100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: "Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinct | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
THEY DONT PADDLE,THEY WALK ACROSS THE BORDERS ,THIS IS A FREE COUNTRY WITH THE SAME PRIVILEDGES AND PROBLEMS AS ANY OTHER DEMOCRATIC NATION...TYPICAL AMERICAN ARROGANCE TO THINK YOU ARE THE ONLY SHINING STAR IN THE WORLD. apologies for the all CAPS dont know any other way to emphasize. symbelyne...... I didn't say we were the only shining star in the world. But we are the richest and most powerful country in the world, which is why millions and millions of people will risk their lives and give up everything to come here. You didn't really answer my post, but one cannot argue with facts. If by richest and most powerful you mean most in debt and armed with the highest number of WMD in the world, then you get no argument from me. symbelyne....... Obviously, I am never going to get an answer out of you as to why your country is so great, so I will not waste any more time on you. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
THEY DONT PADDLE,THEY WALK ACROSS THE BORDERS ,THIS IS A FREE COUNTRY WITH THE SAME PRIVILEDGES AND PROBLEMS AS ANY OTHER DEMOCRATIC NATION...TYPICAL AMERICAN ARROGANCE TO THINK YOU ARE THE ONLY SHINING STAR IN THE WORLD. apologies for the all CAPS dont know any other way to emphasize. symbelyne...... I didn't say we were the only shining star in the world. But we are the richest and most powerful country in the world, which is why millions and millions of people will risk their lives and give up everything to come here. You didn't really answer my post, but one cannot argue with facts. If by richest and most powerful you mean most in debt and armed with the highest number of WMD in the world, then you get no argument from me. symbelyne....... Obviously, I am never going to get an answer out of you as to why your country is so great, so I will not waste any more time on you. My country is great because I love it as much as you love yours...what do you want? page after page of facts??? I dont have to justify anything to you. Want to know about Argentina, google it, or better yet visit it...you'll cry your eyes out the day you have to leave because of how great this country and its people are. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Argentina: https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ar.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
karmafury
on
Tue 02/26/08 07:27 AM
|
|
November 28, 2007 12:00am
AUSTRALIA is the third-most desirable country in which to live according to an annual United Nations report that looks at wealth, life expectancy and educational levels. Australia came in behind top ranking Iceland, and Norway in second spot. The top three nations have not changed since last year's report, when Australia was again in third, but Norway was on top and Iceland second. AIDS-afflicted sub-Saharan African states occupied the lowest rankings of the UN Human Development Index, which assesses 177 countries and territories on the three key indicators. As expected, rich free-market countries dominate the top places. Behind Iceland, Norway and Australia come Canada and Ireland. But the United States has slipped to 12th place, from eighth last year. http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22833504-5013605,00.html |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 28, 2007 12:00am AUSTRALIA is the third-most desirable country in which to live according to an annual United Nations report that looks at wealth, life expectancy and educational levels. Australia came in behind top ranking Iceland, and Norway in second spot. The top three nations have not changed since last year's report, when Australia was again in third, but Norway was on top and Iceland second. AIDS-afflicted sub-Saharan African states occupied the lowest rankings of the UN Human Development Index, which assesses 177 countries and territories on the three key indicators. As expected, rich free-market countries dominate the top places. Behind Iceland, Norway and Australia come Canada and Ireland. But the United States has slipped to 12th place, from eighth last year. http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22833504-5013605,00.html Probably because of all the illegal aliens coming over the border, you know what they say, "there goes the neighborhood" 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
so does that mean we lose the popularity contest??
 <kinda reminds me of highschool> |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 28, 2007 12:00am AUSTRALIA is the third-most desirable country in which to live according to an annual United Nations report that looks at wealth, life expectancy and educational levels. Australia came in behind top ranking Iceland, and Norway in second spot. The top three nations have not changed since last year's report, when Australia was again in third, but Norway was on top and Iceland second. AIDS-afflicted sub-Saharan African states occupied the lowest rankings of the UN Human Development Index, which assesses 177 countries and territories on the three key indicators. As expected, rich free-market countries dominate the top places. Behind Iceland, Norway and Australia come Canada and Ireland. But the United States has slipped to 12th place, from eighth last year. http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22833504-5013605,00.html Probably because of all the illegal aliens coming over the border, you know what they say, "there goes the neighborhood" No doubt the same thing that Native Americans have been saying for the past 200 years. Where did your kin come from???? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
karmafury
on
Tue 02/26/08 07:48 AM
|
|
November 28, 2007 12:00am AUSTRALIA is the third-most desirable country in which to live according to an annual United Nations report that looks at wealth, life expectancy and educational levels. Australia came in behind top ranking Iceland, and Norway in second spot. The top three nations have not changed since last year's report, when Australia was again in third, but Norway was on top and Iceland second. AIDS-afflicted sub-Saharan African states occupied the lowest rankings of the UN Human Development Index, which assesses 177 countries and territories on the three key indicators. As expected, rich free-market countries dominate the top places. Behind Iceland, Norway and Australia come Canada and Ireland. But the United States has slipped to 12th place, from eighth last year. http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22833504-5013605,00.html Probably because of all the illegal aliens coming over the border, you know what they say, "there goes the neighborhood" No doubt the same thing that Native Americans have been saying for the past 200 years. Where did your kin come from???? Not to take sides here but: Indigenous Peoples in Argentina Their territories expropriated over decades and their chiefs militarily defeated, the indigenous nations were incorporated as subjugated peoples and insecure occupiers of their own lands; they were forced to adopt a foreign religion and way of life. Their autonomous socio-economic systems were destroyed and, ever since, they have been subordinated to the processes of capitalist expansion and contraction, despite the fact that their food security depends more on hunting, fishing, gathering and small crop-growing in the north and sheep and cattle rearing in the south. Many Argentinians believe there are no indigenous people in their country, either because the majority have died out or are on the verge of doing so, or because "their descendants" were assimilated into Western civilisation long ago and they now live like any other citizen. Generalised stereotypes have forced many indigenous people to defensively hide their identity in order to avoid being subjected to racial discrimination. Even so, the use of pejorative terms likening the Indians/indigenous to lazy, idle, dirty, ignorant and savage are common in everyday language. Toward the XVIIIth century, the Diaguitas had been assimilated by the Hispanic Creole society. Nowadays, almost nothing remains of their beliefs, traditions or cultural values. Colonial history is pretty much the same all over. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
karmafury
on
Tue 02/26/08 08:02 AM
|
|
Drivenmenutz, I disagree...Australia is not a warmongering formidable force, never has been, probably never will be....we dont have a massive budget for weapons, to defend our freedom. We help out when asked, and do our best to let others be, unless there is oppression, and other countries ask for our help. We have peace, we have freedom....TODAY...why? Lots of reasons...and yes, it could have looked different during world war 2, however, the government of the time had already drawn a big blue line across the top of Australia to hand over to Japan, in the event of invasion...what does that say? Peace and freedom is more about state of mind, and what one is willing to compromise on. Freedom, and liberty, is a catch cry, that will be ever elusive to those that prefer bullying tactics... all it does is create a mindset of having to sleep with one eye open and hope those that have been left disgruntled don't multiply quicker than one can count.... JESSE...... You cannot compare America and Australia. America was founded as a land of hope, freedom and opportunity. Australia was founded as a prison colony. As I mentioned in an earlier post America is the land where Europe sent its best and its brightest. Australia is where Europe dumped its worst, its criminals, its murderers, its rapists, its child molesters and all its other dredges of humanity who were not fit to live with good God-fearing people. You talk about murder. Let's talk about Australia's autrocity against humanity in 1970. I will remind you since I am sure it is something you have conveniently forgotten about. It was genocide. Let me spell that out for you .... Australia planned the deliberate systematic annihilation of its aborigine people by taking the children away from their parents. It was supposedly for the good of the children. So, tell me when your countrymen were spouting freedom, did the aborigine people understand Australia was annihilating them for the sake of freedom. My suggestion is before you criticize America, take a long hard look at Australia. Incidentally, I can give an even more nasty history lesson about your country, but I am not out to destroy you. I want you to stick to the topic of the thread and stop bashing America. When speaking about the things done to the First Australians (not Aboriginals...a term they don't like) perhaps a look at own history. The Aftermath of Native American Genocide and the Legacy it Has Left Behind: http://www.scribd.com/doc/94331/The-Aftermath-of-Native-American-Genocide-and-the-Legacy-it-Has-Left-Behind Assimilating the Natives in the U.S. and Australia http://www.kooriweb.org/gst/genocide/essay_15.html And yes just as guilty in Canada with the Residential Schools. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
what I'm wondering about is who the native people stole the land from....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
they stole it from the cavemen silly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
symbelmyne
on
Tue 02/26/08 09:41 AM
|
|
Karmafury:
The Spaniards that came to this country all but wiped out the indiginous population, much like they did in Mexico and the rest of Latin America. It is a bloody and shameful history that only now is getting attention. The indigenious people were not welcoming and resisted being colonized (since they were literally worked to death in the gold and silver mines) and baptized. But little could they do against the weapons and diseases that the Spaniards brought with them. The name used here is "negro" when talking about the "lower classes". |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
November 28, 2007 12:00am AUSTRALIA is the third-most desirable country in which to live according to an annual United Nations report that looks at wealth, life expectancy and educational levels. Australia came in behind top ranking Iceland, and Norway in second spot. The top three nations have not changed since last year's report, when Australia was again in third, but Norway was on top and Iceland second. AIDS-afflicted sub-Saharan African states occupied the lowest rankings of the UN Human Development Index, which assesses 177 countries and territories on the three key indicators. As expected, rich free-market countries dominate the top places. Behind Iceland, Norway and Australia come Canada and Ireland. But the United States has slipped to 12th place, from eighth last year. http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22833504-5013605,00.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- kermafury....... So Australia is the third ranked country in which to live. Your survey doesn't mean squat. I found one in which your country wasn't even listed. Ireland was listed as the most desirable country in which to live, followed by Switzerland, Norway and Luxembourg. I found another survey, which listed different countries other than the above in various rankings. Considering your report and mine, this tells me that if I kept searching I could probably find one that would show the USA in the top three. In other words, these surveys don't mean a darn thing. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
leahmarie
on
Tue 02/26/08 12:32 PM
|
|
Karmafury: The Spaniards that came to this country all but wiped out the indiginous population, much like they did in Mexico and the rest of Latin America. It is a bloody and shameful history that only now is getting attention. The indigenious people were not welcoming and resisted being colonized (since they were literally worked to death in the gold and silver mines) and baptized. But little could they do against the weapons and diseases that the Spaniards brought with them. The name used here is "negro" when talking about the "lower classes". -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- symbelyne....... You said that the term "negro" refers to the "lower classes." I thought that "negro" refers to people who have a high melanen content in their skin, that is dark skinned people, those of African ethnic origin. I also thought the term "lower classes" incorporates references to education, to occupation, to culture, and to income. In Mexico the Spaniards wiped out the Aztek (? spell) Indians and in the USA, the colonists wiped out the Indians although political correctness has turned them from Indians into Native Americans. Do you mean that "negro" refers to "lower classes" in your country? Or, is that termonology that goes way back before our time? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
they stole it from the cavemen silly. Foliel ....... By George! Finally a man who makes sense!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
karmafury
on
Tue 02/26/08 01:22 PM
|
|
November 28, 2007 12:00am AUSTRALIA is the third-most desirable country in which to live according to an annual United Nations report that looks at wealth, life expectancy and educational levels. Australia came in behind top ranking Iceland, and Norway in second spot. The top three nations have not changed since last year's report, when Australia was again in third, but Norway was on top and Iceland second. AIDS-afflicted sub-Saharan African states occupied the lowest rankings of the UN Human Development Index, which assesses 177 countries and territories on the three key indicators. As expected, rich free-market countries dominate the top places. Behind Iceland, Norway and Australia come Canada and Ireland. But the United States has slipped to 12th place, from eighth last year. http://www.news.com.au/dailytelegraph/story/0,22049,22833504-5013605,00.html -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- kermafury....... So Australia is the third ranked country in which to live. Your survey doesn't mean squat. I found one in which your country wasn't even listed. Ireland was listed as the most desirable country in which to live, followed by Switzerland, Norway and Luxembourg. I found another survey, which listed different countries other than the above in various rankings. Considering your report and mine, this tells me that if I kept searching I could probably find one that would show the USA in the top three. In other words, these surveys don't mean a darn thing. Here's the 2007 / 2008 United Nations Human Development Report taken from United Nations page: http://hdr.undp.org/en/statistics/ 2007/2008 Human Development Index rankings High Human Development 1. Iceland 2. Norway 3. Australia 4. Canada 5. Ireland 6. Sweden 7. Switzerland 8. Japan 9. Netherlands 10. France 11. Finland 12. United States 13. Spain 14. Denmark 15. Austria 16. United Kingdom 17. Belgium 18. Luxembourg 19. New Zealand 20. Italy 21. Hong Kong, China (SAR) 22. Germany 23. Israel 24. Greece 25. Singapore 26. Korea, Rep. of 27. Slovenia 28. Cyprus 29. Portugal 30. Brunei Darussalam 31. Barbados 32. Czech Republic 33. Kuwait 34. Malta 35. Qatar 36. Hungary 37. Poland 38. Argentina 39. United Arab Emirates 40. Chile 41. Bahrain 42. Slovakia 43. Lithuania 44. Estonia 45. Latvia 46. Uruguay 47. Croatia 48. Costa Rica 49. Bahamas 50. Seychelles 51. Cuba 52. Mexico 53. Bulgaria 54. Saint Kitts and Nevis 55. Tonga 56. Libyan Arab Jamahiriya 57. Antigua and Barbuda 58. Oman 59. Trinidad and Tobago 60. Romania 61. Saudi Arabia 62. Panama 63. Malaysia 64. Belarus 65. Mauritius 66. Bosnia and Herzegovina 67. Russian Federation 68. Albania 69. Macedonia, TFYR 70. Brazil Medium Human Development 71. Dominica 72. Saint Lucia 73. Kazakhstan 74. Venezuela, Rep. Bov. 75. Colombia 76. Ukraine 77. Samoa 78. Thailand 79. Dominican Republic 80. Belize 81. China 82. Grenada 83. Armenia 84. Turkey 85. Suriname 86. Jordan 87. Peru 88. Lebanon 89. Ecuador 90. Philippines 91. Tunisia 92. Saint Vincent and the Grenadines 93. Fiji 94. Iran, Islamic Rep. of 95. Paraguay 96. Georgia 97. Guyana 98. Azerbaijan 99. Sri Lanka 100. Maldives 101. Jamaica 102. Cape Verde 103. El Salvador 104. Algeria 105. Viet Nam 106. Occupied Palestinian Territories 107. Indonesia 108. Syrian Arab Republic 109. Turkmenistan 110. Nicaragua 111. Moldova 112. Egypt 113. Uzbekistan 114. Mongolia 115. Honduras 116. Kyrgyzstan 117. Bolivia 118. Guatemala 119. Gabon 120. Vanuatu 121. South Africa 122. Tajikistan 123. São Tomé and Principe 124. Botswana 125. Namibia 126. Morocco 127. Equatorial Guinea 128. India 129. Solomon Islands 130. Lao, People's Dem. Rep. 131. Cambodia 132. Myanmar 133. Bhutan 134. Comoros 135. Ghana 136. Pakistan 137. Mauritania 138. Lesotho 139. Congo 140. Bangladesh 141. Swaziland 142. Nepal 143. Madagascar 144. Cameroon 145. Papua New Guinea 146. Haiti 147. Sudan 148. Kenya 149. Djibouti 150. Timor-Leste 151. Zimbabwe 152. Togo 153. Yemen 154. Uganda 155. Gambia Low Human Development 156. Senegal 157. Eritrea 158. Nigeria 159. Tanzania, U. Rep. of 160. Guinea 161. Rwanda 162. Angola 163. Benin 164. Malawi 165. Zambia 166. Côte d'Ivoire 167. Burundi 168. Congo, Dem. Rep. 169. Ethiopia 170. Chad 171. Central African Republic 172. Mozambique 173. Mali 174. Niger 175. Guinea-Bissau 176. Burkina Faso 177. Sierra Leone FACT: Inequalities in ability to cope with climate change are emerging as an increasingly powerful driver of wider inequalities between and within countries. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
karmafury.....
You are just proving my point. All one has to do is surf the websites to find a survey that fits in with his/her way of thinking. Again, if I had the time and energy, I could surf the web and find sites that put the USA way up there. But what is the point. You would find another survey that would put your country in the top three, four, whatever. The only thing we would accomplish is that we would both waste a lot of time putting up pointless surveys. |
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
Jess642
on
Tue 02/26/08 01:58 PM
|
|
Drivenmenutz, I disagree...Australia is not a warmongering formidable force, never has been, probably never will be....we dont have a massive budget for weapons, to defend our freedom. We help out when asked, and do our best to let others be, unless there is oppression, and other countries ask for our help. We have peace, we have freedom....TODAY...why? Lots of reasons...and yes, it could have looked different during world war 2, however, the government of the time had already drawn a big blue line across the top of Australia to hand over to Japan, in the event of invasion...what does that say? Peace and freedom is more about state of mind, and what one is willing to compromise on. Freedom, and liberty, is a catch cry, that will be ever elusive to those that prefer bullying tactics... all it does is create a mindset of having to sleep with one eye open and hope those that have been left disgruntled don't multiply quicker than one can count.... JESSE...... You cannot compare America and Australia. America was founded as a land of hope, freedom and opportunity. Australia was founded as a prison colony. As I mentioned in an earlier post America is the land where Europe sent its best and its brightest. Australia is where Europe dumped its worst, its criminals, its murderers, its rapists, its child molesters and all its other dredges of humanity who were not fit to live with good God-fearing people. You talk about murder. Let's talk about Australia's autrocity against humanity in 1970. I will remind you since I am sure it is something you have conveniently forgotten about. It was genocide. Let me spell that out for you .... Australia planned the deliberate systematic annihilation of its aborigine people by taking the children away from their parents. It was supposedly for the good of the children. So, tell me when your countrymen were spouting freedom, did the aborigine people understand Australia was annihilating them for the sake of freedom. My suggestion is before you criticize America, take a long hard loook at Australia. Incidentally, I can give an even more nasty history lesson about your country, but I am not out to destroy you. I want you to stick to the topic of the thread and stop bashing America. Lah lah lah lah lah...is that it??? Lmao... The Stolen generation were not killed... and it started in 1910, a forcible assimilation of indigenoua Australians into a European settler way of life... Leahmarie, you my dear with your human relations tag, really need to do some human relations in the history department.. So, from 1910 up until 1976...(so you caught the tail end of the history book), children were taken from their families and placed into Church run missions, or adopted into european settlers homesteads and families in the hope of assimilating this beautiful and ancient culture, and within 5 or 6 generations, 'breeding' the indigenous out of them. Secondly MS LM...Australia was not only a penal colony, but a wonderful enticement for the wealthy and elite middle class to receive land grants, vast amounts of land for grazing, in the late 1700's early 1800's... A tiny proportion of the original ancestors were of convict origins , and usually for a loaf of bread stolen, you have that arse up too leahmarie, the really vicious crimes, convicts were hung, back in the old Motherland....which was yours too..... (And who do you think dug the holes, felled the trees, and cleared the land, for your wealthy origins? It certainly wasn't them and their lily white hands....) Get a grip Lady, if thats the best you can do, try to minimise a poster, by trying, (rather poorly I may add), to ridicule and diminish someone's credibility by their origins....you so need a brush up in the human relations, and human resource industry...  So while we are on this little historical sojourn, with your transparent attempts at using humiliation to control my posts, lets look at the First Nation, and the First Peoples of the US shall we? So, for a handful of beads, and a wink and a nudge, your ancestors swindled and conned a race of peoples out of their land, and that's the elite of your ancestors...sounds more like the petty thieves that were mine... And murderous, while we are dredging up the past....how many First people were masacred, for defending their land? See in 1970, we weren't murdering babies, and mothers, we were realising how stupid it was to take a beautiful culture and sully it with our europeaness...(and before you choose to attempt the degrees of humiliation again, I have an adopted indigenous mother, so I know my sh*te). Leahmarie, if you stuck to the facts.... The US today is in greater danger of more terrorist type attacks than ever before, by the number of countries they are currently bullying, you guys will never have peace, cause you are still thinking the guy with the biggest gun wins... And in the meantime the disgruntled enemies, are just waiting until you send yourselves broke...The US is not free, it's been bonded, to a despotic madman. So am I on topic Ms prefect???  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Drivenmenutz, I disagree...Australia is not a warmongering formidable force, never has been, probably never will be....we dont have a massive budget for weapons, to defend our freedom. We help out when asked, and do our best to let others be, unless there is oppression, and other countries ask for our help. We have peace, we have freedom....TODAY...why? Lots of reasons...and yes, it could have looked different during world war 2, however, the government of the time had already drawn a big blue line across the top of Australia to hand over to Japan, in the event of invasion...what does that say? Peace and freedom is more about state of mind, and what one is willing to compromise on. Freedom, and liberty, is a catch cry, that will be ever elusive to those that prefer bullying tactics... all it does is create a mindset of having to sleep with one eye open and hope those that have been left disgruntled don't multiply quicker than one can count.... JESSE...... You cannot compare America and Australia. America was founded as a land of hope, freedom and opportunity. Australia was founded as a prison colony. As I mentioned in an earlier post America is the land where Europe sent its best and its brightest. Australia is where Europe dumped its worst, its criminals, its murderers, its rapists, its child molesters and all its other dredges of humanity who were not fit to live with good God-fearing people. You talk about murder. Let's talk about Australia's autrocity against humanity in 1970. I will remind you since I am sure it is something you have conveniently forgotten about. It was genocide. Let me spell that out for you .... Australia planned the deliberate systematic annihilation of its aborigine people by taking the children away from their parents. It was supposedly for the good of the children. So, tell me when your countrymen were spouting freedom, did the aborigine people understand Australia was annihilating them for the sake of freedom. My suggestion is before you criticize America, take a long hard loook at Australia. Incidentally, I can give an even more nasty history lesson about your country, but I am not out to destroy you. I want you to stick to the topic of the thread and stop bashing America. Lah lah lah lah lah...is that it??? Lmao... The Stolen generation were not killed... and it started in 1910, a forcible assimilation of indigenoua Australians into a European settler way of life... Leahmarie, you my dear with your human relations tag, really need to do some human relations in the history department.. So, from 1910 up until 1976...(so you caught the tail end of the history book), children were taken from their families and placed into Church run missions, or adopted into european settlers homesteads and families in the hope of assimilating this beautiful and ancient culture, and within 5 or 6 generations, 'breeding' the indigenous out of them. Secondly MS LM...Australia was not only a penal colony, but a wonderful enticement for the wealthy and elite middle class to receive land grants, vast amounts of land for grazing, in the late 1700's early 1800's... A tiny proportion of the original ancestors were of convict origins , and usually for a loaf of bread stolen, you have that arse up too leahmarie, the really vicious crimes, convicts were hung, back in the old Motherland....which was yours too..... (And who do you think dug the holes, felled the trees, and cleared the land, for your wealthy origins? It certainly wasn't them and their lily white hands....) Get a grip Lady, if thats the best you can do, try to minimise a poster, by trying, (rather poorly I may add), to ridicule and diminish someone's credibility by their origins....you so newed a brush up in the human relations, and human resource industry... So while we are on theis little historical sojourn, with your transparent attempts at using humiliation to control my posts, lets look at the First Nation, and the First Peoples of the US shall we? So, for a handful of beads, and a wink and a nudge, your ancestors swindled and conned a race of peoples out of their land, and that's the elite of your ancestors...sounds more like the petty thieves that were mine... And murderous, while we are dredging up the past....how many First people were masacred, for defending their land? See in 1970, we weren't murdering babies, and mothers, we were realising how stupid it was to take a beautiful culture and sully it with our europeaness...(and before you choose to attempt the degrees of humiliation again, I have an adopted indigenous mother, so I know my sh*te). Leahmarie, if you stuck to the facts.... The US today is in greater danger of more terrorist type attacks than ever before, by the number of countries they are currently bullying, you guys will never have peace, cause you are still thinking the guy with the biggest gun wins... And in the meantime the disgruntled enemies, are just waiting until you send yourselves broke...The US is not free, it's been bonded, to a despotic madman. So am I on topic Ms prefect??? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- jesse..... You confirmed what I said is true. You spun it so it doesn't look so bad. You should go into politics. Why not offer your services to Hillary? She needs a good spin artist. And I have to admit without sarcism ..... you spin very well. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Edited by
karmafury
on
Tue 02/26/08 02:03 PM
|
|
karmafury..... You are just proving my point. All one has to do is surf the websites to find a survey that fits in with his/her way of thinking. Again, if I had the time and energy, I could surf the web and find sites that put the USA way up there. But what is the point. You would find another survey that would put your country in the top three, four, whatever. The only thing we would accomplish is that we would both waste a lot of time putting up pointless surveys. Mine are from the United Nations Development Programme where would yours be from? |
|
|
|
|
