Previous 1
Topic: Does anyone else out there also
Peccy's photo
Thu 03/06/08 08:51 PM
Edited by Peccy on Thu 03/06/08 08:51 PM
find it disturbing that as far as we have come in the last 50 years, we are still testing products on animals?

Engraven_Image's photo
Thu 03/06/08 08:53 PM
huh Yes! The people that test condoms on animals are sick!sick

harley46's photo
Thu 03/06/08 08:53 PM
They will do dangerous tests on animals but if we abuse an animal,we go to jail. Somethings wrong with this picture.grumble

fastlinnie's photo
Thu 03/06/08 08:54 PM
i think they are tastybigsmile

Totage's photo
Thu 03/06/08 08:54 PM

find it disturbing that as far as we have come in the last 50 years, we are still testing products on animals?


So testing on humans would be better?

It's the lesser of two evils IMO.

I don't like animals being harmed, but I would rather and animal be harmed than a person.

JMO

Cambolaya65's photo
Thu 03/06/08 08:56 PM
i test animals with MY product??noway huh

DrX's photo
Thu 03/06/08 08:57 PM
Edited by DrX on Thu 03/06/08 08:58 PM


find it disturbing that as far as we have come in the last 50 years, we are still testing products on animals?


So testing on humans would be better?

It's the lesser of two evils IMO.

I don't like animals being harmed, but I would rather and animal be harmed than a person.

JMO


i agree, plus i hear no arguments about the products we get from animal testing. I'm not saying it's right, but it has to be.

I'm sure the jews didnt want to build pyrimids for the egyptions, but look at the marvels we got from that.

Engraven_Image's photo
Thu 03/06/08 08:58 PM
huh Every hunting season, I test my Guns on animals! D@mn, you oughta see what a .50 caliber rifle does to a rabbit!laugh

no photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:02 PM



find it disturbing that as far as we have come in the last 50 years, we are still testing products on animals?


So testing on humans would be better?

It's the lesser of two evils IMO.

I don't like animals being harmed, but I would rather and animal be harmed than a person.

JMO


i agree, plus i hear no arguments about the products we get from animal testing. I'm not saying it's right, but it has to be.

I'm sure the jews didnt want to build pyrimids for the egyptions, but look at the marvels we got from that.


Jews... Slavery...

Gerbils... Cancer research...

Not getting the connection....


BUT anyway, I work in the biotech field, and if not for animal trials, we'd all be spitting up blood after every meal probably. OK, maybe not that dramatic, but my point is, even though animals are cute little furry creatures in God's Woodlands, there are a lot of things that we all enjoy and benefit from through RESPONSIBLE animal testing.

Now, outfits that push the limits? Another story, but animal testing as a whole? If we got rid of it in the 1960s lets just say a lot of us wouldnt be here typing on these fancy schmancy computers. A lot of us would probably be dead already.

DrX's photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:04 PM




find it disturbing that as far as we have come in the last 50 years, we are still testing products on animals?


So testing on humans would be better?

It's the lesser of two evils IMO.

I don't like animals being harmed, but I would rather and animal be harmed than a person.

JMO


i agree, plus i hear no arguments about the products we get from animal testing. I'm not saying it's right, but it has to be.

I'm sure the jews didnt want to build pyrimids for the egyptions, but look at the marvels we got from that.


Jews... Slavery...

Gerbils... Cancer research...

Not getting the connection....


BUT anyway, I work in the biotech field, and if not for animal trials, we'd all be spitting up blood after every meal probably. OK, maybe not that dramatic, but my point is, even though animals are cute little furry creatures in God's Woodlands, there are a lot of things that we all enjoy and benefit from through RESPONSIBLE animal testing.

Now, outfits that push the limits? Another story, but animal testing as a whole? If we got rid of it in the 1960s lets just say a lot of us wouldnt be here typing on these fancy schmancy computers. A lot of us would probably be dead already.


just saying both have to do, what theu really don't want to

EveningKiss's photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:04 PM
Test things out on me! ITs MUCH more humane! smokin

no photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:06 PM


I guess worst case, we could always start using the homeless and unwanted babies?

ok, that was extreme... i know... but i couldn't NOT say it.

Engraven_Image's photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:08 PM

Test things out on me! ITs MUCH more humane! smokin
I would get life if I tested that .50 caliber rifle out on you!!!laugh laugh laugh

DrX's photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:21 PM



I guess worst case, we could always start using the homeless and unwanted babies?

ok, that was extreme... i know... but i couldn't NOT say it.


extreme!? that was keepin' it gangsta!

no photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:26 PM
Eh i say skip the testing and just release it into the public. much more fun that way.

DrX's photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:29 PM

Eh i say skip the testing and just release it into the public. much more fun that way.


true I'm all for zombie phuckers wandering around, damn I wish the dead would rise from their graves, that part in dawn of the dead where they are just picking people off with a rifle, looked fun as hell.

Engraven_Image's photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:34 PM


Eh i say skip the testing and just release it into the public. much more fun that way.


true I'm all for zombie phuckers wandering around, damn I wish the dead would rise from their graves, that part in dawn of the dead where they are just picking people off with a rifle, looked fun as hell.
explode explode explode Hell freakin yeah! I'm waiting for Armageddon! I wanta see some zombies!!! Release the BIOS!!!!explode explode explode

mnhiker's photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:49 PM
Jews... Slavery...

Gerbils... Cancer research...

Not getting the connection....


BUT anyway, I work in the biotech field, and if not for animal trials, we'd all be spitting up blood after every meal probably. OK, maybe not that dramatic, but my point is, even though animals are cute little furry creatures in God's Woodlands, there are a lot of things that we all enjoy and benefit from through RESPONSIBLE animal testing.

Now, outfits that push the limits? Another story, but animal testing as a whole? If we got rid of it in the 1960s lets just say a lot of us wouldnt be here typing on these fancy schmancy computers. A lot of us would probably be dead already.


Exactly. The voice of reason. bigsmile

no photo
Thu 03/06/08 09:55 PM
Mmm I'm all about some zombie action.

Pinky01's photo
Thu 03/06/08 10:07 PM
I am what some might consider an animal activist.
I promote animal rights although i am Not a member of P.E.T.A. (People for Ethical Treatment of Animals) because i have my own similar yet highly differant opinions. I've also been a vegetarian for 7 years now.

Product testing is beyond wrong. It's completely inhumane, let alone the fact that alot of it isnt accurate considering humans have differant DNA, genetical compounds, and differant reactions than these animals.

The fact that we're testing these things on poor animals is horrible considering the technology we have now. Most of these reactions can be predicted via computer models.

Sad truth is people are savages. (personal opinion)
I think it should stop.

Previous 1