Community > Posts By > tribo

 
tribo's photo
Tue 05/29/12 08:39 PM
is there nothing that exist then that is not a god?

tribo's photo
Tue 05/29/12 08:31 PM
Edited by tribo on Tue 05/29/12 08:35 PM

Yep. Nothing still does not exist. Only something can exist.

You can not get something from nothing even in a vacuum.

"It centres around the peculiar theory in quantum mechanics that empty space is not really empty at all.

In reality, so the theory goes, a vacuum is filled with particles that are so small and fleeting they are all but virtual and dip in and out of existence all the time."


Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2000483/Sparks-mirrors-Quantum-scientists-make-nothing.html#ixzz1mC7wIonB


You don't need quantum mechanics to know what can be readily seen Jellybean - all the stars in the sky - there are billions of light-waves / particles that we can easily sense. the so called vacuum of space only exist because as the electromagnetic particles were attracted to each other they in turn joined to make up the planets and stars and all else. as this continued, less matter between them increased the vacuum [less material],larger areas of space.This has been going on eternally, there is no beginning or end to vibrational material.

tribo's photo
Tue 05/29/12 08:14 PM
Hi Jellybean, i don't think anyone is god, i do think many people think there gods, but i won't mention any names, lol.

Hmmmm. then of course i would have to know your or others meanings or definitions as to what you mean by using the word god? but if it's like i remember your saying you are a "creator" Then no, huh uh, negative. :)

tribo's photo
Tue 05/29/12 04:25 PM

A pretty long winded way of saying, the universe is made up of waves of energy and there is no God.


Yep

tribo's photo
Tue 05/29/12 02:18 PM
The Why of Life


Personal thoughts on the, who, where; what; and how existence carries on in an eternal manner.

From solid matter to liquids and gas, as well as any others, one thing we find is the evidence they all vibrate. Though this has not always been possible to investigate or know till present times, that is, within my lifetime, with that evidence one can at least ponder upon its universal implications as to why, what we are able to experience, is the way it is.
For example, let us take wind and our sense of touch. On a purely calm day where no air movement is present and your sitting in a chair, your bodily sense of touch does not feel anything, there is no sensory indication that informs you of any air, yet of course it is there, just not felt. One could argue that it could be felt just by the action of breathing it in and out of course, but that requires the act of doing so. In this scenario for discussion we will leave such out, even though it does hold true, for it is only a precursor to what lies ahead as to my purposes for writing of this.
What is being said for understanding is that our limited senses are both a curse and a gift as to our understanding of life and the universe[s] that surround or engulf us.
It is my present holding of some time now that all things exist and always have existed due to vibratory matter no matter how large or infinitely small. Because of this, life as we know it or as it has always existed before us or will after us, is that which is eternal. In that summation we have all the phenomena that we either know or do not know or have or have not personally experienced. And to me is the only viable explanation for life here or anywhere else.
Our mental training over our lives in religiosity may initially be offended by this seeing that a “creator,” some ethereal being, with both intelligence, power, wisdom, etc., similar to ours but on an infinitely massive scale, higher than ours has brought both our existence and all else about through his/her/it’s, powers. But I read and believe these systems of beliefs, that is pre-history, developed to maintain control of the tribes of people under their influences and no more.
God’s that war and destroy and threaten, even if they Have moments of love or compassion as written about are man’s creation, not the actual work of a god. Proof? I have yet to encounter one religion that does not have as a basis a punishment reward system of one type or another, nor does not have a good versus evil that are put into place by which one’s life and actions are to be judged by. “We” have made our god’s like us, not the other way around.
For this is what we know – ourselves, how can we then think past that which we know in terms of what god’s may be or act like? We had no choice but to exemplify our god’s in ways we could relate to, and that is exactly why we have the religious concepts we do. With this we have spent centuries enforcing these concepts till present, that they are a way of life for many who follow with the devoutness, [at least outwardly] that others expect from ones who follow the traditions of man’s own making.
But with present knowledge, one who studies and thinks beyond the entrapments of mythical teachings or even scientific theories, which are no more than educated guesses for the largest part, especially in the in realm of unknown experiential senses to go by, which is everything outside our sphere of existence here on this world and the little we have seen beyond, we have one thing we can know, and that is the existence of vibrational matter. No matter how densely accumulated or how sparse, it is everywhere and in everything, seen, or unseen. If there were a god, in the sense of our ancient and modern understandings, this would be what a creational force would really be.
I do not believe in an “expanding universe” or the theory of explosion or implosion that started all of which we visualize as the infinite realm that surround us, my common sense and core logic cannot agree with such for obvious reasons. The explosion theory [the big bang] cannot account for where all the material aka matter that we see came from to begin with. Something so large or so dense to have created what we see, not including what were are not able to see, would have had to have been so immense that it is beyond logic. Secondly, for it to have accumulated in such mass, would require it to have been present to begin with to have done such, for a singular collective source to do such would in turn mean that there would first have to be some magnetic force strong enough to pull all the elements together from the entire universe and or beyond to form such. Even if this were the case, the trillions of centuries needed to do so would have meant that absolutely nothing but pure vacuum would have existed throughout the remaining universe, how can an “explosion” take place in a pure vacuum? Well you say because the mass that exploded had within it the necessary oxygen atoms or other to do so, my question then is, why did it then just not ignite as the billions of stars/suns since that time have done? What makes this first and only mass, act differently than everything created by it since? Again if you believe it was caused by implosion then it should have turned into a black hole as stars do, or at least we think they do. We do not have firsthand knowledge of such, only the aftermath of what we believe to be the case.

As to The expanding universe, I think not also because I can see nothing but movement not expansion. The universal entities of space move but that does not indicate expansion, that cannot be proven at least a present. You cannot prove expansion unless you had knowledge of how big something was to begin with for comparison that is out of the realm of science to do so.
That then leaves us with vibrations in the form of matter and waves. The essence of all we know and see as far as the eye can take us and our senses can comprehend. If anything is “eternal” this indeed would be that which is so. If the question arises such as “where do vibrations come from?” The answer is simply they have no beginning or end. They also have no conscience, no emotions, and no concern as to what or where or how what is formed does so. They are merely the suppliers of the matter by which all has come about, they do not judge or expect anything from us or any other life-forms, nor do they care what or how we act or perform or whether we live or die or are happy or sad. They don’t think at all – that is not there purpose, they are generators/suppliers, entities only in the respect of giving forth that which we see and comprehend.
With this comes something tangible as compared to talking of mythical beings and their related stories bound up in sacred bindings, it is not a matter of faith that one has to believe such as I state, we can detect vibrations and even see them with the aid of magnification and feel or sense them in other ways, such as colors.
They do exist, whether you believe or realize they do or not. And they do explain all that was, is, or ever shall be as to life, or any and all other phenomena, seen or unseen. In fact vibrations, in the form of matter and waves, are the only logical explanation for all we personally experience or know, either as a group or individually. Let us not in return try to turn them into some entity worthy of worship, I assure you, you will get no response in return. They will not respond to prayers or request.

tribo's photo
Thu 02/23/12 08:45 AM
LMAO, well.... looks like your in for an exciting year sin, good luck with that, lol.

tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 10:40 PM
ye seekers of truth, what truth do ye seek?

Does it last for awhile or or eternally speak,

if you've found such a thing, then please now do speak.

tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 10:28 PM
well.......... that answers everything i asked, lol

tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 10:27 PM







I enjoy the conversations on these forums . . .

I find nothing gained in responding to Peter, no give and take, no real conversation ever occurs.

Even in our most heated arguments Spider still responds in meaningful ways.


Agreed to the fifth degree.

I think that rhymes..


Well.... that answers everything i asked, lol



No, not one time has anyone ever provided "proof" of these claims that I challenge.

Nothing but deflections, denial and fluff.


No "give and take". Give what? What would you want me to give someone who makes claims about my religion then refuses to back up their claims? Then if they do attempt to back up those claims, they cite "oral testimony"? (most recently by both of you)





Proof of what claims? sodom and gamorah being individuals instead of cities?



I am quite clear on what I do and do not challenge. Read for yourself...





Hmm.. i must have read to quickly, sorry, what do you challenge and why? am i correct in thinking your a christian? why are you not then as a sighkik, forth telling the word of god to those who need to hear, or are you different than a profitt??




Why is it that some people refuse to read for themselves?


Does everyone prefer to be told what to believe instead of coming to their own conclusions?





tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 10:24 PM

Btw, i never thought to define darkness or light. What is light? I seriously dont know. What is it made up of?


Electromagnetic radition.

tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 10:17 PM
Nothing does exist. I am proof of that!!

tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 10:06 PM
Hi jellybean, you know at one time i had interest in this but not much thought till i watched a movie and it had loads of info i had not really seen before here is the address, i think you will find it pretty amazing, i wasn't aware they had been going on for centuries in southern england, of course back then theyt thought the devil was diong them, lol.

http://www.1channel.ch/watch-1312503-Alien-Sign-The-Message

tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 09:53 PM





I enjoy the conversations on these forums . . .

I find nothing gained in responding to Peter, no give and take, no real conversation ever occurs.

Even in our most heated arguments Spider still responds in meaningful ways.


Agreed to the fifth degree.

I think that rhymes..




No, not one time has anyone ever provided "proof" of these claims that I challenge.

Nothing but deflections, denial and fluff.


No "give and take". Give what? What would you want me to give someone who makes claims about my religion then refuses to back up their claims? Then if they do attempt to back up those claims, they cite "oral testimony"? (most recently by both of you)





Proof of what claims? sodom and gamorah being individuals instead of cities?



I am quite clear on what I do and do not challenge. Read for yourself...





Hmm.. i must have read to quickly, sorry, what do you challenge and why? am i correct in thinking your a christian? why are you not then as a sighkik, forth telling the word of god to those who need to hear, or are you different than a profitt??

tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 09:36 PM



I enjoy the conversations on these forums . . .

I find nothing gained in responding to Peter, no give and take, no real conversation ever occurs.

Even in our most heated arguments Spider still responds in meaningful ways.


Agreed to the fifth degree.

I think that rhymes..



No, not one time has anyone ever provided "proof" of these claims that I challenge.

Nothing but deflections, denial and fluff.


No "give and take". Give what? What would you want me to give someone who makes claims about my religion then refuses to back up their claims? Then if they do attempt to back up those claims, they cite "oral testimony"? (most recently by both of you)





Proof of what claims? sodom and gamorah being individuals instead of cities?

tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 09:25 PM




..which ultimately is the 'said claim'.

Ahh, makes sense, however. I was raised southern Babtist and I WAS taught that if you did not believe in Jesus as your savior you would be sent to hell and there was nothing saying it wouldn't be forever.

So any given person may argue scripture, but to deny that these tactics are not used by many Christians is to stick your head in the sand.

Just my .02



Hmmmm, was this a deflection tactic or an obscured "no need to show evidence BS"? Or perhaps it was your evidence in an appeal to authority?


Whatever it was, it's time for you to pull your head out of the sand and recognise what it is that you are doing... You apply the double-standard, sliding scale rule of requirements for "evidence"....

OK, the Southern Baptists taught you about "Jesus" and "Hell", I get that... So then why do you question the existence of God? If you can take oral testimony and draw conclusions as well as make claims about "hell", then what's the difference between that and the existence of God? With one you require "spectacular" evidence, the other, hearsay testimony?

To be honest, I'd have to say that your line of reasoning is what should constitute "magical thinking". After all, it seems to give you the ability to deny what you have posted... It took Sin_and_Sorrow's post to show you the claim(s) you made, doesn't that slight mishap cause you to question your own memory and/or perception?

There were actually two claims made, but I thought I would make it easier for ya by only focussing on one.
"Yea real nice guy this god that requires you believe in him or he makes you suffer for eternity."

1st claim: God requires you to believe in Him...
2nd claim: He will make you suffer for eternity if you don't believe in Him...


So, do you apply the scientific principal and verify your own claims? Or do you simply believe whatever someone tells you and say "no need to show evidence"?





Who are you "spider" in disguise????




Nope... I'm just a psychic who knows that people will not back up their own claims...







Interesting, tell me something in the near future that is of large proportions that will come to pass please.

tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 09:17 PM



Forgiveness can only be granted to a person who is sincerely sorry for what they have done and that is a person who resolves not to do it again. It also can only be granted if you can forgive yourself and others. You must be willing to take full responsibility for your actions and you must know that you have changed and you will be a changed person with resolve. That is being born again in spirit. You are a new person, and a changed person.

None of that requires the idea of God or Jesus or the belief that God or Jesus has forgiven you, but some people feel they need an outside entity to forgive them for their sins and wash them clean.

As long as you forgive yourself and have resolved to be responsible and pay the price and to change your ways, you are a new person, and one can say that you are born again.

Judgement is when you have judged yourself.





Hogwash!!! We are at the center of our bieng pure selfishness, with that comes the inability for true change, meaning if and when circumstances arise that put us in a position to survive we will revert to our most basic instincts not caring what we do to stay alive. the onlt time this does or may not hold true is if we are putting our life at risk to save others we love more than ourselves. And even then it scares the proverbial myth of hell out of us.



You have never been to the center of your being I can tell.laugh

The only constant is change, gradual as it may seem to be.

Yes survival is paramount and so is freedom. Change is inevitable and gradual.

When you learn something meaningful, you will change.



Hi Tribo!! Long time no see! Are you still on the Islands?










Yes but i have been to the center of my "bean", that has to count for something right? lol.Can a leopard change his spots? If i learn something "meaning" - full, like when i have eaten to much, does that count? If i'm "full" of **** does that count? Meaningful is an abstract concept, what is meaningful to you may not be to others. but then if i remember correctly,your pretty much into finding out the impossible for yourself correct? Impossible = truth, lol

No things changed, philippines is no longer in the plan unless my books sell.

tribo's photo
Wed 02/22/12 09:06 PM



I have a question that goes along with your statement here. It's a little "off topic" but it relates into the topic.

So do you check EVERYTHING you know about "history" to verify it to be true? How do you absolutely know Abraham was a president for absolutes? Someone tell you? Where you there? Or I'll go with what you request, "what evidence do you have of this"? And the evidence has to be shown to be authentic and absolute.


I think when 12 different countries all have the same documented proof, whether pictures, or have it written; it's pretty much safe to say its truth.

Even Iraq knows who are presidents have been; even if they do not teach it.

Yet even Christians argue the content of the Bible, let alone the other religion and non-religious in existence.

For me, it is not truth, until I have encountered enough evidence for me to have no room to believe otherwise.


People don't believe in religion because they do not wish to. In this case "Christianity". It's not because they haven't been "convinced" or anything, it's because they CHOOSE not to believe.


Not at all true. I did believe once, but when I began to question, is when I began to have that believe waiver. Lack of evidence, lack of logic.


Yes I understand quite a bit of history CAN be verified through investigation, but have you ever really done it? I'm not speaking about one or two incidents, but everything you know about history, have you thoroughly checked it out to ensure it to be true? If not, why not?


I myself have on areas that presently affect me in some way or another. Some things, I just feel the need or desire to concern myself with because their validity is or little to no value to me so why bother?


History is myth, based on pesonages thruoghout time, no more no less, if they wont believe the truth, then give them the myth.


..on certain levels, this could be true.

My own history, well, that wouldn't be.
I was there for it.


Hi Sin, i even find myself at times not remebering things quite the way they realy happened when talking to others, that is what i mean ok? We "myth" represent and "myth" understand and "myth" construe a time moves on.history, even our own gets embellished, added onto, recollected differntly, i even see this with my 85 year old step mom. I dont correct her, i just agree and move on. But it is true that no history really is what happened just writings by those either present in some or one sense seeing it from thier perspective [one facet of what was actually happening] or gleaning the material from others transcrpits lateron who were also looking at if from thier own perspective, how many heros were there in rome or greece or elsewhere? we will never know, nor the real reasons behind any history.

tribo's photo
Tue 02/21/12 12:48 PM

The Rapture according to Funches :

shows great filmmaking talent.flowerforyou


Now...here is The Rapture (and also the Second Coming )according to SCRIPTURES::wink:

...............


The rapture and the second coming of Christ are often confused.

Sometimes it is difficult to determine whether a scripture verse is

referring to the rapture or the second coming. However, in studying

end-times Bible prophecy, it is very important to differentiate

between the two.



The rapture is when Jesus Christ returns to REMOVE the church (all

believers in Christ) from the earth. The rapture is described in 1

Thessalonians 4:13-18 and 1 Corinthians 15:50-54. Believers who

have died will have their bodies RESURRECTED and, ALONG WITH

BELIEVERS WHO ARE STILL LIVING, will MEET THE LORD IN THE AIR.

This will all occur in a moment, in a TWINKLING OF AN EYE.



HOWEVER.....

The SECOND COMING is when JESUS RETURNS to DEFEAT THE ANTI-

CHRIST, DESTROY EVIL, and ESTABLISH HIS MILLENNIAL KINGDOM. The

second coming is described in Revelation 19:11-16


The important differences between the rapture and second coming are

as follows:



1) At the rapture, believers MEET the Lord IN THE AIR (1

Thessalonians 4:17). At the second coming, believers return WITH

the Lord TO the earth (Revelation 19:14).



2) The second coming occurs AFTER the great and terrible tribulation

(Revelation chapters 6–19). The rapture occurs BEFORE the

tribulation (1 Thessalonians 5:9; Revelation 3:10).



3) The rapture is the removal of believers from the earth as an act

of deliverance (1 Thessalonians 4:13-17, 5:9). The second coming

includes the removal of unbelievers as an act of judgment (Matthew

24:40-41).



4) The rapture will be secret and instant (1 Corinthians 15:50-54).

The second coming will be visible to all (Revelation 1:7; Matthew

24:29-30).



5) The second coming of Christ will not occur until after certain

other end-times events take place (2 Thessalonians 2:4; Matthew

24:15-30; Revelation chapters 6–18).

The rapture is imminent; it could take place at any moment (Titus

2:13; 1 Thessalonians 4:13-8; 1 Corinthians 15:50-54).




Why is it important to keep the rapture and the second coming

distinct?


1) If the rapture and the second coming are the same event,

believers will have to go through the tribulation (1 Thessalonians

5:9; Revelation 3:10).



2) If the rapture and the second coming are the same event, the

return of Christ is not imminent—there are many things which must

occur before He can return (Matthew 24:4-30).



3) In describing the tribulation period, Revelation chapters 6–19

nowhere mentions the church. During the tribulation—also

called “the time of trouble for Jacob” (Jeremiah 30:7)—God will

again turn His primary attention to Israel (Romans 11:17-31).



The rapture and second coming are similar BUT separate events. Both

involve Jesus returning. Both are end-times events. However, it is

crucially important to recognize the differences. In summary, the

rapture is the return of Christ in the clouds to remove all

believers from the earth before the time of God’s wrath. The second

coming is the return of Christ to the earth to bring the

tribulation to an end and to defeat the Antichrist and his evil

world empire.(gotquestions.org)

flowerforyou:heart:flowerforyou






If one were to believe in the two, then it is best decribed by others than those who have based the lies you propose since the times of Darby, you have been fed lies that still continue till present, all in the name of "evangelical" prechings and teachings.

tribo's photo
Tue 02/21/12 12:30 PM

But this statement is not true. One is not punished specifically for not believing. The only way to receive forgiveness of sins is through Jesus Christ, sin can not enter into the kingdom of God. So in order to enter into the kingdom of God, one would have to be cleansed of this sin, which can only be done through Jesus Christ.

Again, it's not specifically the belief in itself that can condemn someone, it's the actions that follow through either the belief or lack thereof. God sends no one into eternal punishment, the person themselves do. They do it through their actions and what they place their faith in.
Great way to remove gods responsibility for the system he created . . . .


Yea so god sits around for billions of years doing nothing. Then he decides the earth should have some bipedal beings on it, but screws up and has to wipe us out with a flood, then he decides to send down himself to appease himself over his own mistakes.

Gotcha.

Its a terrible twisted fantasy were the only one not responsible is the creator himself, lol.


I may even buy what you state if it were not for things 100 times worse in the god scenario, it is just to corrupted to save. even those who study the meanings of the supposed original text will say they really cant be sure of the words meaning in context.

tribo's photo
Tue 02/21/12 12:25 PM

Forgiveness can only be granted to a person who is sincerely sorry for what they have done and that is a person who resolves not to do it again. It also can only be granted if you can forgive yourself and others. You must be willing to take full responsibility for your actions and you must know that you have changed and you will be a changed person with resolve. That is being born again in spirit. You are a new person, and a changed person.

None of that requires the idea of God or Jesus or the belief that God or Jesus has forgiven you, but some people feel they need an outside entity to forgive them for their sins and wash them clean.

As long as you forgive yourself and have resolved to be responsible and pay the price and to change your ways, you are a new person, and one can say that you are born again.

Judgement is when you have judged yourself.





Hogwash!!! We are at the center of our bieng pure selfishness, with that comes the inability for true change, meaning if and when circumstances arise that put us in a position to survive we will revert to our most basic instincts not caring what we do to stay alive. the onlt time this does or may not hold true is if we are putting our life at risk to save others we love more than ourselves. And even then it scares the proverbial myth of hell out of us.

2 4 5 6 7 8 9 24 25