Community > Posts By > s1owhand

 
s1owhand's photo
Sun 02/10/13 01:27 AM
P!nk - Just Give Me A Reason ft. Nate Ruess

http://youtu.be/OpQFFLBMEPI

s1owhand's photo
Sun 02/10/13 01:02 AM
laugh

s1owhand's photo
Sun 02/10/13 12:59 AM
more stupid ways to waste taxpayer's valuable time and money
why don't these idjits do something actually productive for a change?

laugh

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 04:22 PM
Give Me Everything - Pitbull ft Ne-Yo Afrojack Nayer

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPo5wWmKEaI

drinker

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 04:17 PM
Cataracs - Alcohol.

drinker

http://youtu.be/vc2YBVZx-Ps

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 04:13 PM
Edited by s1owhand on Fri 02/08/13 04:15 PM
laugh

It's Friday Night! Let's Party Instead!!


http://youtu.be/vc2YBVZx-Ps{/url]

drinker

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 03:25 PM



Roth presents herself as a religious Christian, yet advocates the opposite of what Jesus stood for as right and proper behaviour (pre-emptive acts of war, etc.).

This obviously makes her the worst of hypocrites. The last thing I would ever consider as having merit, would be her warmongering, satanic views, advocating heinous violations of international law as the right thing to do. Only a complete chump would fall for anything she has to say.


only a complete chump wouldn't listen to it... are you one of those that blames Israel for everything?


...Only when I find them doing something wrong, like breaking international law, which like most of the countries today, they do on a regular basis.


Unfortunately, Israel is singled out unfairly and international law is
misapplied to virtually all their actions without regard to the history
of the conflict their and the egregious antisemitism and hypocrisy of the
UNHRC for example.

No wonder the Israelis feel that they are discriminated against in the UN
and refuse to accept the Kangaroo Court.

Roth is pretty much right in her analysis overall.


The U.N. continues its anti Semitic tirade against Israel demanding Israel completely withdraw from Judea and Samaria where at least a half a million Israelis live and work. The Muslim controlled and agenda laden U.N. screams and quotes endless clauses, article 49, ‘preconditions’ highlighting Palestinian persecution at the hands of the dreaded Israelis.

When one looks at the anti Semitic history of the U.N. and its Islamic handlers, you vividly get the game. Cry victim, war crimes, Apartheid evil of Israel, while stealing and manipulating chunk after chunk of Israeli sovereign land and putting it in the hands of the Palestinians and other Muslim strong holds.

Support, fund and escalate the power of Hamas, Hezbolla and other Muslim groups who will regionally attack and kill Jews, while smuggling in more and more missiles and other deadly weapons. Obama isn’t the only one who demands redistribution of wealth – so does Islam.

GOAL of the U.N. and radical Islam

1) Threaten and murder Jews while stealing great chunks of property from Israel assigning it to Islam. Turn world opinion and America against Israel. Convince the world that Israel is a bully and evil while Palestinians are victims and good.
2) If Israel won’t comply and give away her land to the Palestinians, plan larger strikes at major cities with weapons of mass destruction and an escalated propaganda campaign worldwide.

Now, to the other headline which might make more sense now.

‘Israeli Jets Blast Arms Shipment Inside Syria’ Israel stuck a convoy of trucks inside Syria, west of Damascus transporting Russian-made SA-18 missiles to Hezbollah an avowed enemy of Israel.

Naturally Iran and Syria are screaming because Israel had the intelligence and ability to destroy a missile convey going straight to their enemy Hezbollah that Iran backs and funds for the destruction of Israel. The usual, International sound bite theatre of the absurd is floating everywhere like a putrid ‘mushroom cloud of lies and denial’.

Professor Timor Goksel, a Hezbollah expert said: “An attack of any kind is a major escalation” and “Why would Israel do this out of the blue?” Oh yes! It is such wonderment as to why Israel would attack. Hezbollah has only attacked and murdered Israelis since 1982, heavily funded and supported by Syria and Iran.

Goksel’s statement only reflected like clockwork the horrified responses from around the world. People were dumbfounded and horrified that Israel would dare fly over Syrian airspace and attack.

Here is the bottom line for sane people

Israel was brilliant and had every right to attack the missile carrying convey going to Hezbollah. It was the perfect time to stop the missiles from getting into the hands of Hezbollah, whether it was in Syria, Iran, Palestine, Saudi Arabia, Jordan or Turkey. The perfect time is before Jews die. Any Islamic country surrounding Israel who supports and funds Hamas, Hezbollah and other Islamic terrorist groups who chronically attack and murder Jews are fair game if Israel is to survive.

Israel knows it will cease to exist if these growing and manipulated battles have to be fought in Jerusalem and Tel Aviv which according to Hezbollah’s own words is where they want the fight to go, Tel Aviv.

I think it is time for the Middle east to take this attack on the missile convey in Syria as a warning. You may be next if you continue to fund and ship missiles to the list of Islamic murderers who plan to attack Israel.


s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 03:19 PM
rant

Ranting is a great way to reveal your personality!!

rant

laugh

Bring it on!!

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 03:17 PM







OK, you met someone online. They seem nice on the phone and in email.
You decide to meet for lunch. How do you bring up who is going to pay
or if you are going to go dutch. What do you think?


I don't see a problem with each person paying for their own.


I usually meet for coffee or something small for any intial meeting.
I always offer to buy. If she insists she wants to pay her own way
I wonder if it is because "she just isn't that into me".

laugh

If she is really strapped for cash and she wants to pay her own way,
then she probably really is not that into me. That is pretty lame.
If she insists on paying for her own way and she is actually well-off
then she may or may not be into me...so that doesn't help much.

laugh


Guys actually believe a woman isn't into them simply because they've offered to pay their half of the bill?


it's snooty... thats what i think when they do that... just more head games from women...


What's snooty? Offering to pay my half of the bill? Why do you think it's some kind of game?


because a guy tries to be nice, and he gets this thrown at him... i've heard women talk about this before, and the reason is because they don't want the guy to think the chick "owes" him anything... thats the headgame. if nothing is said beforehand, then the guy pays. i won't ask a chick out again if she says this...


Wow! I step out for a minute and look at all this!! surprised

laugh

It was a JOKE people. You obviously can't tell a person's motivation unless
they clue you in!!

laugh

I will point out that the question is about the INITIAL meeting if you
BOTH decide to meet and it is not an "invite" situation but rather a
first get together - mutual.

I think it is a bit of a conundrum because there is no fixed social
convention for either side to bring up the subject.

My solution is to go for coffee so that it is not a big deal and if she
offers to pay then I would try to still pick up the tab. Then next time
if she insists on buying then I will accept her offer (and get the lobster)
j/k.

laugh

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 12:04 PM


OK, you met someone online. They seem nice on the phone and in email.
You decide to meet for lunch. How do you bring up who is going to pay
or if you are going to go dutch. What do you think?


I don't see a problem with each person paying for their own.


I usually meet for coffee or something small for any intial meeting.
I always offer to buy. If she insists she wants to pay her own way
I wonder if it is because "she just isn't that into me".

laugh

If she is really strapped for cash and she wants to pay her own way,
then she probably really is not that into me. That is pretty lame.
If she insists on paying for her own way and she is actually well-off
then she may or may not be into me...so that doesn't help much.

laugh

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 11:58 AM

If he asked me out of course he should pay ..
Can't be asking women out and can't pay #cheap Lol
If I asked him out I would difinately pay he better not order the lobster jk :laughing:


Kiss, I would buy you Lobster. bigsmile
This summer there was so much the prices were unbelievably low!

I ate quite a few lobster in 2012. They were excellent.

:tongue:

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 11:56 AM


I always pay on a first date.
I take her to the grocery store and let her eat all the free samples she wants.smokin



Nice. I hear Costco has a nice selection of freebies.
laugh


laugh
drinker

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 10:26 AM
Edited by s1owhand on Fri 02/08/13 10:28 AM

Yes, I love foreplay, especially verbal foreplaybigsmile ...Sometimes I start by reciting a poem to my love, usually one written by Slowhand or Migsmitten



I don't have anything to add except I wish to shamelessly promote
this post!!

laugh

drinker

Actually that is kind of hot that someone has used some of my poetry
as aural stimulation.

:wink:

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 02:37 AM
I just "Nudge" or "Wink" XD

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 02:34 AM
Survey says....

"You are a sexual athlete. You are in the 99th percentile in terms of desire
and sexual frequency. And when you are in that bracket, the best thing ever is massage and tantra. Your last sexual encounter lasted approximately 2 hours."

laugh

So, I suggest tantric massage, eyegazing and soothing music. But anything
can be foreplay.

laugh

Painting for example...plus you also make visual artwork!

s1owhand's photo
Fri 02/08/13 02:27 AM
Don't want to stay too long on HOLD...

:tongue:

s1owhand's photo
Wed 02/06/13 07:54 PM



I make it clear before we even meet that it is a dutch thing.....bigsmile




Sure...you say you want to go dutch...but if the guy suggests dutch then
he's an inveterate cheapskate eh?

:tongue:


Not at all I don't feel that the first meet is a date... Just that a meet then if you go out again play it by ear who ever pays that time the next time the other one should pay... I have never had a issue picking up the tab. I do have a issue with someone that is out for a free meal regardless if it is women or men that feel that way...


I like your style. I guess I usually meet for coffee or something light or an activity on the first meet and always offer/insist on picking up the tab and then if we meet again and she wishes to treat then it is all good.

Just wondering about others experiences and suggestions.
Seems to be a delicate point.

s1owhand's photo
Wed 02/06/13 06:25 PM

I make it clear before we even meet that it is a dutch thing.....bigsmile




Sure...you say you want to go dutch...but if the guy suggests dutch then
he's an inveterate cheapskate eh?

:tongue:

s1owhand's photo
Wed 02/06/13 05:49 PM
OK, you met someone online. They seem nice on the phone and in email.
You decide to meet for lunch. How do you bring up who is going to pay
or if you are going to go dutch. What do you think?

s1owhand's photo
Mon 02/04/13 04:36 PM
flowers

1 2 7 8 9 11 13 14 15 24 25