100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: the mindless sheeple who support the war | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
yes, this not a popular war. Maybe it should have never been started. But as freedom loving people as we are, it's our duty, to protect and serve the people who can't defend themselves against tyranny, abuse and genecide. We started it, we must see these people through their time of need. If we leave now, innocent people will have their blood spilt. We left a job undone in Vietnam, many people who where freedom loving lost their lives because they chose the side of liberty and freedom for all. This should never happen again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree with ya madman, but don't see any point in trying to reason with the hawks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hawks?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hawks?
YellowRose: It is a 'term' given to those who support aggressive military action (wars in some cases). Lindyy 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oh, YIPPEE!
I get the honor of having another 'label' applied to me - "mindless sheeple." Sheeple - sheep. I do believe Jesus referes to his people as His sheep and He their shepherd. 
Jesus also says "Feed my sheep." So, I wonder what he thinks of His sheep as being referred to as 'mindless?" Lindyy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hawks?
YellowRose: It is a 'term' given to those who support aggressive military action (wars in some cases). Lindyy
ahhhhhhhhhhhh didn't know that. well i am me and not a hawk, sheeple or anything...  
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Why do people feel the need to start pointless arguments like this? I'm not going to argue with you, mate. You've already made up your mind. because this a public forums, and everybody has the right to express their points of view. hmmmm.. Liberal mindset, well I defend your right to say that sir. Many in the world may not speak as openly as you or allowed to voice their opinions on a venue such as this. Open discussion are healthy in a society based on freedom and liberty. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Fanta46
on
Mon 03/31/08 01:09 PM
|
|
You know Madison, I can respect that good people disagree about the war, about politics and about the best way to run a government. Respect to the point of being able to have civil discourse and even spirited debates. But what I don't respect is seeing post topics that look like yours. Mindless Sheeple? Is that supposed to be clever? Do you think it original or even vaguely inspiring? You really do nothing to add to the solution. Your calling people names doesn't make them want to learn or try to understand your point of view. It makes most (including me) think: "Huh, this guy obviously disagrees with the war but why does he feel the need to insult those who hold a different view?" I don't think threads like this add anything to the picture. They won't change minds already made up and they won't sway those who have cause to reconsider their stance. Perhaps if you had sought to inform, to educate, and above all to treat those who don't agree with you as something more than a group of morons, you'd have better luck. Then again, maybe that is not your goal. -Drew Reading this I think' Why does he even post here? Answer- this is an attack upon the op! No other reason for him to respond unless he feels identity to the topic, or wants to belittle the OP. You think you are tactful, (conceit?) I dont know, but if you cant do anything but address the person then what is your purpose for posting? Obvious- Your post is nothing more than an attack upon the OP! Plenty of threads here to post on or read. So, why address this one at all, unless its an attack, or your jealous because no one responds to your threads. Mindless sheeple, I believe that is a label applied to those without knowledge concerning the issues and concerns of their neighboring States let alone Globally! They just repeat what their God says and follow him any and everywhere he leads them. Crazy ****, esp, when your god is GWB!!
Oh by the way, He didnt apply an individual's name, you applied that label to yourself. Oh well, I always heard if the shoe fits wear it.......... 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
well...i have heard all sorts of view pro and con. from the media to family and friends. i'm certainly not mindless and i have a right to take whatever stance i choose to
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
crickstergo
on
Mon 03/31/08 01:00 PM
|
|
Your satan is GWB...... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hey Madison, since you're so concerned about war, I'm just wondering what your position is on the current Serbia debacle? Or is that outside your political comfort zone?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The minority????
and that America has spoken???????? 
Bush Highest approval rate-88%,,,,,Nov 2001 Highest disapproval-63%,,,,,,,Mar 2008 Sounds like Everyone, but the indoctrinated, got a clue!!! Or, are there that many sheeple???
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damn Democrats!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damn Democrats!!!
ah hem mister
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Fanta46
on
Mon 03/31/08 01:27 PM
|
|
Really
Im not anti-war Nor are most here! How many times have you seen threads attacking Bush for the war in Afghanistan? When there's a reason and its justified I say go kick their butts regardless of the loss in American G.I.'s lives! Iraq is an illegal war, I dont give a crap what the UN says The America I love, doesnt attack another country unprovoked!! Regardless of how much you ignore the facts The fact is, all of Bush's expert advisers, military Generals and what not, were ignored! This war is being fought, with American lives for personal reasons, by a man that hid behind his fathers wealth and power to avoid the same thing he asks these boy's to die for! (minus the oil) If you want, I can run down some Generals, who in their own words saying Bush ignored their advice both before invadeing Iraq, and since!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Fanta46
on
Mon 03/31/08 01:33 PM
|
|
I say we amend the Constitution to say
A man cannot be elected President unless he has military service first! At least then we wont have leaders asking soldiers, and their families to do what they themselves were unwilling to do!
(Commander-n-Chief????) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And no
Damn Republicans!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I say we amend the Constitution to say A man cannot be elected President unless he has military service first! At least then we wont have leaders asking soldiers, and their families to do what they themselves were unwilling to do!
before i put you in the corner again....i actually agree on this one. at least serve in the military first if you are going to be commander and chief |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I say we amend the Constitution to say A man cannot be elected President unless he has military service first! At least then we wont have leaders asking soldiers, and their families to do what they themselves were unwilling to do!
before i put you in the corner again....i actually agree on this one. at least serve in the military first if you are going to be commander and chief
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Did you read up on Yugoslavia???
|
|
|
|
|
