100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Petition | |
|---|---|
|
|
|
There were a total of 17,250 reported murder and non-negligent manslaughter cases in the U.S. in 2016. https://www.statista.com/statistics/195331/number-of-murders-in-the-us-by-state/ also in 2016 there were 10,111 fatalities due to speeding https://www.nhtsa.gov/press-releases/usdot-releases-2016-fatal-traffic-crash-data proposal: since A: speeding is illegal. PERIOD. and B: 10 thousand people would still be alive if someone wasnt speeding. Why dont we invest in changing auto standards so that cars cannot go above the fastest stated speed limit in the US (80)mph ... who is with me? Build that wall and slow down those cars! ? https://crashstats.nhtsa.dot.gov/Api/Public/ViewPublication/810625 The overwhelming amount of fatal car accidents already happen under 80 mile per hour The largest group of fatalities being in the 55 mph range. In the urban areas the 40 mph range. So what is governing cars to a maximum speed of 80 mph going to achieve? How many of the accidents you listed were done at a speed of 80 mph or more? Im not exactly sure, do you know how many illegals in our prisons crossed at the border versus overstayed? 66 percent of those who became illegals in 2014 were overstays, not border crossers ... but we still want to build that wall.... https://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/visa-overstays-outnumber-illegal-border-crossings-trend-expected-continue-n730216 Oh, I see. bait people with one subject while you have a different agenda at the ready all along. Isn't there rules about .. baiting? So, you strung along the people who did answer on the car speed bait... ( I count 8 ) wow... not a very nice thing to do to people.. not nice at all. no, not bait, very direct. just like talking about chicago violence to introduce chicago and violence with BLACK people. Im wondering if people really stand by the train of thought that we should invest to prevent the ability for people to break the law who may end up causing death. Driving was the analogy to see if that train of thought was a constant or hypocritical. I said so in my second post. So now you are on to Chicago and black people on a thread started about cars. Told you my take on it, the others who got duped can surely make up their own minds. I won't feed your scam thread. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
So now you are on to Chicago and black people on a thread started about cars. Told you my take on it, the others who got duped can surely make up their own minds. I won't feed your scam thread. Scam thread? She stated one illegal procedure and one solution as a lens to look at another illegal procedure and a proposed solution for that. This is the same "lens comparison" used by the Supreme Court to decide the constitutionality of one liberty vs a proscribed behavior, such as the baker not making the gay wedding cake. It is just when logic can be used as an argument against your opinion that you drop the hammer on it as a "scam thread", much as evidence that comes from anything other than Fox News these days seems quickly dismissed as "fake" (Maybe we should rename FoxNews "TASS USA"?) Just because she is playing chess and you are playing checkers, MsHarmony is automatically wrong. Wow. As far as the "petition", Greeneyes, you might want to read about the "Dihydrogen Monoxide Hoax" (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dihydrogen_monoxide_hoax), done by a high school kid to encourage critical thinking and logic. Ms, as soon as I saw "petition" in the thread title, I laughed, anticipating where you might be going |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
must be the paralegal training in me ...lol
 I am glad someone got it. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
must be the paralegal training in me ...lol I am glad someone got it. Like I said, you are playing chess while some are playing checkers. Let's get Trump to state his position on Dihydrogen Monoxide... I will bet he is against it, and will probably blame Obama for our inaction on banning it |
|
|
|
|
