The Urantia Book is a collection of spiritualistic channelled writings (as per claims from William Sadler) mostly from the 1930s, compiled and published in 1955.

The Urantianism

was founded by two former Seventh-day Adventists--Chicago psychiatrist William Sadler

The Urantia Book was delivered to William Sadler by seven spirit beings in 1934.

The writings combine Christianity with a cosmology of extraterrestrial spirit beings. The book presents an elaborate pseudo-history of the universe (the book actually claims there are many universes, superuniverses, and so on), and that the name of planet Earth in this cosmology is "Urantia". In the Urantia Book Jesus was the most important spirit being in this universe who came to "Urantia" (Earth) to solidify his superior status, but the ideas of original sin or any need for Jesus to atone for human sins are rejected. In this, it departs from biblical theology.

The Urantia Book is an amalgamation of the Theosophical literature of the late 19th century or early 20th century:

There are sticking similarities.

The Urantia Book contains pronouncements on evolution, cosmology, physics and quantum mechanics, which Martin Gardner ( former Scientific American mathematics columnist) finds deeply flawed.

We are sick and tired of your ism-schism game,
Dying n goin' to heaven in-a Jesus' name, lord,
We know when we understand,
Almighty god is a living man

Courtesy of Peter Tosh a.k.a. The Bushdoctor
A man who was murdered for advocating his beliefs

I think saying and doing certain things on stage in front of the prime minister may have had something to do with it and it was made to look like a robbery

Well.. I personally think Man created God...
Because whoever God is I'm pretty sure he doesn't call himself God...lol..

The urantia book sounds a bit like how scientology began.

Many science-savvy people take it for granted that the universe is made not only of Carl Sagan's oft-quoted "billions and billions" of galaxies, but also a vast amount of an invisible substance called dark matter. This odd matter is thought to be a new kind of subatomic particle that doesn't interact via electromagnetism, nor the strong and weak nuclear forces. Dark matter is also supposed to be five times more prevalent in the universe than the ordinary matter of atoms.

According to evolution's Big Bang theory all matter was flung out into the universe. According to the second law of thermal dynamics (Entropy) the energy used during the big bang is being used up and any expansion is slowing down. Eventually expansion would stop and equilibrium (no movement) will take place. Science has given evidence that the universe is continuing to expand and doing so at a faster rate. Since a creator is out of the question scientists have spent nine decades searching for an explanation. Dark Matter is the latest "discovery".

However, the reality is that dark matter's existence has not yet been proven. Dark matter is still a hypothesis yet some sectors of the science community already assume it is "near" fact. Any scientific theory has to make predictions, and if it's right, then the measurements that are performed should line up with the predictions. Dark matter theories make predictions for how fast galaxies are rotating. But measurements made of the detailed dark matter distribution at the center of low mass galaxies didn't line up with those predictions.

If dark matter does exists and is causing the universe to expand at a higher rate then it has to interact with matter and obey the laws of physics. Stars orbit their parent galaxy in nearly circular paths and gravity is the force that holds the stars in those orbits. Newton's equations predict that the force that makes the stars move in a circular path, F(circular), should equal the force due to gravity on the star, F(gravity), or else the star would fly off into space or fall in to the center of the galaxy (Newton's F = ma).

Near the center of galaxies, Rubin and Ford found that F(circular) was roughly equal to F(gravity), as expected. But far from the center of the galaxies, the two sides of the equation didn't match up very well. These insights reveal that either we don't understand how inertia works, we don't understand how gravity works. Since God has been left out a third possibility is that the equal sign is wrong, meaning that there is some other force or effect that the equation doesn't include. Newton is wrong! So,again, in order to maintain the theory a proven law of physics is denied and an unproven theory (dark matter) now reins supreme.

If dark matter does effect normal matter as we know it then it should be measurable and monitor it's direct effect on regular matter. Other physicists have suggested modifications of the laws of gravity. Einstein's general relativity doesn't help here because, in this realm, Einstein's and Newton's predictions are essentially identical. That a type of matter that doesn't interact with light at all, yet exerts a gravitational pull, permeates the universe. Question: how can a type of matter exist that doesn't interact with light yet exerts a gravitational pull on light?

As in many theories and assumptions put forward to defend evolution no scientific proof exists yet the scientific community will cling fast to these theories (teaching them to our children as fact) until several decades pass and they are found to be without a sound scientific base. But then society continues to live within this deception.

Evolution is a "science" that's continually being modified for the purpose of showing that God is no longer needed under the guise of science.

I doubt if that's the "purpose," but it does seem as though certain science types will go to almost any length of argument to keep the Divine foot out of the door. But evolution could very well be, and is, imo, God directed and God initiated.

And until Science can whip up some live "protoplasm" from a bowl of inert chemicals, they've got nothing. And they're face to face with that fact all of the time. They know that dead end is waiting for them, the time must come when they will have to come to the conclusion that "God did it."

Did god create man... or man create god?

In trying to solve the differential equations that describe space-time, Einstein needed to add a constant term to avoid having the universe collapse upon itself. This term balances the attractive force of gravity contributed by all of the matter in the universe. Physically, this term represents the "vacuum energy", the possibility that empty space possesses density and pressure, thus preventing the universe from collapsing.

When Hubble later showed that galaxies are moving away from us and hence, that the universe is expanding, this term was not longer necessary -- because the universe is not static. Einstein later felt that the inclusion of this term was the biggest blunder of his career, and in most models of cosmology made in the meantime, the cosmological constant dubbed "lambda" is assumed to be equal to zero.

Although the reason for Einstein's inclusion of the term is no longer valid, there remains the possiblity that the cosmological constant is not zero. There are two recent observational clues that suggest that Lambda is not zero:

The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe has determined the cosmological parameters with great precision and finds that most of the contribution to the total density is not matter in any form.

Distant galaxies appear to be further away than their redshift would predict if the universe were not accelerating. These results arose from calculating the distances to galaxies that had supernovae in them.

I doubt that will ever happen..science moves foteard, not backwards...the theory is mostly been proven, they've done countless experiments on insects with short lifespan, and seen the changes for themselves...