Topic: what kind of person is your “type” ? | |
---|---|
i confess that i am scared of heights so no tall trees for me lol
|
|
|
|
ok just shrubs for you then
|
|
|
|
the right guy for me is uh...hmmm
|
|
|
|
what kind of person is your “type” ?
Curvy friendly blondes with extensive lingerie collections. which kind of relationship lasts ?
No kind of relationship. Relationships aren't static objects. "Relationship" is a simplistic term to generalize the ongoing interaction between 2 people, categorizing them into a group label. People constantly change. Relationships are defined by the interaction of the people. Relationships always change. No relationship lasts. Let's say you have a boat named "Theseus." Over years of use you remove and replace all pieces of that boat. You replace the worn sails, you replace the rotting deck, you replace storm damaged windows, ultimately replace everything. Is it still the "Theseus?" What if over time and slow replacement of each individual part you turn it into an airplane. Sails become wings, deck becomes fuselage, rudder becomes engines, fo'c'sle becomes cockpit. Slow transition, not all at once. Then the earth runs out of oil, so dwindling jet fuel, and you slowly return it back to a ship using some of the old parts and some new. Is it still the "Theseus?" Why would someone do that rather than just buy a new boat or plane? People make a choice (conscious or nonconscious) on a daily basis on how to see themselves, see other people, conceptualize their relationship and interactions. Whether or not that is slowly adapting to constant natural uncontrollable change, or a quick process of dumping the old for something new, is just as dependent on external factors as personality "type." People ultimately choose to continue a relationship for very limited reasons. 1. They value the interaction, finding it offers some benefit (especially to the perpetuation of self image), desiring to maintain the momentum. For itself, or for future goals. 2. They fear losing the interaction and/or change. And most importantly: 3. Perceived alternatives have greater costs or less value associated with them. The rest is the process of rationalizing (implicit and cognitive bias influenced) decisions for emotional/mental homeostasis and efficiency. which kind of relationship lasts ?people who are opposites in character or people who are so similar?
Depends on how flexible and adaptable they are, what purpose the "relationship" serves, and the perceived value of what is available to replace it with less cost/risk. which one do you think will stand the test of time?
The one where the relationship has some need to survive the test of time for something other than short term ego (feelings) stroking masquerading as long term image which is done to justify behavior choices. |
|
|
|
yep all of one or the other tends to not work so well. the differences tend to get you to try new stuff but the similarities give the comfort and closeness then all or nothing does not really apply when we desire to be with the person that we seek. there would and should be a balance if not then we should just give up the whole relationship thing. that thought is comforting eric whoa there nelly. i NEVER said give up on relationships even relationships that don't end with happily ever after have value. and there is never any guarantee that any will get there. if you do ultimately want happily ever after, you keep stepping out onto that relationship limb. the trick is learning to step off of the ones that are too weak before they break Very profound and very true. |
|
|
|
sometimes even us neanderthals can see the light |
|
|
|
A bit of both I think.
All great teams have different individual qualities, put them together and you have forever. |
|
|
|
sometimes even us neanderthals can see the light |
|
|
|
My type is a decent human being, first and foremost. Next comes the 3 S's: STRAIGHT, SANE, and SOBER. As far as looks are concerned, I like girly girls: feminine appearance, manicured hands, pedicured feet, the right amount of makeup (not to Tammy Faye Bakker extremes), and a ladylike disposition.
|
|
|
|
it depends on the character itself..
|
|
|
|
i confess that i am scared of heights so no tall trees for me lol Guess tall guys are outta the question. LOL |
|
|
|
i confess that i am scared of heights so no tall trees for me lol Guess tall guys are outta the question. LOL i wrote trees not guys tall guys are hard NOT to notice specially when they are kind .sensitive, sweet and respectful, not to mention smart and good looking too |
|
|
|
ok just shrubs for you then and continue to lurk in the shadows till i see the light lol....now thats an idea. |
|
|
|
A bit of both I think. All great teams have different individual qualities, put them together and you have forever. joe...you believe in forever? |
|
|
|
what kind of person is your “type” ?
Curvy friendly blondes with extensive lingerie collections. which kind of relationship lasts ?
No kind of relationship. Relationships aren't static objects. "Relationship" is a simplistic term to generalize the ongoing interaction between 2 people, categorizing them into a group label. People constantly change. Relationships are defined by the interaction of the people. Relationships always change. No relationship lasts. Let's say you have a boat named "Theseus." Over years of use you remove and replace all pieces of that boat. You replace the worn sails, you replace the rotting deck, you replace storm damaged windows, ultimately replace everything. Is it still the "Theseus?" What if over time and slow replacement of each individual part you turn it into an airplane. Sails become wings, deck becomes fuselage, rudder becomes engines, fo'c'sle becomes cockpit. Slow transition, not all at once. Then the earth runs out of oil, so dwindling jet fuel, and you slowly return it back to a ship using some of the old parts and some new. Is it still the "Theseus?" Why would someone do that rather than just buy a new boat or plane? People make a choice (conscious or nonconscious) on a daily basis on how to see themselves, see other people, conceptualize their relationship and interactions. Whether or not that is slowly adapting to constant natural uncontrollable change, or a quick process of dumping the old for something new, is just as dependent on external factors as personality "type." People ultimately choose to continue a relationship for very limited reasons. 1. They value the interaction, finding it offers some benefit (especially to the perpetuation of self image), desiring to maintain the momentum. For itself, or for future goals. 2. They fear losing the interaction and/or change. And most importantly: 3. Perceived alternatives have greater costs or less value associated with them. The rest is the process of rationalizing (implicit and cognitive bias influenced) decisions for emotional/mental homeostasis and efficiency. which kind of relationship lasts ?people who are opposites in character or people who are so similar?
Depends on how flexible and adaptable they are, what purpose the "relationship" serves, and the perceived value of what is available to replace it with less cost/risk. which one do you think will stand the test of time?
The one where the relationship has some need to survive the test of time for something other than short term ego (feelings) stroking masquerading as long term image which is done to justify behavior choices. once again i am flustered and amazed by how anything can be broken down and analyzed the way you do. thanks |
|
|
|
A bit of both I think. All great teams have different individual qualities, put them together and you have forever. joe...you believe in forever? Of course, or what's the point |
|
|
|
Here is the thing.....in today's world we have desensitized the word "relationship" in to meaning that "you are the one I want.....right now..and maybe it will last...but if someone else comes along then I am gonna do what's right for my own happiness". And that means that we do not want to take the time to work for a relationship. We are all about instant gratification love. So while opposites do attract, and while being similar is a cool thing, what matters most is that wanting to be with someone and putting in the effort to see where it goes. So I guess the answer to your question is rather simple......it's option "C"......who the heck knows? Just enjoy the ride until you meet that person and you get all those mushy feelings inside.
|
|
|
|
option C has always been the choice since A and B are not there. can there be a D that means not to choose and be fine on your own? can we just have a relationship with ourselves?
|
|
|
|
Here is the thing.....in today's world we have desensitized the word "relationship" in to meaning that "you are the one I want.....right now..and maybe it will last...but if someone else comes along then I am gonna do what's right for my own happiness". And that means that we do not want to take the time to work for a relationship. We are all about instant gratification love. So while opposites do attract, and while being similar is a cool thing, what matters most is that wanting to be with someone and putting in the effort to see where it goes. So I guess the answer to your question is rather simple......it's option "C"......who the heck knows? Just enjoy the ride until you meet that person and you get all those mushy feelings inside. nice to see you posting again sir |
|
|
|
Someone who doesnt lie!
|
|
|