“Just capable of sexual assault.”

This just keeps getting weirder and weirder. I think some people should go get psychiatric evaluations.

https://www.dailywire.com/news/36717/womens-march-kavanaugh-doesnt-have-be-guilty-just-emily-zanotti?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_content=062316-news&utm_campaign=benshapiro

That statement is partly true. Assault and rape being very intimate crimes are very often ONLY he said she said with no tangible 'evidence' left behind to present.

The Cosby accusers, for instance, had no EVIDENCE, except that Cosby admitted that he purchased drugs to have sex with women. That means that it is POSSIBLE any or all of the accusers may have been such a woman.

if K had ever been the kind of drunk that could forget what he had done, it would also be possible that he could have done as described and not remember it.

Cosby admitting is is evidence.

Then you throw that big word “IF” in there.

Like IF Kavanaugh were a Democrat no accusations would have come out against him.

not that I agree w anything you say about this case. But look at the word that comes up most in your posts. " IF" . Yet every one of your posts you are convicting him or at least leaning toward guilt, while ignoring the fact every one of her statements has been refuted by the people she said knew of the alledged assault.

Not guilty, but "capable of".

Well... That would certainly disqualify everyone,
past, present, and future.

Capable of...
Even women are capable of.

That is what I just said. IF .. Kavanaugh had been recorded, like Cosby, saying he got so drunk he couldnt remember things, than it would be seen as possible that he COULD have done what Ford said and not remember.

refute: prove (a statement or theory) to be wrong or false; disprove.

Nothing Ford said was 'refiuted', actually.

and yes, judging on how defensive he was about his drinking, the BS explanations he gave about his drinking memory, and boofing, and throwing up, and how detailed she was about the room and the allusion to the event in therapy years before, with clear willingness to be investigated and take lie detector test that she passed,

I do believe her over him. She had much more 'evidence' than any of the Cosby accusers who were just believed on her word and his statement. K made no statement that alluded to a possibility he could get drunk and not remember what he did,. Had he done so it would open the possibility that he could have done it and forgot.

You do know evidence means something that corroborates the accusations. Name one source of evidence of assault You can't do it.

evidence:the available body of facts or information indicating whether a belief or proposition is true or valid.

Direct evidence usually is that which speaks for itself: eyewitness accounts, a confession, or a weapon.

Circumstantial evidence usually is that which suggests a fact by implication or inference: the appearance of the scene of a crime, testimony that suggests a connection or link with a crime, physical evidence that suggests criminal activity.


CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE may be therapists notes describing the incident and a passed lie detector test. just a logical person.

You mean a Democrat like...say...Al Franken?

The FBI has cleared this man 7 times now 7 TIMES! Jesus Christ, he has had every Federal Law Enforcement Agency and intelligence agency up his a$$ now and they couldn't find anything, ANYTHING!

if you say so,,,,never mattered anyhow. majority party were always gonna push him through.

The difference between Kavanaugh and Cosby is that Cosby was given a fair trial in which he was presumed innocent until proven guilty. In contrast, Kavanaugh has been presumed guilty until proven innocent.

though I love you, I disagree. Noone is presumed innocent once a prosecutor takes their case. They are presumed guilty by the cops, presumed guilty by the prosecutor, and often presumed guilty in the public eye before the trial even starts.

I dont believe Kavanaugh had it any differently. Some presumed him guilty like a prosecutor might, some presumed him innocent like a defense attorney might. and both had a fair chance to ask the questions they felt might validate where they stood on their belief of his guilt or innocence.

In a court of law, the burden of proof is on the accuser.

In contrast, Kavanaugh's critics claim that the burden of proof is on the accused.

Or Cory Booker.

Even if kavanaugh is confirmed, he reputation is ruined forever.

Yup. Clinton accused of sexual misconduct that was proven and he gets six figure speaking engagements.....

Democrats aren't held to the same standards as republicans. We need to keep Republicans in the majority to lessen some of the Democratic b.s.

We have edited a few post due to attacking other members please keep responses towards the Topic not each other.


Forum Admin
Kristi