100% FREE ONLINE DATING
sponsored links
Previous
| Topic: Connecticut passes "gun confiscation" bill | |
|---|---|
|
Edited by
Smartazzjohn
on
Thu 05/05/16 08:38 AM
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. If a threat isn't carried out the threat is JUST WORDS. You think a threat itself.....AKA WORDS....is violence and is a reason for a person to lose their rights?????? Is that why so many REGRESSIVE liberals try to shut down speech they don't like...even if it requires inciting riots to stop that speech? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
funny,this thread is about whether that Law is unconstitutional or not!That's all there is to it,the Canadian Snow-job notwithstanding! Will be a Cold Day in Hell when other Countries can decide that the 2nd is null and void! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal... it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen... they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical... liberal logic, eh? *** I LOVE The Calgary Stampede  (in Alberta) Yaa-Hoo * The gunslingers are SOOoooo fast, cool-fun!! *** Cody Stampede is great as well!! ( * (wasted youth) 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal... it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen... they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical... liberal logic, eh? You should try and focus here instead of shooting ya mouth off like a canon Billy Bob. This is what the subject is about The goal is to protect women from the increased lethality at a critical point in a relationship: when they are trying to leave their abusers. About 14 domestic homicides occur annually in Connecticut, half of which are caused by guns.  |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal... it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen... they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical... liberal logic, eh? You should try and focus here instead of shooting ya mouth off like a canon Billy Bob. This is what the subject is about The goal is to protect women from the increased lethality at a critical point in a relationship: when they are trying to leave their abusers. About 14 domestic homicides occur annually in Connecticut, half of which are caused by guns. so you're the only one who gets to "shoot their mouth off" ? i know you like to believe everything your socialist government tells you, but i already know that's NOT what it's aboot... it's aboot gun control, plain and simple... and you shooting your mouth aboot something that has nothing to do with your socialist country doesn't help anything... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal... it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen... they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical... liberal logic, eh? You should try and focus here instead of shooting ya mouth off like a canon Billy Bob. This is what the subject is about The goal is to protect women from the increased lethality at a critical point in a relationship: when they are trying to leave their abusers. About 14 domestic homicides occur annually in Connecticut, half of which are caused by guns. so you're the only one who gets to "shoot their mouth off" ? i know you like to believe everything your socialist government tells you, but i already know that's NOT what it's aboot... it's aboot gun control, plain and simple... and you shooting your mouth aboot something that has nothing to do with your socialist country doesn't help anything... Well your paranoia is getting the best of you. and for your information, many Americans agree with me on this subject... If the info makes sense, does it really matter where it comes from? I don't think so. Go bully somewhere else. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. people sure are scared of something they know nothing aboot...the Open carry law here in Texas, and you know what? NOTHING HAS CHANGED... people aren't killing each other, very rarely even see a gun strapped on, and it's just not a big deal... it's people like you who keep schreeching about their fear of guns that paint this "violent" escapades that don't always happen... they don't want us to judge muslims based on a few radicals, but yet the want to paint every gun owner as a violent radical... liberal logic, eh? You should try and focus here instead of shooting ya mouth off like a canon Billy Bob. This is what the subject is about The goal is to protect women from the increased lethality at a critical point in a relationship: when they are trying to leave their abusers. About 14 domestic homicides occur annually in Connecticut, half of which are caused by guns. so you're the only one who gets to "shoot their mouth off" ? i know you like to believe everything your socialist government tells you, but i already know that's NOT what it's aboot... it's aboot gun control, plain and simple... and you shooting your mouth aboot something that has nothing to do with your socialist country doesn't help anything... Well your paranoia is getting the best of you. and for your information, many Americans agree with me on this subject... If the info makes sense, does it really matter where it comes from? I don't think so. Go bully somewhere else. go spread your socialist propaganda somewhere else... |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. If a threat isn't carried out the threat is JUST WORDS. You think a threat itself.....AKA WORDS....is violence and is a reason for a person to lose their rights?????? Is that why so many REGRESSIVE liberals try to shut down speech they don't like...even if it requires inciting riots to stop that speech? The "LAW" disagrees with you and so do I. A threat IS violence! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. If a threat isn't carried out the threat is JUST WORDS. You think a threat itself.....AKA WORDS....is violence and is a reason for a person to lose their rights?????? Is that why so many REGRESSIVE liberals try to shut down speech they don't like...even if it requires inciting riots to stop that speech? The "LAW" disagrees with you and so do I. A threat IS violence! BullPOOP! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Violence isn't always unjustified. Whether the weapon is a gun, a knife or a baseball bat there is a potential that it can be used for personal protection, criminal aggression or even recreational purposes. Well people in general shouldn't be threatening their spouses or anyone else for that matter. A threat IS violence, therefore those who threaten should lose his/her rights. If a threat isn't carried out the threat is JUST WORDS. You think a threat itself.....AKA WORDS....is violence and is a reason for a person to lose their rights?????? Is that why so many REGRESSIVE liberals try to shut down speech they don't like...even if it requires inciting riots to stop that speech? But... a threat IS violence! WAR IS PEACE, FREEDOM IS SLAVERY, and IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH! 
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
more liberal logic...
|
|
|
|
|
