Edited by
adj4u
on
Fri 08/22/14 12:59 PM
|
|
It beats the imagination when US policies flip-flop dangerously and towards global dangerousity.The US is clearly soft on ISIS.Obama only reluctantly initiated "limited strikes" on ISIS with few jets sent to "halt the advance" of the terrorists "protect stranded yazid's and protect US interests" That was pretty much it.what happened to US no terrorist rhetoric? what happened to US non tolerance to the likes of Saddan Hussein and to Moammar Gaddafi? Why is the US suddenly so sympathetic to the cause of ISIS and eager to permit their existence? Why is the the US not targeting the top command and control centers of ISIS? Tody in the news,the identity of the ISIS British accented member who slaughtered an American journalist was the headlines.What does his identity matter? we know the identity of the killer,its ISIS Its the leadership of ISIS that authorized his killing.The US should go after the command centres.The world is frankly tired of the tolerance of terror. how much is Nigeria spending to fight terrorism in both money and life |
|
|
|
obama should have ordered multiple bombing missions as soon as he learned of the murder and if it happens again order double the bombings and then triple and so on you say but that will kill number two maybe so but they made a chioce to work in a dangerous environment and chances are it may save the life of number 3 or 4 or 5 and so on and if it is learned they kidnap an american a bombing mission on them this wimpy attitude has to stop some civilians may get hurt or killed you say ---- maybe those civilians should hold those making their people look and act horrendously responsible |
|
|
|
Topic:
EXACTLY my question
Edited by
adj4u
on
Fri 08/22/14 12:45 PM
|
|
double posted maybe i should have left it maybe it was destiny doubling my point??? |
|
|
|
Topic:
EXACTLY my question
Edited by
adj4u
on
Fri 08/22/14 12:47 PM
|
|
i am sure the robbery (if it was him like shaggy says it wasn't me) had an effect on browns state of mind thus on his actions as well but that said many things with the fergason fiasco were handle very poorly on both sides if you want respect for your group of people you must hold those in your group responsible for their actions (no matter what group it is) no one is automatically innocent or guilty because of the group they are in I agree. And no one is automatically deserving of death because they commit a crime. i can agree to that to a point but if someone is attacking another the person being attacked should not have to be subjected to the attack that said if you dont wanna die dont attack |
|
|
|
this is why the ""people"" need to arm themselves what will it be like when these officers get control of the military equipment that many local police agencies are receiving |
|
|
|
It beats the imagination when US policies flip-flop dangerously and towards global dangerousity.The US is clearly soft on ISIS.Obama only reluctantly initiated "limited strikes" on ISIS with few jets sent to "halt the advance" of the terrorists "protect stranded yazid's and protect US interests" That was pretty much it.what happened to US no terrorist rhetoric? what happened to US non tolerance to the likes of Saddan Hussein and to Moammar Gaddafi? Why is the US suddenly so sympathetic to the cause of ISIS and eager to permit their existence? Why is the the US not targeting the top command and control centers of ISIS? Tody in the news,the identity of the ISIS British accented member who slaughtered an American journalist was the headlines.What does his identity matter? we know the identity of the killer,its ISIS Its the leadership of ISIS that authorized his killing.The US should go after the command centres.The world is frankly tired of the tolerance of terror. how much is Nigeria spending to fight terrorism in both money and life |
|
|
|
Topic:
EXACTLY my question
Edited by
adj4u
on
Fri 08/22/14 02:48 AM
|
|
i am sure the robbery (if it was him like shaggy says it wasn't me) had an effect on browns state of mind thus on his actions as well but that said many things with the fergason fiasco were handle very poorly on both sides if you want respect for your group of people you must hold those in your group responsible for their actions (no matter what group it is) no one is automatically innocent or guilty because of the group they are in |
|
|
|
Topic:
gun control 1- 10
Edited by
adj4u
on
Fri 08/22/14 02:39 AM
|
|
I'm from Texas and we take our gun rights more seriously than most. I do not think the US government has the right to infringe upon honest citizen's rights to own or carry arms. There are many, many gun laws on the books which are not enforced. These laws apply to criminals, not law abiding citizens. If someone takes a gun and commits a crime, then their rights to freedom should be taken away for a very lone time ... along with their right to vote and their right to own arms. However, the revolving door legal system allows the criminals to be back on the street in no time. The laws that Congress passes that affect honest citizen's rights, IMHO, violate the Second Amendment. exactly the govt seems to think since criminals do something they should punish the law biding citizen if someone's use of a gun to commit a crime how does restricting a law biding citizens right to that gun help stop crime another example in dif area if someone sells their prescription drugs or o d on those drugs how does restricting the use of those drugs from those that truly need them help stop this action it appears the govt thinks punishing the law biding citizen is the better answer than to make the punishment a big enough deterrent to stop the criminal from choosing that profession this country and all countries need to get back to caring about rights of the law biding citizen more than the rights of the criminal and remember they are not a criminal till convicted |
|
|
|
Topic:
gun control 1- 10
|
|
any gun available to the govt should be available to those that pay for the guns the govt has the citizen pays for the govt weapon should not the citizen have the same as those that are supposed to work for them dont start on the nukes case those are not issued to those that work for the taxpayer and are not able to be seyt off without major protocol --- supposedly a tank you ask -- absolutely if you can afford it -- they are issuing them to local police forces thus you should be able to have them when the govt become a threat to the liberties of the "people" it is the responsibility of the "people" to remove said threat! if the "people" are drastically out gunned then how are they to remove the threat? you say that will never happen. tell that to the peaceful protesters that live in fergason mo. that are having their rights trampled on |
|
|
|
Topic:
mail issue
Edited by
adj4u
on
Mon 08/18/14 08:15 AM
|
|
me too again
their profile was still active went to from so n so messaged you |
|
|
|
me too but their profile was still active went to from so n so messaged you |
|
|
|
says i have mail but wont let me get it been a member since 07 so pay membership should be irreverent |
|
|
|
Topic:
future amendments?
|
|
I would propose an amendment(s) that: Restricts congressional pay to the median salary of american workers. Takes away congressional pensions and places congress members on social security. Removes any congressional heath plan and places congress members on our national health plan. Limits campaign funds spent on campaigning. Makes it a requirement that in order to serve in congress, you must remove your money from the stock market. Also, I would like to see a federal law that would grandfather property taxes, so rates cannot be raised after you purchase property forcing you out of your home/land. I would also like to see some serious work done on agriculture. Mainly restrictions on genetic engineering, and things of that nature. actually property tax is unconstitutional paying a tribute to the government makes the government a lord of the land which makes the govt a nobility ------------- No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince or foreign State - See more at: http://constitution.findlaw.com/articles.html#sthash.vV3hLzsl.dpuf |
|
|
|
In all fairness, liberal slant is in the title. Says in the article, the suit was started before Kyles death. While he was still alive. He didn't go after a widow. It just ended that way. The right thing to do would be to drop the suit after his death. why would he that would not stop the lie the right thing to do would have been for the widow to pull the book and have publisher withdraw the comments in question then the right thing to do would be drop the suit but not before |
|
|
|
Edited by
adj4u
on
Thu 08/07/14 10:02 AM
|
|
67 6 day war The Six-Day War between Israel and its Arab neighbors ends with a United Nations-brokered cease-fire. The outnumbered Israel Defense Forces achieved a swift and decisive victory in the brief war, rolling over the Arab coalition that threatened the Jewish state and more than doubling the amount of territory under Israel's control. The greatest fruit of victory lay in seizing the Old City of Jerusalem from Jordan; thousands of Jews wept while bent in prayer at the Second Temple's Western Wall. Increased tensions and skirmishes along Israel's northern border with Syria were the immediate cause of the third Arab-Israeli war. In 1967, Syria intensified its bombardment of Israeli settlements across the border, and Israel struck back by shooting down six Syrian MiG fighters. ------------- ---- Beginning on June 5, Israel focused the main effort of its ground forces against Egypt's Gaza Strip and the Sinai Peninsula. In a lightning attack, the Israelis burst through the Egyptian lines and across the Sinai. The Egyptians fought resolutely but were outflanked by the Israelis and decimated in lethal air attacks. By June 8, the Egyptian forces were defeated, and Israel held the Gaza Strip and the Sinai to the Suez Canal. http://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/six-day-war-ends ============================================================= if the arab nations had not been aggressive in 67 then none of this would be an issue |
|
|
|
maybe the u n should condemn themselves for not sending in peacekeeping forces and confiscating the hamas rocket launchers after all they are the aggressor in this conflict and before anyone brings up isreals confiscated lands they were attacked and the aggressors lost |
|
|
|
get up and see if my new body was truly a new body and see if it was healed of the previous bodies issues |
|
|
|
Topic:
One Hit Wonders
|
|
I think we can all agree this was a one hit wonder EVERYWHERE! However, Rick Derringer did go on to some chart success later... Hang on Sloopy-The McCoys rick also had rock n roll hoochie koo |
|
|
|
Topic:
One Hit Wonders
|
|
blinded by the light manferd mann boys are back in town brownsvillle station all right know free low rider war cant you see marshall tucker band werewolf of london warron zevon layla derik and dominoes [but since eric clapton was in them does it really count] |
|
|
|
well until those harboring bullies stop harboring the bullies there is a good chance those harborers will be harmed as they are where the bullies are until any group holds the evil does in that group accountable rather than helping them then they are as guilty as he evil doer That is usually a true statement..... but ever hear of circumstance? Like what can we do about the clown in our own White House that lies to the people? A Congress that doesn't represent us? An NSA that spies on its own people, on our every move? A taxing body that plays favorites? what does that have to do with those living in gaza and supporting hamas attacking isreal |
|
|