Topic: The Healing Process....After Charlottesville! | |
---|---|
wow
I do not think ANY true hate group (not to be confused with mere seperatists) wants 'healing' either, but I do not think any of them were asked or participating in this thread,, |
|
|
|
These are Fringe Fanatics putting on a show for
the media. If you want healing, find who is funding these groups and prosecute them. When and where is the next show. |
|
|
|
Edited by
alleoops
on
Sat 08/19/17 12:20 PM
|
|
ht
|
|
|
|
These are Fringe Fanatics putting on a show for the media. If you want healing, find who is funding these groups and prosecute them. When and where is the next show. you cannot prosecute people for 'funding' people if 'funding' amounts to donations to a constitutionally protected right to peacefully protest we need to prosecute the people who disrupt what may otherwise be peaceful protests,, or anyone PROVEN to actually have COMPENSATED Them directly for disrupting,, |
|
|
|
If you have cancer how many times do you have to try and heel it before you take it out?
|
|
|
|
SEDITION ACT.
An act in addition to the act intituled, "An act for the punishment of certain crimes against the United States." [Approved July 14, 1798.] ABSTRACT. SECTION I. Punishes combinations against United States government. 1. Definition of offence: Unlawfully to combine or conspire together to oppose any measure of the government of the United States, &c. This section was not complained of. 2. Grade of offence: A high misdemeanour. 3. Punishment: Fine not exceeding $5000, and imprisonment six months to five years. SECTION II. Punishes seditious writings. 1. Definition of offence: To write, print, utter or publish, or cause it to be done, or assist in it, any false, scandalous, and malicious writing against the government of the United States, or either House of Congress, or the President, with intent to defame, or bring either into contempt or disrepute, or to excite against either the hatred of the people of the United States, or to stir up sedition, or to excite unlawful combinations against the government, or to resist it, or to aid or encourage hostile designs of foreign nations. 2. Grade of offence: A misdemeanour. 3. Punishment: Fine not exceeding $2000, and imprisonment not exceeding two years. SECTION III. Allows accused to give in evidence the truth of the matter charged as libellous. SECTION IV. Continues the Act to 3d March, 1801. |
|
|
|
Glad they don't enforce that nonsense in modern times
Trump would be the SEDITION President,,based off of his campaign, and many in these threads could easily be charged ,, all the 'anti government' and conspiracies promoted here? are you kidding? thank goodness for the constitution and freedom of speech, even with all the LIES it allows people to perpetuate, its better than allowing the privileged few to determine what people can or cannot express,,,, |
|
|
|
I've just seen a clip on the news. protesters fighting. A guy in a bright green jacket kicking the sh^t out of someone on the ground, on the back of his jacket it said, jesus loves you! That just shows these people for what they are!
I'm wondering if you have any statues of Nelson Mandela? We do in London, but hang on, he was a terrorist! Raping and killing women and children! |
|
|
|
I've just seen a clip on the news. protesters fighting. A guy in a bright green jacket kicking the sh^t out of someone on the ground, on the back of his jacket it said, jesus loves you! That just shows these people for what they are! I'm wondering if you have any statues of Nelson Mandela? We do in London, but hang on, he was a terrorist! Raping and killing women and children! Was he? Did he do it studying in college? or organizing political events? he was never enlisted or charged with any violence, ,,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
Unknow
on
Sun 08/20/17 01:03 AM
|
|
Often a leader doesn't get his hands dirty, it's a well known fact, depends on how you look at it, the dreamy eyed rights people will see what they want rather than how it is.
And his wife winnie carried on for him whilst he was in prison! |
|
|
|
those hate groups need to be kicked out of this country |
|
|
|
You will never get to parties to work or even agree with each other. We go around the world telling others to have peace and Bury there differences and it can't even be done in our own back yard! "Our "is reference to the UK to.
|
|
|
|
Often a leader doesn't get his hands dirty, it's a well known fact, depends on how you look at it, the dreamy eyed rights people will see what they want rather than how it is. And his wife winnie carried on for him whilst he was in prison! who was he the leader of that he invoked to use violence? my understanding is that it was his christian upbringing and vocalizations for non violent measures EXCEPT in self defense that caused him to be incarcerated ,,,, I have no troubles with seeing humans as they 'are', complex and constantly changing as they have new experiences and live longer,,,, |
|
|
|
Edited by
Conrad_73
on
Sun 08/20/17 02:10 AM
|
|
meanwhile,all over the Globe,ANTIFA does what it does best,inciting Violence and injuring People!
They are an International Terrororganization! No Healing with them around! They are only interested in how much Mayhem they can stir up for their Paymasters! Wonder if they realize they are nothing more than Cannonfodder! No different from Roehm's SA,Himmler's SS or Lenin/Stalin's clandestine Comintern Troublemakers! Doubt if any of them would integrate into the Salvation Army! |
|
|
|
Often a leader doesn't get his hands dirty, it's a well known fact, depends on how you look at it, the dreamy eyed rights people will see what they want rather than how it is. And his wife winnie carried on for him whilst he was in prison! who was he the leader of that he invoked to use violence? my understanding is that it was his christian upbringing and vocalizations for non violent measures EXCEPT in self defense that caused him to be incarcerated ,,,, I have no troubles with seeing humans as they 'are', complex and constantly changing as they have new experiences and live longer,,,, True, but then you get into a race division. Black Christians v white Christians. yes, it was the white who introduced Christianity to them wasn't it? But if you go by what's being said now that there is no excuse for violence. you could label any opposition group as "terrorists "I guess As if a label makes it any better. I guess what the British did in Africa could be compared with settlers of America? Question? |
|
|
|
those hate groups need to be kicked out of this country They are already global,thanks to their financing! |
|
|
|
You will never get to parties to work or even agree with each other. We go around the world telling others to have peace and Bury there differences and it can't even be done in our own back yard! "Our "is reference to the UK to. it could be reference to the US as well |
|
|
|
Edited by
msharmony
on
Sun 08/20/17 03:17 AM
|
|
Often a leader doesn't get his hands dirty, it's a well known fact, depends on how you look at it, the dreamy eyed rights people will see what they want rather than how it is. And his wife winnie carried on for him whilst he was in prison! who was he the leader of that he invoked to use violence? my understanding is that it was his christian upbringing and vocalizations for non violent measures EXCEPT in self defense that caused him to be incarcerated ,,,, I have no troubles with seeing humans as they 'are', complex and constantly changing as they have new experiences and live longer,,,, True, but then you get into a race division. Black Christians v white Christians. yes, it was the white who introduced Christianity to them wasn't it? But if you go by what's being said now that there is no excuse for violence. you could label any opposition group as "terrorists "I guess As if a label makes it any better. I guess what the British did in Africa could be compared with settlers of America? Question? I don't really see the racial element to Christianity but where perception about theft of land or oppression and murder for the power over land already occupied is concerned or course it could |
|
|
|
Often a leader doesn't get his hands dirty, it's a well known fact, depends on how you look at it, the dreamy eyed rights people will see what they want rather than how it is. And his wife winnie carried on for him whilst he was in prison! who was he the leader of that he invoked to use violence? my understanding is that it was his christian upbringing and vocalizations for non violent measures EXCEPT in self defense that caused him to be incarcerated ,,,, I have no troubles with seeing humans as they 'are', complex and constantly changing as they have new experiences and live longer,,,, True, but then you get into a race division. Black Christians v white Christians. yes, it was the white who introduced Christianity to them wasn't it? But if you go by what's being said now that there is no excuse for violence. you could label any opposition group as "terrorists "I guess As if a label makes it any better. I guess what the British did in Africa could be compared with settlers of America? Question? I don't really see the racial element to Christianity but where perception about theft of land or oppression and murder for the power over land already occupied is concerned or course it could It definitely had a race division in the early days, And wasn't that how America was formed? By the theft of land from the natives? |
|
|
|
Often a leader doesn't get his hands dirty, it's a well known fact, depends on how you look at it, the dreamy eyed rights people will see what they want rather than how it is. And his wife winnie carried on for him whilst he was in prison! who was he the leader of that he invoked to use violence? my understanding is that it was his christian upbringing and vocalizations for non violent measures EXCEPT in self defense that caused him to be incarcerated ,,,, I have no troubles with seeing humans as they 'are', complex and constantly changing as they have new experiences and live longer,,,, True, but then you get into a race division. Black Christians v white Christians. yes, it was the white who introduced Christianity to them wasn't it? But if you go by what's being said now that there is no excuse for violence. you could label any opposition group as "terrorists "I guess As if a label makes it any better. I guess what the British did in Africa could be compared with settlers of America? Question? I don't really see the racial element to Christianity but where perception about theft of land or oppression and murder for the power over land already occupied is concerned or course it could It definitely had a race division in the early days, And wasn't that how America was formed? By the theft of land from the natives? Race was created after the biblical books were written. So christianity, or following christ, has no racial element. People have chosen to segregate and determine how to treat others according to their race since that time, but yes, America was 'formed' by doing alot of nasty things to other people. |
|
|