Topic: GRUESOME KILLINGS:BUT WHY IS OBAMA SOFT ON ISIS? | |
---|---|
Edited by
uche9aa
on
Thu 08/21/14 01:47 AM
|
|
It beats the imagination when US policies flip-flop dangerously and towards global dangerousity.The US is clearly soft on ISIS.Obama only reluctantly initiated "limited strikes" on ISIS with few jets sent to "halt the advance" of the terrorists "protect stranded yazid's and protect US interests" That was pretty much it.what happened to US no terrorist rhetoric? what happened to US non tolerance to the likes of Saddan Hussein and to Moammar Gaddafi? Why is the US suddenly so sympathetic to the cause of ISIS and eager to permit their existence? Why is the the US not targeting the top command and control centers of ISIS? Tody in the news,the identity of the ISIS British accented member who slaughtered an American journalist was the headlines.What does his identity matter? we know the identity of the killer,its ISIS Its the leadership of ISIS that authorized his killing.The US should go after the command centres.The world is frankly tired of the tolerance of terror.
|
|
|
|
Clean your Own Side of the Street,Mister!
|
|
|
|
It beats the imagination when US policies flip-flop dangerously and towards global dangerousity.The US is clearly soft on ISIS.Obama only reluctantly initiated "limited strikes" on ISIS with few jets sent to "halt the advance" of the terrorists "protect stranded yazid's and protect US interests" That was pretty much it.what happened to US no terrorist rhetoric? what happened to US non tolerance to the likes of Saddan Hussein and to Moammar Gaddafi? Why is the US suddenly so sympathetic to the cause of ISIS and eager to permit their existence? Why is the the US not targeting the top command and control centers of ISIS? Tody in the news,the identity of the ISIS British accented member who slaughtered an American journalist was the headlines.What does his identity matter? we know the identity of the killer,its ISIS Its the leadership of ISIS that authorized his killing.The US should go after the command centres.The world is frankly tired of the tolerance of terror. Why not tell us where the Top-Brass are hiding,and where the Command-CENTERS are? Me thinks you ought to read up a bit on Asymmetric Warfare! |
|
|
|
Edited by
karmafury
on
Thu 08/21/14 03:40 AM
|
|
ISIS seeks to create an Islamic state in eastern Syria and northern Iraq based on sharia law. The group has captured territory from the fringes of Aleppo in eastern Syria to Falluja in southern Iraq to Mosul in the north.
Unlike Al-Qaeda, ISIS is a regional group with regional interests. "ISIS seeks to create an Islamic state in eastern Syria and northern Iraq based on sharia law. The group has captured territory from the fringes of Aleppo in eastern Syria to Falluja in southern Iraq to Mosul in the north." ISIS: 5 things to know about the Iraqi jihadist group Instead of waiting for the US or other nation to do something why don't the regions affected follow these simple steps. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ohlVVyIy9Gw]simple directions |
|
|
|
We the people are tired of systematic arming of terrorists and permission of terror to cause chaos in erstwhile peaceful zones in the world.we are tired of the use of "kids gloves" against dangerous,real evolving terror.ISIS should be crushed now.some media including the New York Times are pleasantly,deceitfully referring to ISIS as "sunni militia" They equally baptized boko hara terorrists as militants in nigeria.This is an insult to many who regard themselves as "sunni" worldwide and an encouragement of terrorists.The world needs a new direction in leadership,a new world order where conscientious truth and justice trump over deadly personal interests and advantages.ISIS is dangerous aberration and existential threat.It must be crushed and crushed now.Its time to bomb their centres and military formations.Troops on the ground are not required for this as iraqi troops will do the rest and such excuses by US does not float.
|
|
|
|
We the people are tired of systematic arming of terrorists and permission of terror to cause chaos in erstwhile peaceful zones in the world.we are tired of the use of "kids gloves" against dangerous,real evolving terror.ISIS should be crushed now.some media including the New York Times are pleasantly,deceitfully referring to ISIS as "sunni militia" They equally baptized boko hara terorrists as militants in nigeria.This is an insult to many who regard themselves as "sunni" worldwide and an encouragement of terrorists.The world needs a new direction in leadership,a new world order where conscientious truth and justice trump over deadly personal interests and advantages.ISIS is dangerous aberration and existential threat.It must be crushed and crushed now.Its time to bomb their centres and military formations.Troops on the ground are not required for this as iraqi troops will do the rest and such excuses by US does not float.
|
|
|
|
We the people are tired of systematic arming of terrorists and permission of terror to cause chaos in erstwhile peaceful zones in the world.we are tired of the use of "kids gloves" against dangerous,real evolving terror.ISIS should be crushed now.some media including the New York Times are pleasantly,deceitfully referring to ISIS as "sunni militia" They equally baptized boko hara terorrists as militants in nigeria.This is an insult to many who regard themselves as "sunni" worldwide and an encouragement of terrorists.The world needs a new direction in leadership,a new world order where conscientious truth and justice trump over deadly personal interests and advantages.ISIS is dangerous aberration and existential threat.It must be crushed and crushed now.Its time to bomb their centres and military formations.Troops on the ground are not required for this as iraqi troops will do the rest and such excuses by US does not float.
|
|
|
|
We the people are tired of systematic arming of terrorists and permission of terror to cause chaos in erstwhile peaceful zones in the world.we are tired of the use of "kids gloves" against dangerous,real evolving terror.ISIS should be crushed now.some media including the New York Times are pleasantly,deceitfully referring to ISIS as "sunni militia" They equally baptized boko hara terorrists as militants in nigeria.This is an insult to many who regard themselves as "sunni" worldwide and an encouragement of terrorists.The world needs a new direction in leadership,a new world order where conscientious truth and justice trump over deadly personal interests and advantages.ISIS is dangerous aberration and existential threat.It must be crushed and crushed now.Its time to bomb their centres and military formations.Troops on the ground are not required for this as iraqi troops will do the rest and such excuses by US does not float.
|
|
|
|
It beats the imagination when US policies flip-flop dangerously and towards global dangerousity.The US is clearly soft on ISIS.Obama only reluctantly initiated "limited strikes" on ISIS with few jets sent to "halt the advance" of the terrorists "protect stranded yazid's and protect US interests" That was pretty much it.what happened to US no terrorist rhetoric? what happened to US non tolerance to the likes of Saddan Hussein and to Moammar Gaddafi? Why is the US suddenly so sympathetic to the cause of ISIS and eager to permit their existence? Why is the the US not targeting the top command and control centers of ISIS? Tody in the news,the identity of the ISIS British accented member who slaughtered an American journalist was the headlines.What does his identity matter? we know the identity of the killer,its ISIS Its the leadership of ISIS that authorized his killing.The US should go after the command centres.The world is frankly tired of the tolerance of terror. Why don't you do away with Boko Haram. People in glass houses |
|
|
|
Where are the hawks who set-up around poor Libya and dropped 50,000 sorties to get Africa's poor Gaddafi out of power? where is NATO? Where is UN? Where is Qatar and Kuwait?
|
|
|
|
Where are the hawks who set-up around poor Libya and dropped 50,000 sorties to get Africa's poor Gaddafi out of power? where is NATO? Where is UN? Where is Qatar and Kuwait? Ahaha Qatar, the biggest funders of terrorism known to man, and we give them the world cup. Qatar and Dubai, why has there never been any terrorism there, I'll let you work it out. |
|
|
|
Where are the hawks who set-up around poor Libya and dropped 50,000 sorties to get Africa's poor Gaddafi out of power? where is NATO? Where is UN? Where is Qatar and Kuwait? are you talking about the Terrorist Supporter Qatar? |
|
|
|
It beats the imagination when US policies flip-flop dangerously and towards global dangerousity.The US is clearly soft on ISIS.Obama only reluctantly initiated "limited strikes" on ISIS with few jets sent to "halt the advance" of the terrorists "protect stranded yazid's and protect US interests" That was pretty much it.what happened to US no terrorist rhetoric? what happened to US non tolerance to the likes of Saddan Hussein and to Moammar Gaddafi? Why is the US suddenly so sympathetic to the cause of ISIS and eager to permit their existence? Why is the the US not targeting the top command and control centers of ISIS? Tody in the news,the identity of the ISIS British accented member who slaughtered an American journalist was the headlines.What does his identity matter? we know the identity of the killer,its ISIS Its the leadership of ISIS that authorized his killing.The US should go after the command centres.The world is frankly tired of the tolerance of terror. Why isn't the Islamic world (over 1.5 billion and controlling most of the Middle East's oil wealth) going after ISIS? The dozen Islamic countries near ISIS have ten times the military strength necessary to defeat ISIS. The US is tired of the tolerance for Islamic terror by the countries who practice Islam. |
|
|
|
Obama is soft on ISIS because he is soft on the whole Muslim community. That is how he has always been.
|
|
|
|
Obama is soft on ISIS because he is soft on the whole Muslim community. That is how he has always been. |
|
|
|
Obama asked Congress for permission to intervene in Syria last year- as per the War Powers Act; as of this date, Congress has not responded.
|
|
|
|
Obama asked Congress for permission to intervene in Syria last year- as per the War Powers Act; as of this date, Congress has not responded. |
|
|
|
Obama asked Congress for permission to intervene in Syria last year- as per the War Powers Act; as of this date, Congress has not responded. |
|
|
|
Obama is soft on ISIS because he is soft on the whole Muslim community. That is how he has always been. you really need to slow down before you're throwing a cannibbling Fit! |
|
|
|
Obama is soft on ISIS because he is soft on the whole Muslim community. That is how he has always been. seems they already have come back to your Country! Why do you hate the US and the West so much? Remember,it is a US-Site who allows you to publish your Rants! |
|
|