" ...she even said that is why she haven't posted here in months ..so how is my direction misleading... That was the overlooked reality of the conversation, at least from this vantage point. cool a parable Code breaking? I thought that my language was clear as glass... well you almost made it through a post if not for that above parable..."creavtivesoul" let's face it..you're like the riddler in the batman movies...the riddler no matter what had to leave a riddle...and you can't make it through a post without leaving a parable |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Funches...pure logic huh? Your posts are full of logical fallacies my friend ...
Your projections are just that ... your own. You seem to enjoy taking individual words out of context and deciding what MY intention is by adding your own extrapolation. That is not logic... Your words may be scattered regarding what your objective is ... but your agenda is crystal clear... ... my aim was to place them (the religious flock) back on the path to true rightousness I am not religious so your next angle ... "artgurl" when one is on the path to true rightousnes does it really matter wheather one consider oneself religious or not or are in denial about it..all that should matter is that they are on the path ...funches 3:16 Denial? About being religious? Uhhh no I am pretty clear about that ... so next ... there is no reason to assume the path of rightousness is dictated by religion ....for it was mainly the religious that needed to be place back on the path but then the 'real' point you were trying to get across ... but as you and "The Lonely Walker" along with a few other cohorts was comdemning other in your own little inquistion only mean you were all guilty of doing the exact same thing you were condemning others of doing ..that was the point I was trying to get across ..which was fruitless so that's when I decided to bring in creative soul because clearly you even admitted that he was doing his share of arguing but he did it in crypted parable format but yet you choose to defend his behavior ...which is understandable since your profile picture have clouds coming out of your brain with his picture in one of the clouds inquisition? I said I agree that I get tired of going around in circles without progress... uhhh YES funches I do ... I see only one inquisition and it isn't led by me ... You brought creativesoul in as soon as you saw my avatar ... for your own reasons ... And my avatar picture means what within the context of discussion? ... does it have a purpose? ... you know people could look at that and think you were being argumentative, hostile and condescending and another turn in your "logical" fantasy... ...now the question becomes why would supposely normal rational people band together and then resort to taking this delusional path it called "Witch Hunting" Witch Hunting" is when a group of "holier than thou" people find some delusional reason to band together to condemn others for the same offense they are now guilty of theirselves for the simple fact that they are trying to condemn others Who is doing the hunting and who is the hunted ...  ...my intentions was to get you and your cohorts to see the light and place you all back on the path to true rightousness You assume I am not on it? And that it is your job to 'correct' me? ..er..ok...she said "degeneration less that honoruing of the individual" ...she even said that is why she haven't posted here in months ..so how is my direction misleading... Really???????? My quote in context was in response to Abra's response to TLW in which I was saying that I did not think it was the 'debating' that TLW was tired of ... it is when discussions become character assassinations... ie dishonouring of individuals ... that is frustrating because discussions go nowhere. And before you decide that I am now speaking for TLW...let me retract that and replace it with I. Without dredging up old and hurtful posts to illustrate my point, I am speaking of the times when there is no discussion, there are no points being argued ... it is simply name calling and ridicule...I do not like them regardless of who is doing the name calling so I choose to stay out. Does that now mean that I am condemning those who name call? No it means that I am sad when I see human beings doing that to one another ... I do not believe in the notion of separate so what is done to one is done to all. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Next... |
|
|
|
|
