100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Community > Posts By > Wulfenstraat
|
Topic:
are men like women?
|
|
Winston Churchill said, "All we have to fear is fear itself". Do you agree with that statement? 
No, because, as i recall, it was FDR! 
Are men like women? No |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think the fact that there is 6 billion people on this planet just furthers the logic that the bible is accurate when you consider the earth is only a few thousand years old and not billions using the bible for reference.It seems logical if you started with just two people 6,000 years ago you would get around the population you have today.Even in the last hundred or so years we have seen the worlds population rise by at least a billion.So telling me the world is millions of years old according to the atheist makes no sense to me because the population of the planet would be in the hundreds of trillions of people by now. Back only several hundred years, the technology did not allow for feeding billions of people. Go back thousands of years and it was worse, simply subsistence farming. We also know that there have been mass extinctions of people all across the globe many times over, which itself argues against your theory that there should be trillions of people now. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If Jesus is not God anymore than Buddha was God, then Christianity hasn't anymore merit than Buddhism. No because Buddha wasn't the son of God. Sure he was. All are childern of God. Good point, let me refraise that statement. Because Buddha wasn't the begotten child of God. Same difference. 500 years before the New Testament, a young 12 year old boy who would eventually be a god spoke in the temple to the priests and instructed them. His name was Krishna, so similar to Christ. You can see that the New Testament stories of Jesus are really just an accumulation of previous stories of other gods. Any attempt to preserve Jesus as the "Only Begotten Son" of God goes right back to the absurd paradox of a God appeasing himself. You can't really have Jesus as being God and not God simultaneously. This is the entire Christian story. It's all about having your cake and eat it too. It has to be that way because the story is so utterly logically inconsistent and contradicting that it can only be claimed to 'work' as a paradox. In other words, it can only be claimed to 'make sense' if we accept that it does not 'make sense'. 
It's clearly an illogical, and thus absurd story of a God who appeases himself via his "Only Begotten Son". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ringing endorsement. I'll check it out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
And that's all that karma is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Hansel in the Pot
|
|
Back to the top.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is this post still alive? I thought I killed it last month.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, that's what I said.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Personhood
|
|
Oh **** me... Say what? Your pollution is upsetting my stomach. Say what? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
Hansel in the Pot
|
|
Nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I like the cut of your jib.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The first book of the series is called "The Labyrinth Garden Path". The information you request will appear in the Prologue of this book. I haven't written it yet. But I do have a basic idea of what needs to be said there. To give it to you a heads up, my basic philosophy is that life is created by consciousness. The basic fundamental idea is that everything ultimately arises from consciousness (not the other way around as many secularists believe). So the basic thesis is that understanding conciousness is of utmost importance. The entire three-book series is focused on how to better understand consciousness. Not just the secular idea of a conscious brain, but in a spiritual sense of divine consciousness (i.e. it's basically a description of Eastern Myscism put into a western format) It sounds like you have it worked out pretty well, ready to be presented to a publisher. Have you? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1987568,00.html This is more up to date. We are related to Neanderthals....which was something I already knew when I was married. According to that article, Neanderthal DNA survives in the human population. If that is so, then Neanderthal was not a separate specie but simply a race of human (using popular definition of race) that was absorbed by the larger population, like the American Indian is now in the process of being absorbed. The product of a horse and donkey is a mule. Mules are unable to project that combined DNA into the gene pool of either specie. If Neanderthal was a different specie, then his DNA would have died out with the hybrids and not be present in the human gene pool. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Topic:
are men like women?
|
|
more than they care to admit? do they change their minds as well? is it a macho thing to do to act one way and feel a different way later on and be scared to admit it? I find this question impossible to answer, as people`s personalities vary so widely. Blanket statements just don`t apply. LOL, a male co-worker of mine calls me 'Dudelike' - Whaaat??? 
Or,,,,,am I missing something???? You're missing something. And it's obvious. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Wulfenstraat
on
Thu 07/15/10 07:47 AM
|
|
Well, I thought it was creative,well written, and interesting to read. I wasn't offended. I think maybe you were trying to show the consequences of choosing such a life. What's missing, I'd say, is the compassion for the old woman who is now probably really unhappy and facing death alone. There is no mention of the remorse this elderly woman may feel, or the lack of understanding, or love, or fears that may have contributed to her making destructive choices. You only speak of her mistakes, but it's hard to see her humanity. Was this character all bad? Showing the other sides of her personality may lend to believability. I volunteer in a nursing home and it's hard not to feel compassion for the elderly people, even the "not nice" ones(who usually soften if you show you care)...but then, they haven't hurt me...can't speak for those they may have wounded; the ones who won't come to visit. keep writing. Thanks. Open minds seem rare on this site, and your suggestions are valid. Like Abra said, this poem specifies only those old women who were predators on men which I assumed would be 1% of the gender, yet most women took objection, as if most women, thinly disguised as loving women, are actually predators on men. It gave me a start at how many seemingly normal women were 'disguised' predators on men, simply because they saw this poem as an attack on them personally. Or, it may just be that I was correct in my assumption that this sort of woman is only 1% of the population but that women who are predators on men are over-represented on this forum. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Well, I thought it was creative,well written, and interesting to read. I wasn't offended. I think maybe you were trying to show the consequences of choosing such a life. What's missing, I'd say, is the compassion for the old woman who is now probably really unhappy and facing death alone. There is no mention of the remorse this elderly woman may feel, or the lack of understanding, or love, or fears that may have contributed to her making destructive choices. You only speak of her mistakes, but it's hard to see her humanity. Was this character all bad? Showing the other sides of her personality may lend to believability. I volunteer in a nursing home and it's hard not to feel compassion for the elderly people, even the "not nice" ones(who usually soften if you show you care)...but then, they haven't hurt me...can't speak for those they may have wounded; the ones who won't come to visit. keep writing. Thanks. Open minds seem rare on this site, and your suggestions are valid. Like Abra said, this poem is addressed to old women who were predators on men which I assumed would be 1% of the gender, yet most women took objection, as if most women, thinly disguised as loving women, are actually predators on men. It gave me a start at how many seemingly normal women were 'disguised' predators on men, simply because they saw this poem as an attack on them personally. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm an old kid, but I'm finally making up my own religious paradigm that is far better than anything I had ever been taught by the stuffy adults. 
I've come across some of your philosophy before and found it profound. Have you published? I'm just starting to write a three-book set. Three books because the subject matter loans itself to three volumes. But I'm actually working on all three of them simultaneously.
I have several years of notes to work from. Much of it is just a matter of "re-oranization" and putting it into a format that presents the material in a nice linear fashion that a reader can easily follow. Would it be too much to ask for the opening paragraph of your first book, which would essentially be an introduction to your philosophy? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I'm an old kid, but I'm finally making up my own religious paradigm that is far better than anything I had ever been taught by the stuffy adults.
I've come across some of your philosophy before and found it profound. Have you published? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revelation 21:1 And i saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away; and there was no more sea. So, the current Heaven is a shabby place? It needs to be torn down and replaced? Not much of a Heaven. And how do we know that the new projects are going to house the current residents? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Wow. That's some wierd s***. Heavily mysoginistic. I like the plastic version. Hmm? |
|
|
|
|
Previous
