Community > Posts By > aspiringactress

 
aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 01:39 PM


You and Lindyy should go make hateful babies together.




Watch your ignorant mouth or you will be answering to one of the site moderators.

Lindyy


nice.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 01:09 PM


Passive-aggressive behavior refers to passive, sometimes obstructionist resistance to following authoritative instructions in interpersonal or occupational situations. It can manifest itself as resentment, stubbornness, procrastination, sullenness, or repeated failure to accomplish requested tasks for which one is assumed, often explicitly, to be responsible. It is a defense mechanism and, more often than not, only partly conscious. For example, people who are passive-aggressive might take so long to get ready for a party they do not wish to attend, that the party is nearly over by the time they arrive. Alternatively, leaving notes to avoid face-to-face discussion/confrontation is another form of passive-aggressive behavior.

Since you are of no authority to me, and since you are of no position that would be above me, how can I be passive agressive twords you? You did not request any tasks of me, maybe you should look up words when you use them. I was nothing but direct with you, even though I was wrong, I certainly was direct.

You and Lindyy should go make hateful babies together.



you really shouldn't stop with the first thing that crosses your path...a trait like that will may lead you into many failed marriages

"Often passive-aggressives can appear pleasant and congenial, but time eventually proves such qualities are a part of a disguise. Beneath the surface are traits that could be changed but are not.Most prominent are: a “quiet” anger, irrational fear and a need for control."


Oh my ****ing God I said you were right and i was wrong what the **** else do you want from me, how many times do you want to hear it, in how many languages do you want it? In how many tones can I say it? Talk about control issues, you could have just said Appology accepted the first time, not drawn it out. **** have a nice life and please never cross my path again.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 12:53 PM
Passive-aggressive behavior refers to passive, sometimes obstructionist resistance to following authoritative instructions in interpersonal or occupational situations. It can manifest itself as resentment, stubbornness, procrastination, sullenness, or repeated failure to accomplish requested tasks for which one is assumed, often explicitly, to be responsible. It is a defense mechanism and, more often than not, only partly conscious. For example, people who are passive-aggressive might take so long to get ready for a party they do not wish to attend, that the party is nearly over by the time they arrive. Alternatively, leaving notes to avoid face-to-face discussion/confrontation is another form of passive-aggressive behavior.

Since you are of no authority to me, and since you are of no position that would be above me, how can I be passive agressive twords you? You did not request any tasks of me, maybe you should look up words when you use them. I was nothing but direct with you, even though I was wrong, I certainly was direct.

You and Lindyy should go make hateful babies together.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 12:18 PM

Hey, I admitted I was wrong and you were right, can you take the high road or do you want to stay in the gutter of belittling people? Your choice.

I was wrong, I didn't fully understand the meaning of the word, which Winipeg says is the most common word to misinterpret.

I was wrong, you were right, you are the king, i am a piece of ****, you are everything I am nothing, can we proceed now?


I never said or implied you were a piece of anything..and I'm the king now.....have you ever heard the term passive aggressive?

I don't care who makes mistakes but what I don't appreciate is if someone thinks I made a mistake and when it is shown the then they are incorrect instead of just saying ooops they change the question and throw it back at me....do you think I'm that dumb not to realize what your doing?.


I admitted when I realized I was wrong, how would you like me to admit I was wrong before I understood I was wrong, or are you just used to subserivent woman who deem you the ultimate knowledge of all that is important.

When I realized I was wrong, I told you I was wrong, I did not however appreciate the belittlement you had to top it off with.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 12:10 PM

Grab a dictionary and READ.

You sure are a judgmental person.

You must have gotten out on the wrong side of the bed this morning.


Lindyy

P.S. It is very easy to get you frazzled.




You don't frazzle me, just confuse me as to why you are so angry with a woman who greived her son in a different way, and you judge her, because people have different morals than you, and you don't find that acceptable. But then your generation is like that, luckily as we proceed in life and the younger generation comes into adulthood, there is less and less prejudice in the world.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 12:05 PM

I admitted when I was wrong, when I realized I was wrong, but because I did not admit I was wrong simply becuase you told me I was wrong seems to be the issue here.

Hey everyone I was wrong, I made an error, but this guy wants to belittle me because I was wrong, who is more wrong?

\

you made the fool out of yourself by thinking you're clever enough to throw it back at me...next time take a bit of time to check what your saying before you say it....and you must be quite embarrassed as your still trying to show me to be the bad guy..poor little you...the victim...


Hey, I admitted I was wrong and you were right, can you take the high road or do you want to stay in the gutter of belittling people? Your choice.

I was wrong, I didn't fully understand the meaning of the word, which Winipeg says is the most common word to misinterpret.

I was wrong, you were right, you are the king, i am a piece of ****, you are everything I am nothing, can we proceed now?

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 11:57 AM





Oh, before you say anything else, I know what grieving over the death of a son is like, I had a son killed. I would never shame my son the way Sheehan did hers.


Lindyy

P.S. We are still on friendly terms, we just disagree on this.




So if people don't act the way you do/did, they are wrong? That's a shallow exsistance.


Lindyy says:

Do you know what 'shallow existence' means?

Oh, I am sorry, only left wing libbers are allow to have a different opinion.

Lindyy




Yes, a shallow exsistance is one where you and only you have the correct way to lead a life. We can all be stepford wives, and children, or we can be independant thinkers, which world would you rather live in? Oh I know you really want to say the stepford one, but you are too scared to do it.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 11:55 AM

Wow, you are a nasty little person arn't you, yes, you are correct I read more and then understood the term, but thank you so much for seeing just what kind of person you are.


sure I'm a nasty little person because you make a error and instead of accepting that you try to change the question and I called you on it?. You probably bring whiteout and a pen in case you ever mess up your lines so you can change the script to match your screwup....laugh



I admitted when I was wrong, when I realized I was wrong, but because I did not admit I was wrong simply becuase you told me I was wrong seems to be the issue here.

Hey everyone I was wrong, I made an error, but this guy wants to belittle me because I was wrong, who is more wrong?

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 11:49 AM



Oh, before you say anything else, I know what grieving over the death of a son is like, I had a son killed. I would never shame my son the way Sheehan did hers.


Lindyy

P.S. We are still on friendly terms, we just disagree on this.




So if people don't act the way you do/did, they are wrong? That's a shallow exsistance.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 11:46 AM

So tell me when was he removed from office again? Did he serve his full term?


I believe you stated that Clinton was never impeached....he was so why are you trying to sidestep your error?. Do you not understand what impeachment is? Do you not understand that to be impeached has nothing to do with being removed from office. Lets go for the short list....What exactly do you understand?


Wow, you are a nasty little person arn't you, yes, you are correct I read more and then understood the term, but thank you so much for seeing just what kind of person you are.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 11:22 AM

I am more concerned about the fact that you think Clinton was impeached. clinton served his full term and was never impeached. The word impeached means taken out of office for deeds that go against the United States of America. Bill Clinton did no such thing, he got laid.


how do some of you spend all this time on earth and not learn anything....Clinton was impeached...

"Impeaching is to bring federal charges against someone in office. The charges arose from an investigation by Independent Counsel Kenneth Starr. Originally dealing with the failed land deal years earlier known as Whitewater, Starr, with the approval of Attorney General Janet Reno, expanded his investigation into Clinton's conduct during the sexual harassment lawsuit filed by a former Arkansas government employee, Paula Jones. In a sworn deposition for this case, Clinton denied having a "sexual affair" with White House intern Monica Lewinsky. "



Impeachment is the first of two stages in a specific process for a legislative body to remove a government official without that official's agreement. The second stage is conviction.

Impeachment is so rare that the term is often misunderstood. A typical misconception is to confuse it with involuntary removal from office; in fact, it is only a legal statement of charges, paralleling an indictment in criminal law. An official who is impeached faces a second legislative vote (whether by the same body or another), which determines conviction, or failure to convict, on the charges embodied by the impeachment. Most constitutions require a supermajority to convict.

One tradition of impeachment has its origins in the law of England and Wales, where the procedure last took place in 1806. Impeachment exists under constitutional law in many nations around the world, including the United States, India, Brazil, Russia, the Philippines, the Republic of Ireland, and Kyrgyzstan.[1]

The word "impeachment" derives from Latin roots expressing the idea of becoming caught or entrapped, and has analogues in the modern French verb emp�cher (to prevent) and the modern English impede. Medieval popular etymology also associated it (wrongly) with derivations from the Latin impetere (to attack). (In its more frequent and more technical usage, impeachment of a person in the role of a witness is the act challenging the honesty or credibility of that person.)

The process should not be confused with a recall election. A recall election is usually initiated by voters and can be based on "political charges", for example mismanagement, where as impeachment is initiated by a constitutional body (usually a legislative body) and is usually based, but not always, on indictable offenses. The process of removing the official is also different.

So tell me when was he removed from office again? Did he serve his full term?

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 11:11 AM

Clinton lied about having sex, which is a fact that most men do at one time or another, George lied about breaking the laws of the Constitution,


Clinton lied about more than just sex but don't bother looking it up since whatever he did is ok with you...I am interested though in your accusations about George...what laws did he break and if he has why has he not, as Clinton was, impeached for those lies. I mean after all those lies according to you are much more serious than Clinton lying about just a little about some sex...


I am more concerned about the fact that you think Clinton was impeached. clinton served his full term and was never impeached. The word impeached means taken out of office for deeds that go against the United States of America. Bill Clinton did no such thing, he got laid.


aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 11:07 AM

Except what they do with our country, not their genitalia.


well personally I think it is important that Bush had the balls the do what was necessary...


Necessary for whom?

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 08:25 AM

I strongly advise you not to make those kind of remarks about someone when you have no facts to prove it..


I find it ironic that Clinton was proven to be a lier many times over and some have no problem overlooking that fact but those same people are so insistent that Bush lied but there are no facts to support their accusations....


Clinton lied about having sex, which is a fact that most men do at one time or another, George lied about breaking the laws of the Constitution, Bill had only himself to look into the mirror at, George needs to look into the eyes of millions of Americans.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 08:23 AM





Gee, what is everyone going to do when President Bush is no longer in office?

Only in America, unfortunately.


Lindyy


*sighs*

i don't have to AGREE with something to find humor in it...


Lulu:

Sorry, but I found nothing funny about degrading our President. noway

I disliked Clinton, especially after he lied on TV and said, pointing his finger at the camera and saying: "I never had sex with 'that' woman." (She was good enough to have oral sex with him in the Oval Office, which every other Presiden gave great respect to, but he had the sickeningsick audacity to refer to her as 'that' as if she were cheap trash. BUT, during his presidency I never bashed him, after all he was the President of the USA, and for that I gave him respect. AFTER he was out, I tore into him, but in office, he was the President and got respect. Might I note, his actions were so illegal, he is disbarred from practicing law in Arkansas. embarassed embarassed

Lindyy




We did not get into war over the BJ so who cares who has sex???!!!! I bet the oval office is a hot spot for a little nookie. OOPS showing my freakie side here laugh

I could not care less who the pres has sex with, hell dubya is probably getting it regularly he just did not get caught. The fact our government allowed the circus over the bj then showed how literally stupid they are. BJs are a good thing or so I have heard from most of the men I have talked to.

Baby shrub is a disgrace worse then any bj could ever be.


Lindyy says:

dragon:

MAYBE, JUST MAYBE people with MORAL VALUES CARE ABOUT WHAT THE PRESIDENT OF THE USA DOES IN THE OVAL OFFICE.

dragon, again I must remind you Clinton has been DISBARRED from practicing law in Arkansas for his lies.:angry:

dragon, I strongly advise you not to make those kind of remarks about someone when you have no facts to prove it....you are climbing the tree of defamation and slander.

Lindyy


why does your moral view have to be everyone else's moral view? i perfer for Bill to get his freak on, then for GW to send my friends over to fight a war we have no place in. Maybe if GW got a bit freaky once in awhile, we could pull out of the middle east all together, no pun intended.

If you think Bill was the only one, look at the all mightly Kennedy, and Marilyn, he had her killed to cover up his secrets, who is worse? Really none of it is any of our business. Except what they do with our country, not their genitalia.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 08:14 AM
I think it is highly respectable to be a true father, single or not, I don't date single dads, but I sure do respect them.


drinker

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 06:35 AM
People flipidly say they have had them in their past, a true sociopath is what madam said, my ex was one, and is now in prision. You wouldn't flipidly say you knew one, if you really knew one. A sociopath isn't going to randomly be mean on the internet, they want everyone to like them, and they almost always succeed. They never want to look like the bad guy, they always leave that elbow room, mostly play the victim. They don't use harsh words publically, only privately, where it can't be proven.

Trust me I know a thing or two about sociopaths.

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 05:59 AM


I'm sorry, I never meant that you were advising people to run themselves into the poor house, but what if that was someone's last $20, and the church profited, but the player lost mile and bread money for the family, yes it is on a different scale, but the outcome is the same as the guy who gambles away his mortage at the roulette table.

Everything is relative, depending on the situation. But to condone one but shun the other is hypocritic don't you think? And most people who go to the casino's have the money to do so, as they travel to get there, you can find a bingo hall on most street corners. Maybe if you look at it that way the church is a crack peddler, and the casino is the safe haven.


To waste your remaining money on anything, when your family is hungry would be a sin in my opinion. Regardless of what it is.

And I'm not "shunning" any other gambling. I think that Bingo is probably less detrimental if a one becomes addicted, because Bingo wouldn't be easy to spend all of your money on unless you were poor. But that's a side issue.

The main point I'm making is that there is nothing in the Bible against gambling. The profits are going to the church. So I see nothing wrong with Bingo in the church.


Anything can be an addiction, Twinkie are an addiction to someone, well to my sister-in-law for sure. laugh

aspiringactress's photo
Mon 02/18/08 05:31 AM


No, what I am saying is, what is so wrong if you love money? I work very hard for my money, and it is mine, and I am keeping it, where is the sin in that?

and on the second topic, you say that gambling is not a sin if you are doing it to raise money for the church, but it is not ok if you are doing it to raise money for yourself, the outcome is the same so why is there a difference? Doesn't it say somewhere in the bible to take care of your own?


Let's look at it realistically.

We are talking about bingo, not poker or slotmachines.

The Church that runs the games will make a profit.

The people are paying for entertainment and the chance to win.

I'm not saying it's perfectly alright to go out and play poker or the slot machines until you are broke. Bingo is a self limiting game. You pay like $20 for a bunch of cards and you play until the games are over. I guess if you were very poor you could waste all of your money playing bingo. If you weren't very poor, then you would simply be paying for entertainment. There is always a small chance of winning, but it's not that great a chance.

I'm not advocting that someone who needs money go out gambling, I am talking about the profits which end up going to the church. There are benefit bingo games played where I live, which have nothing to do with any church. Bingo is a game a lot of people enjoy playing and the money can be given to whatever charity is involved. Or perhaps it's not done for charity and it's done for profit. Either way, you can pay $20 and go watch a movie or pay $20 and play Bingo all night. Either way, you are paying for entertainment and possibly money. You could do the same with most games of chance, but with those games the possibility of abuse is greater. Any form of gambling is addictive, so it's not something that I do. I spent my entertainment budget on movies, but I have no right to judge someone who spends their entertainment budget on bingo.


I'm sorry, I never meant that you were advising people to run themselves into the poor house, but what if that was someone's last $20, and the church profited, but the player lost mile and bread money for the family, yes it is on a different scale, but the outcome is the same as the guy who gambles away his mortage at the roulette table.

Everything is relative, depending on the situation. But to condone one but shun the other is hypocritic don't you think? And most people who go to the casino's have the money to do so, as they travel to get there, you can find a bingo hall on most street corners. Maybe if you look at it that way the church is a crack peddler, and the casino is the safe haven.

aspiringactress's photo
Sun 02/17/08 09:57 PM


tactful, I already know what the truth is.


Who's truth?


my truth the other person's truth.